NEW YORK, April 15, 2007

Verhoeven Re-Examines Dutch Resistance

Director's New Film "Black Book" Is A Revisionist Account Of World War II In Holland

    • Carice van Houten and Michiel Huisman star in

      Carice van Houten and Michiel Huisman star in "Black Book," Paul Verhoeven's revisionist take on the Dutch Resistence during World War II.  (Sony Pictures Classics)

    • Director Paul Verhoeven attends an evening honoring his latest film,

      Director Paul Verhoeven attends an evening honoring his latest film, "Black Book," at the Film Society of Lincoln Center in New York, February 27, 2007.  (GETTY IMAGES/Peter Kramer)

    Previous slide Next slide
(CBS)  Sunday Morning movie critic David Edelstein says Paul Verhoeven's new movie takes an unusual look at the storied Dutch resistance during World War II.


With some directors, when the lights go down on one of their movies, I'm laughing in anticipation; I know even if it's terrible, it'll be something to see.

Take Paul Verhoeven: only a director with blood in his veins could make a film so flamboyantly, entertainingly god-awful as "Showgirls." Verhoeven is taken very seriously in some circles; I have colleagues who think "Showgirls" is an ironic masterpiece and his outer-space giant-bug war epic "Starship Troopers" a devastating satire. But I don't need to hide behind irony to rave about his new cloak-and-dagger thriller, "Black Book."

A little context: Verhoeven is 68 and grew up in Holland, where he made a splash with "Soldier of Orange." That's relevant to "Black Book" because that film also takes a distinctly anti-romantic view of his countrymen during the Second World War. After his juicy black-widow thriller "The Fourth Man," Verhoeven conquered Hollywood with the amazingly brutal "Robocop." Then came the ultimate black-widow film, the swank noir "Basic Instinct."

You might have gathered Verhoeven has a dark view of human nature. He once said, "The sooner we admit our capacity for evil, the less apt we are to destroy each other" — which is odd because his characters admit their capacity for evil and destroy each other like crazy.

"Black Book" is set in his native Holland under Nazi occupation and centers on a Jewish woman, played by the overpoweringly gorgeous Carice van Houten. After her family is betrayed to the Nazis, she ends up working for the Resistance. She dyes her hair blonde, goes undercover at Gestapo headquarters and seduces the head man, Muntze, played by Sebastian Koch. Most of Verhoeven's movies show women getting ahead by using their feminine wiles and hot bods, which here seems less sexist than bitterly realistic.

Filmmakers tend to drop to their knees whenever Nazis and Jews show up in the same movie, but Verhoeven's not paralyzed with solemnity. "Black Book" is lush, sexy, and shockingly revisionist. The Dutch who risk their lives to hide Jews are anti-Semites; Resistance fighters make secret deals with Germans. Verhoeven's countrymen are, understandably, angry, but I think his ambivalence makes the characters more human.

It's too bad in the last 20 minutes the director's trademark cynicism swamps "Black Book" to the point of absurdity — crosses, double-crosses, humanity at its most vile. Yet you still can't take your eyes off the thing. It's Verhoeven at peak form: a great piece of old-fashioned, linear storytelling, with killer curves.

© MMVII, CBS Interactive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
  • CBSNews.com on Digg
Add a Comment
by toldyouso21 April 15, 2007 10:36 PM EDT
This is sad and only shows that "shock jocks" are not confined to the radio or tv shows. Shock the public, give it a twist--make some money--be KNOWN. Pathetic on such a serious subject. My father in law was in the Dutch resistance as was his wife. Until the day he died, he suffered nightmares about not only what happened to him when the Gestapo finally caught him, but what happened to others. One of the things the Nazis did was each day have the members form a huddled circle and then the head of the jailers went through picking one man to be executed in front of all the others. They never knew the criteria, and each man did not know when "their turn" would come. Once a man volunteered, he was sooo tired and stressed by the game (that could last several hours as the jailer debated the merits of killing a person) that he just came forward. He was shot on the spot--but not killed, he had to lie there with shattered knees as another man was chosen to die. After that, he was dragged into the courtyard to continue the process--but later, he succumbed to gangrene.
Reply to this comment

Exclusive Webshow

Does dad need a nursing home? Dr. LaPook talks with a geriatrician about navigating a difficult decision.
Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
  • Family Ties Family Ties

    Meet Three Adoptees from Samoa and the Families on Opposite Ends of the World who Love Them

  • Nobel Peace Prize Concert Nobel Peace Prize Concert

    Artists from Around the World Rock Out in Oslo to Honor This Year's Laureate, President Obama

  • Diane Saywer Diane Saywer

    The Former "60 Minutes" Correspondent and "GMA" Co-Host is Now in the ABC News Anchor Chair

  • "Avatar" Gets Blue-Carpet Debut

    Long-Awaited Animation Film Gets Premiere in London

  • Day in Pictures Day in Pictures

    A Glimpse at the Day's News as Seen Through a Camera Lens

  • Holly Sampson Undercover Holly Sampson Undercover

    Woman Who Claimed Sexual Affair with Tiger Woods is Paid Escort, Says Madam, Ads

Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: