February 11, 2009 4:55 PM

House Votes To Expand Hate Crimes Law

HATE CRIME, KKK, race, gay, homesexual, anti, black, racism

HATE CRIME, KKK, race, gay, homesexual, anti, black, racism (AP)

(AP)  Just hours after the White House issued a veto threat Thursday, the House voted to add gender and sexual orientation to the categories covered by federal hate crimes law.

The House legislation, passed 237-180, also makes it easier for federal law enforcement to take part in or assist local prosecutions involving bias-motivated attacks. Similar legislation is also moving through the Senate, setting the stage for another veto showdown with President Bush.

"This is an important vote of conscience, of a statement of what America is, a society that understands that we accept differences," said House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md.

Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., the only openly gay man in the House, presided over the chamber as the final vote was taken.

The vote came after fierce lobbying from civil rights groups, who have been pushing for years for added protections against hate crimes, and social conservatives, who say the bill threatens the right to express moral opposition to homosexuality and singles out groups of citizens for special protection.

The White House, in a statement warning of a veto, said state and local criminal laws already cover the new crimes defined under the bill, and there was "no persuasive demonstration of any need to federalize such a potentially large range of violent crime enforcement."

It also noted that the bill leaves other classes, such as the elderly, the military and police officers, without similar special status.

"Our criminal justice system has been built on the ideal of equal justice for all," said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, top Republican on the Judiciary Committee. "Under this bill justice will no longer be equal, but depend on the race, sex, sexual orientation, disability or status of the victim."

Republicans, in a parliamentary move that would have effectively killed the bill, tried to add seniors and the military to those qualifying for hate crimes protection. It was defeated on a mainly party-line vote.

Hate crimes under current federal law apply to acts of violence against individuals on the basis of race, religion, color, or national original. Federal prosecutors have jurisdiction only if the victim is engaged in a specific federally protected activity such as voting.

The House bill would extend the hate crimes category to include sexual orientation, gender, gender identity or disability and give federal authorities greater leeway to participate in hate crimes investigations. It approves $10 million over the next two years to help local law enforcement officials cover the cost of hate crime prosecutions.

Federal investigators could step in if local authorities are unwilling or unable to act. The Human Rights Campaign, the country's largest gay rights group, said this federal intervention could have made a difference in the case of Brandon Teena, the young Nebraska transsexual depicted in the movie "Boys Don't Cry" who was raped after two friends discovered that he was biologically female and then murdered when local police did not arrest those responsible.

But Dr. James C. Dobson, founder of Focus on the Family, warned that the true intent of the bill was "to muzzle people of faith who dare to express their moral and biblical concerns about homosexuality." If you read the Bible in a certain way, he told his broadcast listeners, "you may be guilty of committing a 'thought crime.'"

"It does not impinge on public speech or writing in any way," countered Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers, D-Mich., pointing out that the bill explicitly reaffirms First Amendment and free speech rights.

Conyers said in a statement that state and local authorities will continue to prosecute the overwhelming majority of such cases and the bill requires the attorney general or another high-ranking Justice Department official to approve any federal prosecutions.

The legislation restates already-enacted penalties. Those using guns to commit crimes defined under the bill face prison terms of up to 10 years. Crimes involving kidnapping or sexual assault or resulting in death can bring life terms.

The Judiciary Committee cited FBI figures that there have been more than 113,000 hate crimes since 1991, including 7,163 in 1995. It said that racially motivated bias accounted for 55 percent of those incidents, religious bias for 17 percent, sexual orientation bias for 14 percent and ethnicity bias for 14 percent.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
  • David Morgan

    David Morgan is a senior editor at CBSNews.com and cbssundaymorning.com.

