Iraq: Four Years Later
Polls: War Has Been Longer, Bloodier Than Americans Expected; Most Favor Troop Pullout
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Bush: Iraq Can Still Be Won
On the fourth anniversary of the beginning of the Iraq war, President Bush insisted that victory could still be achieved. "The fight is difficult but it can be won," he said. Jim Axelrod reports.
-
Video
Lessons From Abu Ghraib
Ret. Army Captain Andrew Exum weighs in on the prison abuse scandal at Abu Ghraib and remembers his tours of duty in Iraq and Afghanistan.
-
Video
Containing Iraq's Hotspots
More than half of all insurgent attacks have taken place in Baghdad and Anbar Province. As a result, the U.S. troop buildup has been primarily focused on those two areas. Allen Pizzey reports.
-
-
Photo
A U.S. army vehicle burns in an eastern suburb of Baghdad, Iraq, March 18, 2007, after an apparent attack by insurgents. (AP/APTN/Pool)
-
Photo
U.S. Army soldiers of the 5th Battalion, 20th Infantry Regiment, 3rd Stryker Brigade Combat Team, out of Fort Lewis, Washington, on patrol in Baqouba, Iraq, March 15, 2007. (AP Photo/U.S. Army)
-
Photo
Anti-war demonstrators in Bangor, Maine, sing protest songs and carry signs including "Patriot For Peace" and "Support The Troops - Impeach Bush" as they form a human peace sign in the snow, March 18, 2007. (AP)
-
Photo
Iraqi National Police recruits practice their search techniques at the Joint Security Station in the Hurriyah neighborhood of Baghdad, Iraq, March 14, 2007. (AP)
-
Photo
Celeste Zappala - whose son, Army Sgt. Sherwood Baker, was killed by an explosion in Baghdad - listens to a speaker at an Iraq war anniversary vigil in Philadelphia, March 18, 2007. (AP)
-
-
Interactive
Iraq: 4 Years Later
The conflict wears on as the nation struggles to rebuild.
-
Photo Essay
Anniversary Protests
Demonstrations around the world as the war in Iraq enters its fifth year.
-
Interactive
American Heroes
Profiles of U.S. soldiers who've died in Iraq, a look at the war's toll and pictures of mourning.
Americans did not expect the war to last this long, nor did they think it would cost as many lives as it has.
President Bush continues to receive low ratings on his handling of Iraq and most Americans now oppose his decision to send more troops there. Democrats, meanwhile, are challenging Mr. Bush's Iraq policy, winning House committee approval this week for a troop withdrawal deadline of Sept. 1, 2008, but suffering defeat in the Senate on a separate plan to end the war.
More than half the public now believes the U.S. will not succeed in Iraq. A February poll found that just 20 percent think there's something the U.S. can do to stop the fighting between Iraqis, while 70 percent think there's not much the U.S. can do about it.
WILL THE U.S. SUCCEED IN IRAQ?
3/2007
Very likely
Somewhat likely
Not very/at all likely
Nearly seven in ten Americans now say things are going badly for the U.S. in Iraq; just 29 percent say things are going well. That's a complete reversal from May 2003, two months into the war, when more than seven in 10 thought things in Iraq were going well. Assessments remained positive until shortly after Saddam Hussein was captured in December 2003. Since then, however, views have become gloomier.
The war has been longer and bloodier than Americans expected. At the start of the war, Americans thought it would be a short conflict with fewer than 1,000 fatalities. Since then, over 3,200 U.S. troops have died and more than 24,000 have been wounded.
Asked in March 2003 how many U.S. troops they thought would die in the war, 66 percent of Americans said less than 1,000. Just 22 percent thought more than 1,000 U.S. soldiers would be killed.
