Florida Dumps Touch-Screen Voting Machines
State Will Shift From Controversial Electronic Systems To Ballots With Verifiable Paper Trails
-
Photo
An electronic touch-screen voting machine being prepared in Palm Beach County in October 2004. The Florida legislature voted this week to do away with the controversial machines and replace them with optically-scanned ballots to provide verifiable paper trails. (AP)
-
Special Report
Election Results
Find out who won and by how much in the 2006 midterm elections.
Touch-screen voting machines used in 15 counties will soon be discarded for a verifiable paper-trail system, a move borne out of both the political climate and real concerns that the machines are unreliable.
And, ignoring national party threats and angering other states, Florida will likely be the fourth state to choose the presidential nominees next January.
Voters in 15 counties — comprising about 50 percent of the Florida electorate — will make that choice on touch-screen machines because there won't be enough time to make the changeover before the Jan. 29 vote. Supervisors of elections in those counties will be gearing up for the changeover to optical-scan systems while conducting the election using technology on the way out.
"For the general election it all should be in place," Gov. Charlie Crist said Saturday. He is expected to sign the bill (HB 537) in the next month or so. "Would I rather it be sooner than later? Sure I would. But I'm darn glad it's going to happen now."
Before Florida reaches what Secretary of State Kurt Browning called the "end of the line" of elections evolution — a verifiable paper trail — it has decided to brighten the national spotlight that was first cast on it in 2000, and switched back on in November in a still-disputed congressional race.
"Hopefully the presidential primary won't be a repeat of our election but if we get our investigation completed in time that will help us not only find out what happened in November but hopefully prevent it from happening in January," said David Kochman, a spokesman for Democrat Christine Jennings, who is still contesting her 369-vote defeat to Republican Vern Buchanan in District 13.
Touch-screen voting machines in Sarasota County recorded over 18,000 ballots without a selection in the congressional race. That high rate of "undervotes" — about 10 percent higher than in surrounding counties — and voter testimony of difficulty with the machines led Jennings to challenge the race. A congressional task force is now investigating if something went wrong with the machines. Browning has consistently said — while he doesn't think anything went wrong — the race inspired Crist, a Republican, to take up the rallying cry often heard from Democrats that each ballot needs a verifiable paper trail.
Buchanan's attorney, Hayden Dempsey, also believes the machines work but, like Browning, said the changeover was inspired by the political climate and a crisis of confidence.
"From a voting system standpoint it's not something that needed to be done," Dempsey said. "There's no evidence than any machine in Florida malfunctioned in the last election cycle."
The sales of touch-screen machines is "virtually dead across the U.S.," said Browning. The presidential primary in January will be their last gasp in Florida — except for the next few years when disabled voters will still have to use them.
Florida's voting challenges don't stop with the primary. Browning and elections officials said there is much to be done to comply with the requirements of the bill in time for the 2008 general election — likely to be the largest ever in the state.
"Honestly as soon as this bill passed it just kind of hit me very quickly," Browning said. "Oh my gosh, what does that mean for us? It's a huge task to get ready for the (2008) election."
During testimony leading up to the bill's passage, supervisors of elections told lawmakers to keep in mind all the changes that will have to be made when 2008 rolls around. They wanted to make sure that in the quest to reform elections in Florida, lawmakers wouldn't do too much too fast — and end up setting the state up for more controversy in 2008.
Supervisors are particularly concerned about implementing ballot-on-demand technology, which enables polling places to produce paper ballots when they are requested, said Ron Labasky, general counsel for the Florida State Association of Supervisors of Elections. The touch-screen machines have been useful for early voting because they can produce a number of different ballot styles. And ballot-on-demand has never been used other than for absentee ballots.
"There's a tremendous amount to be done," said Ron Labasky, general counsel for the Florida State Association of Supervisors of Elections. "It's going to be a learning experience for us as well as the public."
© MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



This is fantastic news!
If it weren't for the Florida election fraud of 2000 and the U.S. mainstream media's complicity in this fraud, we would not have had to suffer under the Bu$h-puppet Fuhrer (heil) for all of these long years! Maybe there is hope yet!
For those that would like a review of the 2000 pResidential fraud effort in Florida, here is a brief Flash presentation of the event:
www.ericblumrich.com/gta.html
(speakers)
"Men desire authority for its own sake that they may bear a rule, command and control other men, and live uncommanded and uncontrolled themselves" (St. Thomas More, A Dialogue of Comfort).
Watched that kind of garbage go on here in the Midwest. There was REAL shock when those dirty tricks were contested for once.
Now, let's remove the "gee we forgot to get enough ballots to certain districts but have PLENTY in the Right Districts" ploy stopped.
I'd suggest if they run out of ballots in those "certain" districts, they allow voters to go to the polling places that DO have them lock stock and poor folk.
A few times rubbing elbows with the poor ought to get plenty of ballots to the right districts.
Re: "$400 trillion dollars in debt!"
Whoa! Are you sure about that figure? I think that we could follow a money trail to Mars with $400,000,000,000,000!
The illegal invasion of Iraq has cost us more than $400 billion, so far, with long-term costs estimated beyond $2.5 trillion. Our current National Debt is around $9 trillion. These two larger figures added together ($2.5 trillion + $9 trillion) leaves us with an individual obligation of around $38,000 for every man, woman, and child in the U.S.
Sorry....my bad...thanks for pointing it out to me feelfree....
I'm going out for a frog smoothie.
Have a good day.
Politics is the richest high stakes game in the world. Don't listen to what they say about wmds. Its politics.
"Need gas?"
Here in Minnesota, we have both.
There are always a few idiots beyond idiot-proof and we don't want to let their votes slip away.
Count every idiots vote. That's the american way.
Posted by buhk at 12:10 AM : May 06, 2007
Illegal suppression of the black vote was the main reason Gore "lost" in Florida. That plus the ballots that had many many Jewish people waking up to the surprise that they had actually voted for the racist Pat Buchanan, when they honestly intended to vote for Gore. Lot's and lots of dirty tricks help push Bush into the win column, but the biggest reason of all that he won was because of the US Supreme Court and the class of Al Gore not to fight the obvious fix after their ruling.
Posted by stevex47
Working for the madam as what? Her lack of number skills rules her out as an accountant. As an escort, the cost of drinks for the client would be prohibitive. I guess she could work in her stable, but I didn't know that Ms. Palfrey kept horses.
Ready, by what standard? Back in 2001, the whole country thought Florida was a miscarriage of the electxoral process. So much so, congress passed the Help America Vote Act (HAVA), providing billions in new business for voting machine makers-- all of them run by Republicans. The original idea was to have a consistent, auditable voting process in place by 2004.
However, instead of the built-in audit measures required by HAVA, the nation got only an unseemly feeding frenzy by the voting machine makers over HAVA money. These voting machine makers "forgot" to provide for critical audit features-- the part of HAVA that was its very reason for being.
According to a USAToday article, written months after Bush was designated winner of the Florida contest, uncounted Gore votes-- votes which were clearly marked for Gore-- would have given him a net 688-vote edge over Bush, had these clearly-marked optical ballots been counted.
Instead, Gore advisors made the decision to push for a recount in only four counties, and thus entered the metaphysical realm of what hanging and dimpled chads might express about voter intent.
Posted by stevex47
Working for the madam as what? Her lack of number skills rules her out as an accountant. As an escort, the cost of drinks for the client would be prohibitive. I guess she could work in her stable, but I didn't know that Ms. Palfrey kept horses.
Posted by firststate at 12:46 AM : May 06, 2007
Maybe you hit upon it after all. Maybe she's just there for clients who want to try a little bestiality. Sick and kinky yes, but these ARE republicans we're talking about here too.
Pray for Peace, and God Bless You.
Posted by buhk at 12:10 AM : May 06, 2007
That's you Republican's take on the election! Most of you don't want to believe the idiot lost! He stole his way into the White House! Most of us Democrat's could have accepted Bush as President. If he had actually won fair and square. But, his camp would not allow the votes to be recounted. They drug in Daddy's appointee's to appoint him President! That should have been a red flag to most American's then that Bush and his cronies had no respect for our style of government! That we were in for a rough ride. The 2004 election wasn't much better. There was funny business in Ohio and Florida both. All I can say is, I hope the next election is fraud free! Regardless of who wins and who loses. These last two elections have been rife with fraud most of it perpetrated by Republican's.
Add to that, the President of Dieboldt "personally guaranteeing Bush --the votes of Ohio in 2004" Any one with any amount of decency could smell the stink on that.
Republicans took "Whatever it takes to win" to a new low how frustrating it must be for Bush, to have so many questions hanging over his party and not to be able to find comparable voting debacles from the Democratic side. Probably just as frustrating as it has been for Republicans to pool together enough deviant and abhorrent sexual behavior of Dems to equal what can be found on the website: wwww.armchairsubversive.com and they have been trying to find stuff for the past 7 years. LOL
http://www.buzzdash.com/?page=buzzbite&BB_id=3796
I don't trust Republicans as far as I can see them, let alone when they are out of my sight.
Someone found a way to make those votes disappear and should be procecuted. Fraud seems to be the halmark of what is going on in politics. It all seems so arrogantly blatant. Republicans will have to show me tremendous progress before I'll ever vote foor one again. They have destroyed my trust.
No.. I'd stay away from computer. Especially with elections. Its miles and miles of red tape. The anti-thesis of democracy.
but like the web sites address, we all wish were was one less W.
Try to find their names. You can't. That is why Americans do not trust the Press. Shame on you !!
Posted by RandalDS at 12:23 AM : May 06, 2007
Ok, the supreme court got into it after how Many recounts?
These displaced Yankees (NY'ers...etc who retire and move to Florida)can't read and figure out a ballot? Please!
Al Gore have class, yeah, he got it right after he invented the internet.
Just like the Watergate fiasco, the american people got tired. SICK AND TIRED, of all the "chads", pregnant chads, hanging chads, leaning chads, dimpled chads...etc.
So someone tries to correct the problem that a bunch of people had with the ballots and brings in an electronic solution. Now that is no good. What next?
I know, put all the hopefuls in a room lock the door, have them fight it out, and the only one emerging will be president.
Posted by MichelleM99 at 07:19 PM : May 06, 2007
Yes, unfortunately, the liberals got ahold of our history books. I still have many of my books from the 70s and a couple from the 50s, amazing how much is changed in the name of being politically correct.
And while I am on the subject, why do we have to be PC???
-
by randalds
May 8, 2007 1:42 AM PDT
- Ok, the supreme court got into it after how Many recounts?
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 41 CommentsThese displaced Yankees (NY'ers...etc who retire and move to Florida)can't read and figure out a ballot? Please!
Al Gore have class, yeah, he got it right after he invented the internet.
Just like the Watergate fiasco, the american people got tired. SICK AND TIRED, of all the "chads", pregnant chads, hanging chads, leaning chads, dimpled chads...etc.
So someone tries to correct the problem that a bunch of people had with the ballots and brings in an electronic solution. Now that is no good. What next?
I know, put all the hopefuls in a room lock the door, have them fight it out, and the only one emerging will be president.
Posted by Klingon69 at 02:16 PM : May 07, 2007
None of the recounts had finished yet.
Reading the tiny ballots is confusing to many of the elderly (you'll find that out someday).
The myth that Gore claimed to have invented the Internet is just that, a myth. He never said it, though it has become a right wing urban legend. The plain and simple truth is that it's a lie that's been told and retold, but that still doesn't make it true.