SAN FRANCISCO, Mar. 31, 2007
Judge Cuts Down Bush Forest Rules
Admin. Guidelines Aimed At Opening More Public Land To Logging, Mining Thrown Out By Federal Jurist
-
Photo
(AP / CBS)
-
Interactive
Eye On The Environment
Find out how global warming, air pollution and alternative forms of energy impact our world.
-
Interactive
Bush Presidency
The president's agenda, plus facts, figures, major events and key personalities.
U.S. District Court Judge Phyllis Hamilton ruled Friday that the government failed to adequately consider the effects the rules would have on the environment and neglected to properly gather public comment on the issue.
Hamilton said in her written decision that the government could not institute the new rules until proper environmental reviews were conducted, but she declined to specify how the nation's 155 national forests should be managed until then.
The ruling overturns a key administration environmental rule that governs all 192 million acres of national forests and stops plans such as logging and mining in the parks.
"I think people who love wildlife and care for our public forest should be elated by this decision," said Peter Frost, an attorney with the Western Environmental Law Center, one of 15 environmental groups that brought a pair of lawsuits challenging the new rules.
Hamilton issued a single ruling for both cases.
Frost said that if Hamilton upheld the new rules, "it would have likely meant the loss of species." Frost said the new rules could have made it much easier for new projects such as logging, mining, livestock grazing and road building.
U.S. Forest Service spokesman Joe Walsh said the government was reviewing the decision and noted it differs from rulings on similar cases in two other federal courts, including the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver.
Department of Justice spokeswoman Cynthia Magnuson said government lawyers are reviewing the decision and have not decided whether to appeal.
When government officials announced in December 2004 the first new rules since the 1970s, they said changes would allow forest managers to respond more quickly to wildfires and other threats such as invasive species.
Forest managers have complained that without the new rules they must conduct studies that can take up to seven years to complete. The new rules would have allowed for forest plan revisions to be completed in two years to three years, officials said.
İMMIV The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
The administration was neither interested in environmental impact nor the public's view. It was interested only in satisfying the logging industry's lust for our national forests.
BTW: These are not Bush's laws; deforesting and other things have been going on for decades. Often from other countries.
BTW2: Some trees ought to stay and we concentrate on recycling. With 'global warming' due to the purport concentration of CO2, we need all the trees we can get until we can find an analogue to the photosynthesis process.
All over the "national" forest in Colorado, for example, every few miles, you will see a private drive on private property carved out of the "national" forest through a fake mining claim and a group of lawyers who cheat the public of their public property. This land is seized by multi-millionaires who build grosteque luxury villas high up on every nice ridge or viewpoint.
Of course the next step is to stop logging or other commercial activities on these expensive luxury estates, estate paid and maintained by the stupid taxpayer, the beast of burden, the worthless ones whose land is seized, property stolen, wealth stolen, nature defrauded, and we get to pay for it all too.
Not a victory for the little furry bunnies, its a victory of the indolent nature abusers over the industrious nature abusers, one group of hateful elite fighting with another. Let them all go to hell.
You go girl... put the monkey in his place..
We managed to make it just fine with the rules that existed before Bush. Let's keep those. One thing I know for sure is that if Bush made the rules they were written by and for the industry they are meant to regulate.
It's the only kind of inheritance for our future generations that this administration thinks has any value whatsoever.
Chop it down, sell it, and take the cash.....
to shoot 13-year-old child
Radio exchange contradicts army version of Gaza killing
Thirteen-year-old Iman Al-Hams was killed when an Israeli officer emptied his weapon into her. Israelis have been responsible for killing over 600 other Palestinian children since September 2000.
By Chris McGreal
UK Guardian
An Israeli army officer who repeatedly shot a 13-year-old Palestinian girl in Gaza dismissed a warning from another soldier that she was a child by saying he would have killed her even if she was three years old.
The officer, identified by the army only as Captain R, was charged this week with illegal use of his weapon, conduct unbecoming an officer and other relatively minor infractions after emptying all 10 bullets from his gun%u2019s magazine into Iman al-Hams when she walked into a %u201Csecurity area%u201D on the edge of Rafah refugee camp last month.
A tape recording of radio exchanges between soldiers involved in the incident, played on Israeli television, contradicts the army%u2019s account of the events and appears to show that the captain shot the girl in cold blood.
AMERICA! STOP ISRAELI ZIONIST TERRORISM AND STOP 85 % OF WORLD TERRORISM! PROTECT OURSELVES !
Indeed we are. I would consider more logging of pristine forest land, however, if more fuel were needed to help the PNAC Bush traitors roast in hell.
Re: "Not thinning the forrest is worse than leaving them alone. They are one match away from burning to the ground."
Somehow, our forests have managed to endure for millions and millions of years without your help.
The Bush-puppet even launched an attack on our mighty California redwoods- trees that are thousands of years old. What a greedy, foolish, dope!
I do agreee with you though, that selective logging is preferable to clear-cutting, especially for the watershed.
G.W. Bush.
I'm with Bush on this one. Perhaps it should be added to Patriot Act 3?
Israel has recently had to release Palestinian prisoners who have done just that.
Israel is a US puppet government. "A Clean Break" says Israel isn't western enough. The Priminister wears a suit, has no beard, no dread locks, and rarely wears a hat. Jews follow zionism because the aternative is genocide.
Women wear head scarfs and men have full beards in all monotheist religions. Other wise, they are fakes. Just look at Jesus and Mary.
Show me a million year old tree.
You wrote about the forest, and now you are asking about a tree.
Do you know the difference?
Having previously lived on the west coast for a decade, every time I see a fire, I think of how many bug eaten, disease ridden trees are left to go up in flames.
Bring in the goats and chainsaws !!
I rekon many so called environmentalists would rather see an entire forest burn, than have some type of control over the deadwood and brush.
And with the dry season they have had this year, we shall just wait and see how they fair? The Hollywood sign may not be the only landmark that is threatened.
-
by kiddo88
April 2, 2007 10:05 PM PDT
- Dowjones20k, my uncle is a DNR wildfire fighter for the Superior National Forest, and since you seem to be so concerned about wildfire fighters being hindered in their ability to take preventative measures perhaps you should consider this--Bush was going to allow commercial logging. Loggers dont go after diseased wood, they fell mature trees...the healthy, life giving, still standing trees. Logging doesnt clear deadfall, and in fact the great wildfires of 1918 (google hinckley, cloquet wildfire) that killed my great grandparents were caused by logging. The deadfall created by logging combined with the record drought would only prime the ground with tinder. Poof! there goes your precious wilderness you insist on living in.
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 28 Comments