February 11, 2009 4:59 PM

Tillman's Fellow Ranger Admits Cover-Up

(CBS/AP)  An Army Ranger who was with Pat Tillman when the former football star was cut down by friendly fire in Afghanistan said Tuesday a commanding officer had ordered him to keep quiet about what happened.

The military at first portrayed Tillman's death as the result of heroic combat with the enemy. Army Spc. Bryan O'Neal told a congressional hearing that when he got the chance to talk to Tillman's brother, who had been in a nearby convoy on the fateful day, "I was ordered not to tell him what happened."

"You were ordered not to tell him?" repeated Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

"Roger that, sir," replied O'Neal, dressed in his Army uniform.

The revelation came as committee members questioned whether, and when, top Defense officials and the White House knew that Tillman's death in eastern Afghanistan three years ago was actually a result of gunfire from fellow U.S. soldiers.

Tillman's death received worldwide attention because he had walked away from a huge contract with the NFL's Arizona Cardinals to enlist in the Army after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

His family was initially misled by the Pentagon and did not learn the truth for more than a month. Tillman was awarded a Silver Star based on fabricated accounts — who fabricated them still isn't clear after several investigations.

"We don't know what the secretary of defense knew, we don't know what the White House knew," Waxman said. "What we do know is these were not a series of accidents, these stories. They were calculatedly put out for a public relations purpose. ... Even now there seems to be a cover-up."

Kevin Tillman was in a convoy behind his older brother, a former NFL star, on April 22, 2004, when Pat Tillman was mistakenly shot by other Army Rangers who had just emerged from a canyon where they'd been fired upon. Kevin Tillman didn't see what happened. O'Neal said he was ordered not to tell him by then-Lt. Col. Jeff Bailey, the battalion commander who oversaw Tillman's platoon.

"He basically just said, Sir, that uh, 'Do not let Kevin know, he's probably in a bad place knowing that his brother's dead,"' O'Neal testified. "He made it known that I would get in trouble, sir, if I spoke with Kevin."

O'Neal said he was "quite appalled" by the order.

Bailey's superior officer, then-Col. James C. Nixon, has testified to the Defense Department's inspector general that he ordered that information on the facts of Tillman's death be shared with as few people as possible so that the Tillman family would not learn those facts through news media leaks. That, in turn, shaped Bailey's guidance to his troops.

The Army said initially that Tillman was killed by enemy gunfire while trying to help another group of ambushed soldiers. The family was not told what really happened until May 29, 2004, a delay the Army blamed on procedural mistakes.

Kevin Tillman and Tillman's mother, Mary Tillman, also testified Tuesday but were not in the room when O'Neal spoke.



© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 170 Comments
by toolmangler-2009 April 28, 2007 12:40 AM EDT
Death by friendly fire in combat is still death in combat. There is extreme risk some military operations, even if it's a thousand miles away from the front.
Posted by Jebby_One at 12:33 AM : Apr 26, 2007


Tnx Jebby_one. Thats good enough for me.
Reply to this comment
by jebby_one April 26, 2007 3:37 AM EDT
" The generally poor reliablity of internet-based news isn't helped any when major broadcasters like CBS can't even be bothered with proofreading and fact-checking. "

----------------------------

Does anyone believe that CBS and the NYT are anything other than propaganda agents for the Neo-commie wing of the democrat party?

These guys skipped reporting news about the Holocaust for pete sake.
Reply to this comment
by jebby_one April 26, 2007 3:33 AM EDT
" If you die in combat there is a bigger payoff than if you are killed by accident, (friendy fire)..."

-------------------------

Death by friendly fire in combat is still death in combat. There is extreme risk some military operations, even if it's a thousand miles away from the front.

There is no second class honor associated with friendly fire mishaps. Most military people would not distinguist he two ... until recently when self serving 2-bit politicians tried to exploit friendly fire mishaps.

Does anyone really believe that the Tillman family is better off knowing that Patrick was probably shot by someone in his own unit. Will they be better off if they discover that maybe Patrick's own actions that day may have contributed to his death?

To me he was an honorable soldier, regardless. No need to go beyond that. But now family are questioning the honor of Pat Tillman's comrades. They will now have to defend their honor regardless of where the chips fall. The Tillmans may or may not like what further investigations may reveal.


Reply to this comment
by jebby_one April 26, 2007 3:17 AM EDT
" Jessica has been saying ever since she first got out of the hospital that the story about her 'rescue' and the 'fight' she supposedly put up when captured were falsehoods. This is not something that just came about recently"

-----------------------

The media propelled her undeserved stardom and went to great efforts to keep kher in the spotlight. Why? Probably so theuy could later team up with scumbags like Henry Waxman and blame it all on Republicans.

Don't let this bother you. While they claim that Bush is unpopular the left-wing media's credibility is lower than dog-poop. Hell, the only group with less credibility than the media stooges are the Democrats.

Reply to this comment
by jebby_one April 26, 2007 3:12 AM EDT
" This is so sad. One now wonders how much of what your government says can be trusted...Surely they realise that they need the trust of the people to continue..."

-----------------

With the Bush administration? probably very little can be trusted. With the democrats? Probably nothing can be trusted.

We live in a democratic republican and our leaders are only as good as the people who elect them. Unfortunately we are now in a self-serving cycle where the democrats' believe the only chance of them holding power is to undermine anyone and everyone who has a different opinion from them.


Reply to this comment
by toolmangler-2009 April 26, 2007 1:02 AM EDT
A co-worker who retired from the military, said the coverup by his friends (Tillmans) was because of 'insurance' . If you die in combat there is a bigger payoff than if you are killed by accident, (friendy fire). Alright, lets hear it, is this so? I just want the truth!!!! Speak up VETS
Posted by ToolMangler at 08:42 PM : Apr 24, 2007


Reply to this comment
by gaye5 April 25, 2007 8:24 PM EDT
This is so sad. One now wonders how much of what your government says can be trusted...Surely they realise that they need the trust of the people to continue...
But I can understand the governments cover up if indeed it came from the government..because here I have heard that accidentaly killing of their own soldiers has happens too much in American forces, and when fighting with Americans that we are better off to keep away from them as we are more likely to be accidently killed by Americans than the enemy...
Now this is just what I have heard, it is not official of course, and Americans and Australians have had a long history of fighting happily together saving each others lives... both respecting and caring for each other...and great friendships have come out of combat...
Reply to this comment
by greengirl221 April 25, 2007 3:03 PM EDT
Leave it to the Neo-cons...

As soon as any reports that remotely support the fact the the US is involved in an unjust war or the the US goverment has conducted some shady practices it is dismissed as LEft-wing proproganda. And any person that supports these views is considered anti-patriot.
Remember that just because someone does not agree with what the US gov is doing-it doesn't mean that they are not a patriot.
...And I thought standing up for the Truth was a noble quality-one the that every citizen should posess.

My supports goes out to those who risk everything to expose the truth!
Reply to this comment
by greengirl221 April 25, 2007 2:51 PM EDT
Seeing this story makes you wonder what other incident reports have "fixed" to make the US Government look good. I'm sooo glad Mr. O'Neal & Ms. Lynch are speaking out the truth about what really happened.
Reply to this comment
by gramto7 April 25, 2007 1:16 PM EDT
Jessica Lynch - why has she waited until just now to tell the truth....

Lord help us all.
Posted by dblbar

Jessica has been saying ever since she first got out of the hospital that the story about her 'rescue' and the 'fight' she supposedly put up when captured were falsehoods. This is not something that just came about recently.
Reply to this comment
See all 170 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook