Poll: Little Change In Views On Handguns
There's been little change in Americans' views on gun control in the wake of last week's shooting rampage at Virginia Tech, according to a CBS News/New York Times poll.
A majority favors tighter handgun laws, but not in higher numbers than in the past. More than half said stricter laws could have helped prevent at least some of the violence at Virginia Tech, but Americans continue to oppose a ban on all handguns.
In all, 66 percent of those surveyed think there should be stricter laws covering the sale of handguns, while just 4 percent say the laws should be less strict. Twenty-eight percent think the laws should be kept as they are.
Those numbers are about the same as in August 1999, four months after the
shootings at Columbine High School in Colorado, when 67 percent said they favored stricter handgun laws.
SHOULD LAWS COVERING THE SALE OF HANDGUNS BE …?
Now
More strict
66%
Less strict
4%
Kept as they are
28%
8/1999
More strict
67%
Less strict
5%
Kept as they are
23%
Just 33 percent favor a ban on the sale of all handguns except those issued to police, while 64 percent oppose such a ban.
Support for a handgun ban has decreased somewhat in recent years. In April 1999, just days after the shootings at Columbine, 43 percent said they favored banning handguns.
Four in 10 said stricter gun laws would have had no impact.
A BAN ON THE SALE OF ALL HANDGUNS
Now
Favor
33%
Oppose
64%
April 1999
Favor
43%
Oppose
53%
One in four Americans thinks letting people carry concealed handguns would have reduced some of the violence at Virginia Tech. But the same number think it would have made things worse.
Not surprisingly there are sharp partisan differences on the gun control issue. Seventy-eight percent of Democrats support tougher handguns laws, compared with 51 percent of Republicans. Eighty-two percent of Republicans oppose a handgun ban, compared with 55 percent of Democrats.
For detailed information on how CBS News conducts public opinion surveys, click here.
This poll was conducted among a random sample of 644 adults nationwide, interviewed by telephone April 20-22, 2007. The error due to sampling for results based on the entire sample could be plus or minus four percentage points. The error for subgroups is higher.
Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved. A majority favors tighter handgun laws, but not in higher numbers than in the past. More than half said stricter laws could have helped prevent at least some of the violence at Virginia Tech, but Americans continue to oppose a ban on all handguns.
In all, 66 percent of those surveyed think there should be stricter laws covering the sale of handguns, while just 4 percent say the laws should be less strict. Twenty-eight percent think the laws should be kept as they are.
Those numbers are about the same as in August 1999, four months after the
shootings at Columbine High School in Colorado, when 67 percent said they favored stricter handgun laws.
SHOULD LAWS COVERING THE SALE OF HANDGUNS BE …?
Now
More strict
66%Less strict
4%Kept as they are
28%8/1999
More strict
67%Less strict
5%Kept as they are
23%Just 33 percent favor a ban on the sale of all handguns except those issued to police, while 64 percent oppose such a ban.
Support for a handgun ban has decreased somewhat in recent years. In April 1999, just days after the shootings at Columbine, 43 percent said they favored banning handguns.
On the question of whether stricter laws could have helped limit the violence at Virginia Tech, 53 percent said tougher laws would have had some impact, although only 32 percent said stricter gun laws would have helped a lot.
Read the complete CBS News/New York Times poll results.
Four in 10 said stricter gun laws would have had no impact.
A BAN ON THE SALE OF ALL HANDGUNS
Now
Favor
33%Oppose
64%April 1999
Favor
43%Oppose
53%One in four Americans thinks letting people carry concealed handguns would have reduced some of the violence at Virginia Tech. But the same number think it would have made things worse.
Not surprisingly there are sharp partisan differences on the gun control issue. Seventy-eight percent of Democrats support tougher handguns laws, compared with 51 percent of Republicans. Eighty-two percent of Republicans oppose a handgun ban, compared with 55 percent of Democrats.
This poll was conducted among a random sample of 644 adults nationwide, interviewed by telephone April 20-22, 2007. The error due to sampling for results based on the entire sample could be plus or minus four percentage points. The error for subgroups is higher.
Recommended
- Top Twelve Most Patriotic Songs Ever
- American dystopia more reality than fiction
- Who Lives The American Dream?
- Here's Why People Don't Buy Global Warming
- Filibuster This!
- The Decline and Fall of the American Empire
- Poll: Stem Cell Use Gains Support
- Why I'll take Bill Gates over Steve Jobs every time
A lot of small minded people are so focused on the tragedy and comepletely ignore the "statistic".
I agree with your post at 5:51 pm. But about your post at 5:54: "Gun owners I know tend to have a very healthy respect for firearms and how dangerous they can be....."
How about the ones you don't know?
How many children do you think have died because their parents or their friend's parents have not secured their guns properly OR "thought" they had secured them properly.
You can do background checks and what ever on people before they get a gun, but because everybody owns one, what is stopping some mentally disturbed person from breaking into a home, perhaps your home, and stealing a gun. Unless a gun is locked up in a safe, it ain't secure.
I don't think responsible gun owners would object to measures that would not keep guns out of the hands of sane, reasonable people, but might block someone with a history of mental problems getting one. Gun owners I know tend to have a very healthy respect for firearms and how dangerous they can be in the hands of the untrained or unstable.
When you worked in a prison, what would have been the chances of an inmate killing 32 others with a shiv made out of a toothbrush?
Yes, people kill people. However, guns make the task both easier and more efficient. The argument that if one restricts access to guns one also needs to restrict access to all other items which could be used to kill is a spurious one. How often do you hear about a "drive-by hanging" or a "mass choking"? You don't.
Posted by phil-in-Fin at 03:57 PM : Apr 25, 2007
No, so why don't we just assume that all gun owners are bad then and take everyones rights away.
"In case you haven't noticed, it's not the honest American gun owners (or "gun nuts" as you call them) that are committing mass shootings."
Oh? And you can tell the difference between an honest American gun owner and those who are (going to) commit mass shootings?
You should get a job as soothsayer at a gun-shop.
You GO Katg!! Good with the bad...action to reaction....live and let live....there is NOTHING AND NO ONE THAT IS PERFECT....including, perhaps especially, those idiots that cannot conceive that your position, or my position, is just as valid as theirs.......I WANT the right to have firearms....NOT to take, but to protect, and possibly provide.....
+ report abuse
haah erasmus6
yea this bush administration is pretty dang close to making the american people revolt.(i think neway)
If he had like 3 more years left. their is no way he would last that long. either by impeachment or by force.
I agree with itwasntme000's post at 9:58.
And I have a question: Did the 2 burglars have weapons? Or did you shoot them because you were afraid they did?
Where I live most burglars are not necessarily carrying a weapon. They are coming to steal something, not to kill someone. They most often come when you are not home and if they found someone to be home, then they would leave. Most are not wanting a confrontation. But like I said that is my country not yours.
Read post by itwasntme000 1:24 pm
"Us being armed can overthrow the government."
Do you see what you have done by allowing all your citizens to carry guns?
If you do something your citizens do not agree with watch out! hahaha