February 11, 2009 5:09 PM

Standoff In The Persian Gulf

(CBS/AP)  Naval forces of Iran's hardline Revolutionary Guards seized 15 British sailors and marines at gunpoint Friday in Iraqi waters of the Persian Gulf, U.S. and British officials said. The provocative move comes during heightened tensions between the West and Iran.

Iran insisted the British service members were seized because they had entered Iranian territory and were held "for further investigation," according to Iranian state television.

U.S. and British officials said the incident occurred during a routine inspection of a merchant ship near the disputed Shatt al-Arab waterway, which flows between the two countries and empties into the Gulf. The inspections were part of an ongoing operation to intercept smugglers, insurgents and terrorists, and to protect Iraqi oil terminals, CBS News correspondent Allen Pizzey reports.

The inspection went without a hitch and the British inflatable rafts that the service members use were on the way back to their mother ship when six Iranian Revolutionary Guard naval vessels surrounded them, Pizzey reports.

A U.S. Navy official in Bahrain, Cmdr. Kevin Aandahl, said Iran's Revolutionary Guard naval forces were responsible and had broadcast a brief radio message saying the British had not been harmed.

In London, the British government summoned the Iranian ambassador to the Foreign Office and afterward, British Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett said he "was left in no doubt that we want them back."

Iranian television quoted a Foreign Ministry official as saying that Tehran had also summoned the top British diplomat in Tehran to protest the "illegal entry" into Iranian waters.

"This is not the first time that British military personnel during the occupation of Iraq have entered illegally into Iran's territorial waters," the official was quoted as saying.

(CBS)
Britain's Defense Ministry said the Royal Navy personnel — assigned to the frigate H.M.S. Cornwall — were "engaged in routine boarding operations of merchant shipping in Iraqi territorial waters," and had completed a ship inspection when they were accosted by the Iranian vessels.

The British sailors were part of a task force that protects Iraqi oil terminals and maintains security in Iraqi waters under authority of the U.N. Security Council.

As CBS News national security correspondent David Martin reports, U.S. and British Navies routinely stop and search suspicious vessels in the Gulf, sometimes under the noses of the Iranian Navy, which jealously guards a disputed boundary line in the channel leading to the Iraqi port of Basra.

The Cornwall's commander, Commodore Nick Lambert, said the frigate lost communication with the boarding party, but a helicopter crew saw the Iranian vessels approach.

"I've got 15 sailors and marines who have been arrested by the Iranians and my immediate concern is their safety," Lambert told British Broadcasting Corp. television. Lambert said he hoped it was a "simple mistake" over territorial waters.

In Washington, White House press secretary Tony Snow said the Bush administration is monitoring the situation.

"The British government is demanding the immediate safe return of the people and equipment and we are keeping watch on the situation," Snow said.

CBS News foreign affairs analyst Pamela Falk said: "Military confrontation with Iran in the Gulf is everyone's nightmare scenario. Diplomatic efforts at the U.N. and with the Baghdad conference, which included Iran, were not very successful efforts to keep a cap on Iran's defiance."

The incident occurred as the U.N. Security Council debates further sanctions against Iran over its disputed nuclear program, and amid U.S. allegations that Iran is arming Shiite militias in Iraq.

Hours before the seizure, British Lt. Col. Justin Maciejewski told BBC Radio 4 Today in Basra that the Iranians were arming and funding insurgents attacking British troops in southern Iraq.

The U.S. military has leveled similar charges against the Iranians, insisting they are providing weapons including sophisticated roadside bombs used to kill Americans. Iran has denied the allegations.



© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 281 Comments
by pishdead1 March 26, 2007 11:54 AM EDT
Mr Z. you can be a true american by what we did in iraq. In fact i think thats what it is all about, bringing freedom to an oppressed people is what we have done since we where created (except the Indians). Mr. Z your new name is *** becase that is what u are. and i am sorry to resort to name calling but u are just so far out there that i wish u would move to france.
Reply to this comment
by drinuk March 24, 2007 11:13 AM EDT
The prospect of an escalation of the middle east conflict is too dreadful to contemplate. I did not agree with the Iraq invasion and mourn the deaths of the 260,000 people lost thus far. I do however feel that Iran is winding up for a conflict, they actually want America and Britian to attack them, so that it may involve the whole of the middle east, and cause conflict between Russia, China and ourselves. I never thought I would say this but to prevent any further loss of our lads, we should Nuke the "b a s t a r d s" tomorrow and let the rest know we are sick to death of them.
Reply to this comment
by bluestardad March 24, 2007 11:05 AM EDT
THIS IS A PROVOCATION SO WE CAN BE SEEN AS COMING TO THE AID OF OUR ALLIES AND ATTACKING IRAN BECAUSE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WILL NOT PERMIT THIS WITHOUT SOME COVER! ISRAEL WANTS AMERICA TO ATTACK IRAN AND STAY IN IRAQ.