Add a Comment See all 179 Comments
by wireferee May 4, 2007 9:31 PM EDT
Kilngon69, you asked if someone using the word F** or Qu*** can be charged with a hate crime under this law. Here is your answer. Currently, race is a protected status under the law. If I say the N-word, am I charged with a crime? No...it's not the best word to use, but it's a crime. If I were to scream the N-word as I beat the *** out of a group of Afr. Amer. then it's a hate crime, as I turned my hate into a violent act.
Reply to this comment
by gkc99 May 4, 2007 8:44 PM EDT
Bushit is concerned about the Constitution?--hahahahahahahaha
Reply to this comment
by randalds May 4, 2007 6:49 PM EDT
This law does not affect free speech in any manner whatsoever and in fact goes out of it's way to specifically defend the right to free speech. To say otherwise is to either misunderstand the law, not having read the law or is lying about the law. All this law does is to extend the same hate crime protection to people based on their sexual orientation or gender and that's all. Anti-ga*y people can still spew out their religious hate, but they can't put that hate into violent action, which should not be a problem if they're real Christians after all. If they feel they need to protect some sort of "right" to beat, maim or kill people just because they don't like the fact that those people were born ga*y, then they need to re-examine their own faith because I doubt their Jesus Christ was in favor of that.
Reply to this comment
by killtheliars May 4, 2007 5:57 PM EDT
this is stupid. it is illegal to assualt someone or steal ect, so if someone commits one of these crimes against someone else they will be punished.
What some want to move toward is limiting free speech and this is not acceptable. If someone does not like *** and wants to say so, it is their right. They may not be right, but having what is thought to be an incorrect opinion is not illegal nor should it be.
If this passes all it will take is one incident where someone can link a person hearing someone speak against *** and then that someone attacking a gay person. Then we will loose the right to free speech.
Instead of doing that why don't you survey everyone. Whatever opinion is the most popular among the general population should become official policy. THerefore if thre majority says being gay is ok then *** in the military, boy scouts, clergy ect will all be fine. If the majority feels being gay is not ok then it should be made illegal. This would be more fair then limiting free speach to keep a minority happy.
Reply to this comment
by klingon69 May 4, 2007 5:54 PM EDT
Listen klingon dork,

It's my body, my life, and I can choose to love and be with whomever I want so long as it hurts no one. What kind of an idiot thinks they should have the right to bother me.
Posted by ttinsly at 01:02 PM : May 04, 2007

I never denied that it was your body, or choice. But, as you said, it is your choice, however in an earlier post you stated it was not a choice, so I simply asked for clarification as to whether being homosexual was a genetic inheritance or a lifestyle choice. But, by your opening to this post is proof of the immaturity of you. Be happy in whatever you choose, but read the full thing before you decide to do any "bashing" of your own.
Reply to this comment
by randalds May 4, 2007 5:32 PM EDT
He's right. How come we NEVER see any "hate crime" prosecutions of blacks for crimes against whites? Are blacks not capable of commiting hate crimes? This whole thing is so freakin bogus!
Posted by Infidel_US at 01:28 PM : May 04, 2007

These types of crimes are actually prosecuted all of the time when the crime is one of black people assaulting white people because of their race. In fact 9 black people were convicted of hate crimes and assault against 3 white girls in Long Beach this past January for a beating that took place last Halloween. Anytime a crime is committed against someone BECAUSE of their race or sexual orientation, that is a hate crime. Of course if someone commits a property crime against someone who just happens to be a different race or sexual orientation, then that is not a hate crime. Get it?
Reply to this comment
by infidel_us May 4, 2007 4:28 PM EDT
How about the muggings of elderly people just because they are old? Wasn't there recently an occurance in NY where 2 eldery ladies were targeted by a mugger, who stated,"that I like to help the elderly.
Posted by Klingon69 at 12:18 PM : May 04, 2007

He's right. How come we NEVER see any "hate crime" prosecutions of blacks for crimes against whites? Are blacks not capable of commiting hate crimes? This whole thing is so freakin bogus!
Reply to this comment
by infidel_us May 4, 2007 4:25 PM EDT
"We don't need no thought control" - David Gilmour
That's all this PC rediculous bill is......democrats' attempt to silence dissent.
Reply to this comment
by randalds May 4, 2007 4:16 PM EDT
The only reason the "christians" are against this is because they would rather us live more fearfully and suffer more violence than have us feel more comfortable and live in peace: because they are afraid and are fanatics. And when it comes down to it they would probably prefer that we would simply die and go away anyways.
Posted by ttinsly at 01:02 PM : May 04, 2007

Sad, but true. Sometimes living here in Hollywood/West Hollywood I think I tend to forget that there is still a long way to go for ga*y rights and acceptance in most of the rest of the country. Around here no one looks twice at two men or two women walking hand in hand or sharing a quiet dinner at a restaurant. I hope that someday it's as accepted worldwide.
Reply to this comment
by klingon69 May 4, 2007 3:50 PM EDT
Let's flip the tables. If I walked down the street and started beating someone just because they were Christian, people would be outraged and calling for my death. Religion is a choice, and it's protected by hate crime laws. My sexual orientation isn't a choice, and it should be protected as well!
Posted by wireferee at 05:54 PM : May 03, 2007

Ok, I ask again, being homosexual is a genentic thing, you inherit it from your parents like red hair, freckles, diabetes, heart disease...etc?
Hmmm, always was told that it was alternative lifestyle, meaning a chosen way of life.
Reply to this comment
See all 179 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook