West Baghdad Walls Cause Murders To Plunge
Barriers Dividing Warring Neighborhoods Cause Homicides To Drop From 275 Per Week To 10
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Walls For Security In Baghdad
West Baghdad has now become a safer place. U.S. troops have found an effective way of keeping murder rates down, they build walls. Mark Strassmann has details.
-
Photo
(CBS)
-
Photo Essay
Iraq In Pictures
A daily diary with scenes of the latest attacks and snapshots from the effort to rebuild a nation.
-
Interactive
Iraq: 4 Years Later
The conflict wears on as the nation struggles to rebuild.
-
Interactive
Battle For Iraq
The government, the insurgency, key players, background and photos.
Col. J.B. Burton has the job of protecting 1 million people there.
His soldiers put down miles of concrete barriers along highways and community entrances to block carloads of al Qaeda thugs from attacking neighborhoods here called "mulhallas."
"Well they were just getting off the highway, and then exiting the highway back into these mulhallas, where they can prosecute their campaign of terror," Col. Burton said.
If good fences can make good neighbors, then in Baghdad, good walls can help make safer neighborhoods. Across West Baghdad, since these walls were put in place last November, the homicide rate has dropped from 275 a week to just ten a week.
It sounds like progress. Good news. Something everyone could agree on.
But not in Baghdad, which is more and more becoming walled off like a medieval city.
In an area called Adamiyah, a new wall will separate warring neighborhoods, one Sunni Muslim, the other Shia. The area is so dangerous that U.S. troops can build the wall only at night. The wall is 12 feet high, three miles long.
Not all residents are pleased with the addition.
“It never will keep us safe,” says Quammer Al-Jabbi, an Adamiyah resident.
Al-Jabbi worries she'll be trapped in her Adamiyah neighborhood — with all the terrorists already dug in there.
"When I go inside my home, I never think that I will go out."
In West Baghdad, where the walls are lower, and people feel safer, most accept the disruption.
One resident says through a translator, “Thank you. Thank you for God.”
"All of this stuff is meant to be temporary in nature, until the security situation is to a level that is acceptable to the people of Iraq," says Col. Burton.
But security is nowhere near acceptable. So walls here are everywhere and the city is more divided than ever.
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Video and Galleries from CBS Evening News
- Latest in CBS Evening News
- Sotomayor's Big Day Nears
- U.S. Drones Have al Qaeda On the Run
- The Story Behind the Skating Babies



- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 102 CommentsWest Baghdad Walls Cause Murders To Plunge
======
Well of course. If I had the mighty United States of America soldiers pointng their guns at me; I would think twice also...
GO AMERICA KICK A**!!!
----------------------
Democrats probably don't like the change. They are so heavily invested in a failure in Iraq that they are helping terrorist
More unsupported hype from CBS in this crappy article. Notice, once again, that no author takes credit for this yellow jounalism piece.
Re: "But not in Baghdad, which is more and more becoming walled off like a medieval city."
The Bush regime has agian stooped to using fascistic methods like retinal scans to control access.
The Iraqi "Prime Minister" al-Mailiki has demanded that the Baghdad collective prison wall be removed, as have local residents, but the Bush regime has refused to comply with this demand.
This is further evidence that the current Iraqi 'officials' are mere figureheads with no real authority, and no real legitimacy.
At any rate, while the death rate MAY have decreased in Baghda, it has increased in several other areas, so who cares?
What we do know about the Bush Bulge, is that 100 or so more U.S. soldiers, and who knows how man Iraqis, died for nothing in Iraq this month. Dead only for ignorance, lies, and greed.
And CBS continues to grease the skids of this hell-bound sleigh with these empty, anonymouse, fluff pieces.
Democrat
s probably don't like the change. They are so heavily invested in a failure in Iraq that they are helping terrorist
Posted by Jebby_One at 12:28 AM : Apr 29, 2007
-----
lol
Wow, that is so comforting to them that you KNOW WHAT THEY WANT because they DON'T LIKE THE CHANGE...
They are so heavily invested in a failure in Iraq that they are helping terrorist
Posted by Jebby_One at 12:28 AM : Apr 29, 2007
---
You are so heavily invested in a failured American Policy, you are helping the enemy.
OPEN YOUR EYES!!!!!!!!
10 years of inconvenient walls VERSUS another 1,000 years of violence
http://fullpowertotheshields.blogspot.com/
Thanks.
Re: "So walls here are everywhere and the city is more divided than ever."
No sh#t, Sherlock! Walls have a way of doing that- dividing, that is, usually followed by 'conquer'.
How many more Iraqi and American lives will CBS sacrifice with their propaganda efforts, in order to prop-up the Bush puppet and the Corporate State?
Could this be the craven brainwashed dupe who composed this disinformation article?
That would be great - but I'd like to know where CBS's getting these numbers from, particularly since we know that the Iraqi government has been withholding casualty figures. Col. J.B. Burton?
One of the first rules of good journalism is to get independent confirmation on stats.
"April 28, 2007
"Saturday: 9 GIs, 163 Iraqis Killed; 222 Iraqis Wounded"
www.antiwar.com/updates/?articleid=10891
Or is it that nation building is not really OK, but when your prestige is involved (and a lot of oil and superbases), then.... of course it is!
Is this a new contract for Halliburton, to erect an Israeli-style Final Solution in glorious concrete? Imagine its size, to rival the Great Wall of China. Perhaps, in return for access to Iraqi oil, China might like to build the wall?
Even so, walls do not make a nation. "Iraq", itself, is only a fiction created for post-WW1 European powers-- not for peoples of this region.
Partition of the territory of Iraq is the only practical and lasting multipower solution for the people of Iraq. Halliburton may have the cement contracts in hand, but the time is well-past for Mickey Mousing with the natives-- or the American people.
Re: "10 years of inconvenient walls VERSUS another 1,000 years of violence"
This is not for you to decide though, now is it? Especially based only on your nice rond-numbered delusions.
Want to do something useful? Build a wall around Cheney and the Bush-puppet, and cap it. Please let us know when this project is complete, and give us an accounting of the resulting murder-rate trend inside the wall.
"The wall, of course, will protect no one. I sometimes wonder if this is how the concentration camps began in Europe. The Nazi government probably said, "Oh look- we're just going to protect the Jews with this little wall here- it will be difficult for people to get into their special area to hurt them!" And yet, it will also be difficult to get out."
"The Wall is the latest effort to further break Iraqi society apart. Promoting and supporting civil war isn't enough, apparently"
"I remember Baghdad before the war- one could live anywhere. We didn't know what our neighbors were- we didn't care. No one asked about religion or sect. No one bothered with what was considered a trivial topic: are you Sunni or Shia?"
http://riverbendblog.blogspot.com
Godfux the Bush puppet-Fuhrer (heil).
Re: "If democracy were alive and well in Iraq and the will of the people prevailed we would do an about-face and march right the heck out of there. We are not welcome, we are an illegal occupying force. The one common bond the Sunnis and Shiites have is their disgust for us. Our presence is an irritant to the peace process."
Bulls-eye! CBS owes you a cigar!
The high murder rate is not because of a lack of walls. It's because the US has spent a lot of money to have those poor people killed.
Posted by Sevenveils at 02:49 AM : Apr 29, 2007
Yes actually they were. many off them were fighting in the resistance movement and many died valiantly doing so. Also many more died fighting the Nazi's in the uprsising that took place in the Warsaw ghetto itself. So yes, they were indeed bombing and assassinating the Germans.
The idea of walls for protection is nothing new. Ancient cities used them to keep out enemies. You don't have to go far to see them in some communities in America. The Miami area has gated communities and secured buildings. These are not just for the rich. My son bought a condiminium eleven years ago for $48,000. The building has security guards and cameras. You can not enter or leave the building without being on camera. One block away, is a high crime neighborhood. My son told me not to walk through that neighborhood because of the crime. Many people in Florida live in gated communities and they work.
Posted by incog-nito
For many people, safety and security is the greatest priority. Peaceful coexistance will only succeed after safety and security becomes a reality. As with anything else in life, not one size fits all. Sometimes it is necessary to try different things to reach a goal. If it takes walls to establish peace and security, so be it.
Re: "My success is the result of a willingness to take risks and try different approaches."
I propose placing you inside the capped wall along with ******** Cheney and the Bush puppet, and see if that helps.
You in, so to speak?
Re: "For many people, safety and security is the greatest priority."
Here in the U.S., those of us who are not bootlicking cowards value freedom and democracy far more than false promises of 'security'. If we surrender those assets, we end up like the Israelis.
Re: "My son bought a condiminium eleven years ago for $48,000. The building has security guards and cameras."
Choosing to live in a gated condo in Miami, and being subject to having a prison wall built around your community by a brutal and illegally occupying force, are two very differnt things. Are you unable to differentiate?
You in, so to speak?
Posted by FeelFree1
So, you favor the staus-quo. Bloodshed, torture, and instability. Successful people try different things. Mediocre people stick with the status-quo. The choice is yours.
Re: "So, you favor the staus-quo. Bloodshed, torture, and instability."
Incorrect. To the contrary, this is what I support:
www.ipetitions.com/petition/OutNow
Re: "What next, what do we do after pulling out?"
#1 Jail Cheney, the Bush puppet, Gonzo, Rumsfeld, Perle, Kristol, Rice, Wolfowitz, Feith, Rove, ect., etc., while they await war crimes proceedings.
#2 Apologize to the people of Iraq, for killing, torturing, raping, and maiming so many of their friends and family, and for destroying their country, in pursuit of a fraud-based war of aggression against them.
#3 Seize and liquidate the assets of war profiteers like Bechtel, Halliburton, Blackwater, Wackenhut, G.E., Lockheed-Martin, the American Enterprise Institute, the Carlyle Group, the Rendon Group, AIPAC, and so forth, and use the proceeds to create a reparations fund for the Iraq, Afghan, and U.S. victims of the global Bush regime/PNAC terror crusade.
#4 Organize fresh, free, and fair elections both in Iraq and here, with international observation and certification, and competent peacekeeping security in place.
Any intiative that causes the murder rate to drop by 96% deserves recognition and high praise. Yet even this success is a bitter double-edged sword and measure of our failure in Iraq. It has the effect of peace keeping rather than peace-making. It has the effect of delaying the inevitable rather than resolving the complex thorny issues behind the violence. It also has the effect of re-inforcing the psyche of separatness.
Though necessary to curb the bloodletting, the foundations of this wall are a powerful symbol of the new Iraq - disparate, divided and spiralling out of control. What we are seeing is a precursor to what will inevitably be separate Shia, Sunni and Kurdish nations). But it does not end there. Unwittingly we are driving the Shia's to their kith in Iran and the Sunni's to their kith in Saudi and Syria. This portends even greater violence ahead as all sides prepare the battle for the oil fields and other resources to make their new nations viable.
In Iraq it seems, nothing is ever straight-forward.
And the spin continues it's momentum....
Baghdad Rocked With Loud Explosions
Posted April 29, 2007, 3:12 AM EDT
BAGHDAD, Iraq -- U.S.-led forces fired an artillery barrage in Baghdad Sunday morning, rocking the capital with loud explosions.
The blasts began after 9 a.m. and lasted for at least 15 minutes.
Iraqis in the southern region of the city said American and Iraqi forces had stepped up their operations in the Dora area of southern Baghdad starting Saturday night.
Re: "Although some of these people may qualify as America haters"
The only 'America haters' that I see are those who wish to see more American blood and treasure squandered in an illegal, self-defeating, and disgraceful war of aggression, waged by the illegitimate and greedy Bush puppet.
You seem to be among these ranks.
Re: "should feel blessed that they live in a country which allows dissent"
We don't accept this as a 'blessing'. We demand it as a basic right; one that is guaranteed in our own Consitution.
Those who would surrender our Constitution just to appease their own irrational imaginations are the real anti-Americans, and should find another home.
Posted by FeelFree1
This sounds like something that could have come from an Al Qaeda manual.
And in the process corporate American just went bankrupt and subsequently Amercia.Who sits on the boards and who has significant quantitys of stock and bond ownership?
Posted by rhs648 at 05:24 AM : Apr 29, 2007
This is a fair point. But it is also part of our problem in Iraq. We have been trying to design an Iraq that suits us, that reflects our needs, wants and perspectives. Since 2003 Iraq has become a laboratory experiment gone wrong. A classic example of the inherent dangers of geo-political and social engineering (or meddling).
It is plain to me that there is no way under the sun that we can construct an Iraq in our image, reflecting our values and sympathetic to our positions. It is simply not going to happen. The owners of Iraq are the Iraqi's themselves. We need to ensure that the new Iraq reflects their wishes and aspirations. If in defining those aspirations Iraqi's (Sunni's, Shia and Kurd) decide that they want to live apart - we must help them to realise that outcome.
We cannot impose our vision of the future on the Iraqi's. We need to let them decide it for themselves. More than that, we need to prepare ourselves for the reality that what is best for them may not be what is best for us.
Posted by FeelFree1
that sentiment is shared by over 60% of the American people - and growing everyday.
the misuse of America's trust is echoed across this country and those who deny it's true and refuse to accept that change is necessary are only fooling themselves.
Four years after the SHOCK AND AWE,Baghdad is a city of walls, total distruction in places, people are afraid to leave their homes. Sunni's are killing Shia's. Shia's are killing Sunni's.
But, Hey, SADDAM IS DEAD, SADDAM IS DEAD.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 102 Comments