Officers To Be Blamed For Tillman Coverup
CBS: Pentagon To Point Finger At 9 Officers In Fallout From NFL Star's Friendly Fire Death
-
Play CBS Video Video Army Deceived Tillman Family A Pentagon investigation found top army officers were responsible for covering up the truth about former NFL star Pat Tillman's death in a friendly fire incident. David Martin reports.
-
(CBS/AP)
-
Photo Essay Pat Tillman A look at the former NFL player who died fighting as an Army Ranger in Afghanistan.
-
Interactive Military 101 Basic training to learn all about America's fighting force.
-
Fast Facts Afghanistan Learn about the people, economy and history.
The official version was that the former NFL star had died in a fire fight with the enemy. It was only after a nationally televised memorial service was held for Tillman that his wife and parents were told he had been mistakenly shot by one of his own men.
Until now, only low-ranking soldiers who were part of Tillman's Army Ranger unit have been disciplined in the events surrounding his death. It will now be up to the Army to decide what, if any, disciplinary action to take against these nine officers.
According to a defense official, it does not appear that the IG investigation, the fifth inquiry into Tillman's death, found any indication of an orchestrated cover-up. The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue, said it appears that senior military leaders may not have had all the facts or worked hard enough to get the facts of what happened on that day in April 2004.
Dozens of soldiers — those immediately around Tillman at the scene of the shooting, his immediate superiors and high-ranking officers at a command post nearby — knew within minutes or hours that his death was caused by friendly fire. The IG investigation has focused on how high up the chain of command that knowledge went.
Meanwhile, in Afghanistan, Marines accused of shooting and killing civilians after a suicide bombing in Afghanistan are under U.S. investigation, and their entire unit has been ordered to leave the country early, officials said Friday.
Army Maj. Gen. Francis H. Kearney III, head of Special Operations Command Central, responsible for special operations in the Middle East and Central Asia, ordered the unit of about 120 Marines out of Afghanistan and initiated an investigation into the March 4 incident, said Lt. Col. Lou Leto, spokesman at Kearney's command headquarters.
A spokesman for the Marine unit, Maj. Cliff Gilmore, said it is in the process of leaving Afghanistan but he declined to provide details on the timing and new location, citing a need to preserve security.
In the March 4 incident in Nangahar province, an explosives-rigged minivan crashed into a convoy of Marines that U.S. officials said also came under fire from gunmen. As many as 10 Afghans were killed and 34 wounded as the convoy made an escape. Injured Afghans said the Americans fired on civilian cars and pedestrians as they sped away.
U.S. military officials said militant gunmen shot at Marines and may have caused some of the civilian casualties.
Hundreds of Afghan men held an anti-U.S. demonstration afterward and President Hamid Karzai condemned the incident.
Leto, the spokesman at Special Operations Command Central headquarters in Tampa, Fla., said the Marines, after being ambushed, responded in a way that created "perceptions (that) have really damaged the relationship between the local population and this unit."
"The relationship you have with the local population while conducting counterinsurgency operations is very important, and because the perceptions damaged that, it probably degraded the (Marine) unit's ability to fulfill those kinds of missions," Leto added. "So the general felt it was best to move them out of that area."
© MMVII, CBS Interactive, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
- "I wonder if it was good intentions from his unit? Yes they knew it was friendly fire, but still wanted to spare his family and with good intent, said it was during combat? Not sure on this one,"
Posted by stevex47
My sentiments exactly!! I think the coverup started innocently but snowballed the moment the media got hold of it. Shouldn't have happened, but it did. The media can make a mountain out of a mole-hill. - Reply to this comment
- I wonder if it was good intentions from his unit? Yes they knew it was friendly fire, but still wanted to spare his family and with good intent, said it was during combat? Not sure on this one,
- Reply to this comment
- Friendly fire happens in all wars. The problem here is that there was an intentional effort to cover it up. Is it the idea that we "can't handle the truth"? A more innocent reason? A more sinister reason? If the truth of the matter had come out from the get go, it wouldn't be a matter for concern now!
- Reply to this comment
- Think about it folks,,
, If you where on the other side of the world trying to get Bin Laden... You where killed by the wrong people,,, Wouldn't you want someone to find out how it happened ????? - Reply to this comment
- Come on ppl, S---- happens. If it was on purpose then prosecute the offender, otherwise give condolences and money to the family, admit the truth and move on.
Posted by ToolMangler at 09:49 PM : Mar 24, 2007
Agreed, The cover-up was purposeful, although I'm not sure there will be prosecution of those who instigated it. - Reply to this comment
- Take the political games elsewhere. Let Mr. Timllman rest in peace and let the poor people who shot him recover in peace.
Posted by Jebby_One at 03:28 PM : Mar 24, 2007
What is swept under the rug, stays under the rug? - Reply to this comment
- Oh my goodness!!!!! You mean that 'one' of OUR BOYS was killed by a member of OUR ARMED SERVICES?. That shows what can happen if you put weapons in the hands of HUMAN BEINGS. Come on ppl, S---- happens. If it was on purpose then prosecute the offender, otherwise give condolences and money to the family, admit the truth and move on.
- Reply to this comment
- I saw him with Elvis on the moon. Osama bin Laden captured them and hijacked a plane. He flew it so fast into the Sears towers that it bounced off and produced this calculation (x=eM*U3) (which 9 out of 10 doctors recommend) and the reaction sent the plane hurling to the moon. We need congress to tell Syria to tell Hizbollah to tell China to tell the Fedreral Reserve to print up a gagillion dollars so we can get them back.
- Reply to this comment
- "He was true hero." Posted by greenback01
His sacrifice is no more heroic, and certainly no less heroic, than any others who have given their lives for their country. It would be insensitive and insulting to the loved ones of all the other men and women who gave their lives to say that Tillman's sacrifice was more important.
The fact that he was a sports figure makes him more public, not more important. - Reply to this comment
- "Why would I consciously expose the people who had mistakenly directed the fire at Mr Tillman..."
Posted by Jebby_One at 03:04 PM : Mar 24, 2007
It most certainly was not "mistakenly directed" fire. The Bush administration needed a "hero" to prop up their cause. Who better than a NFL start turned soldier? Look at the facts:
First, he "died in battle".
Later, it was changed to "he died under questionable circumstances" and they wouldn't say how he died.
Then a month later they determined he "might" have been hit by friendly fire.
Now four years later, more "truth" is leaking out.
I believe he was shot in the back and it was done intentionally. The questions are, who ordered it, who did it, and how high up in the administration did they know about it? - Reply to this comment
- greenback01,
Re: "He (Pat Tillman) was true hero."
I think that you are right. I made some unkind comments about Tillman, immediately following his death, and I regret them. Tillman had a much better idea of what was going on than I originally gave him credit for.
Re: The Film "Truth Surge"
www.freedomtown.org/Site/Freedomtown%20Videos.html
I just finished watching this production. This movie is packed with thought provoking and important information, and presented in a uniquely creative and humorous style.
The humor helps to take the edge off of the outrage. Very good! - Reply to this comment
- DUTY - HONOR - COUNTRY -- BUSH WAS & STILL IS A NO SHOW
- Reply to this comment
- Jebby,,, I guess that's your loose interpretation of how to support the troops,, by lying to them & covering up mistakes.
- Reply to this comment
- He was killed by OUR guys, that's the facts and the facts were covered up to save face
------------------
this happens on different levels all the time. How many people die from complecations of AIDS yet such detail is kept secret? How about a fireman having a bad day nursing a hangover and he gets killed in a fire?
Such details are kept secret to protect the person's honor from people like you who are waiting to exploit the circumstances for whatever reasons.
But it goes beyond that in this case ... "OUR" guys was a living breathing human being who probably physically survived the encounter. I seriously doubt that anything that people like you will say will help him get through this.
Take the political games elsewhere. Let Mr. Timllman rest in peace and let the poor people who shot him recover in peace. - Reply to this comment
- neo-commie professes:
" ...I am convinced that any cover-up that happened has the stamp of approval "
-------------
well, I'm pretty convinced that had I been there and under the same circumstances I would have helped cover it up and I wouldn't have needed an order from anyone to do so. Why would I want to subject Mr. Tillman's honor and his family to liberal vulture like you? Why would I consiously expose the people who had mistakenly directed the fire at Mr Tillman to people like you were waiting in the wing to use Mr. Tillman's death for your political purposes?
Mr Tillman died fighting for America. He deserves full military honors. He wasn't a political pawn to be exploited by liberals who are staking their future with America's enemies. - Reply to this comment
- Jebby,,,,, Don't you think our White House policies & the Pentagon dishonored Tillman by lying about the truth & using thier propaganda machine to tell more lies to America in trying to cover up thier own failures of leadership ?????
- Reply to this comment
- "neo-commies are sooo desperate to dishonor the death or Mr. Tillman and make him a victim.
Posted by Jebby_One"
He's dead, I don't he cares at this point whether it was honor or not, he's not here.
He was killed by OUR guys, that's the facts and the facts were covered up to save face of those involved in this stupid mistake- that's criminal and he was a victim... of OUR military. - Reply to this comment
- neo-commies are sooo desperate to dishonor the death or Mr. Tillman and make him a victim.
- Reply to this comment
- Amazing that there are no posts mentioning that Tillman had turned against the war, particularly the invasion of Iraq, and that he was a student of the writings of Noam Chomsky. We likely would have become a visible critic. The "cover up" likely as more to do with his death being from neither friendly fire nor from enemy combatants - let's just call it un-friendly fire. CBS & MSM late to the game and more. Whatever, assuming that a cover-up cannot be proven as to the officers' knowledge of the original erroneous reports, the real truth has no chance at all to surface.
- Reply to this comment
- Ahh, for the good ol' days when the media and technology were in their infancies; when those so empowered and privy to every nuance of warfare and confidential information were left to do their jobs; when everyday Joe Blows had no platform for their rants borne of and fueld by a biased media. Do you folks really believe that there were no cover-ups in previous wars? It's a wonder we're not all speaking Japanese or German. At our present rate, burkas are in your future.
- Reply to this comment




