IAEA: Iran Enriching Uranium Gas
Atomic Energy Agency Warns Of Swift Advance Of Nation's Nuclear Program
-
Photo
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, speaks during in a ceremony to mark Army Day in Tehran, Iran, Wednesday April, 18, 2007. Ahmadinejad on Wednesday said Iran's military is self-sufficient despite sanctions on the country amid increasing pressures by the U.N Security Council on the country over its disputed nuclear program. (AP)
-
Timeline
Iran Nuclear Chronology
Events in development of Iran's nuclear program since it first came to light.
The confidential document — a letter to Iranian officials from a senior IAEA staff member — also protests an Iranian decision to prevent agency inspectors to visit the country's heavy water facility that, when built, will produce plutonium. Enriched uranium and plutonium can both be used for the fissile core of nuclear warheads.
Last week, Iran said it had begun operating 3,000 centrifuges at its Natanz facility, nearly 10 times the previously known number. The United States, Britain, France and others criticized the announcement, but experts, and several world powers, expressed skepticism that Iran's claims were true and diplomats in Vienna familiar with the state of the program told the AP they were greatly exaggerated.
Still, the one-page letter reflected a swift advance in the program. A little more than two weeks ago, those diplomats had said Tehran was running only a little more than 600 centrifuges, and had not introduced any uranium gas into them.
The letter, signed by IAEA Deputy Director General Olli Heinonen and dated April 18 said the agency wanted to "take note of the information provided by Iran ... that Iran has put into operation" 1,312 centrifuges, the machines used to spin the gas into enriched uranium.
The letter also cited Iranian information to the agency that "some UF6 is being fed" into the centrifuges, referring to the uranium gas that can be enriched to levels potent enough to be used for nuclear arms.
Iran says it wants to enrich only to lower levels suitable to generate nuclear power. But suspicions about its ultimate intentions, after nearly two decades of nuclear secrecy exposed only four years ago, have led to U.N. Security Council sanctions for its refusal to freeze its enrichment program.
"Regardless of whether the timetable is one year or five, Iran is proceeding to enrich uranium to industrial grade in defiance of U.N. sanctions," said CBS News foreign affairs analyst Pamela Falk, "buying time with each six-month period that the Security Council sanctions allow."
"There is a sense at the U.N., among the permanent members of the Security Council, that something else needs to be done alongside the sanctions to convince Iran to get back to compliance," adds Falk.
It was unclear what the purpose of the uranium gas feed was. A diplomat accredited to the IAEA, who demanded anonymity because he was disclosing confidential information, said the operation appeared to be part of "stress tests" meant see if the machines were running smoothly.
But he and another diplomat said that, even if the operation was not meant to enrich large amounts of uranium, it appeared to be the last step before larger-scale enrichment begins.
Tehran's heavy water enrichment facilities at Arak also are under suspicion, because the plant, once constructed, will produce plutonium, which can also be used in an arms program. Iran argues it needs the plant for medical research, despite a Security Council demand that it also freeze construction at Arak.
When it is completed within the next decade, Arak will produce enough plutonium for two bombs a year.
Iran last month announced it was unilaterally abrogating part of its Safeguards Agreements linked with the IAEA under which Tehran is obligated to report to the agency six months before it introduces nuclear material of any kind into any facility. In his letter, Heinonen suggested that Iran invoked this move in denying his inspectors the right to visit the Arak facility, but argued it was illegal, because such agreements "cannot be modified unilaterally."
Beyond that, Heinonen said, IAEA inspectors should be allowed to visit Arak because the section abrogated by Iran had to do with early provision of design information of new nuclear facilities and "not to the frequency or timing of" agency inspections to verify information on design already provided by Iran.
Ali Ashgar Soltanieh, the chief Iranian delegate to the IAEA, did not specifically answer those concerns but asserted at a public lecture at the University of Vienna that his country had "no obligation to inform the IAEA" beyond the point that it was prepared to do so.
He said Iran cannot except Security Council demands that it suspend enrichment because they represent a "humiliation of the nation." But he said the Islamic republic was ready to negotiate on international concerns about its nuclear ambitions as long as the precondition of an enrichment freeze was dropped.
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



- 1
- 2
- next
See all 54 CommentsWant to bet the "Manifest" will further the Neo-Cons (FASCISTS) goals?
The "Mainfesto" will be something to further their goal towards Invading Iran or making The US a Police State.
DON'T TRUST THE CORPORATE PROPAGANDA "NEWS"!!!!
I don't like Bush either but he isn't trying to ruin the country. I'm sure in his mind he thinks he is doing good for the country.
And now you say the Liberal press is trying to further the goals of the Conservative president? Yeah ok conspiracy theorist. It amazes me that you could actually believe what you are saying.
I would much rather put my security in the hands of Bush than in the hands of a conspiracy nut like you, who has far fetched ideas about Bush's lies, more importantly, your belief that Iran is a peaceful regime. You can't even type, I'm sure the closest thing to a book you've read in a while is "High Times".
Didntinhale, spark another one up and calm down.
Posted by didntinhale at 05:30 PM : Apr 18, 2007
This is called "willful ignorance".
It really has no place in modern news discussions.
Do you ever try debating the Issues? Ever??
Here comes some more b*u*l*l*sh*i*t Government Propaganda from NBC saying the Virginia Tech shooter had a "Mainfesto".
Want to bet the "Manifest" will further the Neo-Cons (FASCISTS) goals?
The "Mainfesto" will be something to further their goal towards Invading Iran or making The US a Police State.
DON'T TRUST THE CORPORATE PROPAGANDA "NEWS"!!!!
YOUR GOVERNMENT IS RUN BY THE ELITE. YOUR NEWS IS RUN BY THE ELITE.
EVERYTHING YOU ARE TOLD BY THE FASCIST CORPORATE MEDIA HAS AN AGENDA. EVERYTHING.
THE AGENDA IS IRAN.
YOUR GOVERNMENT IS RUN BY THE ELITE. YOUR NEWS IS RUN BY THE ELITE.
EVERYTHING YOU ARE TOLD BY THE FASCIST CORPORATE MEDIA HAS AN AGENDA. EVERYTHING.
THE AGENDA IS IRAN.
Posted by fascistusa at 08:47 PM : Apr 18, 2007
--fascistusa
The News Media's slogan no matter who runs it is not "Death To American" like Irans, explain that away!
Is that REALLY what Iran's media says?
Death to the strongest nuclear power Country that cound wipe them off the face of the earth??
Let me see... who keeps telling YOU that Iran's Media says that?? Huh??
Is that REALLY what Iran's media says?
Death to the strongest nuclear power Country that cound wipe them off the face of the earth??
Let me see... who keeps telling YOU that Iran's Media says that?? Huh??
I'm serious about taking the emotion and heated rhetoric out and dealing with only the facts. The Iranian Media really has nothing to do with Irans Official Slogan which really is "Death to America". It is what it is! That Slogan all by itself says it all! What serious nation would even have such a Slogan? That's a very hateful Slogan!
They do not understand reason, so we must speak their language...a tortuous death to every Iranian official.
Allah has told me to make sure this message gets out...and action is taken.
The address of the Iranian Mission to the UN is:
M. Javad Zarif, Ambassador and Permenant Representative
40th Street and 3rd Avenue
Posted by j-whitman
and you shouldnt be walking free
or allowed to spew this kind of trash in front of kids
lucky you, eh? You can be a biggot. This is America. Take pride, eh?
YOU NEWS LIES TO YOU.
YOUR GOVERNMENT LIES TO YOU.
NO. IRAN DOES NOT HAVE DEATH TO AMERICA ALL OVER ITS NEWS.
But let's keep all emotion out of it. Just be Another Brick In The Wall.
you need to stop doing drugs before posting on news issues dude
its pretty obvious that you have no idea what is going on
AFETAT
Who are you talking too ?? It was the 1st & only time in history a state was created for displaced people.... How about a state for our American indians ?? -- They should have been returned to the countries they originated in, don't you think ??? --- I'm no bigot, far from it..... You just come on here & spew your own ignorance & call others un-American.
AFETAT
Are you ready to fire Bush yet ???
At Least 183 Dead In Baghdad Bombings
8 Coast Gurard Cutters "Deep Water Project" are being scrapped.
Our troops are still under equipped, training has been stopped they need.
The problem is our 'Decider' who consistantly makes bad, deadly decisions & issues tried & failed policies.
Posted by huanaco at 10:52 PM : Apr 18, 2007
--huanaco
The U.S. did exactly everything you said except leave Iraq! The U.S. got rid of Saddam and didn't find any weapons of mass destruction, end of mission, go home! Let Iraq rebuild itself or kill each other with their stupid religious violence, the U.S. job was done and the mission was over as stated. But then the U.S. had mission creep, nation building, which was not in the original plan! I have no idea why the U.S. decided to stay in Iraq! If the Iraqis want to blow each other up, that's their business! I would have said bye bye, have fun!
Unfortunatly we will be in Iraq for decades yet, they can't even maintain security in thier part of the Green Zone ----- BLAME THE 'DECIDER' --- The only ones who think Iraq is going great are the neo-cons who don't want to be called the "Party of Surrender" & Singinrick.
I gotta keep asking,, Why doesn't Bush mention the UAE ????? Or why is he supporting Sunni militants ?????
9/11 attack was by Sunni's,,, Most from the UAE
It's all about Iraq -- For your info
It's not about Virginia Tech,, You pray for them they where all qualified for military duty.
I gotta keep asking,, Why doesn't Bush mention the UAE ????? Or why is he supporting Sunni militants ?????
9/11 attack was by Sunni's,,, Most from the UAE
Posted by j-whitman at 11:27 PM : Apr 18, 2007
--j-whitman
President Bush is the ultimate decider but he does have some smart advice from various sources including his dad, not just in his administration. The U.S. collective intellengence must think this is the best path, anyway I hope that's the case because if its not, God help us all.
Then remember back a few years,, Bush was totally ignoring the IAEA..... You can seriously doubt anything coming fromn the White House on the subject.
Then remember back a few years,, Bush was totally ignoring the IAEA..... You can seriously doubt anything coming fromn the White House on the subject.
Posted by j-whitman at 11:39 PM : Apr 18, 2007
--j-whitman
In sticking with only the facts, quoting intelligence sources from anywhere in the world seems shakey at best! Every intelligence source thought incorrectly Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and it didn't! Intelligence sources need to prove themselves again and until then talk to the hand, the face ain't listening!
Posted by j-whitman at 11:46 PM : Apr 18, 2007
--j-whitman
The simple fact is Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is scary by any stretch of the imagination and he seems to enjoy scaring the hell out of everybody! He really is nothing more than a common thug and bully and there is nothing diplomatic about him so why does everyone think being diplomatic will work, he fakes diplomacy and acts likes he's going along for the sole purpose of buying time for his nightmare agenda! Iran is living proof why there should be a separation between Church and State. Religious rule "only" is extremely dangerous!
You are aware that we have no law that allows Bush to violate them as he choses with his signing statments ??? --- That's a violation of our Constitution & the Presidential Oath of Office.
Much damage has been done to our country & National Security.
Posted by singinrick at 12:14 AM : Apr 19, 2007
,,,same here!
Night folks....
They have ignored, downgraded, violated, all aspects of the NPT - claiming "rights" which they forbid others. Like nukes in space, to mention the most obvious.
By refusing to adhere to long standing international agreements on the development of nuclear technology, American has opened the door for other nations to do exactly the same. Only chaos can result from this dangerous and mistaken policy.
Posted by neoconRcrazy at 03:14 AM : Apr 19, 2007
You are right 'neoconRcrazy'
The Bush administration had recently "canceled" their latest nuclear proliferation project which was to create bunker-busting smart bombs that has the ability to carry small nuclear warheads.
Nevertheless, those plans, when introduced in 2002, were widely known to the world and drew widespread condemnation. That also prompted Russia to rapidly advance their nuclear arsenal as well. Russia, about a year ago, successfully launched a newly improved sub-launched ICBM called the 'Bolava'. The Bolava is designed to evade any kind of anti-balistic missile system ever developed (including the current POS system the U.S. has in "operation").
Needless to say, countries like Iran, Russia, China and perhaps others, will all feel that the biggest threat to world peace is actually the country that currently has the largest nuclear arsenal in the world, and has a dumbsh*t president more than willing to use it. This is known as first strike which Bush proudly announced just about two years ago.
It's no wonder other countries want to make sure they have a formiddable response incase of invasion!
As for remembering the peace lover and peace spreading Israel. Without them and their nukes our world will not see the PEACE again.
Pitiable simple minded people.
"DO you speak arabic? Do you?
Is that REALLY what Iran's media says?
Death to the strongest nuclear power Country that cound wipe them off the face of the earth??
Let me see... who keeps telling YOU that Iran's Media says that?? Huh??"
What did you learn in school? Iranian speak Farsi they are Persian not Arab they don't speak Arabic!!!!!!
Sorry dude, wrong again. He said "the zionist regime must be pushed into the sea".
Farsi is a difficult but rich language, but does not contain all our expressions. "Wipe off the map" is one of them.
But it does make for the sought-after impression, and there are enough fools out there to repeat it day after day. Try a little research before "singin'"....
Just reading the posts these vipers and rumormongoring idiots make is ample proof of that fact.
One would think that if any of this claptrap were true, that congress would appoint a special prosecutor to investigate and prosecute the President. Its never happened. All the gossip in the world will not change that fact.
Sure enought though, soon as they read this, the idiot parade will charge again.
Ok halfwits, post more of your lies, go for it boyz.
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 54 Comments