George Tenet: At The Center Of The Storm
Former CIA Director Breaks His Silence
-
Play CBS Video Video George Tenet Interview Pt. 1 Former CIA Director George Tenet tells Scott Pelley that he thought the U.S. should attack Afghanistan before the September 11 attacks and he knew Iraq was not involved in the attacks.
-
Video George Tenet Interview Pt. 2 Ex-CIA Director George Tenet tells Scott Pelley that the Bush Administration acted dishonorably when it used his famous "slam dunk" remark about WMD in Iraq to ruin his reputation and his career.
-
Video Tenet: 'Slam Dunk' Misused George Tenet says the Bush administration's use of his "slam dunk" comment as the reason America went to war was deceitful and ruined his reputation. Scott Pelley reports.
-
-
Former CIA Director George Tenet (CBS)
-
After 9/11, CIA-run secret prisons like this one photographed by GeoEye Satellite Imaging in Afghanistan were set up. (GeoEye Satellite Imaging)
-
Former CIA Director George Tenet, left, speaks to correspondent Scott Pelley. (CBS)
-
-
Timeline Tenet At The CIA George Tenet's reign as the director of America's premier spy agency.
-
Special Report War On Terror Complete coverage of the military's battle against terrorism.
"Men of honor don't do this?" Pelley asks.
"You don't do this. You don't throw people overboard. You don’t do this you don’t call somebody in, you work your heart out, you show up everyday. You're gonna throw somebody overboard just because it's a deflection? Is that honorable? It's not honorable to me. You know, at the end of the day, the only thing you have is trust and honor in this world. It's all you have. All you have is your reputation built on trust and your personal honor. And when you don't have that anymore, well, there you go. Trust was broken," Tenet says.
"Between you and the White House?" Pelley asks,
"You bet. You bet," Tenet says.
Still, the president awarded Tenet the nation’s highest honor for a civilian, the Medal of Freedom.
Asked if he was conflicted about accepting the medal, Tenet says, "Well, there was conflict."
At Georgetown, he told 60 Minutes he accepted the medal because the citation was for the CIA's work in Afghanistan, not for Iraq. Some have asked whether the medal is why Tenet has withheld criticism of President Bush.
"Some people have wondered whether the Medal of Freedom is the reason you tend to give the president a pass," Pelley remarks.
"Well, that’s the most outrageous thing I have ever heard in my life," Tenet replies. "The notion that I would trade in my integrity to pull punches with anybody is just ridiculous."
He had the second longest tenure at the agency, but on July 11, 2004, Tenet took a cigar, and walked the grounds of the CIA one last time.
"You know that there are people watching this interview, they're gonna say to themselves, 'That's the guy that missed 9/11. That's the guy who got it wrong on Iraq.' To them, you say what?" Pelley asks.
"You know, history'll judge who this guy is. All I would say to them is I'm also the guy that was privileged to lead men and women that saved thousands of lives. I'm also the guy that was privileged to lead men and women who get up every day to try and keep them safe. I'm also the guy that knows that my report card is a heck of a lot better than the bad things, and there a lot of good things, and I would hope that the American people believe that here's a guy who tried to serve his country as best as he knew how, is an honest man, and led his people as well as he possibly could," Tenet says. "And, the rest is for other people to judge."
Produced by Graham Messick, Michael Radutzky and Michael Karzis
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
- Let's find someone else to blame. How about Saddam? Anyone remember March 16, 1988. This was the day Iraq used chemical weapons against Iranian forces and Kurdish separatists. On March 16, 1988 Iraqi troops, on orders from Saddam to stop a Kurdish uprising, attacked the Kurdish town of Halabjah with a mix of poison gas and nerve agents killing 5,000 people, mostly women and children.
Do you think that between August 1990 and March 2003 Sadaam might have disposed of these weapons? Maybe "our" problem is that "we" don't think at all. Of course the CIA thought he had WMD because he did have them and used them. - Reply to this comment
- Lets find someone else to blame. How about Saddam? Anyone remember March 16, 1988. This was the day Iraq used chemical weapons against Iranian forces and Kurdish separatists. On March 16, 1988 Iraqi troops, on orders from Saddam to stop a Kurdish uprising, attacked the Kurdish town of Halabjah with a mix of poison gas and nerve agents killing 5,000 people, mostly women and children.
Do you think that between September 1990 and March 2001 Sadaam might have disposed of these weapons? Maybe "our" problem is that "we" don't think at all. Of course the CIA thought he had WMD because he did have them and used them. - Reply to this comment
- Truth is an entity that defies permanent suppression no matter the guile of the perpetrator. Bit by bit, the truth shall be told about the sinister tale that is the Iraq war.
George Tenet is not the first nor will he be the last to unscroll the mighty plot to invade, occupy and control the political and economic landscape of the Middle East. Never mind the rhetoric about the spread of democracy among the region's unwilling converts.
When all the pieces come together, America will realize that while asleep with apathy, the country has been high jacked and is being held hostage by neo-cons who are slowly bleeding the country to death.
Don't intimidate nor silent the man, George Tenet that is. Please, let him speak because the nation is yearning for the truth. Next, enter Colin Powel and so on and so forth till lastly, Mr. President. Did I hear impeachment?
Wordtodawise - Reply to this comment
- As the wheels of the war lies are falling off Mr. Tenet seeks to distance himself from this tragic page of world history; it is just another sample of his self serving attitude that he chooses to speak now, an hour late and a penny short. One can't help it but think that if the course of events would not not have ended unmasking the real murky background of the US plunge into a senseless war, Mr. Tenet would have elected to remain mum. Where was his demouncing spirit at the time when it would have really counted....at the moment when an effort was needed to avert this catastrophic mistake....at the time when his duty was to stand for reason and not calculation...? And, where does this sudden desire to level with history come from...? Where was it when he accepted the prize for his sheepishness as Bush hang a medal around his neck...? When real men make mistakes they live with them and save whatever dignity they have left and remain silent; loosers try to justify themselves and, if possible, to make a profit in the process. Shame on you, George Tenet...!!!
- Reply to this comment
- I think this story was great at least one person is being honest and is taking blame for his part thats more than I see the others doing mobody wants to admits they are wrong or they make mistakes I did not like the way the guy did the interview he was not very professional
- Reply to this comment
- i,ve seen the interveiw and george tenet just seems to get arrogant every time he speaks.
- Reply to this comment
- An editor may be skilled in his/her ability to dissect writings of an author in an effort to capture audiences that are abstract in its thinking on certain issues; however, any publisher will be hard pressed in finding one (editor) skilled enough to exploit the fact that Mr. Tenet should be jailed along side that of Mr. Bush, Chaney, and the late Sec. Def. for the thoughtless and careless perpetrators of loss of the lives of loyal patrons unto the American way of life and its people (Soldiers, Marines, Airmen, and Sailors).
OEF/OIF Veteran %u2013 Proudly Serving Our America!!! - Reply to this comment
- George Tenent should have been fired on September 12, 2001. Leaving him as the head of the CIA was a slap in the face of all Americans. He failed at his job. His agency failed to protect America. It was a public embarrassment to allow him to keep his job as the Twin Towers burned. Now he takes the high road in an effort to clear his name and make us believe that he was not responsible for what happened on his watch. At this point, he sounds very much like Bart Simpson, "Ieeee didn't do it."
- Reply to this comment
- Then another interesting observation is this. I know Bush Jr is suppose to be educated, but he does not act as if he is. First of all when you compare his ability to speak like most Presidents we have had in the past, he appears unable to do so. He stutters around, repeats things over and over as if he can't think for himself. He also has this bully attitude with the nations and other countries and their leaders, unwilling to talk and he was not selected by popular people paper vote. He was selected in by machine manipulated votes. Like as if he was placed in that position because he lacks to some degree any appearace of education. It's as if he was a puppet whom would be the perfect fit to get a lot over on without him being intellegent enough to see through it. He just followed orders coming from another voice or voices.
it's just odd to me. - Reply to this comment
- The only thing I get out of this guy is that he doesn't want to be held responsible for a failed Iraq policy. Well what the heck is worried about that for?! It isn't his job to declare war! Its the President's!
I think they knew exactly what would happen in Iraq. All the carnage? All the instability with Saddam Hussein gone? THEY KNEW IT! And they did it anyway. Because the wanted the war on terror off american soil.
Posted by booyaw_77 at 01:10 AM : May 01, 2007
---------------------------------
They did it anyway because the longer we are at war in a different country and they have financial ties, the money will continue to roll in. Plus you have to look at it this way too. In order to get PNAC and Agenda 21 to work you will need to bleed the Nation of it's funding. That fits the remark that Bin Laden made about attacking us through our infastructures. If we blled out all out money, destroy the middle class and infiltrate it with forgeiners, causing problems with immagration issues, you have a thrid world country. There will be rich/poor and our society will be dumbed down by this no child left behind law; where they teach classes such as math over their head, rush them through and then make the Taks tests so easy they pass. Moving an uneducated student to a higher grade. - Reply to this comment
- Chaney's Haliburton had a huge oil contract with Iraq I believe it was back in 1999 that fell right through the loop holes once Saddam began selling oil for another currency during the food for oil trade. So a lot of money went down the drain for Chaney Haliburton before 911 even occurred. Voices say there was a alot of anamosity over a contract that never matured. If I remember right it was like 200 million dollar contract. It was a huge contract that fell through.
- Reply to this comment
- The professionalism of the CIA, according to Tenet, is unquestionable, but had he remembered past blunders of not anticipating major events, perhaps he may have been less forceful in the arguments he presented on 60 Minutes.
Here are a few examples:
The CIA failed to predict Egypt and her ally%u2019s intentions to attack Israel in the Yom Kippur war.
The CIA did not anticipate the overthrowing of the Shah and the eminence of Ayatollah Khomeini.
The CIA misjudged the Soviet intent and ignored preparations to invade Afghanistan.
The CIA was equally surprised at the fall of the Berlin Wall as well as the Soviet Union.
During the Cold War the CIA's method of estimating the Warsaw Pact's military strength has been found to be flawed.
The world knows the strength of the CIA was in organizing successful coup d'etats against democratically elected governments during the Cold War and installing murderous, kleptomaniac and puppet regimes in developing countries.
George Tenet's regime at the CIA was just another brick in the wall of CIA's history. - Reply to this comment
- Here's a new one.. the US invaded Iraq because the media said that Saddam had WMD and to get terrorists that were not there.
Senator James Inhofe (R-OK), said last week "The whole idea of weapons of mass destruction was never the issue, yet they keep trying to bring this up... The media made that the issue because they knew Saddam Hussein had used weapons of mass destruction. So we knew that they were there. But that was incidental to the fact we were going after terrorist camps."
So, Bush, Cheney, Rumsfield, Rice, Powell, and Tenet had nothing to with the WMD case for war! "Slam dunk" was invented by the media, not Tenet! Powell and Tenet appeared before the UN with info given to them by the media, but the real reason to go to war was terrorism!
To justify the war, Bush informed Congress on March 19, 2003 that acting against Iraq was consistent with %u201Ccontinuing to take the necessary actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001."
And yet in 2006.. Bush, in a televised news conference, was asked what Iraq had to do with the attack on the WTC. His answer "Nothing!"
"and nobody in this administration has suggested that Saddam Hussein ordered the attack."
The NeoCons will never stop trying to shift blame and resort to flip flopping when caught in lies!
Wait in the truck , "Inhofe the Idiot." - Reply to this comment
- I don't believe at that time George Tenets voice would have even been heard by the public then... specially when everyone was ready to attack someone. The idea to attack someone was the facet to War even for the public at that time. George tenets voice then would have been like tenets voice is now.... worthless to anyone who would listen. Back then you had twice the power, you had Powell and others who's voice would have walked all over what Tenet would have been trying to say and his resignation wouldn't have meant a hill of beans. It has been this long and it is still hard to wake up the kids in Dorthy's sleeping poppy patch. There are those who still believe that the 911 distaster was an outside job and that is their choice. So when you look at the reality of who actually listens and who actually hears and who acts or investigates on what they hear.... again that is another story.
- Reply to this comment
- The bloodiest month for US GIs this year, bloodiest month for the coalition in two years, and tomorrow is the 4th anniversary of MISSION ACCOMPLISHED. It looks like all that has been accomplished is more bloodletting and chaos. What bothers the most isn%u2019t so much the lies, recklessness, and arrogance that got us into this mess, but the almost cavalier way that Bush uses the lives of military personnel to try to save face for his legacy in the history books. GB43 is sending thousands more young Americans to become sniper and IED bait so that he can punt his failed war to the next president just so he can claim that he didn%u2019t LOSE Iraq. If Bush would have listened to any number of knowledge people, including his father and Colin Powell, instead of the hugs-and-flowers nonsense from people like Paul Wolfowitz we wouldn%u2019t be in this mess. How many more must die for Bush%u2019s lies? If Bush gets his way, many more.
- Reply to this comment
- Ya can't have world trade. Its too corrupt. All our politicians are in some fat cat's pocket. And there's too much money for patriotism. There's too much money for freedom anymore. Ya gotta stop global trade. And ya gotta get these companies where their pocketbooks are, and bring back corporate mandated responsibility. This is unbelievable.. WE GOT NO BUSINESS THERE REPUBLICAN!
- Reply to this comment
- Republicans needs to put on a massive MASSIVE public relations effort. To show, not just americans, but the whole world they ain't no crooks! They got a lot of explaining to do. And democrats too. Because they're the ones sit'n in there smell'n republican farts. They were the only ones who coulda stopped them. And they didn't.
- Reply to this comment
- The Christian Right condemned that country to hell. And they did it? Because its all a part of God's plan. Because their schizophrenic hallucinations told them to. Because they KNOW WHAT AL QUEDA IS! THEY KNOW WHY THEY'RE PISSED AT AMERICANS! And they want to keep them busy! An ocean away! Instead of a global cooperative civilian's effort to fight terror. They don't need no high iq'd cops for this war. They need soldiers! They need people who follow orders and don't ask questions!
This is unbelievable! - Reply to this comment
- The war in Iraq is a terrible.. terrible! Precedent! Place a genocidal maniac in charge of an Islamic country. Call him a madman. Come back and kill him under the "pretext" of a broken word. And BAM! Ya got an american led police force. Complete with all the richest of oil companies backing them up.
Our country has been hijacked by rich CEOs and stock brokers. To fight wars like slaves to them, and not like patriots.
The Constitution has long been shredded! - Reply to this comment
- The only thing I get out of this guy is that he doesn't want to be held responsible for a failed Iraq policy. Well what the heck is worried about that for?! It isn't his job to declare war! Its the President's!
I think they knew exactly what would happen in Iraq. All the carnage? All the instability with Saddam Hussein gone? THEY KNEW IT! And they did it anyway. Because the wanted the war on terror off american soil. - Reply to this comment

