NEW YORK. April, 14, 2007

Global Warming Protests Held Across U.S.

More Than 1,300 Events Urged Congress To Require 80 Percent Cut In Emissions By 2050

  • Participants with the

    Participants with the "Sea of People" project march down the street in Lower Manhattan during the Step It Up 2007 rally, Saturday, April 14, 2007 in New York.  (AP Photo/Dima Gavrysh)

  • Photo Essay A Warming Effect

    A behind-the-scenes look at the 60 Minutes team's trip to Patagonia, Chile and Antarctica.

  • Interactive Global Warming

    The greenhouse effect, a look at the Kyoto Protocol and a history of the Earth's climate.

(AP)  Americans worried about climate change gathered Saturday on ski slopes and in cities for a nationwide day of demonstrations aimed at drawing attention to global warming.

More than 1,300 events were organized in every state under the banner Step It Up 2007 to push Congress to require an 80 percent cut in carbon dioxide emissions by 2050.

“When it comes to global warming, I don't exactly think President Bush is doing such a hot job,” said 12-year-old New Yorker Tiffany Cordero. “A lot of people are thinking just of now. But we won't have a 'now' if we don't focus on the future.”

Tiffany delivered a speech for a rally in lower Manhattan's Battery Park, overlooking New York Harbor, where people dressed in blue — some equipped with scuba gear and beach balls — gathered to form a Sea of People human line to symbolically mark New York's future coastline.

Scientists say melting polar ice caps and glaciers will cause ocean levels to rise, although estimates vary. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has projected that ocean levels will rise 7 to 23 inches this century, but other scientists warn the sea level could rise 10 feet or more, enough to flood Lower Manhattan and other low-lying coastal areas.

The threatened rise in the ocean also was dramatized by a New Coast Parade in Portland, Maine, one of more than 30 observances in that state. “The most important things that we have a responsibility to do in government are to prepare our children for a bright future and to preserve and protect our natural resources,” Maine Gov. John Baldacci told a gathering in Portland.

The nationwide events were spearheaded by a group of recent graduates from Vermont's Middlebury College, who organized a campaign of blogs, e-mail messages and word of mouth communications.

“We see this to be the most pressing issue of our time, and our generation,” said Will Bates, 23, one of six former Middlebury students who helped organize the event with author Bill McKibben, a scholar in residence at the college and among the first to write about global warming, in his 1989 book “The End of Nature.”

In Chicago's Daley Plaza, about 500 people listened to speeches from a panel of environmental experts who called for a reduction in carbon dioxide emissions. The crowd also waved signs exclaiming “Step it up Congress.”

In California, 200 hikers made a strenuous, hour-long climb up a steep canyon to a point just below the famous Hollywood sign.

“It takes real passion to make a big difference — strength in numbers,” said Kara Thurman of Santa Monica.

Earlier, hundreds gathered along Santa Monica's Third Street Promenade just east of the Pacific Ocean to listen to lectures and listen to makers of “green” products pitch their wares.

“We have such a wonderful planet and it is really tragic for us to ruin it with global warming,” said organizer Jim Stewart of Earth Day L.A. “The bottom line is everybody needs to be carbon-neutral.”

In one of the day's first demonstrations, skiers unfurled a protest banner in April snow on Whiteface Mountain near Wilmington, N.Y. Another group made an early morning hike to the summit of Maine's Cadillac Mountain, which is the first spot in the U.S. to be lit by the rising sun.

The Whiteface Mountain skiers fear long-term temperature increases promise trouble for native plants, wildlife and people in the Adirondack Mountains of northern New York state.

“It's subtle,” said Nola Royce, who has been going to the Adirondacks since 1971. For example, she said, the region's notorious, biting black flies are emerging earlier in the season.

Neil Woodworth, executive director of the Adirondack Mountain Club, said less obvious concerns about warming include pests moving northward. He mentioned tick-borne Lyme disease, now a problem farther south in Connecticut, New Jersey and southern New York, as well as the Sirex wood wasp, hemlock woolly adelgid and Asian longhorned beetle.

“All these tree eaters normally prefer more temperate climates than the Adirondacks,” Woodworth said. “And as the Adirondack climate gets warmer in the winters the below-freezing barrier that has held these pests at bay is going to be lost.”

© MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 74 Comments
by infidel_us April 16, 2007 6:19 PM EDT
I think I'll do some skiing this weekend up in some powdery global warming!
Reply to this comment
by erasmus6 April 16, 2007 5:18 PM EDT
that should read: Global warming is causing the weather to be ERRATIC and severe weather to be more frequent.
Reply to this comment
by erasmus6 April 16, 2007 5:15 PM EDT
janem4

Global warming is causing the weather to be ERRATIC and more frequent.

That noise you hear is me banging my head against the wall.
Reply to this comment
by ralan40 April 16, 2007 12:10 PM EDT
cutting down on CO2 emmissions alone will not do the trick. These "news media scientists" who think human influenced CO2 rediction is the answer would eat a salad with a stick of butter and think they're on a diet. Are we forgetting about methane? Another greenhouse gas that is 10 times stronger than CO2. This is released by decomposition of living matter. The warming oceans are filled with it and releasing it at a greater rate. What about the rest of the world? China will surpass the US in emmision of human released Greenhouse gasses. I say Human influenced because nature creates more greenhouse gasses than we can.
Reply to this comment
by jimfinster April 15, 2007 10:32 PM EDT
dlpracer:

Let's get right to the heart of this debate.

1) CO2 is a greenhouse gas. Fact.
2) CO2 levels have increased approx 40%. Fact.
3) Atmospheric temperatures have increased at the same time. Fact.
4) Increasing temperatures affect climate. Fact.

Now, how in the world can you spin such basic information? These are facts, not computer models. Facts independently verified by many different researchers in many different countries. Jeez, dude.



Reply to this comment
by jimfinster April 15, 2007 10:27 PM EDT
dlpracer:

The "Oregon Petition" is a joke. You really need to go back and look at what it says, and who actually signed it. There is an excellent summary in Wikipedia.
Reply to this comment
by rheola-2009 April 15, 2007 9:58 PM EDT
Ainttaken

You seem to be well on the ball there, but I can not afford a hit man.
Reply to this comment
by rheola-2009 April 15, 2007 8:34 PM EDT
Dipracer

The world has always had extreme weather events,of that there is no doubt, but never with the rapidity of now.
are you not being just a bit stupid with your comment of my perfect 75 degree day, yes I did in past state that I was enjoying such a day, but you know as well as do I that the weather has many vaguaries, and like you, I both enjoy or abhore them, depending on the event.

It is hard to exactly define an EXTREME weather event, however I do feel that the present storm passing throughj the U.S. could easily, and well be called just that.

Janem4

You can be as perdantic as you wish Climate change/Global warming, You, as I and all others know full well, those terms are used to describe the same situation.
Your other statement is just ridiculous, grow up.
Reply to this comment
by dlpracer April 15, 2007 8:13 PM EDT
rheola says:

That storm passing through the U.S. at present is exactly what the climatologists have pointed out repeatably, that would be, and is proving to be, so many times, on an increasing scale throughout the world.

-------------

...and it is people like you that are dangerous. Everytime there is anything short of a perfect 75 degree, light wind, cloudless day...you will blame it on GW. Pity the poor children of today's hysterics that will never be able to enjoy a thunderstorm, one of nature's great light shows, because they will have been brainwashed into thinking that the end is near...tsk, tsk.

How do you explain this storm in 1888...well before SUV's and Al Gore???

The Great Blizzard of 1888 (March 11 %u2013 March 14, 1888) was one of the most severe blizzards in United States recorded history, with snow drifts in excess of 50 feet. All across the eastern seaboard there were snow walls up to 50 inches high.

That is recorded HISTORY....with pictures if you care to look it up.

What's the explaination for that EXTREME weather event.....HUH???

Tornados are a way of life this time of year and have been for centuries. Let's recall the Super Outbreak of April 3, 1974 that killed 315, and injured 5000 people. Here is the tornado count by severity: F5 6, F4 23, F3 35, F2 30, F1 31, F0 23. All in one day.

By the way, that was during the media's global COOLING frenzy.

Try again.

Reply to this comment
by rheola-2009 April 15, 2007 7:52 PM EDT
WHen you see so many persons posting, that can not present an argument beyond attempting to denigrate Al Gore, it certainl shows the limits of their mentality, that being their complete failure to do any more than parrot what they, either have said over and over in the past, or simply have jumped on the Al Gore bandwagon, as their mental capacity makes it impossible for them to come up with some thinking of their own.

That storm passing through the U.S. at present is exactly what the climatologists have pointed out repeatably, that would be, and is proving to be, so many times, on an increasing scale throughout the world.

Thankfully, there are enough aware people to overide those who blindly refuse to remve their blinkers.
Reply to this comment
by nodoom April 15, 2007 6:24 PM EDT
How much CO2 is being emitted pulling off all these demonstrations?
This is just another of many politically motivated doomsday events. If it was not, many questions would be answered.
Like why is it when I fill my glass with ice and water, it never flows over? In fact as it warms it eventually becomes empty! Maybe the water evaporates faster as it becomes warmer? And as more water evaporates into the atmosphere it usually leads to more rain or might we say less drought? Now, where I live more rain means more growth. What does this vegetation thrive on? Rain and CO2? What does it emit, oxygen?
So if you really believe man is causing global warming, why don't you ask how many trees you need to plant instead of spewing out political CO2?
Incidentally, I believe just about everything is very complicated to algore.
Reply to this comment
by dlpracer April 15, 2007 6:20 PM EDT
Oh and one more cannard that the GW alarmist use consistantly when science gets in the way of their mis-information march....

...the OIL COMPANIES are paying them!!

That let's them off the hook so they don't have to answer the challenge to their hysteria.

Of course they conveniently leave the fact that most scientist are on the government nipple through grants and to say there is little to be alarmed about and institute reasonable environmental solutions and conservation, would be to cut one's throat.

Try again.
Reply to this comment
by iceman_196o April 15, 2007 6:07 PM EDT
Oh Poop
Reply to this comment
by dlpracer April 15, 2007 6:03 PM EDT
jimfinster says:

OK, I call you on your BS. Provide the citation for the 18,000 scientists that dispute global warming.

---------------

The Oregon Petition is the name commonly given to a petition opposed to the Kyoto protocol, organised by the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine (OISM) between 1999 and 2001, shortly before the United States was expected to ratify the protocol. Professor Frederick Seitz, the past President of the National Academy of Sciences, wrote a cover letter endorsing the petition.

The Oregon Petition was the third, and by the far the largest, of five prominent efforts intended to show that a "scientific consensus" does not exist on the subject of global warming. The total number of signatures received was said to be 19,700.

Try again.
Reply to this comment
by gochip April 15, 2007 5:53 PM EDT
You got it!
Check this out on Google.

The Great Global Warming Swindle.

Unless you do not want to be confused with the facts...



Reply to this comment
by gochip April 15, 2007 5:53 PM EDT
You got it!
Check this out on Google.

The Great Global Warming Swindle.

Unless you do not want to be confused with the facts...



Reply to this comment
by jimfinster April 15, 2007 5:52 PM EDT
gone fishing, it is a beautiful sunny day here in Oregon
Reply to this comment
by jimfinster April 15, 2007 5:47 PM EDT
dlpracer:

Also, atmospheric CO2 concentration has increased about 40% since the start of the Inudstrial Revolution. That is emperical data. THAT IS FACT.

Reply to this comment
by jimfinster April 15, 2007 5:38 PM EDT
dlpracer:

OK, I call you on your BS. Provide the citation for the 18,000 scientists that dispute global warming.

Reply to this comment
by jimfinster April 15, 2007 5:34 PM EDT
scottlsf:

Your argument reminds me of the con position on Iraq:

"It's going really well, but the media refused to report the good stuff. They just want to talk about all the people dying..."

Reply to this comment
See all 74 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie." Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: