Are Women "Opting Out" Of Careers?
Scholars Disagree Over Why Fewer Mothers Stay At High-Powered Jobs
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Changing Trend Among Women
In a new trend, women are leaving their jobs to stay at home with their kids. In the last decade, the number of college-educated mothers working outside the home has dropped 7%. Kelly Wallace reports.
-
Photo
Nicole Knox left her high-powered job and started a law firm from home. Business — and her family, she says — are thriving. (CBS)
-
Interactive
On The Job
Explore America's labor economy, track recent major layoffs and meet key economic players.
-
Timeline
Women In Uniform
How the role of women in the U.S. military has expanded over time.
“I went back and forth and then finally I decided that I couldn’t do the level, I couldn’t be at the level I needed to be at the job I was doing and also do what I wanted to do with Jackson,” Knox told CBS News correspondent Kelly Wallace.
Knox, who's 33, was student body president at Northwestern Law School. She never expected to be an example of a heated debate these days: mothers opting out of work.
“I never planned to stay at home,” she said. “I’m really not a homemaker. I wasn't at the time. I'm much better now.”
Ever since the New York Times profiled some highly educated career women who gave it up to become full-time moms, “opting out” has been seen as the latest trend in mothering – a kind of social revolution.
But the question is why did these women turn their backs on corporate America to be home with their kids? Did they opt out or did they run out of options?
“It’s a myth,” said Sociologist Pam Stone, author of Optiong Out: Why Women Really Quit and Head Home. “It’s a myth in two ways. There’s no revolution and women aren’t opting out, they are being shut out.”
In researching her new book, Stone found most left top careers with great reluctance.
"I really expected that I was going to hear them telling me all about family and all about the pulls of family," Stone said. "But instead what I found is they were talking a lot about work, and it was the conditions of their jobs that were really forcing them out, forcing them into making a decision."
Philosopher Linda Hirshman has a different take. She believes women are choosing to walk away from work — and making a big mistake.
Her book — Get To Work — outraged many stay-at-home.
“If you opt out, you do not use your full talents and abilities, for the most part,” Hirshman said. “If you try to get back, it’s very hard to get back to the place that you left.”
Hirshman wonders why it's always the women struggling to balance work and family.
“If working part-time is such a great idea, why aren’t men doing it?” Hirshman said. “They are not doing it.”
Some women say it's not opting out, it's opting different.
"It's not fair to say you're opting out and that's it, you're no longer working or wanting to work, it's where you're opting out of a certain level of work or job or certain lifestyle," she said.
That's what Nicole Knox has done. She started a law firm from home.
Business — and her family, she says — are thriving.
© MMVII, CBS Interactive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Video and Galleries from CBS Evening News
- Latest in CBS Evening News
- The Story Behind the Skating Babies
- Sagging Sales, Even in a Beach Paradise
- Grief, Outrage over Grave Desecrations



God loves us all. But God is also known for not liking the acts of the greedy. Which is what having people living off less, whether they like it or not. And for some, they have to live off of nothing. Why isn't God helping them?
I know there will be someone who says, "why don't the fathers stay home?" Valid question, perhaps the fathers could, depending on the family. I just think in today's time the parents are so taken by making money, they force the children to raise themselves.
God doesn't have to give you(or me)an answer as to why thing happen,or don't happen.It is the human condition,and human actions, or sad coincidence, that has people in certain situations. God knows,and watches over them. He's not accountable to you.
Besides the obvious deep bond a parent forms with their kids when they stay at home, the overlooked advantage is that children learn by observing their parents "at work".
What the work is isn't as important as watching & assisting in the work being performed. The work can be housework, cooking, gardening, or cash generating business such as crafts, real estate or journalism- the point is that kids learn about work ethic, finances, how to conduct themselves in public, job & life skills by their parent's side.
It wasn't so long ago that kids did just that- like blacksmithing, farming, housework chores. Now things have gotten far too easy for them. 20 yr olds who can't function without an ipod stuck in their ear & a lap top are incapable of filling out a job application, dressing & speaking appropriately during an interview or even operating a washing machine!
I once interviewed a 25 yr old to do some part time filing for me. Besides dressing like she was on her way to the beach she asked me at the end, through cracking her gum, "So, are ya gonna call me, or what?"
Twenty years later, with my girls now in high school, I am able to look back at the time that I was able to devote to them as a precious gift to me. Where work defined who I was in the 80's, the greatest part of my identity today is my daughters. Though my marriage failed 6 years ago, in part because of my reduced committment to work, because of my closeness and involvement with my girls, I was able to have custody of them 50% of the time. I still attend all of their sports competitions, though I sit on the sidelines, and the class trips are fewer, but longer (imagine leaving from Connecticut at 5AM to see Gettysburg and return the same day). I don't have as much saved for retirement as I should, but I have a wealth of memories from being a coach, a tour guide, a field day coordinator and class dad as well as a closeness to my daughters that few fathers have.
Posted by RichEhrlich at 08:38 AM : May 11, 2007
You made a vadid point: many people argue that they need to save for retirement. But I suspect that your closeness with your children is starting up a new/old fad of children taking care of their parents in their old age! Good job, dad! Blessings.
Ya know... I was waiting for the liberal to come out & try to pin THIS one on Bush too... really is amazing, Bush not only controls hurricane weather, but he can also force women to stay home... he must be an alien - or a demi god or something... knock it off liberals - you may have legitimate beefs with Bush, but trying to stick everything & ANYthing on him no matter HOW absurd really detracts from your legitimacy...
Not so fast though, while some may be fortunate enough to HAVE that option, the economics have changed - and now, for most, the option of staying at home isn't so easy to come by on a single income... Reminds me of a scene from the movie 'A Bronx Tale' where the mob guy offers to let a group of thugs leave & they disrespect him... then he locks the door & says, "...now yous can't leave..."
To me, feminism doesn't mean that I'm the same as a man; it means that I'm free to make my own decisions based on who I am as a woman. It doesn't really matter if you stay home or work. What's really important is that you think for yourself and make the decision that is right for you and your family. That decision is different for each one of us. If we start letting other women tell us what to do, or make us feel badly about our choices, then we haven't come very far, have we?
Amen - that was very well put.
By the same token though and as I mentioned before... I think we need to kind of qualify such statements as:
"Being home with my children is simply more important to me than the money or the career."
Because I think that for many women who DO work, it's not necessarily because they value money & career more than their children or time spent with them. Most often, it's simply a matter of making ends meet. Particularly for newer families, just being able to afford a mortgage with today's housing costs often requires two incomes. Certainly people make sacrifices & "make do" in order to afford living on a single income... but I think in today's world, it's simply not an option for most families...
But I look at their lives & all I see is stuff & stress. The parents are always arguing & arranging about who is picking whom up at which day care or after school activity. And who's picking up dinner, because there's no time to cook. The horror stories of parents who thought the other one was picking the baby up from the sitter. They are stretched to the max & what little time they have left over they try to "create quality family time" usually around the tv, one of several they own; along with the pool they never have time to swim in, the video games & toys & electronic gadgets, the stuff & more stuff.
I'm so sad for the kids who wouldn't recognise their parents in a line up, unless it's the back of their heads- because that's all the kids ever see from the back seat of the car...
I can't help but think, how can people call that living?! That is merely existing.
Fortunately, I found a great job with a company that values family. I have managed to develop a great work-family balance and my two children are happy and thriving at a small church daycare across the street.
I admire moms who are able to stay home--your job is harder than most believe. I also admire moms who balance work and home--your job is tough too. Ultimately, though, I feel we should stop criticizing each other and help each other out.
The reality is that each of us has to make decisions that work for our families. I believe my kids are healthier and happier because I'm happier.
Having a choice is the blessing. We should support each other's choices and do what we can to help make all these situations work.
HOLLYWOOD'S VERSION OF CORPORATE LIFE IS MISLEADING. Obviously when David E Kelley writes his scripts, his primary purpose is entertainment, so certain cinematic liberties are taken. In the case of corporate law practice, note that the law firms being portrayed in shows like Ally McBeal, BOSTON LEGAL and other series have endlessly interesting points of law being discussed, no one seems to ever be working, billable hours somehow are magically accrued, tort(damage)defendants routinely fold like a house of cards in days for millions of dollars, trials happen near instantly and are often completed in days.
THE MARGINAL TAX RATES for spouse B with a successful Spouse A are often so high that the 2nd earning spouse on a net basis is earning very little. For example for a self-employed Spouse B (on any job, even part-time)they will be paying as high as 55.3% of each dollar in a typical state,based upon a 35.0% fed rate, 5.0% state rate. 12.4% self-employment tax (to the ceiling), and the (unlimited ceiling) 2.9% medicare tax, in lower brackets probably 30% on the margin, and with daycare, clothes, and transportation 30% to 70% overall.
-
by jujugvc
May 13, 2007 9:45 PM PDT
- Every woman is different. I used to look at a girlfriend who work 60 hr/wk and raise her son, and wonder why I could not do that! I had 3 girls within 15 months, so it was not practical. I stayed home for 6 years, then began to work part time. I work for a great employer who gives me total flex time. I get paid hourly - no benefits - but I consider a part time opportunity at a fair wage a BENEFIT! I ahve tried leaving my girls with teenage sitters - they all seem to want to sit in front of the computer or tv while "watching" my girls! Not satisfactory! So, I work part time, and I get to do all sorts of stuff with my girls - PTO, driving them to chorus, tennis, karate - we are INVOLVED with one another. I am grateful for the way it worked out and I will NEVER judge anyone - I just hope other moms & dads get to know their kids like I get to!
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 27 Comments