Report: Haditha Charges Should Be Dropped
Hearing Officer Says Case Against Corporal Lacks Sufficient Evidence, Witness Unreliable
-
Marine Lance Cpl. Justin Sharratt arrives for his Article 32 investigation hearing at Camp Pendleton Marine Corps Base in San Diego County Monday, June 11, 2007. (AP Photo/Denis Poroy)
-
Interactive Iraq: 4 Years Later The conflict wears on as the nation struggles to rebuild.
The murder charges were brought against Lance Cpl. Justin L. Sharratt for killing three Iraqi brothers in November 2005.
Haditha is a town of 70,000, in Anbar province, the heart of the Sunni resistance, where, among the residents, anti-American passions run high, reports CBS News 60 Minutes correspondent Scott Pelley. In the months before Sharratt's unit arrived, other Marines there had suffered some of the heaviest causalities in all of Iraq, including the bombing of an armored vehicle that killed 14 Marines. Days before that, six Marines in Haditha were ambushed, tortured and killed. The enemy put it on the Internet
The hearing officer, Lt. Col. Paul Ware, wrote in a report released by the defense Tuesday that those charges were based on unreliable witness accounts, insupportable forensic evidence and questionable legal theories. He also wrote that the case could have dangerous consequences on the battlefield, where soldiers might hesitate during critical moments when facing an enemy.
"The government version is unsupported by independent evidence," Ware wrote in the 18-page report. "To believe the government version of facts is to disregard clear and convincing evidence to the contrary."
Prosecutors allege Sharratt and other members of his battalion carried out a revenge-motivated assault on Iraqi civilians that left 24 dead after a roadside bomb killed a fellow Marine, Lance Cpl. Miguel Terrazas of El Paso, Texas.View photos taken by Lucian Read, a photographer who was embedded with Marines in Haditha
Sharratt contends the Iraqi men he confronted were insurgents and at least one was holding an AK-47 rifle when he fired at them.
In addition to Sharratt, two other enlisted men are charged with murder and four officers are accused of failing to investigate the incident — the largest single Iraqi civilian death case of the war. Sharratt's case is the first among the three charged with murder to go to a hearing known as an Article 32 investigation, the military equivalent of a grand jury.
"We reacted to how we were supposed to react to our training and I did that to the best of my ability. The rest of the Marines that were there, they did their job properly as well," Sharratt's squad leader, Staff Sgt. Frank Wuterich, told CBS News' 60 Minutes in March.
"Whether this was a brave act of combat against the enemy or tragedy of misperception born out of conducting combat with an enemy that hides among innocents, Lance Corporal Sharratt's actions were in accord with the rules of engagement and use of force," Ware wrote.
He said further prosecution of Sharratt could set a "dangerous precedent that ... may encourage others to bear false witness against Marines as a tactic to erode public support of the Marine Corps and its mission in Iraq."
"Even more dangerous is the potential that a Marine may hesitate at the critical moment when facing the enemy," he said.
The recommendation to drop the murder charge is nonbinding. A final decision about whether Sharratt should stand trial will be made by Lt. Gen. James Mattis, the commanding general overseeing the case.
Prosecutors at Sharratt's preliminary hearing introduced several accounts from Iraqis that said Sharratt had separated four men from a group of women and children and ordered them into a house. There, prosecutors said, he shot three of them and when he ran out of bullets the squad leader Wuterich allegedly shot the fourth.
Ware deemed the witness accounts and testimony given by other Marines unreliable.
At home in Canonsburg, Pa., Sharratt's family said the news was huge.
"That report is a declaration of Justin's innocence," said Sharratt's mother, Theresa. "This is very, very good news."
Defense attorneys James Culp and Gary Myers said in a statement that the report "reflected the value of the calm of a courtroom and the adversarial process."
This is the second time an investigating officer has recommended charges not continue to trial in connection with the Haditha killings. In the case of Marine lawyer Capt. Randy W. Stone, the investigating officer recommended Stone's dereliction of duty charge be dealt with administratively.
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
- tbweb wrote:
"The Police who wrote up my Accident Report did implicate the entire illegal Mexican group and complained they are experiencing a high volume of accidents due to illegal Mexicans driving without the proper license, insurance and registration and in many cases stolen cars and it was a big problem. I personally didn't implicate the entire illegal Mexican group the Police did! The Police also went on to add that crime and shoplifting was an even bigger problem since they can't track them even when they have finger prints, they just disappear into the American landscape."
Regardless of what the police officer said, the entire Mexican group is exceptionally unlikely to all be involved in car theft etc.
That would be like me saying that all police officers are corrupt because of the actions of a few.
