Hagel: Some Might Seek Bush Impeachment
GOP Senator Says Impeachment Possible If President Pushes Ahead With Iraq Strategy
-
Photo
Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., left, has described President Bush as someone who does not believe he is accountable to anyone with regard to the Iraq war. (AP Photo/Nati Harnik)
-
Interactive
Iraq: 4 Years Later
The conflict wears on as the nation struggles to rebuild.
-
Interactive
New Plan For Iraq
Key elements of the plan, excerpts from the president's speech, reaction and more.
Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel, a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and a frequent critic of the war, stopped short of calling for Mr. Bush's impeachment. But he made clear Sunday that some lawmakers viewed that as an option should Mr. Bush choose to push ahead despite public sentiment against the war.
"Any president who says, I don't care, or I will not respond to what the people of this country are saying about Iraq or anything else, or I don't care what the Congress does, I am going to proceed — if a president really believes that, then there are — what I was pointing out, there are ways to deal with that," said Hagel, who is considering a run for president in the 2008 elections. Mr. Bush cannot run because of term limits.
In the April edition of Esquire magazine, Hagel described Mr. Bush as someone who does not believe he is accountable to anyone. "He's not accountable anymore, which isn't totally true. You can impeach him, and before this is over, you might see calls for his impeachment. I don't know. It depends on how this goes," Hagel told the magazine.
The White House had no immediate reaction Sunday to Hagel's comments.
Meanwhile, the Senate plans to begin debate Monday on a war spending bill that would set a nonbinding goal of March 31, 2008, for the removal of combat troops. One of the Senate's Republican leaders said he believes his party has enough votes to block the measure.
The House of Representatives narrowly passed a bill Friday that would pay for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan this year but would require that combat troops come home from Iraq before September 2008 — or earlier if the Iraqi government did not meet certain requirements.
The Senate's No. 2 Republican leader, Trent Lott, on Sunday harshly criticized House Democrats for setting an "artificial date" for withdrawing troops from Iraq and said he believes Republicans have enough votes to prevent passage of a similar bill in the Senate.
"We need to put that kind of decision in the hands of our commanders who are there on the ground with the men and women," Lott said. "For Congress to impose an artificial date of any kind is totally irresponsible."
In his weekly radio address Saturday, Mr. Bush accused Democrats of partisanship in the House vote and said it would cut the number of troops below a level that U.S. military commanders say they need. Vice President Dick Cheney also accused Democrats of undermining U.S. troops in Iraq and of sending a message to terrorists that America will retreat in the face of danger.
Sen. Bill Nelson, a Democrat, said the Senate bill seeks to heed the recommendations of the bipartisan Iraq Study Group by setting a goal of withdrawing some troops while leaving others behind to train the Iraqi army for border patrol and other missions.
"That, combined with a very aggressive, diplomatic effort in the region is what we're going to need to have," he said.
Hagel spoke on ABC television's "This Week," Lott appeared on "Fox News Sunday," and Nelson was on CNN's "Late Edition."
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- next
See all 219 CommentsCivil war will break out as a deep recession sweeps the nation when the US military is asked to arrest speaker Peolsi for treason as she tries to assume office of president.
I ask Congress to impeach President Bush and Vice President Cheney for the following reasons:
1. Violating the United Nations Charter by launching an illegal "War of Aggression" against Iraq without cause, using fraud to sell the war to Congress and the public, misusing government funds to begin bombing without Congressional authorization, and subjecting our military personnel to unnecessary harm, debilitating injuries, and deaths.
2. Violating U.S. and international law by authorizing the torture of thousands of captives, resulting in dozens of deaths, and keeping prisoners hidden from the International Committee of the Red Cross.
3. Violating the Constitution by arbitrarily detaining Americans, legal residents, and non-Americans, without due process, without charge, and without access to counsel.
4. Violating the Geneva Conventions by targeting civilians, journalists, hospitals, and ambulances, and using illegal weapons, including white phosphorous, depleted uranium, and a new type of napalm.
MORE TO COME..
After almost 4 years of rubberstamping Bush lies and policy for this war, after thoudands of ded Americans and perhaps hundreds of thousands of dead Iraqis....Republicans should NEVER, EVER utter the words "irresponsible" "dishonest" or "support the troops".
Bush used the war and our troops for his own ends and the republicans gave him a blank check and were derilect in their duty as a Congress to perform Checks and balances. Take note, America--obviously, we did NOT clean house well enough in November, there are still those who think they should serve the President or their party and fail to serve WE THE PEOPLE.
5. Violating U.S. law and the Constitution through widespread wiretapping of the phone calls and emails of Americans without a warrant.
6. Violating the Constitution by using "signing statements" to defy hundreds of laws passed by Congress.
7. Violating U.S. and state law by obstructing honest elections in 2000, 2002, 2004, and 2006.
8. Violating U.S. law by using paid propaganda and disinformation, selectively and misleadingly leaking classified information, and exposing the identity of a covert CIA operative working on sensitive WMD proliferation for political retribution.
9. Subverting the Constitution and abusing Presidential power by asserting a "Unitary Executive Theory" giving unlimited powers to the President, by obstructing efforts by Congress and the Courts to review and restrict Presidential actions, and by promoting and signing legislation negating the Bill of Rights and the Writ of Habeas Corpus.
10. Gross negligence in failing to assist New Orleans residents after Hurricane Katrina, in ignoring urgent warnings of an Al Qaeda attack prior to Sept. 11, 2001, and in increasing air pollution causing global warming.
I love the part, where the White House has no comment on that remark. Must be a first. Let the backroom grumblings continue and now that someone dare speak it--let true debates on impeachment begin!!!!!
Wonder if Bush is a trifle worried that when Hagel pointed out his nakedness, the rest might finally agree that Bush's a.z.z is hanging in the wind by a thread
Probably CBS with CNN's help..........
The War in Iraq is still not the war on Terror and Iraq still did not attack America on 911! President Bush and the Republicans have failed on their Support for the Troops on all Counts!
If you follow the money trail you will find that most of those elected officials who support the war in Iraq are under the influence of AIPAC.
http://www.aipac.org/forms/join_aipacClubs.htm
Now here is the real kicker! President Bush is funding Al Qaeda in Lebanon with funds from Iraq! This is Impeachment and Treason! Here is the proof Read it!
http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/070305fa_fact_hersh
If you think Americas sacrifice is worth it contact your ELECTED OFFICIAL and tell them http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/
The House Speakers email address: AmericanVoices@mail.house.gov
info@gop.com Here is the Republican Party email address too!
democraticparty@democrats.org Here is the Democratic Party email address also!
Posted by forthepeaple at 10:13 AM : Mar 26, 2007
******************************************
Violation of the Constitution in 2005 when Bush threatened the Netherlands by stating that if any Americans were held in the Hague on war crimes, the US military would use any means necessary to retrieve them, including fighter jets.
This is in violation of the 11 Amendment (ratified in 1797) which states that America is bound by all international resolutions, treaties, conventions and promises she makes, that neither the Executive, Legislative or US Supreme Court will have jurisdiction in such matters and that the US must submit herself to the will of international law in matters involving international breaches.
Bush swore to uphold the Constitution. By stating that, and by having Congress grant immunity from prosecution for war crimes (which is only good domestically) and by removing our name from the Geneva Conventions--5/2005, bush still is culpable for the start of the war, torture, rendition, his threats to the Netherlands and violation of the 11th Amendment.
Haaaa haaaa.
Yea, prominent among liberal DEMOCRATS because he's sided with them on every anti-Bush position for the past 6 years.
CBS is trying too hard.
Yea now Bush is looking in the back rooms like after his friends the Saudi Government let 15 hijackers and Bin Laden hit us on 911! Bush is wondering which of his JOCKSTRAP Republican supporters are going to stab him in the back next!
The War in Iraq is still not the war on Terror and Iraq still did not attack America on 911! President Bush and the Republicans have failed on their Support for the Troops on all Counts!
If you follow the money trail you will find that most of those elected officials who support the war in Iraq are under the influence of AIPAC.
http://www.aipac.org/forms/join_aipacClubs.htm
Now here is the real kicker! President Bush is funding Al Qaeda in Lebanon with funds from Iraq! This is Impeachment and Treason! Here is the proof Read it!
http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/070305fa_fact_hersh
If you think Americas sacrifice is worth it contact your ELECTED OFFICIAL and tell them http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/
The House Speakers email address: AmericanVoices@mail.house.gov
info@gop.com Here is the Republican Party email address too!
democraticparty@democrats.org Here is the Democratic Party email address also!
George Bush should be removed from office, not only for the good of the American people, but for the good of the entire world.
He is a far greater menace and instigator of terrorism than OBL, al qaida or anyone else. Al qaida doesn't need to attack the US, they have George Bush and his supporters destroying the US for them.
Bush is the worst president in US history.
And, should be impeached as soon as possible.
I T S A B O U T % U @ % I # G T I M E
The U.S. along with many other counrties are in way way way way more danger now from terrorist threat then ever before. Bush succeded in being a complete tool. He IS THE WORST PRESIDENT IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES. No time will not tell. he is the worst period.
and antoniorego
are you from planet earth??? open your eyes.....
or are you from anywhere but the U.S. and hate us?
I might not like Hagel but he never prost-ituted himself to MoveOn.Org as the former Reagan Navy Secretary did.
As for Webb, Murtha, Pelosi - SOME WILL CALL THEM TRAITORS. And if the shoe fits, the Democratic cowards need to wear it.
One more thing, Bozos - especially for the hyenas and roaches calling for Impeachment. Sure, go ahead and call to impeach Bush and Cheney - but make sure that's only considered after Pelosi, Webb, Murtha, Dean, Kerry, Byrd, Kennedy are put on drumhead court-martials for treason.
Unless Pelosi puts on fatigues, grabs a gun and puts her sorry a$$ alongside our fighting men and women, in short, demonstrate some courage and conviction, then she deserves to face a military tribunal right alongside her Al Qaeda friends.
Both of them.
George Bush is the worst president in US history. And, is directly responsible for the sharp increase in global terrorism.
Bush & Cheney should be removed from office as soon as possible.
This must not be much of a story, Drudge doesn't mention a thing about it. I think CBS is reaching and dreaming.
Like one of the other posts said, you can tell a lot by a man by his enemies.
Who jammed the broadcast satallites on 9/11?
Who or what attacked NYC on 9/11?
Bushism:
"You work three jobs? %u2026 Uniquely American, isn't it? I mean, that is fantastic that you're doing that." --to a divorced mother of three, Omaha, Nebraska, Feb. 4, 2005
You must show forgiveness for KKK Byrd, they say the Pope was a Nazi and if that can be forgiven anything can!
Posted by HawkSprings
This is an AP story, dumazz! I read it yesterday.
Bushism:
"And there is distrust in Washington. I am surprised, frankly, at the amount of distrust that exists in this town. And I'm sorry it's the case, and I'll work hard to try to elevate it." --George W. Bush, interview on National Public Radio, Jan. 29, 2007
That's one promise he kept.
-Governor George W. Bush (R-TX) discussing Kosovo, Houston Chronicle, 04-09-99
Bushisms:
"Brownie, you're doing a heck of a job."
%u2014 Praising Michael Brown, director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the morning after he revealed (in a network television interview) that he did not know about the thousands of people stranded at New Orleans' convention center until a day after extensive media reports on the situation. (Washington Post, "FEMA Director Singled Out by Response Critics", Spencer S. Hsu and Susan B. Glasser, Sept. 6, 2005.)
"I don't think anybody anticipated the breech of the levees."
%u2014 Bush, on "Good Morning America", six days after repeated warnings from experts about the scope of damage expected from Katrina, Sept. 1, 2005.
Cheney and the rest of the cabinet need to be tried for treason against the US and then sent to jail. They are all traitors to the US.
Bushisms:
"Gosh, I just don't think I ever said I'm not worried about Osama bin Laden. It's kind of one of those exaggerations."
%u2014Bush, during the final presidential debate, attempting to refute Kerry%u2019s claim that the president boasted he was not concerned about Osama bin Laden.
"So I don't know where he is. You know, I just don't spend that much time on him... We haven't heard much from him. And I wouldn't necessarily say he's at the center of any command structure. And, again, I don't know where he is. I- I'll repeat what I said. I truly am not that concerned about him."
%u2014Bush, answering a question about Osama bin Laden at a March 13, 2002 news conference.