EXPECTATIONS FOR U.S. LOSS OF LIFE
3/20-3/24/2003
Less than 1,000
1,000-5,000
More than that
Tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians have also been killed in the war, but precise figures are difficult to come by. Estimates range from more than 50,000 into the hundreds of thousands, the Associated Press says. The U.N. Assistance Mission for Iraq reports more than 34,000 deaths in 2006 alone.
In April 2003, just weeks after the fall of Baghdad, seven in 10 Americans thought U.S. troops would be in Iraq for two years or less. Only 27 percent thought they'd be there longer than two years.
Now, Americans indicate they're ready for the troops to start coming home. Fifty-six percent want to decrease U.S. troop levels or remove all U.S. forces from Iraq. Nearly six in ten oppose President Bush's decision to deploy more than 20,000 additional troops to Iraq.
U.S. TROOP LEVELS IN IRAQ SHOULD…
3/2007
Increase
Keep the same number
Decrease
Remove all troops
Americans give the president some leeway, however. More than half think it will take at six months to determine if the troop increase is working.
Despite the political arguments that have surrounded the troop and funding decisions, more than seven in ten Americans say one can oppose the war and still support U.S. troops.
The American people continue to give Mr. Bush low marks for his leadership on Iraq. His current approval rating is 28 percent; he has not reached the 30 percent mark since October 2006.
That's a far cry from April 2003, after the fall of Baghdad, when Mr. Bush enjoyed a high of 79 percent approval. But as U.S. troops continued to suffer casualties, even after the president's declaration that major combat had ended, more Americans began to disapprove of Mr. Bush's handling of the war. There was a brief surge in support following Saddam's capture, but more Americans have disapproved than approved of the president's handing of the war since March 2004.
Mr. Bush has also been hurt by the recent reports of shoddy treatment of veterans at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center. Three in four Americans do not think the Bush administration has done enough to care for these wounded soldiers.
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
- Latest in Opinion: CBS News Polls
- Poll: Most Back Public Health Care Option
- Poll: Sotomayor Still An Unknown
- Poll: No Dent In Obama's Popularity



- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- next
See all 227 CommentsHeck of a job Bushies!
This so called "war on terror" seems to be going about as well as the so called "war on drugs."
"Americans did not expect the war to last this long, nor did they think it would cost as many lives as it has."
Now, why would that be?
Who was it that repeatedly claimed Iraqis would "greet us as liberators?"
Who was it that claimed "mission accomplished, major combat operations are over" (four years ago)?
Who was it that claimed the "hostilities would only last six months, if that"?
Who was it that claimed Iraq's oil would easily pay all the costs of the invasion, occupation and reconstruction?
Who is responsible for all those and many other lies?
And, why hasn't he been prosecuted?
Well Bushies, you wanted your war, you kicked and screamed for it, you expended incredible energy lying about it. Now as the war goes so do your political fortunes.
I was once proud to be american and proud to say i i'm a vet,now i just want out.You all in congress and capital hill and white house should be working for america and the americans that elected you to protect us,that isn't the case and i know why. I have been looking and found something that all america has forgotton.Who said this statement: If the personal freedoms of all americans by the Constitution and bill of right are Inhibiting the Government ability to (Govern)that meant control, the people of united states of america..Than we Should look to Limit those GUARANTEES #2.The united states Government CAN'T BE so fixed on our desires to preserve the RIGHTS of ORDINARY AMERICANS #3.I can do any ********* thing i want,I'm president of the united states and you dont forget that.....who am I..... so you all have been following your orders well i want you all to know that i hold all of you accountable for the murders of thousends of americans that have died and wounded in a war we have no buisness being in,
You hold us all responsible? So be it. I suppose you have as much right to judge as the next guy.
Find an event near you, to display your dissatisfaction:
www.unitedforpeace.org/article.php?id=3545
The American people continue to give Mr. Bush low marks for his leadership on Iraq. His current approval rating is 28 percent; he has not reached the 30 percent mark since October 2006. More Americans have disapproved than approved of the president's handing of the war since March 2004.
Mr. Bush has also been hurt by the recent reports of shoddy treatment of veterans at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center. Three in four Americans do not think the Bush administration has done enough to care for these wounded soldiers.
1)How did Bush know he was safe at the school house when any plane in the sky could be hijacked at any minute?
a) God told him.
b) al-Qeada hates American people but loves it's leaders.
c) Bush is the real terrorist.
2) Why did Hani Honjoure go out of his way to hit a recently reinforced section of the Pentagon and not the head offices of Rumsfeld and to brass?
a) al-Qeada's main Jihad is against construction workers.
b) The third pillar of Islam states: "Hurt none who rank high in the United States Military".
c) Rumsfeld is really al-Qeada #3.
If I had to watch Iraqi soldiers driving by my house all day, I'd be a "terrorist" too. I mean no offense to the troops. They are just doing what they are told.
And speaking of "Poles", how did the American die raking leaves?
a) Heart attack from the wrong medication his doctor was paid off to prescribe by stock holders in the company that made the drug.
b) His wife ran him down after finding gay teen porn on his computer.
c) A Polish Jew told him he could save time by raking them in the tree.
How are we to stop terrorist from entering our country when the majority of our military is overseas fighting a war that can't be won.......
Yet you just don't care enough to stop it.
Go ahead, impeach Bu$h and Cheney
Do something you can be proud of.
ASK THEM HOW MUCH AIPAC INFLUENCES THEIR VOTES ON IRAQ?
http://www.aipac.org/forms/join_aipacClubs.htm
Alexander, Lamar- (R - TN)
Allard, Wayne- (R - CO)
Chambliss, Saxby- (R - GA)
Cochran, Thad- (R - MS)
Coleman, Norm- (R - MN)
Collins, Susan M.- (R - ME)
Cornyn, John- (R - TX)
Craig, Larry E.- (R - ID)
Dole, Elizabeth- (R - NC)
Enzi, Michael B.- (R - WY)
Graham, Lindsey- (R - SC)
Hagel, Chuck- (R - NE)
Inhofe, James M.- (R - OK)
McConnell, Mitch- (R - KY)
Roberts, Pat- (R - KS)
Sessions, Jeff- (R - AL)
Smith, Gordon H.- (R - OR)
Stevens, Ted- (R - AK)
Sununu, John E.- (R - NH)
Warner, John- (R - VA)
If you think Americas sacrifice is worth it contact your ELECTED OFFICIAL and tell them http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/
The House Speakers email address: AmericanVoices@mail.house.gov
info@gop.com Here is the Republican Party email address too!
democraticparty@democrats.org Here is the Democratic Party email address also!
I have full confidence that VP Cheney could bring his shotgun to interviews and get away with it. And Alberto could host his own torture TV network that would sky rocket to #1 in a week.
1)How did Bush know he was safe at the school house when any plane in the sky could be hijacked at any minute?
a) God told him.
b) al-Qeada hates American people but loves it's leaders.
c) Bush is the real terrorist.
2) Why did Hani Honjoure go out of his way to hit a recently reinforced section of the Pentagon and not the head offices of Rumsfeld and to brass?
a) al-Qeada's main Jihad is against construction workers.
b) The third pillar of Islam states: "Hurt none who rank high in the United States Military".
c) Rumsfeld is really al-Qeada #3.
And now the results after asking 250 million Americans. There is a 2% error margin.
1)How did Bush know he was safe at the school house when any plane in the sky could be hijacked at any minute?
a) God told him. - 38%
b) al-Qeada hates American people but loves it's leaders. - 61%
c) Bush is the real terrorist. - 1%
2) Why did Hani Honjoure go out of his way to hit a recently reinforced section of the Pentagon and not the head offices of Rumsfeld and to brass?
a) al-Qeada's main Jihad is against construction workers. - 25%
b) The third pillar of Islam states: "Hurt none who rank high in the United States Military". - 72%
c) Rumsfeld is really al-Qeada #3. - 3%
Founded in 1953 by Isaiah L. "Si" Kenen, AIPAC's original name was the American Zionist Committee for Public Affairs. According to UCLA political science professor and author, Steven Spiegel, "the tension between the Eisenhower administration and Israeli supporters was so acute that there were rumors that the administration would investigate the American Zionist Council. Therefore, an independent lobbying committee was formed, which years later was renamed [AIPAC]." [SPIEGEL, p. 52].[citation needed] Today, AIPAC has over 100,000 members.[1]
Activities and stated goals
AIPAC's stated purpose is to lobby the Congress of the United States on issues and legislation "to ensure that the U.S.-Israel relationship is strong so that both countries can work together" to meet the challenges of "stopping Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, fighting terrorism and achieving peace".[2] It regularly meets with members of Congress and holds events where it can share its views. It also provides analysis of the voting records of U.S. federal representatives and senators with regard to how they voted on legislation related to Israel. The New York Times described AIPAC on July 6, 1987 as "a major force in shaping United States policy in the Middle East."
READ AIPAC AD BELOW
http://www.aipac.org/forms/join_aipacClubs.htm
The money we spend defending Israel would put every man, woman and child in Israel on luxury cruise ships for life with hundred dollar bills to use for toilet paper.
The religios right is spending our money and blood to defend a country whose people don't even believe Jesus was the son of God. How's that for irony? I have nothing against Jews, I just don't feel we owe the nation of Israel our lives and future. They aren't even allowed to help us in our "War on Terror" because, believe it or not, they are less popular than even us.
Is it just my government that doesn't seem to be doing what government is intended to do or is YOUR government and all the rest at fault also?
Posted by XLT150
Yes, we went to Iraq because: (1) they must have attacked the USA; or (2) they must have supported Al Qaeda who did attack the USA; or (3) they must have had WMD's like Bush said.
Well, none of these are true. We went to Iraq because we have warmongering leaders who think of nothing to keep their own power at any cost. They have lied to America and the World. And Rumsfeld and other top Bush Admin and Defense Dept individuals are answering War Crimes charges in an International War Crimes Tribunal in the country of one of our Allies (Germany). I guess that is NOT a surprise since there really is NO legitimate reason to be in Iraq now, XLT150.
During their terms, it is essential that our leaders hear what we think of what they are doing so they can make decisions appropriately. The media is responsible for conducting polls since no one else will. If you don't like the results of a poll, the only way to change those results is to change the reality of the issues being polled.
The biggest problem with polls is that millions of people turn off their home phones after deciding to use only their cell phones. People are also learning to get themselves on "do not call" lists or request that their numbers be unpublished. Pollsters then can only reach those who have not taken these measures.
If the only people being polled are those with landlines, who are home instead of out doing something, who also tend to answer calls when the caller ID says "unknown caller", the polls may eventually only reflect the opinions of idiots.
Let's see, in chess, if you capture the oponent's king and as an added plus, your oponent is trying to kill himself....
No, I think you need more tax money and troops... total failure!
That's funny, because for the pasts 4 years they've been trying to fix and rebuild Iraq.... maybe I missed something here?
LMAO!!!
Grammer aside, if you do not have the money to spend on an election you cannot get elected. Sad as that may be, that's the simple truth.
"The military is on a nobel mission to rebuild Iraq"
So neo-cons... which is it???????
I think as soon as you solve this argument, there may actually be a strategy for the war in Iraq.
Posted by zootallures2
In chess, when you capture the opponent's king, and three years later the game is still raging on with no end in sight, it suddenly occurs to you...
THIS AIN'T NO EFF'N CHESS GAME !!
And if it were, the last person in America I'd want making moves for my side on the chessboard, is George W. Bush.
He is checkmated, which means he would be captured if he were to move again. The losing player generally resigns long before that happens.
His king is never actually captured.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- next
See all 227 Comments