Generalizations are not facts. - Reply to this comment
- drivelphobe wrote:
"You appropriately used the word angry and poor mcdazz, seeing only another opportunity to babble, hastily put his own words in your post. Like I said, he/she/it has no original thought process."
And if you could read, you would have seen where I acknowledged my mistake and even apologised.
Of course, that's probably waaaaaay above your level of comprehension.
But then, I guess you just can't teach a racist redneck anything.
Now get back to your mommas bed, Adolf. - Reply to this comment
- WDRussell1...
Flailing and screeching is perfect! - Reply to this comment
- I'm sorry, but did you say something even remotely worthy, Adolf?
Posted by mcdazz at 06:36 AM : Apr 22, 2007
Dont worry, he is just another chickenhawk, flailing his arms and screeching. - Reply to this comment
- tbweb..
Don't waste your time trying to convince mcdazz of anything. Of course the Police implicated the entire illegal Mexican community. The driving forces in illegals' existance here in the USA, is to survive, not be caught, consume every entitlement they can get, and breed like rabbits. Oh, I forgot their resolve to never learn English.
You appropriately used the word angry and poor mcdazz, seeing only another opportunity to babble, hastily put his own words in your post. Like I said, he/she/it has no original thought process. - Reply to this comment
- While I strongly dislike the fact that illegals of ANY nationality living here, the actions of one does not in any way mean that they are all car thieves intent on crashing into Americans.
Posted by mcdazz at 09:21 AM : Apr 22, 2007
--mcdazz
The Police who wrote up my Accident Report did implicate the entire illegal Mexican group and complained they are experiencing a high volume of accidents due to illegal Mexicans driving without the proper license, insurance and registration and in many cases stolen cars and it was a big problem. I personally didn't implicate the entire illegal Mexican group the Police did! The Police also went on to add that crime and shoplifting was an even bigger problem since they can't track them even when they have finger prints, they just disappear into the American landscape. - Reply to this comment
- Poor mcdazz...
No thoughts of his own. Only childlike digs at every post he/she/it reads. It sounds like infantile nattering. - Reply to this comment
- tdweb:
I also forgot to mention the fact that ******** Cheney has been caught driving under the influence twice.
Of course, I don't believe that all Republicans drive while under the influence of alcohol. - Reply to this comment
- tbweb wrote:
"This is where you guys are very slick and Posters communicating with you need to be very careful because a lot of you play on words and even change them. I didn't use the word "hate", I used the word "angry" and there is a difference. The answer is "No", I would not have hated or been angry with my fellow Americans and here is why, natural born and legal Americans are part of the American environment and landscape, a part of the American package, illegal people who are not suppose to be in America and committing crimes and doing illegal things upset the apple cart and statistical odds of normal Americans running into problems like in my case."
Firstly, apologies for the misunderstanding in regards to the word "hated" - my intention was certainly not to misinterpret or misrepresent your words.
While I can understand why you are angry, I strongly disagree with being angry with an entire group of people simply because of the actions of one criminal moron.
While I strongly dislike the fact that illegals of ANY nationality living here, the actions of one does not in any way mean that they are all car thieves intent on crashing into Americans.
Quite frankly, I am angry at anyone who recklessly disregards our laws - and especially at those who drunk drive - and that includes GW Bush. - Reply to this comment
- Would you have hated all your fellow Americans if it had have been an American illegally driving a stolen car, with stolen tags, no insurance with no insurance?
Posted by mcdazz at 06:42 AM : Apr 22, 2007
--mcdazz
This is where you guys are very slick and Posters communicating with you need to be very careful because a lot of you play on words and even change them. I didn't use the word "hate", I used the word "angry" and there is a difference. The answer is "No", I would not have hated or been angry with my fellow Americans and here is why, natural born and legal Americans are part of the American environment and landscape, a part of the American package, illegal people who are not suppose to be in America and committing crimes and doing illegal things upset the apple cart and statistical odds of normal Americans running into problems like in my case. If you're in the U.S. illegally then everything thing you do is probably illegal in the context of false papers, false documents and even if the illegal works its still shakey because they had to lie to get the job, its just corrupt all the way around and there is no avoiding it. - Reply to this comment
- doessuckcok wrote:
"Most Liberal arguments sound as if their being made by a 6 yo girl but that one sticks out"
That's because we need to dumb our arguments down in the hope that dumb@ss Republicans like you have a chance of understanding them.
Looks like you're too much of a dumb@ss to even understand that. - Reply to this comment
- doessuckcok wrote:
"Well Golly McC@ck does it take a liberal genius to understand that there is a difference between people who are SUPPOSED to be here and those who are here Illegally? Most Liberal arguments sound as if their being made by a 6 yo girl but that one sticks out"
Hey there moron, have you joined the army yet, or are you just going to continue pretending being a veteran?
Here's something so simple that even a Republican crackhead like yourself can understand it.
