Texas Nears Statewide Testing For Steroids
Senate Approves Measure That Would Affect 733,000 High School Athletes
-
Photo
(CBS/AP)
-
Interactive
Sports Doping
Find out more about drug testing and performance-enhancing drugs.
-
Interactive
Education In America
Backpack ready? Learn more about education in America through fun facts, national statistics and unusual schools.
The program would test at least 22,000 public school athletes starting next fall. Students who test positive would have to sit out of competition for 30 days, and repeat positive tests could lead to a permanent ban.
"I think this will make high school athletics safer," said Sen. Kyle Janek, R-Houston, the sponsor of the measure. The bill passed 28-2 and now goes to the House.
The House is considering a similar measure.
The big difference between the two chambers is how to pay for it. The Senate would have the state bear the cost, which could be up to $4 million per year. The House measure would require the University Interscholastic League, the state's governing body for high school sports, to assess a fee on sports tickets to pay for the tests.
Texas has about 733,000 athletes at about 1,300 public schools.
Under the proposed law, refusal to take a test will be considered a positive test. An initial positive test would bring a suspension of at least 30 days. A second would bring a one-year suspension, followed by a permanent ban for a third.
The bill does not include sanctions for schools whose athletes test positive.
The bill would also require middle school and high school coaches to complete a training program on the dangers of steroid use, which can include dramatic mood swings, heart disease and cancer.
A state study among 141,000 Texas students in grades 7-12 conducted by Texas A&M University found that steroid use fell from 2 percent in 2004 to 1.5 percent in 2006. Among 12th graders, it went down from 2.4 percent to 1.8 percent.
© MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



Waste of state resources, invasion of kids privacy. Why not test when you have some evidence of guilt; versus treating everybody as guilty and making them prove their innocence.