Is FDA Capable Of Keeping Food Safe?
Experts Say Understaffed Agency Is Unable To Prevent Future Outbreaks Of Contaminated Food
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Growing Concern About The FDA
A former FDA deputy commissioner says the agency is so understaffed that it has little ability to prevent problems like the deadly outbreak of E. coli in spinach last year. Nancy Cordes reports.
-
Video
FDA Under Fire
As with tainted food, the FDA doesn't take action against a drug until after someone gets ill or dies. People in Washington want to know why. Wyatt Andrews reports.
-
Photo
The FDA was unable to prevent last year's E. coli outbreak; three people died and hundreds were sickened by tainted spinach. (CBS)
-
Quiz
Food Safety Quiz
Do you know how to handle a turkey safely? Take this quiz and find out!
-
In The Spotlight
Pet Food Recall
A complete list of products and answers to questions regarding the recall
There had been 19 outbreaks since 1995.
The letter did not indicate plans to step up inspections. Instead, it called on the industry to take "the appropriate measures to provide a safe product."
One year later, outbreak No. 20 — the spinach — killed three and sickened more than 200.
A former FDA deputy commissioner says the agency is so understaffed it has little capacity to prevent outbreaks, even predictable ones.
"I think basically FDA right now is really not able to protect the safety of the food supply the way people expect," Michael Taylor, the former FDA deputy commissioner for policy, told CBS News.
An anonymous tip alerted the FDA to salmonella in a ConAgra factory more than a year before the peanut butter made there sickened 400 people.
Investigators visited the plant but didn't press ConAgra to explain why it had recently destroyed a batch of peanut butter.
Part of the problem, critics say, is that in recent years food has take a back seat to drugs at the agency charged with regulating both.
"Sadly, today this great Food and Drug Administration, when it comes to food safety, has become the weakest link," said Sen. Richard Durban, D-Ill.
Just compare the FDA to its sister agency, the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The FDA is responsible for 80 percent of the nation's ever-growing food supply; the USDA for the other 20 percent. And yet the USDA has five times the number of inspectors.
"If products are regulated by FDA, like seafood and produce and grains, they might only see an inspector once every five or 10 years," said Caroline Smith DeWaal of the Center for Science in the Public Interest.
That's why this month, in the wake of the E. coli outbreak, the California produce industry imposed standards on itself — far more strict than the FDA’s rules.
"We didn't wait for regulation or legislation. That can take a lot of time to do," says Joe Pezini of Ocean Mist Farms. "Even the government has said this is the fastest way to enact change."
The Bush administration's budget calls for an additional $11 million for FDA food safety efforts next year. Former FDA officials say the agency needs 10 times that.
Meanwhile, CBS News correspondent Wyatt Andrews reports that the FDA isn't just under fire for how it handles food – the drug part of its safety mission is also under attack in Washington – and for the same reason: The agency doesn't take action until after someone gets sick or dies.
"There is a saying: 'The history of the FDA is written in tombstones,'" says Bill Vaughan of Consumers Union.
For example, researchers connected Vioxx to up to 140,000 heart attacks before the FDA pulled it from the market. With Baycol, the death count was 31. The drug Rezulin caused 28 deaths before it was recalled.
One reason is the FDA is not allowed by law to require a drug safety study after a drug is released to patients market. And even after the FDA learns of problems, it has to ask the drug manufacturer for a changes on the label.
© MMVII, CBS Interactive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Video and Galleries from CBS Evening News
- Latest in CBS Evening News
- The Story Behind the Skating Babies
- Sagging Sales, Even in a Beach Paradise
- Grief, Outrage over Grave Desecrations



We need to demand that the SCOURCE of ingredients be put on packaging. Those of us wanting to "buy local" have no way of knowing where any of this stuff comes from.
I agree.
It's up to those who package and sell the food to follow those regulations.
Stop regulating and do you think that, for even one attosecond, anybody would continue to keep existing regulations in place of their own free will? No. They will be dropped, with the typically used claim that regulations are expensive.
good thing we just blew $500 billion in iraq for nothing.
Then, (Apocalypse NOW) we go on our merry way down the tubes because we are to chicken to hold specific individuals accountable during, before, and after the fact(not just by slapping their wrists!).
If we won't wake up as a country and prosecute those who would posture as "leaders" and "Agencies" but fail us miserably in actual performance--and worse, treasonous activity--
we are sleepwalking into oblivion, a painful slide without anesthesia.
If we want hope instead of wishing for it--the above is The Way. The Roadmap to a Phoenix America.
Your tainted/poisoned food.........
...... is brought to you by your beloved Bush Administration and the tax cuts that helped decimate the FDA!
BON APPETIT!
That squib of a doctrine has poisoned every moment of the Bush years with corruption and incompetence, while Bush2 and minions made sure America got the least they had to offer.
As the fallout from the Bush era attests, this bogus idea about proper governance is simply not borne out by fact. If Bush2 proves anything at all by negative example, it is the importance of effective, intelligent government.
The best government model is both informed and diligent. Weighing wisdom and power, Plato said each is vital for effective government.
Meanwhile, fumbling with the levers of government power, the Bush FDA has not mastered even the appearance of administration, much less its conduct.
Posted by ciruoc at 09:30 PM : Apr 23, 2007
Exactly!! 100% correct!
-
by skinnydipt
April 24, 2007 8:32 PM PDT
- I trust the FDA's oversight of our food supplies about as much as I would believe there are honest snake oil salesmen (oh...if the FDA approves them, they are???) NOT!
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 24 CommentsThe pet food recall and extension there of is just the tip of the iceberg. More information about the imcompetence of the system makes headlines, but those who work(ed) investigating foodborne illnesses are not surprised. The most vulnerable humans are the young, the very old and the infirm...but even healthy adults with varied diets could be at risk. Our animal companions and farm animals are just the "canaries in the mine".
It can't be ALL because of Bush, but it is falling in his watch. We need massive reform NOW.