February 11, 2009 5:08 PM

Truck Bombs Kill 63 Iraqis In Tal Afar

(CBS/AP)  Two truck bombs struck markets in Tal Afar on Tuesday, killing at least 63 people and wounding 150, and suspected Sunni insurgents tried to ambush ambulances carrying the dozens of wounded in the second attack on the predominantly Shiite city in four days.

The bombings in Tal Afar, about 90 miles from the Syrian border, highlighted the resurgent violence in a city President George W. Bush held out as a symbol of U.S. success a year ago.

The deadliest blast occurred when an explosives-laden trucks was detonated by remote control while people gathered to buy the flour it was carrying in a Shiite neighborhood in the center of the city, 260 miles northwest of Baghdad.

A truck loaded with vegetables also blew up near a wholesale market in a northern part of the city.

On Saturday, a man wearing an explosives belt blew himself up outside a pastry shop in the central market area in Tal Afar, killing at least 10 people and wounding three, just over a year after President Bush declared the city was an example of progress made in bringing security to Iraq.

The attacks came on a day when scattered violence left at least 16 other people dead around the country.

A suicide car bomber killed at least 10 people in a market near Ramadi Tuesday, a mortar attack on a Shiite area in southern Baghdad killed at least four people and police in the northern city of Kirkuk said intruders killed two elderly sisters, both nuns at the Cathedral of the Virgin.

The suicide bomber near Ramadi exploded his payload in the al-Jazeera district northeast of the provincial capital in an area that was not patrolled by the military, police Col. Tarik Yousif said.

In other developments:

  • The Democratic-controlled Senate narrowly signaled support Tuesday for the withdrawal of U.S. combat troops from Iraq by next March. Republican attempts to scuttle the nonbinding timeline failed on a vote of 50-48, largely along party lines. The roll call marked the Senate's most forceful challenge to date of the administration's handling of a war that has claimed the lives of more than 3,200 U.S. troops.

  • The U.S. military says an American soldier and an American contractor were killed in a rocket attack on the heavily guarded Green Zone. One other contractor was seriously wounded and in stable condition, and three others were slightly wounded, said Lou Fintor, the embassy spokesman.

  • A military leader of the 1920 Revolution Brigades, a major Sunni Arab insurgent group, was killed Tuesday in an ambush west of Baghdad, the group said in a statement. A local official said Harith Dhaher al-Dhari died when gunmen fired rocket propelled grenades on his car in the Abu Ghraib district. A passenger traveling with al-Dhari also was killed as well as another associate in a second car traveling behind, according to the official.

  • U.S. soldiers foiled two suicide truck bombings against their base in a small town west of Baghdad and killed as many as 15 attackers, the U.S. military reported Tuesday. The attacks began when a water truck tried to drive into the base just north of Karmah, a town not far from the city of Fallujah, at about 2 p.m. Monday. A soldier opened fire and the truck bomb exploded.

  • The U.S. military said a Marine was killed Saturday during combat in Anbar province west of Baghdad but gave no details.

  • Suspected Shiite militants broke into a Sunni mosque in Iskandariyah, 30 miles south of Baghdad, Tuesday and planted explosives that damaged the gate and a fence, police said. Clashes broke out about an hour later, leaving four Sunni militants dead and one Shiite militant wounded, police said.

  • A roadside bomb struck Iraqi police on a foot patrol in southeastern Baghdad, killing a policeman and wounding two others, and another police officer was killed in a drive-by shooting in eastern Baghdad, police said.

  • A Shiite man and his three sons were wounded when a mortar round struck their house in Haswa, about 3 miles east of Iskandariyah, police said.



  • © 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
    Add a Comment See all 160 Comments
    by dsutton13 March 29, 2007 1:14 PM EDT
    The old saying goes something like this "those who fail to study history are doomed to repeat it." If one were to do a study of the militant side of Islam, the birthing place of the current wave of radical islamic terrorism, going back to the very beginning...submission, means permission to keep on advancing. Artificial time tables that would have our forces redeployed while guaranteeing a radical takeover of the nation are not helpful to anyone but the enemy. We need to leave Iraq, but neither the Democratic pary leadership in the nations capital or the terrorist on the ground in Iraq should dictate the terms. We should leave as soon as our military leadership believes Iraqi security services are ready to do the job themselves. A phased withdrawal with reasonable guidelines or bench marks that allow the Iraqi's to take control of their own destiny would be best. If you think the war is ugly now...just let the politicians run it...you have only to look at the mess they have produced in Washington to understand the dangers.
    Reply to this comment
    by grazinggoat March 28, 2007 7:09 AM EDT
    Who should we side with in Iraq's civil war?
    - Should we side with the Pro-Sadam Sunni extremists that hate us?
    or
    - Should we side with the Pro-Iranian Shia extremists that hate us?
    or
    - Should we just stand in the middle and get shot at?
    Posted by Jebby_One

    -What if we just got out of that knee-deep-sh*t smellin' quagmire our beloved incompetent president dragged us in? with the nice and error-free intel he got from the as much incompetent CIA agents. Or was it an on-purpose bogus intel?
    -Talking of knee-deep sh*t, he's about to push us in another one next door to Iraq. Get the hell outta there...
    Reply to this comment
    by March 28, 2007 6:27 AM EDT
    RandalDS wrote:

    "Been hitting the bottle a bit too much tonight jebby? What in the fu*ck does any of this have to do with Saddam or Iraq? Or are you just trying on of those famous republican diversions?"

    When they have no answer or are too scared to offer an opinion that differs from their party politics, they turn to what they know best - lies and misdirection.
    Reply to this comment
    by randalds March 28, 2007 5:56 AM EDT
    Amazing .. So when are Liberals going to start demanding the arrest and punishment of the Cook County Sheriff. Or is abuse and torture of Americans being held at big DEMOCRAT county jails acceptable to Liberals?

    http://www.newsday.com/news
    /nationworld/chi-dpjailbeatings-special,
    0,4681239.special?coll=sns-ap-nationworl
    d-headlines
    Posted by Jebby_One at 02:49 AM : Mar 28, 2007

    Been hitting the bottle a bit too much tonight jebby? What in the fu*ck does any of this have to do with Saddam or Iraq? Or are you just trying on of those famous republican diversions?
    Reply to this comment
    by jebby_one March 28, 2007 5:49 AM EDT
    Neo-commie states :
    Why in Hell should Saddam Hussein be responsible of the massacre of 148 Iraqi people, while our incompetent Rummy should not be held responsible of the savage treatment and torture of the 9 Iraqi prisonners under American forces occupation?

    --------------

    Amazing .. So when are Liberals going to start demanding the arrest and punishment of the Cook County Sheriff. Or is abuse and torture of Americans being held at big DEMOCRAT county jails acceptable to Liberals?

    http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/chi-dpjailbeatings-special,0,4681239.special?coll=sns-ap-nationworld-headlines
    Reply to this comment
    by March 28, 2007 5:45 AM EDT
    Jebby_One wrote:

    "Heaven forbid but one of these three possibilities will likely be better than siding with Liberals who hate us."

    They don't hate you - they just pity the fact that you haven't been able to pull your head out of your a*se long enough to see the damage that Bush has done to the United States.
    Reply to this comment
    by jebby_one March 28, 2007 5:40 AM EDT
    Who should we side with in Iraq's civil war?
    - Should we side with the Pro-Sadam Sunni extremists that hate us?
    or
    - Should we side with the Pro-Iranian Shia extremists that hate us?
    or
    - Should we just stand in the middle and get shot at?

    ----

    Heaven forbid but one of these three possibilities will likely be better than siding with Liberals who hate us.


    Reply to this comment
    by March 28, 2007 5:37 AM EDT
    Hey pwrslm, you've already proved to everyone what a liar you are earlier, so what are you back here for now?

    To spread some more of your distorted and not very factual lies?

    You need two kinds of help - first, an education, secondly, some mental help.

    You're one sick little hypocritical puppy.
    Reply to this comment
    by randalds March 28, 2007 5:02 AM EDT
    W
    hy in Hell should Saddam Hussein be responsible of the massacre of 148 Iraqi people, while our incompetent Rummy should not be held responsible of the savage treatment and torture of the 9 Iraqi prisonners under American forces occupation?

    Posted by grazinggoat at 01:46 AM : Mar 28, 2007

    Because, sadly, many years ago our government passed a law making it illegal to sue a government employee for anything they were doing in performance of their job. This is one of the reasons military doctors do not need malpractice insurance. They can't be sued by military personal no matter how badly they screw up. If you're a service member or dependent and your doctor cuts the wrong leg off, too bad. Tough sh*it. You're out of luck.

    Of course I'd b happy to pay for Rummy to go on a vacation to Germany where they have an indictment and arrest warrant pending against him for war crimes. ;-) Just in the interests of justice.
    Reply to this comment
    by grazinggoat March 28, 2007 4:46 AM EDT
    CBS: Court Throws Out Rumsfeld Torture Case
    Judge Says Former Defense Secretary%u2019s Government Position Shields Him From Being Sued

    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/03/27/terror/main2617315.shtml

    -Why in Hell should Saddam Hussein be responsible of the massacre of 148 Iraqi people, while our incompetent Rummy should not be held responsible of the savage treatment and torture of the 9 Iraqi prisonners under American forces occupation?
    Reply to this comment
    See all 160 Comments
    .
    Scroll Left
    Scroll Right More »
    CBS News on Facebook