Dow
     +72.81
12874.04
+0.57%
|
     +9.13
1351.77
+0.68%
|
     +105.93
14106.44
+0.76%
|
     +27.51
2931.39
+0.95%
|
     +0.61
53.88
+1.15%
|
     +0.14
116.41
+0.12%
|
     -0.08
1.93
-3.80%
August 19, 2010 11:41 AM

Inside Foreclosure No. A200642668

(AP)  The lights are still on inside Foreclosure No. A200642668 — so while there's time, have a look around.

Here's the living room, still covered in the worn blue shag Angela Sneary always intended to replace with the sheen of hardwood. And downstairs, through a curtain of plastic beads, is the basement where husband Tim was going to knock out a wall and put in a foosball table.

Step this way and the Snearys point out the places where they never could find the cash to hang a ceiling fan, install a hot tub, replace the siding ... a long list of abandoned ambitions that seem almost too big to squeeze into the modest four-bedroom tri-level.

Owning a home is all about finding humor in unfinished projects. But the Snearys never had the luxury.

They ran out of money first, then time. Soon, they'll almost certainly be out of a home.

Buying a home is the American dream.

Many families, though, likely never would have become owners if not for the tremendous growth in a new kind of mortgage business called subprime lending. It long seemed like a winning proposition for all parties. Now the costs are becoming apparent — and they are very unsettling.

Subprime lenders peddle new kinds of mortgages, often requiring no money down and made at "teaser" interest rates that soon rise. They target marginal borrowers with weak credit. By last year, subprime loans made up 20 percent of the market for new mortgages.

But as the housing market cools, thousands of subprime borrowers are struggling to keep their homes. Clearly, this isn't how the American dream is supposed to play out.

The experience of families like the Snearys show how the squeeze created by questionable lending can quickly be compounded by family economic crises, a lack of planning and knowledge, and the rapid shifts in a real estate market that once seemed unstoppable.

"We Thought We Were Getting A Deal"

The Sneary family grew fast — a girl, a boy and then another boy in four years. Tim found work doing landscaping in Denver's mushrooming subdivisions. Angela got a job working for an insurance company. Eventually, they combined to make around $55,000 a year.

In 2004, the couple set out to look at homes in Thornton, a fast-expanding, mostly working-class suburb 20 minutes outside Denver.

They loved the second house the agent showed them, painted glowing pink with a big shade tree out front. The kitchen drawer-pulls were shaped like tiny forks and spoons. It had plenty of space for three kids, three dogs and six cats.

It cost $204,000. "We thought we were getting a deal," Tim says.

The agent said he'd find them a mortgage, no money down. They never thought to shop around.

Agent Kent Widmar says he has no memory of the couple or the deal. But he knows his customers — and subprime loans are the only loans most can get.

"I kind of work the bottom of the market, the tough deals, the people that can't get credit anywhere," Widmar says. "You're dealing with people where nobody else (other lenders) is even going to talk to them ... It's not like you have a whole lot of choices."

The Snearys say they expected to borrow at a fixed rate of 6.5 percent. That would put monthly payments at about $1,290, a little more than rent.

But at the closing, all the numbers were higher. The Snearys were offered two loans, both from a Texas subprime lender, Sebring Capital Partners. The first, for 90 percent of the purchase price, was at 8.31 percent, set to adjust after two years. The second, for the remainder, was at 13.69 percent.

The house would cost $1,623.80 a month to start — and it was almost certain to rise.

Looking back, Tim wishes they'd asked more questions or considered walking out. But everything was in boxes, and they'd given notice. So they eyed each other nervously, and agreed to work more hours. Then, they signed the papers.

Once The Rate Goes Up

The mortgage business has changed considerably.

"When we were children, the lender was a savings and loan — just like in 'It's a Wonderful Life,'" says Oliver Frascona, a Boulder, Colo., attorney whose firm represents many lenders in foreclosure proceedings, including the Snearys'. "The lender was loaning their own money ... so they were very careful with how they lent it."



© 2010 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment
by ralan40 March 26, 2007 12:29 PM EDT
Ignorance of the Law is no excuse and neither is ignorance of a bad loan. I'm a President of a Condo association dealing with huge losses because of foreclosures...The problem and fault rests with the Homeowners. The News Media trys to elicit the sympathy of the everyday person but how can anyone feel sorry for these people? Why do people try to shift the blame elsewhere? This couple signed the paperwork, were they forced at gunpoint to sign? The fact is that they didn't have the money and practically birthed a litter of kids on top of that. Here's a helpful "hint from Hell-o-wheez"...DON'T BUY SOMETHING IF YOU CAN'T AFFORD IT! I'm not denying the fact that the loans are bad and the sales people are pushy. But these people featured here seem to have a problem of limiting themselves, (she obvously doesn't understand the concept of 'NO'). All you Bush bashers and people who think goverment can solve our problems can just go on and on about how the world is such a wonderful utopia now since the Democrats won the last election AND SO MUCH HAS CHANGED in a political News item. The problem here is everyone expects others to take the blame and fix the problem. Here's a concept...hold people personally responsible for their actions
Reply to this comment
by sclaires March 25, 2007 1:21 AM EDT
I have to rent since I cannot afford to buy a home on the disability income I get. Of course I am helping the owner pay the taxes, water, upkeep, but for me it is cheaper then buying. I would love to be able to own a home, but my income during my working years was too low to even consider that. Now the prices of homes have gone out of sight so that whoever buys one has to be able to have more then one job if single and more then two if married. I realized that I could not pay for a home so I did what I had to do and that was rent. Even now though, rental housing has gone through the roof. People need to look carefully at their income and outgo to make sure there is enought left after a house payment to provide for their family. Too many do not do that and then end up in foreclosure because of not thinking ahead. They all want a house to call a home but do not realize the expense involved in getting and keeping one. If someone is talented enough to keep up a house, then some of the expense is not there, but the individual has to be talented to do that.
Reply to this comment
by mbievtea March 25, 2007 12:27 AM EDT
I'm sorry for the Sneary', but let's look at the facts in this story: two people making together $55,000 buy a house at $204,000. Then they make themselves believe that they can afford a house and spend all the money necessary to upkeep and make improvements. Then they quickly have three children in the same time they are keeping their fantasy in which they believe nothing will change. I want to ask the question: how well were they living without the $204,000 house before they bought it? I can *** well bet they didn't have any money -- since they tricked themselves to think they could get a $204,000 house with "easy monthly payments". These people are naive, ignorant, and susceptible to the sales pitch "hey, you don't have to make enough money to buy an expensive house, because here's how you do it and just hold-off paying more money because you'll eventually ... " IDIOTS!!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by bildooreilly March 24, 2007 11:05 PM EDT
Fact is folks the government on every level, school districts, cities, counties, states, and feds steal and hide so much money stolen from us in taxes that if they'd redistribute those surpluses back to who they belong to we the people hardly any of us would ever need to beg for a loan again. They're stealing our money in an official double bookkeeping scam called the CAFR, Comprehensive Annual Financial Report which is the official double book where they list all of their holdings, liquid assets, and profits... The budget is just a shell game where they show us the bills. Fact is our system is so profitable we could all be living in a totally tax free society, still providing all of the same services and getting a dividend earnings check every month or year if things were ran honestly. It comes down to this folks, this is our country, not a few elitists, we're all shareholders in the greatest corporation in the world, the United States Of America.

This is not a conspiracy theory, the real numbers are right in the government(s) very own annual CAFR reports that they've kept hidden through non disclosure since 1946 when they started this scam. There are over 85,000 CAFR's filed every year in the usa by local, and state governmental bodies. Go investigate this on search engines....
Reply to this comment
by bildooreilly March 24, 2007 11:05 PM EDT
Fact is folks the government on every level, school districts, cities, counties, states, and feds steal and hide so much money stolen from us in taxes that if they'd redistribute those surpluses back to who they belong to we the people hardly any of us would ever need to beg for a loan again. They're stealing our money in an official double bookkeeping scam called the CAFR, Comprehensive Annual Financial Report which is the official double book where they list all of their holdings, liquid assets, and profits... The budget is just a shell game where they show us the bills. Fact is our system is so profitable we could all be living in a totally tax free society, still providing all of the same services and getting a dividend earnings check every month or year if things were ran honestly. It comes down to this folks, this is our country, not a few elitists, we're all shareholders in the greatest corporation in the world, the United States Of America.

This is not a conspiracy theory, the real numbers are right in the government(s) very own annual CAFR reports that they've kept hidden through non disclosure since 1946 when they started this scam. There are over 85,000 CAFR's filed every year in the usa by local, and state governmental bodies. Go investigate this on search engines....
Reply to this comment
by lestb35 March 24, 2007 8:12 PM EDT
Since Congress has proven over and over again they don't give a rat's *** about people only corporations, maybe our kids and grandkids will not be able to buy property due to the tremendous tax burden and it will be completely under international corporate ownership. That will be the true death of America.
Reply to this comment
by rray52 March 24, 2007 7:13 PM EDT
A hard way to learn about the cycles of the housing market, but from the last paragraph they are on the right track.

How about that real-estate agent, a real bottom feeder. After he got his commission he could care less he pushed them into more house than they could afford.
Reply to this comment
by standlee5 March 24, 2007 7:08 PM EDT
NO BAILOUT. No matter how much Wall Street whines or lobbyists smooze. NO BAILOUTS. Taxpayers are sick and tired of bailing out these greedy bastirds. Fine them and regulate the h3ll out of them. No bailout.
Reply to this comment
by snowbrd7 March 24, 2007 6:56 PM EDT
There's nothing wrong with renting.
Reply to this comment
by bocaoma March 24, 2007 4:59 PM EDT
i really feel sorry for anybody dealing with foreclosure. if you live in ohio, maybe you can qualify for some of the state bond money. check it out & good luck.
Reply to this comment
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook