May 13, 2007

Mitt Romney Wants To Re-Tool Washington

Mike Wallace Interviews The Contender For The GOP Presidential Nomination

  • Play CBS Video Video Romney On Abortion

    Only On The Web: Mike Wallace talks to Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney about his changing positions on abortion

  • Video Romney On The Iraq War

    Only On The Web: Mitt Romney, a Republican presidential candidate, discusses his views on the war in Iraq with Mike Wallace.

  • Video Romney On Religion

    Only On The Web: Former Mass. governor and current Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney talks to Mike Wallace about Mormonism and his close family ties.

  • Mitt Romney, the former governor of Massachusetts, has raised more money than any other Republican candidate. Photo

    Mitt Romney, the former governor of Massachusetts, has raised more money than any other Republican candidate.  (CBS)

(CBS)  Sixty-year-old Mitt Romney is a dark horse in the contest for the Republican presidential nomination. Although he is the least known of the frontrunners, he's raised more money – $21 million – than any other Republican candidate.

As correspondent Mike Wallace reports, Romney attracted national attention when, as governor of Massachusetts from 2003 to 2006, he balanced the budget every year, without raising taxes. He ran the state like the hugely successful CEO he's been for over 20 years.

And that came after he had rescued the 2002 Olympic winter games from financial disaster. And Romney says that now that he's turned around the Olympics and Massachusetts, he's ready to do the same for all of the U.S.A.



Over six feet tall, trim, fit, his hair graying slightly at the temples, he looks like a president. His movie star presence somehow reminds you of Cary Grant or Ronald Reagan.

"The rap on you of course is that you’re too smooth, too handsome, too polished. Are you really known as matinee Mitt?" Wallace asks.

"That’s the rap on you, Mike," Romney replies. "Too smooth, too polished."

But beneath the polish, there’s the steel of a tough minded and seasoned executive who is used to running things his way. Romney is reportedly worth over half a billion dollars that he earned as a venture capitalist who used cost-cutting, bottom line zeal to help grow companies like Domino's Pizza and Staples and re-tool ailing companies into profitable successes.

Now he wants to re-tool Washington.

"It is time to cut out the mountains of waste and inefficiency and duplication in the federal government. I’ve done that in business. I’ve done it in the Olympics. I’ve done it in Massachusetts and frankly I can’t wait to get my hands on Washington," Romney says.

"One thing people can be confident of is I have led and managed and I brought change to organizations. And if there’s ever been a time that Washington needed to be changed it’s now. It’s a mess in Washington," he adds.

To many Americans, that mess in Washington has been created by his fellow Republican, George W. Bush.

Romney carefully follows Ronald Reagan’s rule: never speak ill of a fellow Republican. But while he praises the president, he distances himself from Bush.

Only On The Web Videos
Mitt Romney on: Abortion | The Iraq War | Religion
"Why do you think all of a sudden the Democrats are in charge?" Wallace asks.

"Well, because of Iraq," Romney says.

"You mean the president screwed up in Iraq?" Wallace asks.

"I think the administration made a number of errors," Romney says.

"Like for instance?" Wallace asks.

"Well, I don’t think we were adequately prepared for what occurred. I don’t think we had done enough planning, I don’t think we’d considered the various downsides and risks," Romney says.

"We, is George W. Bush," Wallace remarks.

"Well, he’s the person where the buck stops," Romney says. "But it’s the whole administration."

"They screwed up," Wallace remarks.

"Well, they made mistakes. I’m not gonna use the same phrase you would. And we’re paying for those mistakes," Romney says.

And, he says, there were misjudgments. "I think there was a strong, honest belief among people in our administration that we would be welcomed with open arms. And that Iraq would become a model of democracy for all of the Middle East. And you know what? We were wrong," Romney says.

But Bush is right, Romney says, about the current U.S. troop surge in Iraq, at least for now.

"I think we’re gonna know in a matter of months if it’s working or it’s not working," he says.

Among the things he wants to do as president is increase U.S. troop strength overall by at least 100,000 and modernize military equipment. He wants to secure the Mexican border and decrease U.S. dependence on foreign oil. He’s against gay marriage and civil unions and says that he'll hold the line on taxes.

Continued



Produced By Ruth Streeter
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Recent Segments
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Add a Comment See all 262 Comments
by hypnotoad72 May 10, 2007 7:45 PM PDT
He'll bash anybody. He thinks all single people choose to be because it's easier. (Um, some people want to be married and all but have yet to find anybody...)

Didn't he say somewhere that Americans have to sacrifice more? Or was that McCain? Either way, I thought offshoring was making Americans sacrifice... or the obscenely high cost of education. Never mind gas when nobody wants to put in light rail despite all those commercials pertaining to light rail and/or "clean coal", of which America has more of it than the middle east has oil... That isn't sacrifice enough, especially in a land whose corporate and political leaders don't seem to know what to do with all these problems?

Or is it an embarrassment to be intelligent in America; where dumb is played up and the geeks and nerds knocked down?

Even John McCain is a superior candidate, but he's proven himself fairly dim and clearly out of touch as well. He thinks Americans wouldn't pick lettuce for even $50/hr. Whatever. He's wasting his time. 2 down, 8 to go. Make that 9, if the blab about Republicans liking Hillary is even remotely real (they loathed her in the early '90s with her liberal plans, so why like her now?)
Reply to this comment
by boothbay71 May 10, 2007 8:57 PM PDT
I'd really like to know, Mike...how many candidates have you interviewed during your 60 years of reporting where you asked if they had premarital ***? I'm guessing...oh, let's see....NONE. Why don't you just be honest for once and admit that you are not a politically unbiased reporter, but instead a far, far left shill for the Democrat party? And CBS, why don't you admit for once that you don't just allow this, but encourage it? You can ask whatever you want, but simply be honest about your motives.

Yeah...like THAT will ever happen!
Reply to this comment
by boothbay71 May 10, 2007 8:57 PM PDT
I'd really like to know, Mike...how many candidates have you interviewed during your 60 years of reporting where you asked if they had premarital ***? I'm guessing...oh, let's see....NONE. Why don't you just be honest for once and admit that you are not a politically unbiased reporter, but instead a far, far left shill for the Democrat party? And CBS, why don't you admit for once that you don't just allow this, but encourage it? You can ask whatever you want, but simply be honest about your motives.

Yeah...like THAT will ever happen!
Reply to this comment
by boothbay71 May 10, 2007 9:00 PM PDT
I'd really like to know, Mike...how many candidates have you interviewed during your 60 years of reporting where you asked if they had premarital ***? I'm guessing...oh, let's see....NONE. Why don't you just be honest for once and admit that you are not a politically unbiased reporter, but instead a far, far left shill for the Democrat party? And CBS, why don't you admit for once that you don't just allow this, but encourage it? You can ask whatever you want, but simply be honest about your motives.

Yeah...like THAT will ever happen!
Reply to this comment
by tedrumme May 10, 2007 9:36 PM PDT
I just learned at Matt Drudge's site that CBS's Wallace asked Mitt Romney if he and his wife engaged in sexual relations before they were married.

Wallace is a great suppurating southern end of a porcine alimentary canal. As are all of you media types, who think you populate a moral plane well above the rest of us, and from which you peer down on us all from a very great height. God-like, you believe justified of every intrusion, every implied insult, every mental excrescence.

You "main stream media" people are a disgrace to journalism, to the nation, and to your fathers, if you know who they are.
Reply to this comment
by tedrumme May 10, 2007 9:41 PM PDT
I just learned at Matt Drudge's site that CBS's Wallace asked Mitt Romney if he and his wife engaged in sexual relations before they were married.

Wallace is a great suppurating southern end of a porcine alimentary canal. As are all of you media types, who think you populate a moral plane well above the rest of us, and from which you peer down on us all from a very great height. God-like, you believe justified of every intrusion, every implied insult, every mental excrescence.

You "main stream media" people are a disgrace to journalism, to the nation, and to your fathers, if you know who they are.
Reply to this comment
by macfan1950 May 10, 2007 10:15 PM PDT
From what I see of Wallace's interview of Romney, it's a wonder anyone takes Wallace seriously. Why in the world did he waste time asking such amazingly stupid questions about polygamy and pre-marital ***? Oh, I forgot, he's part of the dying mainstream media, who will do anything for ratings....

This is the reason I don't even watch *any* TV news shows anymore.
Reply to this comment
by ccrcb44 May 11, 2007 4:55 AM PDT
Mike Wallace, you are a sick and demited man. It`s time for you to go out to the pastures and graze.
Reply to this comment
by ccrcb44 May 11, 2007 5:07 AM PDT
Mike Wallace, you are a sick demited man. Get your mind out of the gutter. Better yet, go out to pastures and graze.
Reply to this comment
by tedybudy May 11, 2007 6:43 AM PDT
first iam a retired senior and not a fan of mr romney nor the mormons but now i know why a once great news organization is at the bottom of the manure pile change your bias and anchors and retire your worn out staff
Reply to this comment
by jetlizhan May 11, 2007 7:57 AM PDT
romney should've answered 'none of your d@mn business' to the premarital *** question - honestly, why asked such a stupid question, because let's face it - who cares?
Reply to this comment
by truehart10 May 11, 2007 8:21 AM PDT
Mike Wallace - should be ashamed. Regardless of whether you like Mitt Romney or not, asking if he and his wife had *** before they were married is incredibly inappropriate and insulting. They deserve an apology.
Reply to this comment
by culligancan May 11, 2007 8:34 AM PDT
I would have offered him a Coca Colo Classic or a beer and then asked him the question. Religious people are the worst.
Reply to this comment
by perception5 May 11, 2007 8:55 AM PDT
Mit's a good guy. His father was a popular 3-term Govenor of Michigan in the 1960's.

It would be nice if reporters like Mike Wallace would focus on the "issues" that each candidate has.

Mit isn't running for "Pastor-in-Chief" he's running for "Commander-in-Chief".

Mit has tremdous cross-functional experience would make a great President for all Americans, he is very moderate.

If Americans liked Ronald Reagan they are going to LOVE Mit Romney..........
Reply to this comment
by perception5 May 11, 2007 8:58 AM PDT
Mit's a good guy. His father was a popular 3-term Govenor of Michigan in the 1960's.

It would be nice if reporters like Mike Wallace would focus on the "issues" that each candidate has.

Mit isn't running for "Pastor-in-Chief" he's running for "Commander-in-Chief".

Mit has tremdous cross-functional experience would make a great President for all Americans, he is very moderate.

If Americans liked Ronald Reagan they are going to LOVE Mit Romney..........
Reply to this comment
by travistcummi May 11, 2007 9:14 AM PDT
Mike, way to represent the "Greatest Generation". You should be ashamed...and fired!
Reply to this comment
by king77shaw May 11, 2007 9:53 AM PDT
the Republican Party platform -

ENERGY policy: Big Oil
FOREIGN policy: AIPAC
HEALTHCARE: Pharma
FISCAL policy: Wall St booms while the middle class starves
NATIONAL DEFENSE: perpetual war that will only profit the corporate war machine at the expense of the troops, their families and the hundreds of thousands of innocents that get slaughtered around the world because of our policies.

EPA: Exxon-Mobil Protection Agency
EDUCATION: why ?, best to keep the masses stupid and gullible ..
RELIGION: best to educate with myth, more pliable than the truth -

... the middle class is insignificant to the Republican Party - they seek a ruling elite and a vast working poor which consolidates wealth and power for their corporate masters, leaving very little for "we the people". America is quickly becoming a third world country riddled with debt under Republican greedership. Is this the way of life we want to protect ? Is this the America we grew up with ? Time to wake up sheeple !
Reply to this comment
by king77shaw May 11, 2007 9:57 AM PDT
we have no good options in Iraq anymore - the Republican neo-con agenda that rules the party has failed America, the Iraqis and the global community at large ... the only beneficiaries have been the elitist corporate insiders and lobbyists (Exxon-Mobil, Bechtel, KBR, AIPAC, Halliburton, Blackwater) that have been making a killing while supporting the killing ... in a period of American history when we most needed leadership, we've seen the true face of the Republican party - GREED.
Reply to this comment
by harp1963 May 11, 2007 10:10 AM PDT
Dear Mitt,

After 8 years of "git'er done" George, I would be surprised if, whoever the Republican candidate is, they don't loose by a landslide to the Democrats. I think America has finally realised that "Praise the Lord" and pass as many laws as you possibly can to benefit the guy with $10,000,000 in the bank isn't really looking out for the common good of all Americans.
Reply to this comment
by gasp3 May 11, 2007 10:19 AM PDT
Mr.Wallace...tell me...how u been feeling lately??..been taking all the right pills???....so say..what's up with the pre-marital s$"..query....can't get it up anymore..?...it's the blue pill Mike..that'll give u some relief..
Reply to this comment
by terrapin78 May 11, 2007 10:21 AM PDT
The question about pre-marital *** is an appropriate question to ask. Especially since these religious nuts think that condoms are a bad thing.

Also, if these clowns are the "values" candidate, we have a right to determine if they are hypocrites or not BEFORE an election.

Mike, keep asking those questions that are meant to reveal the real candidate!
Reply to this comment
by processorr2 May 11, 2007 10:37 AM PDT


Bush is the Commander and Chief.

Anyone who questions him is a traitor.

Anyone who critisizes him is a traitor.

His record of success in Iraq speaks for itself.


Reply to this comment
by vunderlutz May 11, 2007 10:39 AM PDT
My first vote for president was in 1964. In 1988 I was an endorsed Republican candidate for state legislature. I have voted a straight Republican ticket from 1964 through 2000. In 2004, I crossed the line and voted for John Kerry.

Never again, not ever, not one more time, will I vote for another Republican for any office, state or federal.

I am not impressed with any of the current field of 2008 wannabes regardless of party.

I am looking for the dark horse.

I believe I am not alone...
Reply to this comment
by pepperp1 May 11, 2007 10:43 AM PDT
%u2026%u2026%u2026.who cares about his religion, he is right on his Iraq comments I would just add Congress to that list of accountable folks%u2026...
Reply to this comment
by bm6005 May 11, 2007 10:43 AM PDT
f Americans liked Ronald Reagan they are going to LOVE Mit Romney..........
Posted by lackofperception5

I didn't and I wouldn't!!! Reagan was a king size a**hole!
Reply to this comment
by bm6005 May 11, 2007 10:47 AM PDT
Reagan was the start of the gutting of the middle class. Everything for the rich and richer. Trickle down my a@@!!
Reply to this comment
by bellal-2009 May 11, 2007 10:48 AM PDT
A Mormon lady told me the other day that polygamy was a result of the Mormons having more women than men. The Mormon men had been killed because of religous persecution. Whether that's true or not I don't know but if so it's an interesting bit of history and shouldn't be demoralized.
Reply to this comment
by bm6005 May 11, 2007 10:50 AM PDT
Reagan started the gutting of the middle class. Everything he did was for the rich and richer! trickle down my a@@!!
Reply to this comment
by johnkuhn2 May 11, 2007 11:14 AM PDT
One of the tenants of the Mormon faith is conversion of the masses. If you think this loon is not adhering to this principal of his faith then you are being duped once again. No more holier then thoughs in our White House. He cares only for himself and his flock. Look at how he changed to win the governorship of MASS. How can someone approaching their 60's change their mind on a Woman's Right to Choose. Oh My God. Please tell me people are not buying this bull *** again. He is pandering to the right just to get elected. Once again we the American People will lose if he wins because he will owe so much to his constituents who unlike the Democratic constituents are for the rich getting richer and hard working middle class getting nothing.
Reply to this comment
by skyhawk761 May 11, 2007 11:24 AM PDT
Mit isn't running for "Pastor-in-Chief" he's running for "Commander-in-Chief".

Posted by perception5 at 08:58 AM : May 11, 2007

This posted by the party that spent MILLIONS trying to find out that Clinton got a BJ! Your a freakin hypocrite.
Reply to this comment
by johnkuhn2 May 11, 2007 11:26 AM PDT
Oh and please don't have then come to my front door and prostelyze......
Reply to this comment
by busywestbee May 11, 2007 11:37 AM PDT
What does a question about whether or not Mitt & Ann Romney had pre-martial *** 38 YEARS AGO have to do with him running for President now? I don't get it...
While Mike Wallace did a pretty good job of interviewing LDS Church President Gordon B. Hinckley - he should have stayed "retired" for this one.
Reply to this comment
by crawford1234 May 11, 2007 12:08 PM PDT
I don't trust someone who doesn't have premarital ***. Seriously. Nor people who don't drink. If they are THAT uptight, I don't want them with their finger on the button. Too fidigity.
Reply to this comment
by phudoc67 May 11, 2007 12:23 PM PDT
Mitt Romney tries to be a "Lincoln", but comes across like a "Yugo".
Reply to this comment
by mudrose-2009 May 11, 2007 12:41 PM PDT
Every Mormon I have ever met was slicker then a jar of vaseline on vinyl..... They care only to convert the masses to their messed up form of Christianity. Hello do you really believe Jesus appeared to some dude in upstate New York during the 1800's. At least the bible was written 2000 years ago so it is much more difficult to dismiss, but hey where were all the Reporters that had access to the printing press to spread this great miracle to all of the US. Religion is a way to make money. Plain and simple. When the Pope actually allows homeless and hte destitue to camp out in the Vatican and gain a meaningfull education without the fear of being abused s e x u a l l y. then I will listen to these religous loons. Pray at home alone and leave it out of public debate... Please......
Posted by JohnKuhn2

Then you must know that your fearless majority leader President Harry Reid is a Moron, oops a Mormom, too.
Reply to this comment
by gdmoore2 May 11, 2007 12:43 PM PDT
Mitt Romney needs to stay in the shallow end of the pool. This poll chaser is giving the least possible comment, banking that most voters will assume he is aligned with them on the remainder of his views.
Reply to this comment
by tomar0317 May 11, 2007 12:47 PM PDT
Religion is a personal choice. Leave it out of politics. It's what individuals once in office do to represent the people that elected them.
Reply to this comment
by kirstinharr May 11, 2007 12:53 PM PDT
The only thing more frightening than a Mormon President of the US would be a Muslim President. Just not ready for something that far from the mainstream...
Reply to this comment
by bwessels May 11, 2007 1:01 PM PDT
4 out of 5 wives surveyed say, "Vote for Mitt!"

He lied about everything he possibly could to become governor of Massachusetts. Then he started fundraising for president by bashing his own state. Opportunistic, fake, liar. (Is "Mitt" a nickname for "George?")
Reply to this comment
by ekucrew May 11, 2007 1:05 PM PDT
Romney AND Ted Nugent... both draft dodgers from Southern Michigan....hundreds from townships all over Southern MI served in Vietnam and many died over there while these two hid out.
Reply to this comment
by lars008-2009 May 11, 2007 1:11 PM PDT
CAN WE KILL THEM NOW???

if it is ok for fascist nazi islamic muslims to kill all non muslims everywhere.... is it ok for the non muslims to kill all fascist nazi islamic muslims???

Wouldn't killing 5.1 BILLION people (the number of non muslims in the world) be the very definition of barbarism???
Or is it fascist nazi islam%u2019s way of solving global warming???

Switching Sides: Inside The Enemy Camp

But then in 2000, well before his arrest, something happened which would make Abas question everything he believed in: a fatwa, a religious edict, was issued by Osama bin Laden.

"It should be understood that killing Americans and Jews anywhere found are the highest act of worship and the highest form of good deeds in the eyes of Allah," Simon quotes bin Laden.

Abas and his fellow commanders were ordered to read the fatwa to their men and make sure they carried it out. The others obeyed, but Abas refused. It was his moment of truth. He firmly believed that jihad was to be fought only on the battlefield in defense of Islam; he had always been taught that the killing of civilians had nothing to do with holy war and that it was forbidden.

The fatwa justified killing non-Muslim civilians everywhere.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/05/04/60minutes/main2761108.shtml?source=RSSattr=60Minutes_2761108
Reply to this comment
by nptcbt May 11, 2007 1:12 PM PDT
To JohnKuhn2

OK, so how many of the members of the "Mormon" church have you met, and how many do you know on a personal basis? There's a lot of diversity in such a large organization. Your outrageous comments clearly identify you as a bigot and Mormon-phobe - and one who knows nothing about the Mormon Church or its people.
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman May 11, 2007 1:23 PM PDT
Lars,,
, Shouldn't you be attacking Mormans ??? -- You're Christians murdered them ran them out of Missouri & Illinois to Utah & orginized death squads to murder them & run them out of Utah.
--- DON'T YOU CALL THEM THE ANTI-CHRIST ?? ---
Reply to this comment
by lars008-2009 May 11, 2007 1:39 PM PDT
FASCIST NAZI ISLAM EXTENDS IT'S 1400 YEAR OLD GLOBAL JIHAD...

Hezbollah builds a Western base
From inside South America%u2019s Tri-border area, Iran-linked militia targets U.S.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17874369/
Sources: Terrorists find haven in South America
Deep in the heart of South America, the region where Brazil, Argentina and Paraguay meet has some of the most porous borders -- and busiest black markets -- in the world.
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/americas/11/07/inv.terror.south/
Part 1: Hezbollah south of the border
CIUDAD DEL ESTE, at the triple border of Brazil, Argentina and Paraguay - This is the way savage globalization ends - at least 20,000 shops, stalls, tin shacks and mini-malls crammed into 15 blocks selling everything under the (tropical) sun. There's Little Asia - thousands of Taiwanese, mainland Chinese and Koreans. But above all there are some 20,000 Arabs of Syrian and mostly Lebanese descent (another 12,000 live in the Brazilian resort of Foz do Iguacu, across the Friendship Bridge).
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Front_Page/HH03Aa01.html
Hezbollah: A Case Study of Global Reach
http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/templateC07.php?CID=132
Reply to this comment
by perception5 May 11, 2007 1:58 PM PDT
I wonder what Martin Luther King Jr. would say about this issue?

Maybe he would say "don't judge me on what religion I am ...........but instead judge me on the content of my character"

If America is ever going to evolve into the greatest country in the history of our planet we need to get away from judging people on:

1. color of their skin

2. what religion they are .....or not

3. what Party they belong to.

When electing our political leaders shouldn't it "really" be on the "issues"???

What do you think?
Reply to this comment
by perception5 May 11, 2007 2:01 PM PDT
I wonder what Martin Luther King Jr. would say about this issue?

Maybe he would say "don't judge me on what religion I am ...........but instead judge me on the content of my character"

If America is ever going to evolve into the greatest country in the history of our planet we need to get away from judging people on:

1. color of their skin

2. what religion they are .....or not

3. what Party they belong to.

When electing our political leaders shouldn't it "really" be on the "issues"???

Is there anything wrong with this approach?
Reply to this comment
by jvman4u May 11, 2007 2:07 PM PDT
Hello, it`s not about being MORMON, but, I don't see how that helps anyone either, it's about he`s say`n just what we all already know- trying to make a connection, he`s just like MCaine, gonna say whatever, to whomever to be popular and then we`ll suffer yet another 4 more years of nothing but lies... Vote Democratic, it`s the only way out of this slippery slope, and with alota luck, one day somewhere in the next decade, we`ll again be a superpower and have some credibility and respectability again.
Reply to this comment
by duchess14-2009 May 11, 2007 2:11 PM PDT
Note to Mormons: There are no living prophets on earth at this time. There were never any secret gold plates. Do not ever compare your persicution with that of the Jews. Why doesn't every Mormon go the Colorado City and rescue those children from the child molesters and charge both the men and women with child abuse. Being president is not a sign of things to come in the eternity, i.e. Gods. You have the Bible in one hand and the Book of Mormon in the other, which one do you think God wants you to read? Better yet, which one would you choose?
Reply to this comment
by clemenhagen1 May 11, 2007 2:14 PM PDT
In the late 1890's the Mormons, desirus of statehood, realized that polygamy stood in the way of that goal. The prophets miraculously received word from God, at that exact moment, that polygamy would no longer be countenanced by the Almighty. I don't have that much trouble with disavowing polygamy due to political considerations. I do have a problem with ascribing it to God. Am I really to believe that a vision inspired by God "told" the church elders to abandon the practice. That has cult written all over it; judging from Romney's calculating flip-flops on issue after issue I can see little has changed in either our dear cult or it's followers.
Reply to this comment
by iceman_1960 May 11, 2007 2:16 PM PDT
"And I must admit, I can't image anything more awful than polygamy" - Mitt Romney.

Really ?

I can think of a lot of things worse than polygamy.
Reply to this comment
See all 262 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
60 Minutes RSS Feed