February 11, 2009 5:03 PM

Stem Cells Offer Hope For Diabetics

(CBS/AP)  Thirteen young diabetics in Brazil have ditched their insulin shots and need no other medication thanks to a risky, but promising treatment with their own stem cells — apparently the first time such a feat has been accomplished.

Though too early to call it a cure, the procedure has enabled the young people, who have Type I diabetes, to live insulin-free so far, some for as long as three years. The treatment involves stem cell transplants from the patients' own blood.

"It's the first time in the history of Type 1 diabetes where people have gone with no treatment whatsoever ... no medications at all, with normal blood sugars," said study co-author Dr. Richard Burt of Northwestern University's medical school in Chicago.

While the procedure can be potentially life-threatening, none of the 15 patients in the study died or suffered lasting side effects. But it didn't work for two of them.

For now, the new treatment does not apply to the nearly 20 million Americans with Type 2 diabetes, reports CBS News medical correspondent Dr. Jon LaPook. But diabetics are hopeful they'll some day be free of a lifetime of pinpricks and injections.

Larger, more rigorous studies are needed to determine if stem cell transplants could become standard treatment for people with the disease once called juvenile diabetes. It is less common than Type 2 diabetes, which is associated with obesity.

The hazards of stem cell transplantation also raise questions about whether the study should have included children. One patient was as young as 14.

Dr. Lainie Ross, a medical ethicist at the University of Chicago, said the researchers should have studied adults first before exposing young teens to the potential harms of stem cell transplant, which include infertility and late-onset cancers.

In addition, Ross said that the study should have had a comparison group to make sure the treatment was indeed better than standard diabetes care.

Burt, who wrote the study protocol, said the research was done in Brazil because U.S. doctors were not interested in the approach. The study was approved by ethics committees in Brazil, he said, adding that he personally believes it was appropriate to do the research in children as well as adults, as long as the Brazilian ethics panels approved.

Burt and other diabetes experts called the results an important step forward.

"It's the threshold of a very promising time for the field," said Dr. Jay Skyler of the Diabetes Research Institute at the University of Miami.

Skyler wrote an editorial in the Journal of the American Medical Association, which published the study, saying the results are likely to stimulate research that may lead to methods of preventing or reversing Type I diabetes.

"These are exciting results. They look impressive," said Dr. Gordon Weir of Joslin Diabetes Center in Boston.



© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 21 Comments
by twowilduns April 12, 2007 10:14 PM EDT
I was diagnosed with type 1 diabetes in September of 1975. I have lived with this miserable disease for 30 years. There is nothing worse than having to stick yourself three or more times a day and wearing this heavy pump around 24/7. It only weighs approximately 2 pounds, but it is a heavy reminder that one day I could wake up and never see my two sons again due to blindness or never be able to walk on my own two feet again because of amputation. Am I whinning or having a pity party right now? You bet I am, live with it for a day or two "DOC's". You'd be digging up a cure quick. I know that physicians and pharmaceutical companies are making a killing, beleive me, my parents have spent a fortune on two children with diabetes, and so have I for all of my grown life. How much would a round trip ticket to Brazil cost me?
Reply to this comment
by cassandra825 April 12, 2007 9:20 AM EDT
The Senate and the House recently passed bills for enhancing stem cell research. The White House plans to veto these bills. Is this because of funding?
Reply to this comment
by aquaannie April 11, 2007 3:06 PM EDT
afubar

Exactly! They aren't even interested in conducting research or clinical trial on adult or umbilical cord stem cells. The Us medical field is only fooling around with mice and rats with embryonic stem cells and have had ZERO I repeat ZERO results!

Meanwhile, doctors in other countries have focused on adult and cord stem cells and are seeing some good results for diseases such as diabetes, MS, Parkinsons' and Lou Gehrig's disease, but you won't see that in the news. I know first hand about this lie that has been perpetuated by the Bush haters. It's a shame that so many will die because of lies and propaganda from ignorant people.
Reply to this comment
by afubar69 April 11, 2007 3:00 PM EDT
"Burt, who wrote the study protocol, said the research was done in Brazil because U.S. doctors were not interested in the approach."

Of course they weren't interested. Far too many US Docs are in the pharmacy giant's pockets. There'd be no financial gain if they could actually cure a patient.

America, just what are we becoming???????
Reply to this comment
by aquaannie April 11, 2007 2:58 PM EDT
PEOPLE - BUSH HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS!

ARE YOU ALL IGNORANT OR JUST BUSH HATERS WHO CAN'T SEEM TO BLAME THE MEDICAL FIELD WHICH IS WHERE THE BLAME LIES.

I had umbilical cord stem cell treatment last week in another country because you can't do it here. Why? BLAME THE FDA - NOT BUSH.

There is no ban on stem cell research in the US -there is a limit on how much money the government is willing to spend. I hope you folks get it after this. It's this very mindset which is preventing any of this to be done in the US. Adult stem cell and Umbilical cord stem cell treatments are being done in South America, China, Mexico, the Caribbean and some parts of Europe.
Reply to this comment
by rf35 April 11, 2007 2:56 PM EDT
"...you find that the most optimistic dates for any breakthroughs is measured in decades, not months or even years."
opfor311

So let's get the lead out and get started! That is the weakest excuse for not funding embryonic stem cell research I've ever heard. The adult cells, while promising for some applications, are more limited than the embryonic versions.

Really, I think you and Dr. Ross are the only ones not excited about this treatment. And maybe Bush. "Damned science helped someone again...now how will I get the round Earth fanatics to go away?"
Reply to this comment
by aquaannie April 11, 2007 1:30 PM EDT
As a recent recipient of umbilical cord stem cells I would like to clarify what is happening in the medical field and it has nothing to do with Bush! What is happening in the US is horrible and a major injustice to the American people.

There are three types of stem cells:

Adult stem cells - this is the type that was used for these Brazilian diabetics. There has been many successes using adult stem cells in other countries.

Umbilical cord stem cells - taken from the umbilical cord of a healthy full-term baby.Again, there have been many successes with this type of stem cell in other countries.

Embryonic stem cells - these cells up until now have only caused super tumors. Also, Bush has nnot banned the use of embryonic stem cells - he is simply limiting the government money spent on it.

You ask why aren't US doctors jumping on this? Because they have been brainwashed into writing prescriptions for everything. The medical field in the US isn't interested in curing - only in managing diseases.

How many disease have been cured in any way other than antibiotics?
Reply to this comment
by soups9 April 11, 2007 12:05 PM EDT
I love these people that decide what is moral or what isn't . Are they God? Do they speak for God?

I dove into my friends swimming pool and broke my neck in 1974 I was 14 yrs old. Not only have I been personally devastated by this accident but so has my entire family and friends. I am not looking to run the Boston marathon. I would be grateful to dress my self or get out of bed on my own, possibly to have control of my bladder or bowels. I feel that this research is the only moral thing to do in my case.

As long as women have the right to decide to have an abortion the fetuses can be donated by these women for stem cell research. Different types of stem cells - neural or bone marrow - can be isolated from the fetus and cultured until they number several million.

If the shoe were on the other foot I guarantee these same people would be singing a different tune...
Reply to this comment
by beasia April 11, 2007 11:15 AM EDT
MCVet

I do agree with you on the moral limits. the Nazi's and the tuskegee experiment were horrific.

dissecting tiny humans though, I must disagree. We are talking about 150 cells here. you can scrap part of your arm and get that many cells--is that murder/atrocity? Nope. Those aren't babies. Cells aren't babies until they can live outside the mother's womb without dying--or 6 months.
Reply to this comment
by feedback3-2009 April 11, 2007 11:14 AM EDT
pepperwood2 -

Let me get this right, you are comparing using embryos to help find cures for horrible diseases to the Nazi Holocaust? (that would be balls of cells not little minature people, which by the way would otherwise be flushed down the toilet) .
Reply to this comment
See all 21 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
Better Information. Better Health.
CBS News on Facebook