ALEXANDRIA, Va., April 6, 2007
Judge Slaps Injunction On Vonage
Order Bars Internet Phone Company From Signing Up New Customers
-
(AP)
-
Blog Technology Blog Blog postings on the latest technology news, tips and tidbits.
Vonage planned an immediate appeal.
Vonage's lawyers said the compromise injunction issued by U.S. District Court Judge Claude Hilton was almost as devastating as an injunction that would have affected Vonage's 2.2 million existing customers.
"It's the difference of cutting off oxygen as opposed to the bullet in the head," Vonage lawyer Roger Warin said.
Verizon's lawyers had suggested the compromise injunction as a way to avoid shutting down Vonage's entire network.
Last month, a jury in Alexandria found that Vonage infringed on three patents held by Verizon and awarded Verizon $58 million plus future royalties of 5.5 percent on revenue obtained through continued use of the infringed patents.
On March 23, Hilton went even further, issuing a permanent injunction barring Vonage from further use of the patented technology. But he delayed putting it into effect until Friday's hearing, where he replaced it with the compromise suggested by Verizon.
Hilton said he would wait until next Thursday to enter Friday's order, giving Vonage time to appeal.
Hilton has said that awarding royalties to Verizon was insufficient, given a competitive climate in which Vonage continues to gain subscribers at Verizon's expense.
If the compromise injunction stands, Vonage's existing customers won't have their phone service disrupted.
In court papers filed Wednesday, Verizon said that if a full injunction were implemented, it "would cause virtually all of (Vonage's) customers to leave for another provider."
Vonage officials have said that Verizon overstates the patents' importance and that they have a strong likelihood of getting the verdict overturned.
Rebecca Arbogast, a telecom analyst with Stifel Nicolaus, says Verizon was smart to offer the compromise because it is nearly as effective as a total injunction and is more likely to hold up on appeal.
"I think Verizon's legal strategy has been very aggressive and very effective," she said. "Vonage doesn't have very many attractive options except to hope for an emergency stay."
© MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
The secrets of tennis legend 
Now we see Verizon getting rewarded at the expense of Vonage. Hmm go figure; probably just a coincidence.
Anyways, I use Vonage and will never use Verizon or AT&T; as they both lied to their customers. If you don't mind people listening into your telephone conversations; you should be able to charge them, rather than paying to provide these creeps some entertainment.
Personally, I don't wish to support big brother's illegal attempts to spy on American's; that's why I won't ever use Verizon or AT&T again. Besides, Vonage has provided very good service to me for over 3 years now.
No punishment is too much for Vonage and their predator sales tactics.
Posted by criminalgirl...
Criminalgirl, the public at large including the judge are tired of hearing that song ad nauseam, he probably slapped an injunction on them to silence it.