Superjumbo Jet Makes First U.S. Landings

Airbus A380 Planes Makes Near Simultaneous Arrivals In NYC, L.A.

(AP)  The latest jetliner to claim the title of world's biggest passenger aircraft completed its maiden voyage to America on Monday, flying on football field-length wings and a prayer that the U.S. airline industry will want to buy the double-decker jumbo jet.

The four-engine Airbus A380 touched down at Kennedy International Airport at about 12:10 p.m. EDT, to the cheers of onlookers gathered to watch the arrival. As the plane taxied, a pilot waved an American flag. Minutes later, a separate A380 arrived in Los Angeles, but was devoid of any passengers.

The nearly eight-hour trans-Atlantic flight was a chance for plane builder Airbus and German airline Lufthansa AG to show off the jewel of Airbus' offerings to potential American buyers and to the airports they hope to turn into flight bases for the jet. The 239-foot-long A380 can seat as many as 550 passengers, hold 81,890 gallons of fuel, cruise at 560 mph and fly some 8,000 nautical miles.

Lufthansa Flight 8940 is meant to be a statement by Airbus that it can accommodate vast numbers of travelers comfortably and efficiently.

"We're talking about an airplane that is representing aviation in the 21st century in terms of efficiency," said Jens Bischoff, Lufthansa's vice president for the Americas.

It was one of the highest-profile maiden voyages since 1969, when the Concorde, the world's first and still only commercial supersonic transport, arrived at JFK from London. The European-made Concorde was retired from British and French service in 2005.

Airbus hopes the A380 — designed to carry more people farther than any plane in history, though at subsonic speeds — will dominate air travel for the next two decades.

---

CBS News correspondent Bob Orr took a video tour of the Airbus 380 in 2001. See what he found.

---

Waiting in the wings, however, is Boeing Co., whose 747 jumbo jet has been the world's principal long-haul aircraft for the past 30 years and now has competitors to the A380 in early production.

For Airbus, which has been beset by management and financial problems — including a two-year delay to the A380 that wiped out more than $6.61 billion in profit forecasts — the flight is a chance to prove that the plane will be ready when the first deliveries are made in October to Singapore airlines.

Lufthansa chief pilot Juergen Raps, who has flown the A380 before, said that despite the superjumbo jet's size, it was nimble and responsive.

"If I were to compare it to driving, you would think this would be like driving a truck or a bus," he said inside the plane's cockpit. "It's like driving a Ferrari."

The air show began early Monday at Frankfurt International Airport when the A380 took off as Lufthansa Flight 8940 for the flight to Kennedy. Onboard were 483 people, including four pilots, four Airbus crew members, 23 Lufthansa cabin crew and several hundred passengers, mostly Airbus and Lufthansa employees along with some reporters.

The flight was to operate just as if it were a commercial one with full dining and entertainment services.

After the inaugural run, Lufthansa and Airbus will operate a demonstration flight to Chicago's O'Hare Airport on Tuesday, before returning to New York and then Frankfurt. The plane then heads to Hong Kong and back, before continuing its journey to Washington Dulles International Airport on March 25, with a final stop at Lufthansa's Munich hub on March 28.

Using the performance results from this circuit — flying the plane as it would be done so if it were in service — Lufthansa's goal is to match the A380's turnaround time from landing to takeoff with that of much smaller long-haul jets already in operation.

Airbus has 166 orders from 15 airlines for the new plane, which has already made tests flights in Europe and to Asia.

"We are proud that ... we are now able to present the A380 to the American people," said Mario Heinen, the head of Airbus' A380 program.

The Los Angeles International Airport nearly lost out on the highly anticipated landing of an A380 there after Airbus announced plans to land the jet in New York instead.

The company revised its plan to allow for arrival at both locations. Los Angeles sped up construction of a $9 million gate for the giant gate to accommodate the plane.

Toulouse, France-based Airbus said that plane will perform tests at the California airport, including airfield maneuvers, docking at the terminal gate and ground and gate handling exercises. The Los Angeles airport, the fifth-busiest worldwide, is expected to be the first U.S. destination for the A380 when it enters commercial service.

The flights come as Airbus looks to put what Louis Gallois, co-chief executive of parent company European Aeronautic Defense and Space Co., called "the worst year for Airbus in its life" behind it. Airbus is seeking to recoup its losses by cutting 10,000 jobs and spinning off or closing six of its European manufacturing plants.

[nothappyatall]

Yet another massive waste of fuel, and another larger terrorist target to use to kill 500 in one shot instead of 300.

" 550 passengers, burn a gallon of gas per passenger every 80 miles"

That's 550 gallons of gas to fly only 80 miles, 5,500 gallons to fly just 800 miles. This is nothing less than an astounding waste of ever shortening supplies of gas just to move people from A to B- people: stay HOME!

[rafterman1]

Well, not necessarily more expensive. If you can use one, slightly more fuel-expensive jet to take the same number of people in one flight that a smaller jet would require two flights, you save fuel overall.

[p1zaul]

newster1 you're a straight idiot.

http://travel.howstuffworks.com/question192.htm

[lochlan-2009]

So, I guess my car gets 150 miles per passenger.

[nolalou]

Since it's called an AirBus, to fit all those extra passengers, do some people have to stand in the aisle, holding on to those overhead straps, like on a bus? :)

[us_infidel]

ever shortening supplies of gas just to move people from A to B- people: stay HOME!

Posted by newster1 at 12:44 PM : Mar 19, 2007

Actually, it's Jet-A, a kerosene. We'll just do like ALGore, Edwards, et al......build a pollution credit in to the fare.

[delta5243]

I wonder how much that thing costs ???

[rf35]

I hope it's more comfortable than the coach sections of the 747, 777, or MD11.

[b727100bear]

It's an ugly, bloated looking airplane that resembles a pregnant whale! The Boeing 747 is graceful, aesthetically pleasing and will always be the standard to which all other widebody aircraft will be compared. Considering the number of A380 orders cancelled by Federal Express Corporation and others to date, this U.S. tour is clearly a damage control effort by Airbus Industrie.

[jolsonbear]

Great!!! Germany has sent us another friggin Dirigible. Most of these things are full of business travelers; idiots who don't know that there is a faster, cheaper and more fuel efficient form of business travel--Video Conference. Almost all business travelers you see actually spend 90% of there time on thier laptops and blackberrys "connected" to thier clients back home. Why not stay home where you can actually face-toface with the majority of your clients and "connect" to your global clients electronically.

[tvgenius]

No thanks. Now you can be crammed into your seat along with 500 other people instead of 230. How about getting serious about building on Amtrak's strengths and developing a nationwide rail system that is as good as it could be.

[ghggg]

Is it me or did anyone else notice that little wobble it did as it taxied down the runway? Also, why are the wings flopping like that? I understand aerodynamics but those wings don't look stable to me.

[theway6]

nikosk1, another uninformed Kool Aid drinker I see. The first US President to fly on such an aircraft was a Democrat (Roosevelt), and another Democrat ordered a bigger plan (Truman). Yet another Democrat ordered up the first big jet. That would be Kennedy using a B707 airframe. Last time I checked, unemployment is at an all time low, economy is great, and no terror bombs have gone off in the US. Not bad for a "republican" president. Such single minded thoughts do not serve you well.

[theway6]

zootallures2, your comment is simply tasteless and an insult to all those who died to protect the world from nut cases such as Hitler and Mussolini. This is not to mention the millions of Jews and political prisoners that were killed for sport. At that time Germany deservedly drew the world's wrath. Lest you think terrorism is a joke, remember that folks such as yourself are the first targets in their eyes.

[freezulu]

I work for FedEx - we cancelled our A380 orders and opted for the Boeing 777F. UPS has also cancelled all of their A380 orders. Airbus is running at least 2 YEARS behind schedule! They have to sell over 200 A380s now just to break even - good luck on that.

[speechwrite1]

jagarundi, the A380's wings flex by design; if they did not, they'd never withstand the loads imposed on them by normal flight or turbulence. One only needs to look at the venerable B-52 as it takes to the air. Its fuel-laden wings, supported on the ground by small outrigger tires, rise nearly 20'at the wingtip as lift offsets gravity. Any flexing, horizontal or vertical, you see on a large plane serves the same general purpose -- protecting the airframe from the loads of flight.

[speechwrite1]

jagarundi, the A380's wings flex by design; if they did not, they'd never withstand the loads imposed on them by normal flight or turbulence. One only needs to look at the venerable B-52 as it takes to the air. Its fuel-laden wings, supported on the ground by small outrigger tires, rise nearly 20'at the wingtip as lift offsets gravity. Any flexing, horizontal or vertical, you see on a large plane serves the same general purpose -- protecting the airframe from the loads of flight.

[speechwrite1]

jagarundi, the A380's wings flex by design; if they did not, they'd never withstand the loads imposed on them by normal flight or turbulence. One only needs to look at the venerable B-52 as it takes to the air. Its fuel-laden wings, supported on the ground by small outrigger tires, rise nearly 20'at the wingtip as lift offsets gravity. Any flexing, horizontal or vertical, you see on a large plane serves the same general purpose -- protecting the airframe from the loads of flight.

[speechwrite1]

Sorry about that, folks. The publish button went wild on me.

[speechwrite1]

nikoski1, the White House (whether D or R) would not order an A380. The 747-200B in use today gets in and out of many of the world's municipal airports already adapted to the standard passenger version, while the A380 is going to be limited to a precious few landing sites, due to its ramp space limitations and runway width issues. Boeing will have the edge for the foreseeable future. Physics and logistics trump politics in this case.

[speechwrite1]

nikosk1, Mr. Reagan did not "order" the replacement to the 707; the plan to replace the aging airframes of both Special Air Mission (SAM) 707s began before Reagan, and the first 747 was delivered during the first Bush presidency.

[toolmangler-2009]

I love it!!!! Now we an airplane that can destroy 2 tall buildings in a single mound!!!!

[candojj1]

How many SAMs does it take to shoot this sucka out of the sky? What an idiotic idea!!! What's the range of a sam? This thing must be visible from Afghanistan on take off from Sydney.

[jimbo554]

Wobble, heck, it looked like it was about to skid sideways to me.