February 11, 2009 5:01 PM

Signs Were There, Was Security In Place?

(CBS/AP)  Almost as soon as the shooting stopped at Virginia Tech, the questions began. How could such a tragic crime have happened in a place where parents believed their children were safe?

Former professor of criminology Adam Thermos has made campus security his business — and his passion — for almost 20 years. He said it's difficult to judge the Virginia Tech administration until the investigation is completed.

"The reality is, a lot of the universities today are going to be looking into their mission statement and whether or not they can really fulfill this mission of providing a safe environment for their students," Thermos, who founded the campus security consulting group Strategic Technology Group, told The Early Show co-anchor Russ Mitchell.

Details on the life of 23-year-old Cho Seung-Hui, the student responsible for the deadliest shooting rampage in modern U.S. history, are slowly emerging, as well as indications that there were warning signs of what was to come.

Photos: Virginia Tech Mourns
Cho, a senior majoring in English, arrived in the U.S. as boy from South Korea in 1992 and was raised in suburban Washington, D.C., officials said. He was living on campus in a different dorm from the one where Monday's bloodbath began.

Police and university officials offered no clues as to exactly what set him off.

"He was a loner, and we're having difficulty finding information about him," school spokesman Larry Hincker said.

But Katherine Newman, a professor of sociology at Princeton University, said most school shooters are rarely loners, but rather failed joiners.

Photos: Virginia Tech Tragedy
"People who continuously try to join social groups and are rebuffed," said Newman, the author of "Rampage: The Social Roots of School Shootings." "And their daily experience is one of rejection and friction."

Professor Carolyn Rude, chairwoman of the university's English department, said she did not personally know the gunman. But she said she spoke with Lucinda Roy, the department's director of creative writing, who had Cho in one of her classes and described him as "troubled."

"There was some concern about him," Rude said. "Sometimes, in creative writing, people reveal things and you never know if it's creative or if they're describing things, if they're imagining things or just how real it might be. But we're all alert to not ignore things like this."

She said Cho was referred to the counseling service, but she said she did not know when, or what the outcome was. Rude refused to release any of his writings or his grades, citing privacy laws.

The Chicago Tribune reported on its Web site that he left a note in his dorm room that included a rambling list of grievances. Citing unidentified sources, the Tribune said he had recently shown troubling signs, including setting a fire in a dorm room and stalking some women.

ABC, citing law enforcement sources, reported that the note, which is several pages long, explains Cho's actions and says, "You caused me to do this."

Click here for an interactive gallery of the victims.

"Some of the other shooters I studied also wrote murderous essays, which they turned in to teachers, which shocked them," Newman said. "Virginia Tech was far more proactive than most schools I've studied. The other similarity I find eerie is he's the younger brother of a successful older sister — graduated from Princeton. One of the other cases I studied was very much like this. A younger brother who wasn't as successful as his valedictorian sister. In a high-achieving society, that can be difficult burden."

Newman said that most school shooters give warning signs, sometimes as much as nine months in advance. She thinks Cho was giving off those signals because many students at Virginia Tech were not shocked about who the shooter turned out to be. Nonetheless, Newman said it is difficult to discern the difference between someone who is depressed and someone who is going to snap and do something awful.

"All of us know many people who suffer from depression," she said. "Very few of them are going to become killers. So I think it's difficult to identify them in advance. It's much more likely that we can stop these events by listening to the warning signals that they send off and being alert to them. I think that's actually what Virginia Tech did do but a dedicated killer is difficult to stop."

Investigators believe Cho at some point had been taking medication for depression, the Tribune reported.

Classmates said that on the first day of an introduction to British literature class last year, the 30 or so English students went around and introduced themselves. When it was Cho's turn, he didn't speak.



© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 23 Comments
by booyaw_77 April 19, 2007 8:34 AM EDT
To even speculate on a "we shoulda known" type thing is lunacy. Nobody could have known that ANYBODY at the university level would have done this. Nobody. Nobody could have speculated on it. Nobody could have done anything different. This is not a movie where you get to write the script. This is real life. And real life is different. Even from 20/20 hindsight.

Nobody could have known what this guy was gonna do.
Reply to this comment
by booyaw_77 April 19, 2007 8:30 AM EDT
Dear ********** and Bigcanoe,

Don't forget about that all time big daddy of them all: The Disabilities Act.
Reply to this comment
by toolmangler-2009 April 19, 2007 1:03 AM EDT
Homeland Security will 'morph' into a Big Brother type outfit. Everybody will be required to have RFIDs implanted and each child that is born will be implanted in the hospital and may well be the first to receive RFID implants, ostensibly to protect them from being stolen from the hospitals. To protect society from V Tech type killers everybody will have to undergo phsych evaluation. You will be watched from birth til death with any variation dealt with or punished. Gene-splicing will assure all abnormal variants to be eliminated from the gene-pool. We will become a clones of the chosen examples of well behaved people. If you don't think I am right, do some reading (George Orwell, (Isaiah, Daniel Revelation from the Christian Bible), Wag The Dog, and many other books (prophetic and Deductive Reasoning). The Stage is set and the curtain is moving, open your eyes people the wolf is at the door. OOOppss wait a minute some one is at the do...
Reply to this comment
by zipperhead60 April 19, 2007 12:22 AM EDT
Bigcanoe

Did you know that the "Privacy Law" for medical conditions you mentioned, is just 10 years old now. Revamped from a previous law protecting patient rights? Well again, that law, like thousands of other laws throughout history have been "brought up to times". Modernized. Revised. And all I'm suggesting is not changing constitual history here. I'm tossing out the idea that politicians (with this latest in a long line of senseless school shootings) should take a long hard look at bring this "Privacy Law" for outlaws as you say, into the modern times. Sure it won't be a perfect world if one law is updated for society, but what else do you do, issue everyone in the USA a gun ....and scream out - Happy hunting, boys!!!
I'd like to think our politicians can do something to stem this stream of senseless crimes in schools.
Reply to this comment
by sasi1-2009 April 19, 2007 12:18 AM EDT
Cho Seung-hui needed help, and never received any. This is something that needs to be investigated.

There is no such thing as total safety. No law can guarantee anyone protection from someone determined to kill them. The only change in law that might help would be to allow schools and/or businesses to require psychiatric treatment for students/workers deemed to be acting in a bizarre manner. Society is largely to blame for the mess we find our country in today. Too many parents are having children they don't want & do not take care of. Too many children are being abused either physically, mentally or sexually. Too many parents are drug addicts & have no knowledge of how to be parents. The ridiculous 'war on drugs' has cost billions, and done nothing. I feel the druggies are people who cannot face responsibility, respectability, criticism, or life in general. What does this say to their children? Worst of all are the schools and teachers who push drugs such as ritalin so they won't have to deal with any form of conflict. Too many schools today are encouraging kids to quit school (again to avoid conflict). All drugs being dispensed to children today need to be thoroughly scrutinized. Wonder if Cho was on medication?
Reply to this comment
by bigcanoe2 April 18, 2007 11:56 PM EDT
**********

Quote: "Sorry, but privacy laws to the generaly public .... sure I agree with. Privacy laws that protect people like this gunman? You don't have my sympathy."

Either you agree with the privacy laws as you catagorically say that you do, or you don't agree with them. But the law protects everyone, even people like this gunman.

I am simply pointing out here that another law, called the "Law of Unintended Consequences," often comes into the picture when any new law is passed.

And I am pointing out that laws are not going to solve the problem of mad men killing others. The law just can NOT accomplish that because by definition, outlaws do not obey the law. This guy started out an outlaw and he died an outlaw. Laws do NOT stop outlaws.
Reply to this comment
by zipperhead60 April 18, 2007 11:51 PM EDT
My point being, laws get changed all the time. Revamped, revised, updated. Times change and laws need to change with them. My point exactly is Privacy laws NEED to be revamped, revised, updated; not for medical conditions or penny annie crimes but for things like happened at V Tech. Columbine, Pennsylvania and others. Columbine was 8 years ago!!! ands its still so easy to obtain a gun, or 2.
Just taking one problem here at a time Bigcanoe2 ... wink ... we can work on all the other one's you mentioned after we fix this one. Priorities , ya know?
: )
Reply to this comment
by zipperhead60 April 18, 2007 11:37 PM EDT
So Bigcanoe2 why don't you tell the 33 families that changing a "privacy law" for the criminally insane, just won't do. It would just be one more itty bitty law, we all would have to "live" with.

Sorry, but privacy laws to the generaly public .... sure I agree with. Privacy laws that protect people like this gunman? You don't have my sympathy.

Reply to this comment
by bigcanoe2 April 18, 2007 11:12 PM EDT
Dear **********

Have you heard about Federal PRIVACY LAWS? Have you heard that sensitive medical information like mental status is protected by Federal Law? Did you know it would have been a Federal Crime for the gun dealer to know that? Did you know he is forbiden by law from knowing that? If not, WHY don't you know these things? You can't go to the doctors office and look at anyones medical records unless they are YOURS and ONLY yours. If you do, you have commited a crime.

So that little item is why he was able to buy guns with his record. Oh, and a little didja know, these news people reporting this medical information are all comitting crimes because they too are prohibited from doing that. So much for laws huh? But maybe if we outlaw guns they will obey that law? Yep. Just one more law is all we need. We are one law short of fixing the problem once and for all times.

Hey!! While you are at it, will you also outlaw drunk driving please? Drunks kill a lot of good people every year. But it's not their fault, it's the booze. Maybe we should outlaw booze? Opps. I think we tried that already and it didn't work either.
Reply to this comment
by zipperhead60 April 18, 2007 11:01 PM EDT
Enraged in Virginia!!
So how the **** is it, that someone who had a known previous episode with 2 female co-eds, was either voluntarily or involuntarily (depending on police statements) committed to a psychiatric center for assesment. Deemed suicidal by a friend. The subject of a professors scrutiny because of bizarre papers written in her classes causing her to be deeply worried by his behaviour at VTech.
How is it, someone with 5 past experiences in the last year and a half, can be permitted to buy 2 handguns!!!
Does the gun lobby have than hands THAT DEEP in the pockets of government; that stricter guide lines for purchasing a gun can be that F'ing easy
!!!!!
33 dead
33 innocent youth
33 families destroyed
Wake up Virginia government, be agressive, learn from this, if nothing else, draft new gun laws. Firm, concrete, sound gun laws. Don't let these young people's life's be for naught.
Reply to this comment
See all 23 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook