By

Alfonso Serrano /

CBS/ February 11, 2009, 5:04 PM

Fed Suspended In Student Loan Probe

By CBS News producer Phil Hirschkorn.



A federal education official implicated in an investigation of the student loan industry has been suspended from his job, while subpoenas were issued Friday on the nation's largest student lender.

The Education Department placed Matteo "Matt" Fontana on paid administrative leave Friday. Fontana, a department employee since November 2002, has overseen a student financial aid database for the past two years. He did not return phone messages seeking comment.

Fontana is the first current government official embroiled in a probe led by New York State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo focusing on conflicts of interest between lending companies and universities.

Cuomo has sent letters to and requested documents from more than a hundred schools for information about any financial incentives the schools or their administrators may have derived from doing business with certain lenders, such a gifts, junkets, and awards of stock.

A common practice exposed by Cuomo is a revenue-sharing agreement, whereby a lender pays back a school a fixed percentage of the net value loans steered its way. Lenders particularly benefit when schools place them on a short list of "preferred" lenders, since 3,200 firms nationwide are competing for market share in the $85 billion a year business.

Two-thirds of American college students leave school with loan debt, with the average among graduating seniors being $19,202, according to the most recent National Postsecondary Student Aid Study.

Three large universities – Columbia, University of Texas-Austin, and University of Southern California – this week suspended their financial aid directors for owning stock during their tenure in Education Lending Group, which has since merged with Student Loan Xpress, the nation's eight largest student loan provider.

Fontana once owned 10,500 shares of stock in the Education Lending Group, according to a prospectus the student loan company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in September 2003 prior to a public stock offering. With a trading price at the time of $9.54 a share, Fontana stood to earn close to $100,000 from the sale, a substantial profit if he, like other investorts had acquired shares for $1 each. His actual buy and sale prices have not been disclosed. Along with Cuomo's office, the Education Department's inspector general and general counsel are reviewing the matter.

Student Loan Xpress is owned by CIT Group Inc., a publicly-traded financial services company with $74 billion in managed assets.

On Friday, Cuomo's office issued subpoenas to CIT and Student Loan XPress for any and all information about stock sales, transfers, or offers to any federal, state, local government officials or employees.

The attorney general also issued subpoenas to the nation's largest student lender, Sallie Mae, for any information regarding employees who also worked at the Department of Education over the past six years.

That would include Fontana, who worked on information technology for Sallie Mae from 1994 to 2001, and his boss at the Education Department, Theresa "Terri" Shaw, the head of Federal Student Aid, which administers federal loans and grants to 11 million people, according to the department's website. Shaw worked at Sallie Mae from 1980 to 1999, rising to senior vice president and chief information officer.

"No matter what the subpoena is, we look forward to cooperating with it," said Sallie Mae spokesman Tom Joyce.

In addition, Friday, Education Secretary Margaret Spellings asked University of Texas-Austin financial aid director Larry Burt to resign from the Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance, an independent committee created by Congress and launched in 1988 to advise Congress and the Education Secretary on student aid policy.

Burt, like USC's Catherine Thomas, once owned and sold 1,500 shares in Education Lending Group (EDLG) stock in 2003 for a profit exceeding $14,000, according to financial records obtained by Cuomo's office.

Columbia's David Charlow, who owned five times as many shares in EDLG, earned more than $100,000 from his sale in 2005, according to the attorney general.

USC Vice Provost Jerome Lucido said on Friday the Thomas case "appears to be isolated to a single individual who may have violated our policies." In a letter to students, faculty, and staff, Lucido continued, "We believe there have been no adverse financial consequences for our students and their families."

Lucido said USC had temporarily removed Student Loan Xpress from its recommended lender list "pending a complete review of the facts."

Earlier this week, two of the most expensive schools in the country, the University of Pennsylvania and New York University, agreed to contribute more than a $1 million each – proceeds from recent revenue-sharing agreements with Citibank Student Loan Corporation – into a fund that will reimburse past borrowers about $500 apiece.

Thirty-one other schools joined Penn and NYU in adopting a code of conduct that prohibits revenue-sharing with lenders, requires schools to disclose why they chose preferred lenders, and bans financial aid officers and other school officials from receiving more than nominal gifts from lenders.

Citibank Student Loan Corporation, the nation's second largest student lender, became the first financial institution to adopt the code of conduct.
Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved.
16 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nemieB says:
Yeah..Too bad for the poor and can't afford people. How are they gonna improve their status?..How are they gonna go to school?...
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
bill1fj says:
I believe that If congress ever investigates the student loan racket they will find lots of fraud and manipulation.
Billions of dollars worth.
But I doubt if they will ever have a real investigation due to the large donations made to politicians by those very people that need to be investigated.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
hietalas says:
Its NOT what you know,,,but WHO you know. Look at Bush and his buddies. What a fine bunch of ____ they are!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sissy_8 says:
Could someone, ANYONE, tell me of one single, solitary branch, department, office, or anywhere else, that has not been tainted by this corrupt, inept, totally criminial republican administration? I beg of you THINK! Everywhere we turn, no matter where we look, eventually something putrid shows up.

When the democrats finally took over Congress in November, how many of you agreed with the few that so self-righteously said that "there shouldn't be an overwhelming amount of investigations, oversight, or hearings into the practices of the last 12 years of republican control. I say, "there can't be enough".

Oh Lordy, will we be able to make it to '08?

Sissy
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jimc52 says:
R we amazed? The entire US Govt under the Republican Agenda has been corrupted. The moment you put private business people into government jobs and expect a government to work like a corporation, this is exactly what you get. Apparently, US Govt employees think taxpayer money is their private business expense account, their "stock option" or their golden parachute. If you think I am wrong, witness the number of scandals the Bush administration has had during the last 6 years. Look at how many top US Govt employees and political appointees have been caught stealing, cheating, robbing or have been involved in underhanded, illegal or immoral doings. How many have stepped down rather than be prosecuted? And, they do it all arrogantly, like corporate CEO's...like they have the "right" to steal from America. They don't see it as America's assets. They see it as their own private little bank account.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
gkc99 says:
The American elite, across the spectrum from "Globalizer #1" Bill Clinton to "America's Mussolini" George W. Bushit, has presided over and encouraged massive losses of good-paying jobs to Asia. They have given away the USA technological and manufacturing edge to China and India so they can hire for less and line their own pockets. Yet when the fired workers try to retrain for the "new" jobs, they are forced into debt slavery. Thanks to the multinational elite who run the USA, retraining isn't even tax-deductible--you pay for your education with after-tax dollars, while the Donald Trumps get fat federal benefits and can slough off debt by bankruptcy every time it becomes convenient for them to do so. So don't expect it to get any better under "Mrs. Globalizer #1" Heartless Hilary. The only hope is to smash the stranglehold that the corporate elite has on American government.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
djermano1 says:
In America it isn't about who scores the highest on the exam to reach the qualifications to be President or a Senator, or Congressman, it is about influence peddling, corruption, lies, and stealing elections that gain them power, and yet people in America are duped into believing their lies and forced to support that? I really disagree.
It is not the matter of being accredited that counts, it is a matter that accredited does not disclaim others or claim their way isn't untainted, unspoiled, not rotten, or not infected by its disease, from its own doing, is the matter. Accreditation needs to change their ways in which really reflect honesty, and bringing about the fact that education is the winner when it comes to domestic and foreign policy. The military can really go take a hike!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
djermano1 says:
They have classes in it, but there is not a Professional Criteria or framework of accountability for government. It is a party system! Nothing but a bunch of Republican Elephant Democrat Donkey anarchy that thinks buying office or casting votes from an educationally deprived nation is their permission and authority to invade the supposedly sacred office of the Provider of the United States . Notice I did not say president.
The President does the dirty work by breaking the law, and then has an underling take the blame, and later the President pardons him! What kind of system is that? Or the President is caught red handed; his underlings fill in his shoes and pardon him! That my fellow Americans is Organized Crime.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
djermano1 says:
Strange but true is the fact that people who go to Accredited Universities are the ones who set the tone and doctrine of who needs what in order to get an Accredited Degree. I need to study 101 law, and 207 Ethics in order to be a Lawyer. The same goes with many Professions in society, be it a Physician, Pharmacist, CEO, Scientist, Engineer; but you do not need a Professional Degree to be President of the United States. A person can have a Business Degree, or any Non-Related Degree for that matter to be President.
You tell me how that is creditable? The man or woman who is in charge of world economic affairs and decisions of war which kill people has no Professional Presidential Credential? It's like saying I can sit out on the beach for 3 days all sunny and hot and not get sunburn. Not real! Fake! Phony! I don't believe!
There is no curriculum for Government.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
djermano1 says:
Instead there is cross border arguments about why the have people do not do more to help the have-not people. That does not mean using the military to persuade ideology on another culture to take their resources and their belief systems. Enlisted men are not given the chance for education before they go to war. Instead after the war they are so happy and proud they can go skiing on one leg instead of two? Why do you think they use education as a ploy to enlist men with the GI Bill? So they will join the Army and the US government might not have to foot the bill for their education.
There is something morally wrong with that, and nobody seems to recognize it. If we had education systems that worked and provided funding properly not only in the USA but also in other countries; what need for a military? How much good could have been achieved with the trillions spent on killing in Iraq for the military, when it could have been used to educate and change the feelings and atmosphere of the situation? I think the answer is clear; much good.
reply
See all 16 Comments