We can still support our allies such as Israel without putting their interest over that of our own country. This is something American Politicians have not understood! It is not in Americas interest to attack Iran or to stay in Iraq!

If you follow the money trail you will find that most of those elected officials who support the war in Iraq are under the influence of AIPAC.

http://www.aipac.org/forms/join_aipacClubs.htm



Now here is the real kicker! President Bush is funding Al Qaeda in Lebanon with funds from Iraq! This is Impeachment and Treason! Here is the proof Read it!
http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/070305fa_fact_hersh


If you think Americas sacrifice is worth it contact your ELECTED OFFICIAL and tell them http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/

The House Speakers email address: AmericanVoices@mail.house.gov

info@gop.com Here is the Republican Party email address too!

democraticparty@democrats.org Here is the Democratic Party email address also!
Reply to this comment
by epiker-2009 March 24, 2007 5:48 AM EDT
edit: *presently ruled by
Reply to this comment
by epiker-2009 March 24, 2007 5:44 AM EDT
zetrat,

You're being melodramatic and posing absurd, rhetorical questions and then you're expecting a serious response from us. Here's an example of your antics:

"Back to the point. Please justify why any of us real Americans should tolerate you violent, autocratic creeps."

Can that even be considered a real question? But there is something you said that I can address. Yes the US invading Iran is bringing them real democracy because Iran is presently a religious totalitarian regime, which grabbed power by brutality and force.

But that issue is beside the point-the primary reason to attack Iran is to end their nuclear weapons program and yes we have every right to disarm anyone that threatens our freedom.
Reply to this comment
by epiker-2009 March 24, 2007 5:25 AM EDT
cooljcrg-you're quite right, I was being a bit optimistic on the Iranian people, but we certainly can't take any chances. If the Iranians foolishly decide to defend the tyrannical regime (that's enslaved them and threatens the west), then they're also have to suffer the consequences.

Hopefully the Dumbasscrats don't try to put the brakes on an eventual Iranian attack. Muslims must love their well-trained, anti-west leftist stooges fighting on their behalf here.

What the left doesn't understand is that once Iran or any terrorist group gets their hands on a nuke, there is no way of undoing the deaths of millions of Americans and we'll probably be forced to annihilate all muslims. So we can't make any mistake-we must defeat our enemy at any cost before things get out of hand.
Reply to this comment
by zertrat March 24, 2007 5:23 AM EDT
Dear Cool, Scanner, Pishhead, Thugdriver, Epikrat:

I'm going to bed now (because I'm a pansy who does not understand the manliness of staying up all night to assert righteousness on pathetic old CBS) but i expect to get a full explanation from you nutcases about how and why american values involve occupying a sovereign nation and trying to set up a government that is fundamentally not democratic, in the sense that nobody there wants our version. Have any of you been there? -- no, i thought so. Some of us have been in that neck of the woods. Seems like the English had good intent in the 18th Century about how to govern the colonies, but the locals did not really like it. I feel bad for Epikrat because he's stressing out that I'm crying all night long. Thanks, Epi, I'll somehow get by. Back to the point. Please justify why any of us real Americans should tolerate you violent, autocratic creeps.
Reply to this comment
by zertrat March 24, 2007 5:04 AM EDT
Dear tbweb,
No, I'm not advocating blowing up Iran.
You're not in charge? Good.
Reply to this comment
by zertrat March 24, 2007 4:56 AM EDT
Dear Epiker,
Sorry to bruise your delicate feelings. I was not trying to chase you off, and I'm sorry if you ran away with your tail between your legs. My fault. I apologize, and I hope that you can engage with the rest of us in meaningful discussion. I posed this question some time ago, and none of you faux Americans want to answer it:

"Someone on this post please answer this simplest of questions: How can you be a true American and occupy the country of Iraq?"

Because you, Epiker, are so disdainful of feminine behavior and non-americans, certainly you can give me a full and satisfying answer to this question. If you cannot, I understand, and wish you the best.
Reply to this comment
by tbweb March 24, 2007 4:50 AM EDT
--zertrat

You're the all-knowing, all-seeing, clear it all up advisor here? LOL!! Yes, blow Iran up and leave the nuclear tips on the Ballistic Missiles too! Why take the nuclear tips off and replace them with conventional war heads? Iran deserves every blast! blah blah blah! No more chit chat! I say the U.S. attacks and warm Irans arrogant b-u-t-t now! But hey, I'm not in charge!
Reply to this comment
See all 281 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook