NEW YORK, April 9, 2007
Private E-mails Next White House Worry?
The Skinny: Democrats Say Use Of GOP Computer System May Violate Federal Rules
-
White House political adviser Karl Rove. (AP)
-
Who's Who Firings Firestorm Justice Department at center of controversy over firing of eight U.S. attorneys.
-
Interactive Iraq: 4 Years Later The conflict wears on as the nation struggles to rebuild.
-
Who's Who 2008 Democratic Hopefuls Clinton, Obama and Edwards lead the chase for the Democratic nomination.
A private e-mail system used by Karl Rove and his top deputies at the White House may be the latest headache for the already migraine-addled Bush administration.
According to a report in Monday's Los Angeles Times, back in 2001, the Republican National Committee provided Rove and others with laptops and a "back channel email and paging system" to be used alongside their government-issued equipment. The purpose was to avoid charges that government resources were being used for political campaign purposes.
Now, Democrats say there's evidence suggesting the RNC's e-mail system was being used for political and government policy matters – which would be a violation of federal rules.
Further, Democrats say some e-mails obtained through ongoing inquiries suggest the system may have been used to conceal activities such as contacts with convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff.
Democratic congressional investigators are seeking access to the RNC-White House communications system, which, the Times says, was used by several top White House officials besides Rove.
That prospect has the White House nervous. Some Republicans fear the e-mails may contain previously unavailable inside information about the administration's political activities.
"There is concern about what may be in these e-mails," one GOP activist said.
The private e-mail system first came to light in the controversy over the firings of eight U.S. attorneys when a Rove deputy used an RNC e-mail account to correspond with the Justice Department about dismissing one of the prosecutors.
Is It Safer In Iraq?
Is the Bush administration's security push in Baghdad working, as the White House and supporters like Sen. John McCain assert? Or are conditions in the Iraqi capital as dangerous as ever, as Democratic critics claim?
Nearly two months after the push began, the New York Times offers an assessment of its progress Monday, and the results are decidedly mixed.
While overall death rates for all of Iraq have not dropped significantly, the Times says the number of victims of sectarian death squads in Baghdad has dropped, and some parts of the capital appear calmer, as more U.S. troops stream into the city.
But there's been little indication that the push is achieving its main goal of creating a stable environment in which rival Iraqi factions "can try to figure out how to run the country together." The Times says there's been "no visible move toward compromise on the main dividing issues, like regional autonomy and more power sharing between Shiites and Sunnis."
And Baghdad has become a far deadlier place for American forces. In the seven weeks since the push began, the rate of U.S. fatalities in Baghdad has nearly doubled from the previous period, from 29 to 53. The overall rate of U.S. deaths in Iraq has stayed about the same.
Clinton Inc.
The Wall Street Journal takes a look Monday inside the "potent political machine" that is the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign.
While the "charismatic" Barack Obama can generate media buzz and draw large crowds, and John Edwards has strong appeal to the Democratic Party's liberal base, Clinton's greatest asset, the Journal says, is the strength of her national political organization.
That organization helped Sen. Clinton top the field in first-quarter 2007 fundraising with a record $26 million.
The Journal says Clinton's staff is packed with experienced political professionals, including many former members of Bill Clinton's presidential campaign teams. Hillary Clinton's organization is "a direct descendant" of the one that propelled Mr. Clinton to victories in the 1992 and 1996 presidential races, and then helped her to easy wins in the 2000 and 2006 Senate contests in New York.
And what's Bill Clinton's role in his wife's campaign? The Journal says the former president is one of the campaign's "pillars," advising his wife and often making appearances on her behalf.
A NOTE TO READERS: The Skinny is now available via e-mail. Click here and follow the directions to register to receive it in your inbox each weekday morning.
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
More From CBS Evening News: The Skinny
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 31 CommentsIMPEACH the chimp, and cheney!!!
Posted by mbcsmith
It is a matter of law that individuals within the upper levels of the executive branch do not hold title to documents that they produced or received in the course of their performing their jobs. Those documents are the property of the United States. Documents subject to executive privilege shouldn't be stored on private servers or networks since there are specific requirements about their handling, storage and ultimate release under proper circumstances and time constraints.
The US Archives take possession of presidential documents when a president leaves office. The archivists aren't supposed to need to track down government property in the possession of the political parties or other entities.
How dare the Libs expect anyone in the dicknbush junta to obey the law? Aren't dicknbush a law unto themselves?
With regard to the illegal wiretapping, what criteria are used to determine which calls or transmissions involve terrorists? Could the determination be made in part, through unlawful data mining?
so what's your problem ... this isn't anywhere near as bad as that 'lincoln bedroom scandal' ... or ... travelgate!
LET ME SEE, FIRST, THERE WAS THE SO-CALLED"NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND ACT" IN WHICH SCHOOLS WOULD LOSE FUNDING IF CERTAIN BENCHMARKS WERE'NT MET. YET HE REFUSED TO FUND THOSE SCHOOLS WHICH HAD A LARGE IMMIGRANT POPULATION, WITH THE PROPER TEACHERS WHO SPOKE THE LANGUAGE OF THESE IMMIGRANTS. HE HAD PAID CONSERVATIVE RADIO SHOW HOSTS, TO ENDORSE THAT POLICY WITH FEDERAL TAX DOLLARS. BROKE THE LAW BY FUNDING THE FAITH BASED INITIATIVE, WITHOUT SO MUCH AS GIVING EQUAL FUNDING TO ANY ATHIEST BASED GROUPS EQUAL OPPORTUNITY, WHICH ALSO MEANS HE VIOLATED THE LAW BY,BYPASSING THE SEPARATION OF CHURCH AN STATE. HE INSTALLED 2SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, WITH RIGHT WING VIEWS. PAID A GAY ESCORT,TO POSE AS A WHITE HOUSE PRESS CORP REPORTER TO ASK EASY QUESTIONS WHENEVER PRESS CONFERENCES BECAME TOO HEATED.
Posted by airmanc5 at 01:12 PM : Apr 09, 2007
Nancy was being disingenuous--you know when you do something that on the surface cannot be criticized or reproached but deep down everyone knows you just d1cked them?
Nancy made Bush look like a petulant fool and also at the same time, gave the impression she was pushing his agenda--but since it was against his wishes, it was very amusing for her and Syria et al to know first hand, that Bush does not control or run this Congress like he did the other one. This is what is called nuance. And if people were more aware of it--Bush would not have been elected once, let alone twice.
The law is that all official government business that is conducted via email be conducted on government servers so it is preserved as historical documents and for future reference in investigations. Since it is to be assumed that government business is to be conducted in an above board manner this should only be a problem for those who don't intend to do so. Yes members of congress and the supreme court are covered by this same law and it's no different then the fact that any emails you send and receive while at work on your companies server belongs to them and they can read them any time they wish. The White House staff knew this and used a private server provided by the RNC to conduct official (if questionable) business, which is also a violation of the law. All email to and from White House offices is considered official since they are employees of the government and are at work, therefore all email to and from White House office MUST, by law, be on government servers and subject to review. Personally I think it's a great law, unless they have something to hide, just like their supporters say about spying on Americans. lol!
Posted by bdfriedman0
All official documents and records are subject to the Presidential Records Act of 1978. The PRA changed the legal ownership of the official records of the President from private to public, and established a new statutory structure under which Presidents must manage their records. It applies equally to records of vice-presidential records.
Posted by janem4 at 07:37 PM : Apr 09, 2007
It's not a tax hike, so please stop lying about that. It's not extending parts of the tax cuts for the rich that Bush shoved thorough the rubber stamp congress after he took power. This tax cut came with an expiration date and the congress is going to expire it sooner rather then later. Also only those temporary cuts that affect the upper 1% (the bulk of those who saw their taxes cut back then) are being expired. 99% of Americans will see no difference at all. Also we are not cutting funding for the troops (another lie) we are actually trying to give the president more money then he asked for, but are putting some conditions on the money as Congresses did for generations before the rubber stamp congresses of the first 6 years of the Bush regime. Please stop lying. Thank you.
Hey Janem4, what's this commnet about tax hikes on a story about the Bush administration's ongoing abuses of our federal governance system? Good attempt to divert attention from the Bush administration, nice one.
Clinton!
DemoRATS!
Loonies!
Just getting lonely here, guess the neocons are under their rocks sending their support to Rove...
Posted by Zoroastor at 02:32 PM : Apr 09, 2007
I don't know about that. airmanc5 is here trying to whip up a phony outrage against Nancy Pelosi, which is not only a neocon thing to do, it's off topic.
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 31 Comments