April 8, 2007

McCain Discusses Iraq Market Visit

Arizona Senator Speaks Exclusively With Correspondent Scott Pelley

  • Play CBS Video Video Pelley's Reporter's Notebook

    Only On The Web: Scott Pelley describes what it was like to visit Baghdad with Republican presidential hopeful Sen. John McCain while working on a "60 Minutes" segment about him.

  • Video McCain On His Iraq Visit

    Sen. John McCain touted his safety during his recent trip to Baghdad. Scott Pelley talks about McCain's trip and his interview with McCain on "60 Minutes."

  • Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., walks through the al-Shorja market, surrounded by soldiers.

    Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., walks through the al-Shorja market, surrounded by soldiers.  (CBS)

(CBS)  What is complicated for McCain is, ironically, the politics. The ugliness and compromises don’t suit him. He’s seen lust for the Oval Office bring out the worst in his opponents and, he admitted to 60 Minutes, the worst in him. Both happened in the year 2000 after the New Hampshire primary. He had beaten George W. Bush and South Carolina was the showdown.

"In the 2000 campaign in South Carolina, there was a whispering campaign that you had fathered a child, a black child, and it was a vicious slander against you, your wife Cindy, and your daughter, who you adopted from Bangladesh," Pelley says.

Asked if he believes the Bush campaign was behind this, McCain says, "I do not know whether the Bush campaign was behind it or not. I know that there were most likely supporters of the Bush campaign that were behind it. But I don't have hard evidence that the Bush campaign was behind it. And, yes, I was angry about it. And, yes, I remained angry for some period of time. And, yes, I'm over it. You move on in life. You can’t dwell on past injustices."

"How is that forgivable?" Pelley asks.

"Many injustices have been done to me in my life. And people have come to me and said, 'I wanna move on,'" McCain says.

By 2004, McCain moved on to a tight embrace of the president. He supported making permanent the tax cuts he once opposed and he's the president’s most important ally on Iraq.

"Let me bring up another issue that surrounded South Carolina in the year 2000. There was a political issue, a local issue about whether the Confederate flag should fly over the Capitol. You waffled on that," Pelley says.

"Yes. Worse than waffled," McCain acknowledges.

Asked what he means, McCain says, "Well, I said that it was strictly a state issue and clearly knowing that it wasn't."

"That's not what you believed in your heart?" Pelley asks.

"No," the senator says.

"What did you believe in your heart?" Pelley asks.

"That it was a symbol to many of, a very offensive symbol to many, many Americans," McCain says.

Why did he say that in 2000?

"I'm sure for all the wrong reasons," McCain says.

Asked what those wrong reasons would be, McCain tells Pelley, "For ambition."

Was it ambition this week that caused him to star in the show in the Baghdad market or worry that the American audience is leaving the theater even as the Bush administration is rewriting the script?

60 Minutes flew with McCain to Anbar province, the heart of the Sunni insurgency. On a U.S. base there he met with a Sunni sheikh whose father and two brothers were killed by al Qaeda. The sheikh told McCain that his tribe and others are now joining the U.S.

"Whoever points a gun at any American soldier, it’s like he points a gun at our families, at our military, and it’s the same thing," the sheik said.

To McCain it was a sign of progress, but he understands there’s still a war to fight. Over the two days of his visit, eight Americans were killed in action.

"Senator, are you betting your candidacy that the surge strategy is going to work?" Pelley asks.

"Oh, I think that may be the case. But I don't worry about it or think about it," McCain says. "There's too many young people who have sacrificed too much for our country and their sacrifice is far more important than any than any ambitions of mine. And I've said a few times I'd rather lose a campaign than lose a war."


Produced By Tom Anderson
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Recent Segments
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Add a Comment See all 184 Comments
by arnol_ April 11, 2007 4:05 AM EDT
Note McCain's benchmarks for success as he laid them out for Iraqi leadership:

#1. We've go to have the oil revenue thing pass.
#2,3,4,5,.... all those other issues.

"the oil revenue thing" he's talking about is a pending legislation that will turn control over the Iraqi oil to oil companies.

McCain is clearly part of the *** Cheney cabal, who took us there for oil, and we are still there for oil.

We can't leave now he says, because if we do, what's next?

But don't be fooled. This is not a question he and all of them want you to think about. They want none of that. All it is is a way to start their fear mongering on you. Chaos, haven for terrorists, if we leave they will follow us here, 911.

And I am so disgusted with the subservient media who never dares to confront them with a simple "how do you know?" And this is the same people who lied us into this war, and who have been wrong on everything they predicted about how this adventure would turn out, now trying to prolong it as much as possible with more lies and more fear mongering.

I used to respect him. Now there is nothing but contempt.
Reply to this comment
by firststate April 10, 2007 8:58 PM EDT
earlcornbrea
Our children, grandchildren and probably beyond will have to pay for all the insanity in Iraq, including the Bushshit tour by the former straight-talker. Now, McCan't talk straight is just a mouthpiece for the Pedophiles for a new American century (PNAC). They continue thinking that if nobody notices the bad news, it goes away. Now McCan't talk straight is hoping to prevent anyone's noticing the surge in US military fatalities that's rising slightly faster than the the surge in forces. The extra soldiers are providing extra targets.

The current "whack-a-mole" policy proves that the generals really did know more than the political hacks about the size of the force needed. We might have prevented the Iraqi civil war if we had started with enough troops and/or left the bulk of Iraq's military & police intact. The dicknbush crew decided that the bushie a$$kissers knew more than the military about the size of the force needed, as their second mistake. Their first being, letting "daddy" issues drive military policy. The number of their mistakes has risen steadily, along with both the human and financial costs of those mistakes.
Reply to this comment
by earlcornbrea April 10, 2007 3:49 PM EDT
Who is paying for John McCain's security? TWO Apache helicopers, soldier support, etc?... This is clearly a campaign stunt. He put lives in jepardy and spent MORE of our American dollars - to what? TRY to prove himself right? He proved he is a liar and we paid for it.

Reply to this comment
by bandit931 April 10, 2007 1:48 PM EDT
since you decided to insult my MOS bluestardad, lol, I thought I would post again, my point was you should ask your kids and I am sure they will agree with me that a good portion of the troops are not seeing combat, instead getting paid to sit around on FOBs eating fat kid food in the mess halls, hence why I said its a "paid vacation", I am sure your kids would agree. And please dont insult my MOS again cause you have no clue what I do.
Reply to this comment
by bluestardad April 10, 2007 1:19 PM EDT
I agree that the Bush administration is Hated outside the bubble of Washington Republicans That is why they are covered in security and only speak at Military bases. If Bush went out in Real Public he would be stoned by the American People! We have been drawn to Iraq for the interest of things other than American National Security Interest? If this can be proven then America can and should arrest Bush and Cheney their Entire Administration and put them on trial for War Crimes just like we did the Nazis after WWII.

If you follow the money trail you will find that most of those elected officials who support the war in Iraq are under the influence of AIPAC.

http://www.aipac.org/forms/join_aipacClubs.htm

50 years of American involvement in the Middle East is enough. If these animals do not want to play in the sand box together it is not in Americas interest to make them. We Should get out of the entire Middle East! They have nothing worth one more American Life anywhere in the Middle East!
If you think Americas sacrifice is worth it contact your ELECTED OFFICIAL and tell them http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/

The House Speakers email address: AmericanVoices@mail.house.gov

info@gop.com Here is the Republican Party email address too!

democraticparty@democrats.org Here is the Democratic Party email address also!
Reply to this comment
by toldyouso21 April 10, 2007 12:26 PM EDT
People of McCain's generation are less likely to have been heavily involved in drugs, less likely to have plaigarized their way through high school & college, more likely to have volunteered for military service. Posted by jaye43 at 02:13 AM : Apr 10, 2007


I was laughing soooo hard at those remarks, that I almost forgot to post. What was it we heard about vietnam? Oh yeah..that drugs like heroin and weed were rife among soldiers and back home--they were doing the same and tripping out on LSD. Even king bush did coke and weed right? How old was McCain in Vietnam. Let's see....40 years ago.... hm 32. I guess your right. No 32 year old would even THINK about doing drugs (not)

Seriously though--McCain is a liar. It is just like that moment when Bush claimed he (and his admin) never was about staying the course and Youtube and the media played clip after clip---you get caught with your pants down on tv (in a lie) and it is all over but the singing.

McCain is promising us more of the same--and outside the GOP bubble Bush is HATED and despised by most Americans. You tell us more of the same--in lies, in leadership in the stance on the war--it is time for your azz to go.
Reply to this comment
by hillaryin08 April 10, 2007 12:11 PM EDT
I guess you kook liberals didnt get the word that Nancy and Dingy Harry got water-boarded on this issue by the Real Democrat Leadership!

Nice Try............
Reply to this comment
by forthepeopl1 April 10, 2007 11:59 AM EDT
Administration officials led by Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff and Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez have been meeting privately for weeks with Republican senators. That expanded to a meeting in late March with key senators from both parties.

privately means how much money will i get if i go along with you boys. so how much for me.me.me.me.me.me.me.me.

that what it all about..how much money is in it for me..

time to get rid of our government......
Posted by forthepeopl1 at 08:38 AM : Apr 10, 2007
Reply to this comment
by forthepeopl1 April 10, 2007 11:13 AM EDT
A declassified Pentagon report released Thursday concludes that there was no
direct cooperation between Saddam Hussein's regime and al Qeada. But *** Cheney,
apparently, remains convinced there was. ONLY IN HIS AND BUSHES HEAD!!!! ALSO
RUMSFELDS HEAD..THEY SHOULD BE HANGED FOR TREASON AGAIST OUR COUNTRY...FOR THE
MURDERS OF OUR KIDS.

The Washington Post on Friday said the report, which had been issued in summary
form in February, drew on "captured Iraqi documents" and "interrogations of
Saddam Hussein and two former aides" which "all confirmed" that Saddam and al
Qaeda were not working together prior to the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq. THERE
HAVE BEEN ALOT OF US SAYING THIS EXECT THING FOR A LONG TIME NOW, SO WERE ARE
THE ONES THAT LOVE THERE BUSH CRIME FAMILY.THIS SHOULD KILL THEM..SEEING CHENEY
WINEING LIKE A BABY.

WHY NOT LET ALL AMERICA KNOW ALL THIS, THIS SHOULD BE IN ALL PAPERS AND NEWS FOR
DAY ON DAYS UNTIL OUR ELECTED DO THE RIGHT THING. IMPEACH AND CHARGE THEM ALL
WITH WAR CRIMES...

at what point do you in congress take our consitution,bill of rights and play by the law..before there is a coup on your hands
Reply to this comment
by yeibiche April 10, 2007 11:07 AM EDT
"I wonder at what point do you stop doing what you think is right and you start doing what the majority of the American people want?" Pelley asks.

"Well, again, I disagree with what the majority of the American people want. Failure will lead to chaos, withdrawal will lead to chaos," McCain replies.

So, basically McCain is telling us that even though he hopes to be our President, he doesn't give a f%$** what we want, he's going to do it his way. Seems we've already had 6 years of THAT strategy. And to think I was supporting him before Bush stole the crown. When will these arrogant *** learn that "we the people" are the boss?


Reply to this comment
See all 184 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Sarah Palin's Popularity Grows, Poll Finds

    (386 recent comments)

60 Minutes RSS Feed