A crime is a crime regardless of who committed it.
Can you understand that?
Whether it was committed by an illegal immigrant or an American citizen, it's still a crime and should be punished as such.
Is that something you can comprehend in that little tiny piece of cr@p that you call a brain? - Reply to this comment
- tbweb wrote:
"...Then one day I was driving and an illegal Mexican smashed into my new car, he was not paying attention. He was driving a stolen car with stolen tags and had no drivers licence or car insurance. After my deductable it cost me $1300.00 out of pocket to get my car fixed the way I wanted it fixed. Counting the down time, lost of $1300.00 and the fact that this dude didn't seem to care or speak English made me very angry. The Police Officer who wrote the accident report said this is happening all the time, there are too many illegals driving illegally!"
Would you have hated all your fellow Americans if it had have been an American illegally driving a stolen car, with stolen tags, no insurance with no insurance? - Reply to this comment
- drivelphobe wrote:
"Our troops need to adopt the tactics of our enemy, only with more force and volume until every last jihadist is pushing daisies. A few beheadings in the public square and maybe a few stonings are definitely in order. When you are fighting enemy like the filthy Islamist pigs, you need to think like an exterminator and take out the whole population. Remember, these animals are not human and they cannot be entitled to any rights of the human race. Go Bush and please remove any restrictions on our troops that impair their ability to do the job of exterminating the enemy. Shoot first and ask questions later. Let's get the show on the road."
I'm sorry, but did you say something even remotely worthy, Adolf? - Reply to this comment
- Related:
"The most powerful indictment of the news media for falling down in its duties in the run-up to the war in Iraq will appear next Wednesday, a 90-minute PBS broadcast called "Buying the War," which marks the return of "Bill Moyers Journal." E&P was sent a preview DVD and a draft transcript for the program this week."
"While much of the evidence of the media's role as cheerleaders for the war presented here is not new, it is skillfully assembled, with many fresh quotes from interviews (with the likes of Tim Russert and Walter Pincus) along with numerous embarrassing examples of past statements by journalists and pundits that proved grossly misleading or wrong. Several prominent media figures, prodded by Moyers, admit the media failed miserably, though few take personal responsibility." - Reply to this comment
- Our troops need to adopt the tactics of our enemy, only with more force and volume until every last jihadist is pushing daisies. A few beheadings in the public square and maybe a few stonings are definitely in order. When you are fighting enemy like the filthy Islamist pigs, you need to think like an exterminator and take out the whole population. Remember, these animals are not human and they cannot be entitled to any rights of the human race. Go Bush and please remove any restrictions on our troops that impair their ability to do the job of exterminating the enemy. Shoot first and ask questions later. Let's get the show on the road.
- Reply to this comment
- 3 more dead U.S. soldiers today in Iraq, and 1 more Polish soldier killed. Dead for ignorance, deception, and greed.
Four more lives sacrificed to our puppet-Fuhrer (heil), and that doesn't even begin to take into account the ongoing misery of the Iraqi people.
www.nbc5.com/news/12743034/detail.html?rss=chi&psp=nationalnews - Reply to this comment
- --feelfree1
The subject wasn't changed, the point being made was you need to have a personal experience to understand some of the issues and I provided an example, too bad you didn't get it! Maybe if your parents or loved ones were killed in the destruction of the World Trade Center some reality would smack you in the face. I quite frankly don't even believe you live in the U.S. or are even an American to be blunt. - Reply to this comment
- We can't help but notice that when the Bush dead-enders run out of inane and impotent arguments, they typically try to change the subject to something completely unrelated.
In most instances, the 2 main sources for the bulk of our world's most serious problems, according to them, originate either in Bill Clinton's pants, or in Mexico. - Reply to this comment
- --feelfree1
You won't understand how some of us feel until these issues touch your life in a personal way. Things are different when you have a personal experience. I remember not caring about illegals in the U.S., I remember feeling sorry for them and hoping they find a home in the U.S. and even wrote positively about illegals in my college assignments, its true. Then one day I was driving and an illegal Mexican smashed into my new car, he was not paying attention. He was driving a stolen car with stolen tags and had no drivers licence or car insurance. After my deductable it cost me $1300.00 out of pocket to get my car fixed the way I wanted it fixed. Counting the down time, lost of $1300.00 and the fact that this dude didn't seem to care or speak English made me very angry. The Police Officer who wrote the accident report said this is happening all the time, there are too many illegals driving illegally! My attitude towards illegals changed because of a personal experience, all of a sudden I wasn't so sympathetic and understaning anymore. It was hard to stay the same, I think personal experiences might change your mind about a lot of these issues too! Just be ready, you may be shocked to find your views changing. - Reply to this comment

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."