1. a never ending "war" without an objective or budget,
2. alienation of the US from a majority of the world, including the UN,
3. sharp divisions amongst the American people,
4. two (and counting) quagmires in which US forces are being used as cannon fodder & bomb detectors,
and,
5. a financial crisis that will become reality when the actual costs of his corrupt & incompetent administration are finally realized.
And those are just the main points. That does not include other actions by his corrupt and/or incompetent subordinates and/or cronies.
Those are grounds for impeachment.
And, will cause Bush to be acknowledged by historians as the worst president in US history.
Posted by HawkSprings
This is an AP story, dumazz! I read it yesterday.
Posted by dallison7 at 11:18 AM : Mar 26, 2007
+ report this comment
It's also, a Statement from a SENATOR in the UNITED STATES SENATE who happens to be a REPUBLICAN. But we are seeing more and more of this, the REAL Republican's starting to turn against the Southern Fascist/Religious Reich Wing of the Party. Yes Impeachment is a VERY good option indeed for a NAZI who just IGNORES the wishes of the People. He has to understand that this nation is NOT a Corporation and he is NOT the Chairman of the Board. Sieg Heil.
Posted by HawkSprings at 11:11 AM : Mar 26, 2007
Now THAT says something. Since a full 70% of America DOES NOT agree with him, I'll say it also says one hell of a lot about the man as a Leader. Course you Fascist think we're supposed to just follow the Fuehrer don't you. You long ago gave up the AMERICAN belief that a leader is suppose to cause us to follow. Sieg Heil Y'all. LMAO
Posted by tuckerndfw at 11:28 AM : Mar 26, 2007
Thats about the most clueless assumption I have yet to see on this issue, or any of the others you assume are true.
Maybe thats the real issue, if these clowns can imagine something going wrong, they can blame it on Bush. Its a frenzy of rabid dogs.
Posted by Superpat180 at 11:07 AM : Mar 26, 2007
+ report this comment
Right! Typical Nazi. To hell with what the PEOPLE want and the FACT that the PEOPLE sent her there to do EXACTLY what she did. No wonder you LOSERS are getting the do do kicked out of you in the middle east. You're, all of you, as phoney as the "Democracy" you are trying to sell! Sieg Heil.
Posted by tuckerndfw
You forgot: #6 Refusing to fund the war he started by veto of the funding bill.
Bushism:
"The truth of that matter is, if you listen carefully, Saddam would still be in power if he were president of the United States, and we%u2019d be a lot better off."
%u2014Bush at the second presidential debate in St. Louis, Oct. 8, 2004.
Maybe thats the real issue, if these clowns can imagine something going wrong, they can blame it on Bush. Its a frenzy of rabid dogs.
Posted by pwrslm at 11:37 AM : Mar 26, 2007
LOL Now I've heard it all!! This MISERABLE excuse for a LEADER Admitts he got it wrong FINALLY. There is reams of evidence we were mislead and LIED to about Iraq. There's a mountain of like evidence that Iraq had NOTHING to do with any attack against us and rows upon rows of EXPERTS tell us our REAL enemy has rebuilt and is ready to take us on AGAIN in Afganistan. But never mind all that we have GOT to make sure this Southern Fascist saves face!! How pathetic you LOSERS are!! At long last, HOW PATHETIC you are!! Sieg Heil
Bushism:
"And as a result of the United States military, Taliban no longer is in existence."
%u2014Bush, demonstrating a weak grasp on reality at a campaign stop in Springfield, Ohio on Sept. 27, 2004.
And I value those words because they have seen it up close and personal. Many have had comrades in arms die alongside them. They know the true cost of a war. They know war is a last resort. They know war is not to be waged preemptively, or for false claims of danger. But what do we have in Iraq?
We have a preemptive strike against a nation with no WMDs, no connection to the tower killers, no uranium, no mobile bio labs, etc. In other words a war based on lies for our Fearless Leader's own benefit.
Add to that the outrageous profiteering, the mismanagement, the missing millions in cash, the growing civil war, the neglected wounded and we have a total debacle in front of us.
After all this blood, after all this death, after all these lies; how can we NOT impeach this president and his vice president?
I'm kidding of course.
and george should free up Gonzales to be his personal attorney again--he may need his sleazy acumen to justify the torture, war lies, breaches in the Constitution etc that he helped Bush get away with for the past 6 years.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- next
See all 219 Comments