The Duke Case: Innocent
Lesley Stahl Speaks To The Exonerated Players And The State A.G.
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Duke Players, AG Speak Out
In Full: The three former Duke lacrosse players, and the attorney general who gave them their lives back by clearing them of all charges, talk to Lesley Stahl about the ordeal.
-
Video
Cooper Discusses Duke Case
North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper tells Lesley Stahl about his office's investigation into the Duke lacrosse case. Cooper says the situation was "much worse than we thought."
-
Video
Duke Lacrosse Players Speak
"60 Minutes" correspondent Ed Bradley talks to the Duke lacrosse players accused of raping an exotic dancer. They profess their innocence and discuss how the case has put their future plans on hold.
-
-
Photo
David Evans, left, Reade Seligmann, center, and Collin Finnerty. (CBS)
-
Photo
North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper speaks during a news conference in Raleigh, N.C., on April 11, 2007. (AP)
-
Photo
Former Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong. (AP Photo/Gerry Broome)
-
-
Photo Essay
Duke Lacrosse Case
Duke lacrosse players were charged with sexual abuse in high profile case that caused tension in Durham, N.C.
In no uncertain terms, North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper said his review of the case made it clear that they had been the victims of a troubled woman's false allegations and a rogue prosecutor’s rush to accuse.
In two previous reports, 60 Minutes raised serious questions about the case, and now the three young men tell correspondent Lesley Stahl about the agonizing ordeal of being charged with a crime they didn’t commit.
And Attorney General Cooper explains in new and explicit detail why the charges never should have been brought in the first place. Cooper concluded there had been a miscarriage of justice and with one word – "innocent" – gave three young men their lives back.
"We had heard that he might say, as we refer to it now, as the "i" word – innocent. But when he first said there's insufficient evidence to go forward, we were saying, 'Oh my God,'" remembers David Evans.
"Because he didn’t say it right away," Stahl remarks.
"He didn’t say it, and then all of a sudden, there’s this crescendo, and you can see where he was going with his speech," Evans explains.
"I never heard 'innocent' because everyone in the room jumped up and starting cheering," Evans adds, referring to the moment State Attorney General Cooper made the announcement that all remaining charges had been dropped.
"We were waiting for it from the very beginning. And the moment he did it, I completely broke down. I don’t even remember who I ended up hugging. Everyone was jumping up and down and we knew then that was when we got our lives back," Reade Seligmann said to Stahl.
"I feel, you know, weight off my shoulders, feel a lot better. Everything, you know, it still hasn’t sunk in completely but I think I just try to remind myself that it’s over," Collin Finnerty says.
The late Ed Bradley first talked to the students in October 2006; in January 2007, Stahl also interviewed their parents.
For Seligman, Finnerty and Evans it was, to say the least, a relief, after 395 days of hell.
"The possibility of going to jail for 30 years was very real. That was very real for us," Seligmann tells Stahl.
"And you thought about it … have you seen yourself in a prison cell for 30 years?" Stahl asks.
"You know, I pictured how they'd react when they said guilty, you know, having jurors say guilty. And to know everything was taken away from me for nothing," Seligmann says. "And one of my biggest fears was that it would go to trial and that it would be a hung jury and I would be stuck in limbo for the rest of my life."
"It's almost impossible to put your head in a place where you know you didn't do something and you're accused and you can't get up from under it," Stahl remarks.
"You don't want to be there," Evans says, laughing.
And Evans says the whole experience was surreal. "I don't believe my life over the last year is actually mine. I mean it, you kind of see yourself on TV. You see all of these people talking about it. But when you know you haven't done anything it's so difficult to grasp with the fact. I mean, I'd be with some of my friends at a restaurant and all of a sudden one of them would be like, 'You're out on bail.' And I'd be like, and it hit me. And I'd be like, 'Oh my God,'" he says.
Produced By Michael Radutzky, Tanya Simon and Shachar Bar-On
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.


- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- next
See all 181 CommentsThe word you're looking for is prostitute.
As far as the "H" word, I find it offensive that anyone would use the word to begin with regardless of their ethnicity. BTW: The "H" word's origin is the word '***' the origin of which is of the "late Old English h%u014Dre, of Germanic origin" - source: New Oxford American Dictionary.
Referring to these students from Duke, I think it's terrible what has happened to them and hope that their lives won't be severely impacted (in the long term) from this event. I'd like to see the accuser apologize for what she said. That would be a great step to making amends. At the least it would allow for some closure.
This was the case of a woman with no class attempting to use race in order to gain status.
I heard one NCCU student comment that this was about race, status, and class.
In a way she is right.
This was a case of a woman with no class attempting to use race in order to gain status.
But how about the young women they hired for their party? Their behavior, especially that of the accuser, was hardly "innocent" either. No tears should be shed for them.
One can hope only that everyone in this whole sordid mess takes some time to consider his or her life and start in some new directions.
In addition, Duke University as a whole, from its craven President on down, needs to look long and hard at its standards of acceptable behaviors -- on and off campus. Likewise, the parents of all the students should take a close look at what they are teaching their children.
For this, President Brodheart must resign or be fired by his Trustees.
While these young men and their fellow team members are not angels, they are "innocent" of the charges that had been filed. So, yes, to that extent, they are "innocent".
But how about the young women they hired for their party? Their behavior, especially that of the accuser, was hardly "innocent" either. No tears should be shed for them.
One can hope only that everyone in this whole sordid mess takes some time to consider his or her life and start in some new directions.
In addition, Duke University as a whole, from its craven President on down, needs to look long and hard at its standards of acceptable behaviors -- on and off campus. Likewise, the parents of all the students should take a close look at what they are teaching their children.
Yes the women involved here should be prosecuted also, but the players should not get away scott free and be made heros, just because their parents worked hard and had the money to pay their way out of this mess. Personally,
I am disapointed that CBS chose to air these three delinquents again. They have had their 15 minutes of fame. Leave it alone. Life isn't fair. Move on and get a life.
Got away scott free? Got away from what? You are a moron. Didn't you listen, see, hear? THEY DIDN'T DO ANYTHING.
What do I now say to my son and daughter. Everyone should be ashamed. The State Attorney General should be embarrassed by his pig behavior . What IF IT WAS HIS DAUGHTER!!!! I guess North Carolina has different ideas on how girls should be treated. Just a note that I have never have been compelled to respond to any other story, but I am so disgusted on how this was handled from the beginning!! Is their really any real justice.
What has men drove us to,
Andrea Eder
2. Were there any narcotics or barbiturates or "date rape" drugs found in her system from
the laboratory after the reported "rape"?
3. Where are her shoes and why is she escorted into the passenger side of the vehicle?
Who was driving?
4. The anti-depressant drugs you reported that she has been prescribed, was the
prescription before or after the reported rape?
5. Investigative reporters do not lead questions with an anticipated answer, but ask
questions with an unexpected response.
During this interview with the attorney of the defendant(s), all appeared staged and controlled by Lesley Stahl's. Lesley Stahl%u2019s, facial expressions, subtle non-verbal responses and body language during the interview with the defense attorney and non-verbal show of concern and support for members of the lacrosse team is visually apparent. Replay the video and see for yourself.
As the old saying goes, lie down with dogs you are certain to wake up with fleas.
NOT!
Answer the question...What was her answer?!!!
Ridiculous. I am female. I don't "approve" of the boys' actions with the strippers, but that was legal activity and those here who are trying to still condemn them just illustrate why they have such a good slander case against Nifong, the city of Durham, and probably Duke University as well.
It was obvious this woman, who made up the exact same story a decade earlier about being raped by three men, is disturbed and there is a long history of her falsely accusing people, even her ex-husband. Nifong used this woman's mental disability, which was clearly evident to anyone speaking with her, to get elected as DA in the city of Durham, which has an African-American population of over 40%. He boasted about it in the media and enflamed racial tensions before he had a shred of evidence, and then when he had exonerating evidence, he either ignored it or tried to hide it -- that is what he is being charged with right now -- hiding DNA evidence that showed the woman had 3 different DNA "samples" on her that night, none of which were from any lacrosse player at Duke -- the whole team was swabbed, except for the one black teammate.
2. Were there any narcotics or barbiturates or "date rape" drugs found in her system from
the laboratory after the reported "rape"?
3. Where are her shoes and why is she escorted into the passenger side of the vehicle?
Who was driving?
4. The anti-depressant drugs you reported that she has been prescribed, was the
prescription before or after the reported rape?
5. Cooper showed her the photo. Asked what she said, the attorney general tells Stahl,
"Well, I don't remember what the answer was for that particular picture, but it was
usually %u2013 that that picture's been doctored. Or that just can't be true. Or Duke
University paid somebody off." What was her answer?!!!!
6. In response to the issue of community division. This one of many incidences in
American History can not recreate community and social division. Use your brains
people.
Investigative reporters do not lead questions with an anticipated answer, but ask
questions with an unexpected response.
During this interview with the attorney of the defendant(s), all appeared staged and controlled. Lesley Stahl%u2019s, facial expressions, subtle non-verbal responses and body language during the interview with the defense attorney and non-verbal show of concern and support for members of the lacrosse team is visually apparent. Replay the video and see for yourself.
I'm glad the former Duke lacrosse young men now have their lives back but fair should be fair all the time.
I'm glad the former Duke lacrosse young men now have their lives back but fair should be fair all the time.
I think we should know what happened in the house with the girls. Did they strip? Who knew where to get the girls? What were the boys drinking and how much? What other kinds of lewd behavior happened in the house? Is it normal behavior for Duke students to hire girls and take them to a house for partyng or for entertainment? Did anyone touch the girls in any way? Was *** solicted for money, and was any kind of sexual behavior preformed? Were any laws broken by hiring girls to preform? Who owned the house?
How much money was paid the girls? Do you really think the Duke players were all perfectly innocent? etc. etc.
Rape may have not happened, but there was probably a lot more to this case than CBS reproted.
Come on Lesley and CBS get the whole story.
James Carney
In fact, it is expected. Just like the comments before any evidence was presented, before an investigation even began, there are racist driven fools everywhere. There are people everywhere who refuse to seek the truth because it requires being unbiased. It requires that the most important element be only the facts.
When people enter the discussion with bias of any sort, they will not, cannot and refuse to see the truth. They live a miserable existence as a result.
For those who seek the truth ONLY and check their bias outside the door can sleep well and live well knowing they took emotion and personal opinion out of the journey to find the answers.
That is true of any issues, no matter the people involved. Facts don't have emotions, they stand alone and provide the path to the truth.
I suspect we have a lot of miserable people posting here and elsewhere. And I know they are a minority of people and that makes me have faith in society that the majority care about the truth, not the bias.
In fact, it is expected. Just like the comments before any evidence was presented, before an investigation even began, there are racist driven fools everywhere. There are people everywhere who refuse to seek the truth because it requires being unbiased. It requires that the most important element be only the facts.
When people enter the discussion with bias of any sort, they will not, cannot and refuse to see the truth. They live a miserable existence as a result.
For those who seek the truth ONLY and check their bias outside the door can sleep well and live well knowing they took emotion and personal opinion out of the journey to find the answers.
That is true of any issues, no matter the people involved. Facts don't have emotions, they stand alone and provide the path to the truth.
I suspect we have a lot of miserable people posting here and elsewhere. And I know they are a minority of people and that makes me have faith in society that the majority care about the truth, not the bias.
Most likely, in this case, it was taken for bipolar illness. Still, many people who take Depakote do not take it for psychosis.
Posted by louiej611 at 09:05 PM : Apr 15, 2007"
An ex-cop, eh?
One down!
The police force need to make more exes of cops like you and FAST! LOL
Those preppy PUNKS were MERELY INVESTIGATED and for GOOD REASONS: They are the 'usual suspects'!
Those preppy PUNKS left behind them a trail of drug, drunkenness, and disorderliness bordering on criminality.
People need to go read their history of bad behavior in the community, and understand why ANY GOOD COP AND DA would have REASONABLE cause to INVESTIGATE those preppy PUNKS!
It's not like those preppy PUNKS were sent to jail for decades as MANY INNOCENT Americans have been, and without an apology.
Those dumb Duke jocks were merely INVESTIGATED (and rightly so) because of the DEPRAVE CIRCUMSTANCES that place themselves in on a regular basis with DRUGS, DRUNKENNESS, AND DISORDERLINESS, PLUS they were ACCUSED in a circumstances of DRUGS, DRUNKENNESS, DISORDERLINESS AND ***!
Cops like you should be ex every time. You have no idea about the principles of Maintaining Law and Order in a society.
Too bad more like you aren't ex! LOL
Young men in at college parties should always hire white strippers.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- next
See all 181 Comments