February 11, 2009 5:02 PM

Rove Lawyer: E-Mail Deletion Unintentional

(CBS/AP)  Karl Rove's lawyer on Friday dismissed the notion that President Bush's chief political adviser intentionally deleted his own e-mails from a Republican-sponsored computer system.

The attorney said Rove believed the communications were being preserved in accordance with the law.

"His understanding starting very, very early in the administration was that those e-mails were being archived," Rove's attorney, Robert Luskin, said.

The issue arose because the White House and Republican National Committee have said they may have lost e-mails from Rove and other administration officials. Democrat-chaired congressional committees want those e-mails for their probe of the firings of eight federal prosecutors.

CBS News White House Correspondent Peter Maer says that Democrats are hinting at Watergate-like coverups, comparing the missing e-mails to the famous 18-minute gap in a Nixon White House tape.

Aides to President Bush improperly used Republican Party-sponsored e-mail accounts for official business, the administration acknowledges, and lost an undetermined number of e-mails in the process.

The "mistake," as the White House is calling it, was discovered inadvertently through Congress' ongoing probe of the administration's dismissal of the U.S. attorneys.

In the thousands of pages of documents the Justice Department has given to congressional investigators were e-mails disclosing that at least one White House official used his party-supplied, non-governmental e-mail account to help plan the firings.

New documents released Friday by the Justice Department may shed additional light, but their release prompted Attorney General Alberto Gonzales' one-time chief of staff, Kyle Sampson, to postpone a closed-door interview with congressional investigators.

One Justice Department spreadsheet on the qualifications of the sitting federal prosecutors shows that along with prosecution experience, political experience and judicial experience, the U.S. attorneys were judged on whether they were members of the conservative Federalist Society.

The Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies, founded by conservative law students, now claims 35,000 members, including prominent members of the Bush administration, the federal judiciary and Congress.

Among those prosecutors noted for being members: Rachel Paulose, the U.S. attorney in Minnesota whose office suffered a revolt this month when three lawyers resigned their management posts. Paulose earlier had served as a top Justice Department counsel and special assistant to Gonzales.

One of the eight prosecutors who were fired, Kevin Ryan of San Francisco, also was a member of the conservative group, according to the document.

The missing e-mails posed some of the weightiest questions of a sprawling political and legal conflict between the Bush administration and Democrats in Congress.

Democrats are questioning whether any White House officials purposely sent e-mails about official business on the RNC server — then deleted them, in violation of the law — to avoid scrutiny.

White House officials said the administration is making an aggressive effort to recover anything that was lost. "We have no indications that there was improper intent when using these RNC e-mails," spokeswoman Dana Perino said.

Luskin said Rove didn't know that deleting e-mails from his RNC in-box also deleted them from the RNC's server. That system was changed in 2005.

Such a configuration is uncommon and makes recovering e-mails "immeasurably harder," said retired FBI computer crimes specialist Joseph Dooley.

"It happens on occasion but usually you're not deleting things off the server," Dooley said. "That's highly unusual."



© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 164 Comments
by forthepeopl1 April 16, 2007 1:36 PM EDT
why would any american in this country follow any laws of this country??"

Posted by forthepeopl1 at 11:34 AM : Apr 15, 2007

When George Bush announced the "Bush doctrine," and then began arguing he was not restricted by any known laws, which congress seemed to support, the US entered into anarchy.

Legally, no one is obligated to comply with any laws upon implementation of the "Bush doctrine" (the invasion of Iraq).

But, as a practical matter, police and courts still enforce laws even though they have no legal authority, under the "Bush doctrine," to do so.

In other words, don't expect the police to ignore you while you rob a local bank. George Bush and cronies are allowed to rob the US Treasury because the GOP refuses to uphold the law (US Constitution).

But you can bet they'll enforce it on people who are not part of the Bush Mafia.
Posted by tuckerndfw at 11:45 AM : Apr 15, 2007

NOW EVERYONE LETS HAVE SOME FUN.. I AM GOING TO TAKE OUT AND PAY FOR IT MY SELF A FULL PAGE FRONT PAGE IN ALL NEWS PAPERS ALL OVER THE COUNTRY AND LET THE GAMES BEGIN YEE HAA.

they want to see a civilwar. they will have one soon , very soon. and we americans are going to take out them all..and put in place a government for the people by the people.. come on america wake up before its to late, no one in the media is telling the truth,wake up..i am a vet and know what the truth is.please everyone listen to me this government is being run for profit only...not for america..
Reply to this comment
by forthepeopl1 April 16, 2007 1:36 PM EDT
why would any american in this country follow any laws of this country??"

Posted by forthepeopl1 at 11:34 AM : Apr 15, 2007

When George Bush announced the "Bush doctrine," and then began arguing he was not restricted by any known laws, which congress seemed to support, the US entered into anarchy.

Legally, no one is obligated to comply with any laws upon implementation of the "Bush doctrine" (the invasion of Iraq).

But, as a practical matter, police and courts still enforce laws even though they have no legal authority, under the "Bush doctrine," to do so.

In other words, don't expect the police to ignore you while you rob a local bank. George Bush and cronies are allowed to rob the US Treasury because the GOP refuses to uphold the law (US Constitution).

But you can bet they'll enforce it on people who are not part of the Bush Mafia.
Posted by tuckerndfw at 11:45 AM : Apr 15, 2007

NOW EVERYONE LETS HAVE SOME FUN.. I AM GOING TO TAKE OUT AND PAY FOR IT MY SELF A FULL PAGE FRONT PAGE IN ALL NEWS PAPERS ALL OVER THE COUNTRY AND LET THE GAMES BEGIN YEE HAA.

they want to see a civilwar. they will have one soon , very soon. and we americans are going to take out them all..and put in place a government for the people by the people.. come on america wake up before its to late, no one in the media is telling the truth,wake up..i am a vet and know what the truth is.please everyone listen to me this government is being run for profit only...not for america..
Reply to this comment
by forthepeopl1 April 16, 2007 1:36 PM EDT
why would any american in this country follow any laws of this country??"

Posted by forthepeopl1 at 11:34 AM : Apr 15, 2007

When George Bush announced the "Bush doctrine," and then began arguing he was not restricted by any known laws, which congress seemed to support, the US entered into anarchy.

Legally, no one is obligated to comply with any laws upon implementation of the "Bush doctrine" (the invasion of Iraq).

But, as a practical matter, police and courts still enforce laws even though they have no legal authority, under the "Bush doctrine," to do so.

In other words, don't expect the police to ignore you while you rob a local bank. George Bush and cronies are allowed to rob the US Treasury because the GOP refuses to uphold the law (US Constitution).

But you can bet they'll enforce it on people who are not part of the Bush Mafia.
Posted by tuckerndfw at 11:45 AM : Apr 15, 2007

NOW EVERYONE LETS HAVE SOME FUN.. I AM GOING TO TAKE OUT AND PAY FOR IT MY SELF A FULL PAGE FRONT PAGE IN ALL NEWS PAPERS ALL OVER THE COUNTRY AND LET THE GAMES BEGIN YEE HAA.

they want to see a civilwar. they will have one soon , very soon. and we americans are going to take out them all..and put in place a government for the people by the people.. come on america wake up before its to late, no one in the media is telling the truth,wake up..i am a vet and know what the truth is.please everyone listen to me this government is being run for profit only...not for america..
Reply to this comment
by forthepeopl1 April 16, 2007 1:36 PM EDT
why would any american in this country follow any laws of this country??"

Posted by forthepeopl1 at 11:34 AM : Apr 15, 2007

When George Bush announced the "Bush doctrine," and then began arguing he was not restricted by any known laws, which congress seemed to support, the US entered into anarchy.

Legally, no one is obligated to comply with any laws upon implementation of the "Bush doctrine" (the invasion of Iraq).

But, as a practical matter, police and courts still enforce laws even though they have no legal authority, under the "Bush doctrine," to do so.

In other words, don't expect the police to ignore you while you rob a local bank. George Bush and cronies are allowed to rob the US Treasury because the GOP refuses to uphold the law (US Constitution).

But you can bet they'll enforce it on people who are not part of the Bush Mafia.
Posted by tuckerndfw at 11:45 AM : Apr 15, 2007

NOW EVERYONE LETS HAVE SOME FUN.. I AM GOING TO TAKE OUT AND PAY FOR IT MY SELF A FULL PAGE FRONT PAGE IN ALL NEWS PAPERS ALL OVER THE COUNTRY AND LET THE GAMES BEGIN YEE HAA.

they want to see a civilwar. they will have one soon , very soon. and we americans are going to take out them all..and put in place a government for the people by the people.. come on america wake up before its to late, no one in the media is telling the truth,wake up..i am a vet and know what the truth is.please everyone listen to me this government is being run for profit only...not for america..
Reply to this comment
by forthepeopl1 April 16, 2007 1:36 PM EDT
why would any american in this country follow any laws of this country??"

Posted by forthepeopl1 at 11:34 AM : Apr 15, 2007

When George Bush announced the "Bush doctrine," and then began arguing he was not restricted by any known laws, which congress seemed to support, the US entered into anarchy.

Legally, no one is obligated to comply with any laws upon implementation of the "Bush doctrine" (the invasion of Iraq).

But, as a practical matter, police and courts still enforce laws even though they have no legal authority, under the "Bush doctrine," to do so.

In other words, don't expect the police to ignore you while you rob a local bank. George Bush and cronies are allowed to rob the US Treasury because the GOP refuses to uphold the law (US Constitution).

But you can bet they'll enforce it on people who are not part of the Bush Mafia.
Posted by tuckerndfw at 11:45 AM : Apr 15, 2007

NOW EVERYONE LETS HAVE SOME FUN.. I AM GOING TO TAKE OUT AND PAY FOR IT MY SELF A FULL PAGE FRONT PAGE IN ALL NEWS PAPERS ALL OVER THE COUNTRY AND LET THE GAMES BEGIN YEE HAA.

they want to see a civilwar. they will have one soon , very soon. and we americans are going to take out them all..and put in place a government for the people by the people.. come on america wake up before its to late, no one in the media is telling the truth,wake up..i am a vet and know what the truth is.please everyone listen to me this government is being run for profit only...not for america..
Reply to this comment
by forthepeopl1 April 16, 2007 1:36 PM EDT
why would any american in this country follow any laws of this country??"

Posted by forthepeopl1 at 11:34 AM : Apr 15, 2007

When George Bush announced the "Bush doctrine," and then began arguing he was not restricted by any known laws, which congress seemed to support, the US entered into anarchy.

Legally, no one is obligated to comply with any laws upon implementation of the "Bush doctrine" (the invasion of Iraq).

But, as a practical matter, police and courts still enforce laws even though they have no legal authority, under the "Bush doctrine," to do so.

In other words, don't expect the police to ignore you while you rob a local bank. George Bush and cronies are allowed to rob the US Treasury because the GOP refuses to uphold the law (US Constitution).

But you can bet they'll enforce it on people who are not part of the Bush Mafia.
Posted by tuckerndfw at 11:45 AM : Apr 15, 2007

NOW EVERYONE LETS HAVE SOME FUN.. I AM GOING TO TAKE OUT AND PAY FOR IT MY SELF A FULL PAGE FRONT PAGE IN ALL NEWS PAPERS ALL OVER THE COUNTRY AND LET THE GAMES BEGIN YEE HAA.

they want to see a civilwar. they will have one soon , very soon. and we americans are going to take out them all..and put in place a government for the people by the people.. come on america wake up before its to late, no one in the media is telling the truth,wake up..i am a vet and know what the truth is.please everyone listen to me this government is being run for profit only...not for america..
Reply to this comment
by firststate April 16, 2007 4:42 AM EDT
Karl Rove is just doing what he thinks is best for America as he wishes it to be. Other names for his unitary executive are king and emperor. Iraq was probably intended to be the first in a string of conquests for the perverts new American century and their new empire.

Does anyone actually believe that the RNC doesn't back up and archive data? Don't they keep every bit of information they have about everyone they deal with in order to be able to use that information in future campaigns? If the emails in question were good for the administration, I'd be willing to bet the farm that they wouldn't have been quite as thoroughly deleted as they now claim they were.

The three biggest lies in the world:
anything Bush says
anything Cheney says
anything rove says either of the other two meant.
Reply to this comment
by emhawks April 16, 2007 1:19 AM EDT


AS SOMEONE SAID IN AN EARLIER POST AT THIS SITE, NOTHING KARL ROVE DOES IS UNINTENTIONAL.
Reply to this comment
by j0hnwi11iams April 16, 2007 1:10 AM EDT
The powerful like Rove should bear the burden of proof for their innocence. These thugs should not remain in power because we lack the evidence to convict them. Criminal or incompetent, what difference does it makes?
Reply to this comment
by wayfedup April 15, 2007 10:49 PM EDT
We fools believed them - allowed this to happen. There will be revenge for all this - you can count on it.


Posted by neoconRcrazy at 09:20 AM : Apr 15, 2007


Speak for YOURSELF, there, neoconRcrazy person... A WHOOOOLLLE LOT of US NEVER VOTED for this bunch of LYING THEIVES!
Reply to this comment
See all 164 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook