Reid: Cheney Is Bush's "Attack Dog"
Senate Democrat Reacts After VP Accuses Him Of Playing Politics With Iraq Funding
-
Play CBS Video Video Cheney Not Into 'Name Calling' Following his weekly meeting with Senate Republicans, Vice President Cheney stopped to talk to reporters about Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's comment about the Iraq war. Sharyl Attkisson reports.
-
Video Cheney Rebukes Reid CBS News RAW: Vice President Dick Cheney issued a stinging rebuke of Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, calling the Nevada Democrat's comments on the Iraq war "uniformed and misleading."
-
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., right, talks to the media about the war in Iraq with Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., on Capitol Hill on April 24, 2007. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)
-
Who's Who Congress Reacts To Plan Reaction to President Bush's new Iraq stategy, which includes an increase in troops.
-
In The Spotlight Bush's New Iraq Strategy A glimpse at some of the key elements in President Bush's new plan for Iraq.
The particularly harsh exchange came just hours after Mr. Bush said he would veto the latest war spending bill taking shape in Congress, which includes a timetable for withdrawing from Iraq.
The vice president was so angry at Reid that he did something he almost never does, reports CBS News correspondent Sharyl Attkisson. Cheney stopped to talk to reporters after his weekly meeting with Senate Republicans.
"Some Democratic leaders seem to believe that blind opposition to the new strategy in Iraq is good politics," Cheney said. "Sen. Reid himself has said that the war in Iraq will bring his party more seats in the next election."
"It is cynical to declare that the war is lost because you believe it gives you political advantage," Cheney said.
Cheney said he felt compelled to make a statement in front of cameras to express his personal frustration with Reid, D-Nev., after the Senate majority leader told reporters last week the war was lost. Cheney's remarks also showed the high stakes involved for the White House in trying to stave off Democratic efforts to end the war.
While Bush has enough Republican votes to sustain his veto, Democrats say they have public opinion on their side and that will eventually force Bush to change.
"This isn't a political issue," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. "I respect where the president is coming from on this. I wish he would respect where we are coming from, which is a reflection of where the American people are coming from."
Reid shrugged off Cheney's remarks — but with his own dig at the vice president.
"I'm not going to get into a name-calling match with the administration's chief attack dog," he said.
The $124.2 billion legislation would continue to fund the war in Iraq but also would require that troops begin pulling out by Oct. 1 or earlier if the Iraqi government does not make progress in tamping down sectarian violence and forging political agreements. The bill ultimately sets a nonbinding goal for combat operations to end by April 1, 2008.
"It's a good piece of legislation," Reid said. "I would hope the president would stop being so brusque and waving it off. This is a bill that is good for the troops. It's good for the country."
With Democrats expecting to send Mr. Bush the final bill as early as next week, the president stood firm Tuesday against any measure that would set a timetable for withdrawal.
"They chose to make a political statement," he said. "That's their right, but it is wrong for our troops and it's wrong for our country. To accept the bill proposed by the Democratic leadership would be to accept a policy that directly contradicts the judgment of our military commanders."
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer said Democrats will ignore the veto threat and send the bill to Mr. Bush in the hope that he will have a change of heart. But, Hoyer added, they don't expect it.
"He will do with it what he will do," said Hoyer, D-Md. If Bush vetoes the measure, Democrats will consider their next step and try to bring Republicans on board.
"My intuition tells me there are an awful lot of members of the president's party who have great concerns about simply staying the course," Hoyer said.
Mr. Bush said U.S. troops should not be caught in the middle of a showdown between the White House and Congress.
"Yesterday, Democratic leaders announced that they planned to send me a bill that will fund our troops only if we agree to handcuff our generals, add billions of dollars of unrelated spending and begin to pull out of Iraq by an arbitrary date," Bush said on the South Lawn.
He said the bill would mandate the withdrawal of troops despite the fact that the top U.S. commander in Iraq, Gen. David Petraeus, has not yet received all the reinforcements he has said he needs to secure Baghdad and the troubled Anbar Province.
Democrats have argued that the election that left them in control of Congress was a referendum for a change of strategy in Iraq. Mr. Bush used the same election results to argue his point.
"The American people did not vote for failure," he said. "That is precisely what the Democratic leadership's bill would guarantee."
Petraeus and other top defense officials on Wednesday will try to persuade lawmakers in a private briefing not to set a timetable.
Under the bill, U.S. forces could remain in Iraq after the 2008 date, but would be restricted to three non-combat missions: protecting U.S. personnel and facilities, engaging in counterterrorism activities against al Qaeda and other similar organizations, and training and equipping Iraqi forces.
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
- How "American" of you!
Posted by RandalDS at 06:28 PM : Apr 25, 2007
What makes you think these "terrorists" are entitled to the same rights and privelidges as an American citizen???? How dare you elevate them to our level! - Reply to this comment
- Harry Reid and his colleagues are the modern equivalents to Neville Chamberlaain. They are clueless to the threaats facing this country or how to deal with them. God save us if you people who think like he does get in control of this country. One can only hope that before the next election, you will all receive the Darwin Award and the gene pool will be cleansed.
Posted by rdbeale at 08:07 PM : Apr 25, 2007
You know you're right and I, like most Americans are getting dam*n sick of his constant appeasement of Bush. As Chamberlain showed yo can't appease an ultra right wing madman like Hitler, or in our case Bush, you can only oppose them and try to take them down before they get too much power. In the 1930's we let right wing Nazism run amuck and it cost millions of lives to destroy it then. This time lets strangle the infancy of this generation's Nazism, the Neoconservative movement, while it's still in it's crib and save all of the lives it'll cost to destroy it later. Let's stop the madman now, preemptive, BEFORE he can become another Hitler. - Reply to this comment
- Mudrose - You wouldn't know American from your a..
- Reply to this comment
- Harry Reid and his colleagues are the modern equivalents to Neville Chamberlaain. They are clueless to the threaats facing this country or how to deal with them. God save us if you people who think like he does get in control of this country. One can only hope that before the next election, you will all receive the Darwin Award and the gene pool will be cleansed.
- Reply to this comment
- You all belong in Guantanamo. No trials, no communications, no immunity.
Posted by mudrose at 04:44 PM : Apr 25, 2007
How "American" of you! - Reply to this comment
Posted by mudrose:
You all belong in Guantanamo. No trials, no communications, no immunity.
-You're absolutely right. Everybody who doesn't agree with you should be thrown into Guantanamo without a trial. Let's burn the US Constitution with all of it's liberal freedoms, that will save america!!
Zee vill komply vit dis order!!! Yah vol mein Komandant!!!- Reply to this comment
- The multicultural left has made great strides in destroying this country. Why is it that you are so compelled to attack President Bush when you ignored the corruption and cronyism of the Clintons? Why is it that you feel so proud to attack this great nation? We may have problems but at least we don%u2019t stone people to death for exposing their ankles. In the end, people like you and the hypocrite George Soros are not taken seriously. You fund your rants with money that is shielded from taxes in offshore funds that help the super-rich like the ambulance chaser John Edwards. You all belong in Guantanamo. No trials, no communications, no immunity.
- Reply to this comment
- Cheney is the lowest form of life and worst public servant I have seen in my lifetime. He and Bush should both serve time for war crimes, as they singlehandidly caused the deaths of thousands of innocent Americans and Iraqis. My blood pressure soars just to hear his pathetic name. What a useless piece of humanity.
I hope history places *** Cheney in the same category as Hitler and other mass murderers of our time. - Reply to this comment
- "It is cynical to declare that the war is lost because you believe it gives you political advantage."
-Vice President *** Cheney
It's even more cynical to declare that this war is winnable, just, and in the Iraqi's best interest. I would even go beyond the word "Cynical" and use the word "Evil." - Reply to this comment
- "It is cynical to declare that the war is lost because you believe it gives you political advantage."
-Vice President *** Cheney
It's even more cynical to declare that this war is winnable, just, and in the Iraqi's best interest. I would even go beyond the word "Cynical" and use the word "Evil." - Reply to this comment
Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror.




