Brit Convicted Of Leaking Secret Iraq Memo
Cipher Expert Admitted He Felt Strongly About Document About Secret Blair-Bush Talks
-
British Prime Minister Tony Blair outside 10 Downing Street, May 9, 2007. (AP)
-
Interactive Iraq: 4 Years Later The conflict wears on as the nation struggles to rebuild.
-
Fast Facts United Kingdom Learn about the people, economy and history.
-
In The Spotlight Bush's New Iraq Strategy A glimpse at some of the key elements in President Bush's new plan for Iraq.
David Keogh, 50, a cipher expert, had admitted passing on the secret memo about April 2004 talks between the two leaders in which Mr. Bush purportedly referred to bombing the Arab television station Al-Jazeera.
A jury continued to deliberate on a second count against Keogh and a single charge against co-defendant Leo O'Connor.
Keogh told London's Central Criminal Court he felt strongly about the memo, which he had to relay to diplomats overseas using secure methods, and hoped it would come to wider attention.
"The main person in my mind was John Kerry, who at the time was American candidate for the U.S. presidential election in 2004," Keogh had testified.
He admitted holding "unfavorable" views on President Bush, but said he did not think publishing the document would hurt Britain's security or international relations.
The Daily Mirror newspaper previously reported that the memo showed Blair arguing against Mr. Bush's suggestion of bombing Al-Jazeera's headquarters in Doha, Qatar. The Daily Mirror said its sources disagreed on whether the president's suggestion was serious.
Blair said he had no information about any proposed U.S. action against Al-Jazeera, and the White House called the claims "outlandish and inconceivable."
The document, marked "Secret-Personal," was intended to be restricted to senior officials.
The memo's contents, which are considered so sensitive that much of the trial is being heard behind closed doors, have not been directly referred to by counsel or witnesses in open court.
© MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
- This person leaked information that involved a potential war crime. The people involved should be considered heros, not criminals--where exactly can one go--if there is knowledge of a country doing evil? Or are the good guys suppose to shelve the morality of it all and just suck it up and watch civilians be murdered? Get some priorities UK--you are becoming as depraved and amoral as the Republicans in the US
- Reply to this comment
- This person leaked information that involved a potential war crime. The people involved should be considered heros, not criminals--where exactly can one go--if there is knowledge of a country doing evil? Or are the good guys suppose to shelve the morality of it all and just suck it up and watch civilians be murdered? Get some priorities UK--you are becoming as depraved and amoral as the Republicans in the US
- Reply to this comment
- If Bush was involved with the memo then obviously "they" are hiding the discussion about bombing Al-Jazeera. Which actually did happen. It should be prosecuted.
- Reply to this comment
- Should have bombed the rest of the Middle-East while they were at it.
- Reply to this comment
- If Bush was involved with the memo then obviously "they" are hiding the discussion about bombing Al-Jazeera. Which actually did happen. It should be prosecuted.
- Reply to this comment
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."




