Gonzales Gave 2 Aides Firing Power
Attorney General's Staffers Could Hire Or Fire About 135 Political Appointees
-
-
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales walks away from the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, April 30, 2007, prior the start of a joint news conference between President Bush, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, and European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
-
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales' former Chief of Staff Kyle Sampson prepares to testify on Capitol Hill in Washington, March 29, 2007, before a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on the Justice Department firings of U.S. Attorneys. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)
-
-
Who's Who Firings Firestorm Justice Department at center of controversy over firing of eight U.S. attorneys.
The March 2006 order gave Gonzales' then-Chief of Staff Kyle Sampson and later White House liaison Monica Goodling authority to hire and fire about 135 politically appointed Justice Department employees who did not require Senate confirmation.
When Gonzales issued the order, top Justice Department officials were well into the process of determining which U.S. attorneys to fire. A month later, Goodling became White House liaison. The list eventually was narrowed to eight U.S. attorneys, and their dismissals began in December.
The uproar that ensued spawned congressional and internal Justice Department investigations, claimed Sampson's and Goodling's jobs and imperiled Gonzales' position.
Labeled "Internal Order," the document bestowed "the authority, with the approval of the attorney general, to take final action in matters pertaining to the appointment, employment, pay separation and general administration" of non-civil service employees of the Justice Department.
Such employees include deputy assistant attorneys general and press aides. U.S. attorneys, who serve as the top federal prosecutors in their state districts, normally require Senate confirmation and would not be covered by the order.
The order was first reported Monday by National Journal.
Democrats pounced on news of the order, complaining that it had not been turned over to them among thousands of other documents released by the department about the firings.
"The mass firing of U.S. attorneys appeared to be part of a systematic scheme to inject political influence into the hiring and firing decisions of key Justice employees," said Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy. "This secret order would seem to be evidence of an effort to hardwire control over law enforcement by White House political operatives."
"This revelation shows that the Attorney General was prepared to engage in an extraordinary delegation of power to two young and unaccountable staffers who may have taken their marching orders directly from the White House," said Senator Chuck Schumer.
But the Justice Department said Gonzales never relinquished authority over hiring and firing decisions. In addition, political appointees — "non-career employees" — are just that: they serve at the pleasure of the president and can be fired for any reason.
"This order simply gives the chief of staff and the White House liaison the authority to execute certain decisions related to the hiring and termination of some non-career employees with, as the memo states, the approval of the attorney general," Justice Department spokesman Brian Roehrkasse said.
During a Senate hearing April 17, Gonzales repeatedly said he did not recall details of how those firings were carried out, making a point to emphasize that he delegated many of the details to his staff — notably Sampson and Goodling.
Democrats have accused the two of using ideology to decide which U.S. attorneys to fire, pointing to Sampson and Goodling's frequent consultations with former White House Counsel Harriet Miers and presidential counselor Karl Rove.
© MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."





- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 53 CommentsMaybe THAT'S what Gonzales does all day. He OBVIOUSLY doesn't do the job he was given -that apparently was pawned off to kids with NO experience for it but he must have thought they would be GREAT "fall guys" if Congress caught on.
In the meantime, BIN LADEN is STILL FREE and George is MISDIRECTING OUR TROOPS FROM THE OBJECTIVE of capturing the ADMITTED perpetrator of 9/11. Can he quit evading the question and tell the American people WHY HE DOESN'T WANT BIN LADEN CAPTURED. Is he SO desperate to PROTECT BIN LADEN that he went as far as to FLY BIN LADEN'S FAMILY BACK TO SAUDI ON 9/12/2001 and send our troops AWAY FROM BIN LADEN to takeover the ONLY non Fundamentalist run country in the region. Why has he set IRAQ up to become FUNDAMENTALIST??
Is there an admitted payback for the Saudi multi-million dollar bailout of Harkin Oil or is it just the Close relations of the Bush family and the Saudi royals that have given George his "marching orders"?
He needs to get out of our government!
Lets have some people with integrity on the job, if that is possible with this administration.
(And I was one of millions that made the mistake of voting for Bush after being tricked by his administrations lies.)
They gloss over that with the greatest of ease. But hey....Bush lied and people died, right? :)
Posted by Infidel_US
Yeah, spurious analogy there; firing all attorneys (including two attorneys investigating Whitewater) in no way equates to Bush lying to Congress and the American people to go to war with Iraq, leading to the deaths (so far) of over 3,300 american soldiers.
Covert Control of the vote by ANY group should not be allowed!!!!!"
Posted by homespunlady at 11:54 AM : May 01, 2007
------------------
homespunlady; maybe that explains why Bush has always been so arrogant?
I suspect they made a huge miscalculation of the voter%u2019s choices last November and will make sure that doesn%u2019t happen in 2008. You are right in reminding everyone because there doesn%u2019t appear to be any serious show of concern, even by those of us most affected.
It is very hard for the average American to ever consider, let alone believe; that their vote%u2019s could/would ever be changed from the way they had cast them, just as it is hard to even contemplate the possibility that 911 was only a part of the plan to invade Iraq.
All of Gonzales problems are Clinton's fault!
Clinton fired 12,500 prosecutors.
I like puppies.
Your breath is blowing back in your face.
Posted by FARTKNOCKER2 at 12:47 PM : May 01, 2007
Wasting your time. They've got answeres for this. "Clinton got rid of them all in the beginning of his presidency." Even though a couple of them were investigating the Whitewater dealings down in Arkansas.
They gloss over that with the greatest of ease. But hey....Bush lied and people died, right? :)
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/01/washington/01corrupt.html?ei=5088&en=301d72e7b39b9fca&ex=1335672000&adxnnl=0&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss&adxnnlx=1178021124-2nztnLGh95f0AKQEII50hA&pagewanted=all
Posted by david1737 at 11:42 AM : May 01, 2007
Oh please....why don't you come down off your condescending high horse. You bedwetting libs are in no position to be taking the high road....on anything!!! Care to show me the "evidence" of "vast unbridled corruption of the Neo-cons", you cry baby? What will you do when Rosie O'Lardass is off the view?
Covert Control of the vote by ANY group should not be allowed!!!!!
I guess Mr. Gonzales was hired to just stand next to Mr. Bush and look Hispanic.
He doesn't seem to have any duties that he can remember or that he hasn't delegated to others.
In his defense, he does look very Hispanic and that is refreshing in Washington.
As I recall the concept of an absentee landlord was considered poor management in the evaluation of the US Attorneys. This is just more evidence that AG Gonzales was an absentee landlord and again by his own standards should subject to replacement.
Posted by david1737 at 11:20 AM : May 01, 2007
hilarious.....did you think of that all on your own???
Posted by Infidel_US at 11:21 AM : May 01, 2007
No! Pedophiles are not "funny" and neither is the vast unbridled corruption of the Neo-cons, nor are these topics to be the subject of sarcasm.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 53 Comments