February 11, 2009 5:03 PM

Spy Chief Seeks More Surveillance Power

(AP)  President Bush's spy chief is pushing to expand the government's surveillance authority at the same time the administration is under attack for stretching its domestic eavesdropping powers.

National Intelligence Director Mike McConnell has circulated a draft bill that would expand the government's powers under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, liberalizing how that law can be used.

Known as "FISA," the 1978 law was passed to allow surveillance in espionage and other foreign intelligence investigations, but still allow federal judges on a secretive panel to ensure protections for U.S. citizens — at home or abroad — and other permanent U.S. residents.

The changes McConnell is seeking mostly affect a cloak-and-dagger category of warrants used to investigate suspected spies, terrorists and other national security threats. The court-approved surveillance could include planting listening devices and hidden cameras, searching luggage and breaking into homes to make copies of computer hard drives.

McConnell, who took over the 16 U.S. spy agencies and their 100,000 employees less than three months ago, is signaling a more aggressive posture for his office and will lay out his broad priorities on Wednesday as part of a 100-day plan.

The retired Navy vice admiral recently met with leaders at the National Security Agency, Justice Department and other agencies to learn more about the rules they operate under and what ties their hands, according to officials familiar with the discussions and McConnell's proposals. The officials described them on condition that they not be identified because the plans are still being developed.

According to officials familiar with the draft changes to FISA, McConnell wants to:

  • Give the NSA the power to monitor foreigners without seeking FISA court approval, even if the surveillance is conducted by tapping phones and e-mail accounts in the United States. "Determinations about whether a court order is required should be based on considerations about the target of the surveillance, rather than the particular means of communication or the location from which the surveillance is being conducted," NSA Director Keith Alexander told the Senate last year.

  • Clarify the standards the FBI and NSA must use to get court orders for basic information about calls and e-mails — such as the number dialed, e-mail address, or time and date of the communications. Civil liberties advocates contend the change will make it too easy for the government to access this information.

  • Triple the life span of a FISA warrant for a non-U.S. citizen from 120 days to one year, allowing the government to monitor much longer without checking back in with a judge.

  • Give telecommunications companies immunity from civil liability for their cooperation with the government's terrorist surveillance program. Pending lawsuits against companies such as Verizon and AT&T allege they violated privacy laws by giving phone records to the NSA for the program.

  • Extend from 72 hours to one week the amount of time the government can conduct surveillance without a court order in emergencies.

    McConnell, Alexander and a senior Justice Department official will appear at a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on April 17 to discuss whether to amend the FISA law. Chad Kolton, McConnell's spokesman, declined to comment on the director's proposals.

    Government officials have been publicly and privately discussing changes to FISA since last year. A senior intelligence official said the goal is to update the law to ensure Americans' constitutional protection against unreasonable search and seizure, while improving use of government resources to pursue threats against U.S. interests.

    Critics question whether the changes are needed and worry about what the Bush administration has in store, given a rash of allegations about domestic surveillance and abuse of power. "Congress should certainly be very skeptical about proposals to give this government greater powers to spy on its own citizens," said Caroline Fredrickson, the Washington legislative office director for the American Civil Liberties Union.

    The proposed changes to domestic surveillance would be so broad that "you have basically done away with the protections of the FISA," said Kate Martin, head of the Center for National Security Studies.

    Rep. Heather Wilson, R-N.M., who unsuccessfully sponsored legislation last year to update FISA, said Congress must act because current court orders bolstering the president's terrorist surveillance program are legally shaky. She wants the law to be rewritten to ensure the NSA can continue the program.

    Mr. Bush has faced months of criticism for his 2001 decision to order the NSA to monitor the international calls and e-mails of U.S. citizens when terrorism is suspected. More recently, the Justice Department and FBI have been sharply rebuked for bad bookkeeping and other mistakes involving their powers under the USA Patriot Act to secretly demand Americans' e-mail, financial and other personal records through so-called national security letters. Top government officials have tried to dampen the outrage by promising accountability and have argued that the letters are essential tools to protect against terror threats.

    McConnell hinted at his discomfort with current laws last week during a speech before an audience of government executives, saying he worries that current laws and regulations prevent intelligence agencies from using all of their capabilities to protect the nation.

    "That's the big challenge going forward," he said, acknowledging changes would require significant congressional debate.
  • © 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
    Add a Comment See all 37 Comments
    by victoriarum April 13, 2007 9:58 AM EDT
    So many secrets, no wonder justice is just a word.

    Pray for Peace. God Bless.
    Reply to this comment
    by gunownerdan April 12, 2007 3:00 PM EDT




    "Today we need a nation of minute men; citizens who are not only prepared to take up arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as a basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom. The cause of liberty, the cause of American, cannot succeed with any lesser effort."
    -- President John F. Kennedy, January 29, 1961
    http://www.a-human-right.com/effective.html



    Reply to this comment
    by lars_69 April 12, 2007 1:28 PM EDT
    We the people.......
    History repeats itself
    War Powers Act.
    Iraq Declaration.
    War without end.....
    Representative Government.
    New speak
    Dept. of Defense = Dept. of War
    Dept. of Justice = Dept. of Injustice
    "In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act" -George Orwell
    Reply to this comment
    by me4prezz April 12, 2007 1:57 AM EDT
    http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=107_cong_public_laws&docid=f:publ056.107

    Here is the full text of the Patriot Act. It is frightening all the powers they gave to themselves. When you cannot get the power you want from the Constitution, simply circumvent the Constitution with a law overiding its boundaries.
    Reply to this comment
    by me4prezz April 12, 2007 1:54 AM EDT
    Hitler took over that government and country, not by force, but by a slow degrading and stripping away of the people's belief in themselves as a person. He stripped away everything that made them a person, everything that made them a patriot, and then told them that to blame was the Jews and that to change all of that, you must go to war and kill them.

    How, exactly, does that differ from what Bush did to the Americans after 9/11? He told us that the Iraqis were to blame and that they were holding more weapons of mass destruction to perform more and more 9/11s and that to stop that, we need to go to war and kill them all.

    So, where is the difference? Bush is a tyrant. Bush is a traitor to the USA and so is his administration. Let them fall prey to the very same Patriot Act that he used against us.
    Reply to this comment
    by docadams3 April 12, 2007 1:48 AM EDT
    Not on your life. This bunch of fools has already proven that they don't know where the boundaries of decency are. I wouldn't trust them to keep my dog, much less go through the lives of innocent citizens on fishing expeditions. These creeps need to be stopped.
    Reply to this comment
    by docpeter-2009 April 12, 2007 1:32 AM EDT
    Orwell was only 20 years off with his prediction.
    Reply to this comment
    by mountainzen April 12, 2007 12:43 AM EDT
    "Extend from 72 hours to one week the amount of time the government can conduct surveillance without a court order in emergencies.".

    Emergencies being defined as:
    1) George W. Bush entering a spelling bee.
    2) George W. Bush being stung by a bee.
    3) George W. Bush riding a bicycle.
    4) George W. Bush needing to pronounce "Nuclear" in a speech.
    5)....
    Reply to this comment
    by missingamerica April 12, 2007 12:12 AM EDT
    "Extend from 72 hours to one week the amount of time the government can conduct surveillance without a court order in emergencies.".

    Will these acts require a court order even if they are called off prior to the elapse of 7 days?

    How many times can you surveil the same subject for seven days?

    As in, if you take one day off, does the counter reset and you don't have to have any court oversight?
    Reply to this comment
    by me4prezz April 11, 2007 11:50 PM EDT
    TREASON
    trea7son (tr%u0113'z%u0259n)
    n.
    Violation of allegiance toward one's country or sovereign, especially the betrayal of one's country by waging war against it or by consciously and purposely acting to aid its enemies.
    A betrayal of trust or confidence.

    TYRANNY
    tyr7an7ny (tr-n)
    n. pl. tyr7an7nies
    1. A government in which a single ruler is vested with absolute power.
    2. The office, authority, or jurisdiction of an absolute ruler.
    3. Absolute power, especially when exercised unjustly or cruelly: "I have sworn . . . eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man" Thomas Jefferson.
    4.
    a. Use of absolute power.
    b. A tyrannical act.
    5. Extreme harshness or severity; rigor.

    Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:--"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

    Bush's real fear of the Constitution lies in this passage:

    Section. 4.

    The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

    Americans do not have the luxury of forgetting the Constitution if we wish to maintain the rights and freedoms that was paid for through blood of Americans.

    Reply to this comment
    See all 37 Comments
    .
    Scroll Left
    Scroll Right More »
    CBS News on Facebook