Clinton Would Keep Some Troops In Iraq
The Skinny: Democratic Presidential Hopeful Tells N.Y. Times Reduced U.S. Force Needed To Fight al Qaeda
-
Photo
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y. (Getty Images)
-
Who's Who
2008 Democratic Hopefuls
Clinton, Obama and Edwards lead the chase for the Democratic nomination.
-
Who's Who
2008 Republican Hopefuls
McCain and Giuliani head up the Republican pack chasing the presidency.
Sen. Hillary Clinton sheds new light on what she'd do about Iraq if she were elected president in a New York Times interview Thursday.
The Democratic frontrunner has advocated "bringing the troops home," but she tells the newspaper she'd keep a reduced U.S. military force in Iraq to fight al Qaeda, discourage Iranian aggression, protect the Kurds and perhaps assist the Iraqi military.
"I think we have remaining vital national security interests in Iraq” she said, which require the continued presence of American troops.
Clinton wouldn’t give precise figures on the size of the U.S. force she envisions remaining in Iraq, but she said it would not be involved in urban warfare in Baghdad or in trying to quell sectarian violence.
"It would be far fewer troops," she said. "We would not be doing patrols. We would not be kicking in doors. We would not be trying to insert ourselves in the middle between the various Shiite and Sunni factions. I do not think that is a smart or achievable mission for American forces."
She also criticized President Bush's troop buildup in Iraq, but said, "We’re doing it, and it’s unlikely we can stop it."
Clinton said she would vote for the Democratic resolution on Iraq now being debated in the Senate, which calls for the pullout of U.S. combat forces from Iraq by the end of March 2008. She noted that the resolution also calls for “a limited number” of troops to remain in Iraq after that date.
Has McCain Lost His Maverick Touch?
John McCain's invitation to match wits with him on his Web site on picking the NCAA tourney winners may be a first for a presidential candidate, but the Washington Post still wonders if the Arizona senator is losing the maverick spirit that invigorated his 2000 campaign.
After nearly riding his "Straight Talk Express" to the White House seven years ago, the Post says McCain "has become the very picture of the highly managed presidential candidate he once scorned."
And that, the paper says, is losing him support.
McCain backers say he remains a maverick who has publicly challenged President Bush over U.S. torture policy, judges and campaign finance reform. But the Post points out that McCain has loaded his campaign staff with former Bush aides and has been one of the staunchest supporters of the president's Iraq policy.
The GOP campaign landscape is also far different this time than in 2000, with both Rudy Giuliani and Mitt Romney taking up the mantle of Washington outsider.
"Among Republican voters, Rudy has become the John McCain of 2008," said Rep. Peter T. King of New York, a former McCain supporter who’s backing Giuliani now. "Being the guy who's tough, independent, an iconoclast – he is a newer version of John McCain."
Following The Obama Trail… To Indonesia
News organizations continue to roll up the frequent flier miles exploring Sen. Barack Obama's peripatetic childhood. The Los Angeles Times sent a reporter all the way to Indonesia to report on the four years Obama spent there as a boy and the impact living in a Muslim country had on him – and could have on his presidential aspirations.
The Times says that Obama "crisscrossed the religious divide" in Indonesia. "At the local primary school, he prayed in thanks to a Catholic saint. In the neighborhood mosque, he bowed to Allah."
Obama's campaign has emphasized his strong Christian beliefs and says he "has never been a practicing Muslim." A false report earlier this year that he attended a radical madrasa in Jakarta caused a brief stir before it was shot down.
Still, the Times says that while an understanding of the Muslim world might seem an advantage for a White House hopeful, any "connection with Islam is untrod territory for presidential politics."
A NOTE TO READERS: The Skinny is now available via e-mail for those of you umbilically attached to your blackberries and whatnot. Click here and follow the directions to register to receive it in your inbox each weekday morning.
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Video and Galleries from CBS Evening News: The Skinny
- Latest in CBS Evening News: The Skinny
- Anatomy Of An Intentional Foreclosure
- Nevada Tree Killer Gets 5 Years In Prison
- Two Steps Forward, One Step Back In Iraq



"It would be far fewer troops," she said. "We would not be doing patrols. We would not be kicking in doors.
Hillary Clinton
How the heck is she going to do all that with fewer troops? If you want to find "torrorist" kicking in doors in urban areas is exactly where you have to be. Someone explain this to me as I am confused. It's either all or nothing. And right now I am thinking call it a day and go home because we don't have the ability to do the "all" option.
I know politicians always do that, but she's the worst I've seen.
He and Hillary are in the same bed these days - saying whatever to win a few votes. Straight Talk Express is out of coal and out of steam...
John Dean's attempt at a coup d'etat.
CBS seems to routinely exclude news stories about Democrats who make fools of themselves :)
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0307/3142.html
Did a lot of 'detainees' do bad things? Yes, so take them to court and show everyone what we know. It's a fine line between the good of the many and winning the war but Bush and crew and doing a lot of damage in the name of a bogus cause.
Secret prisons and courts typically belonged to the Nazis, Stalin and the KGB and other governements who care nothing about people rights. When we give up those last rights (since Bush has taken away so many other things), we become just like them. Maybe that was GB 41's idea of a new world order.
------------------------
Civil rights pertain to CIVILIANS, not enemy combatants. Civilized society gets to act civilized only after the military has made it safe.
It doesn't work the way neo-commie Democrats proclaim. They know that. Neo-commies have a long history of denying people of their rights and are experts at thinning the ranks of those who disagree by sending them to the firing squads following a 2 minute administrative review.
Any rhetoric from the neo-commies about "rights" is all about political opportunism.
The only way this will work is to flat out knock 'em senseless first. Make them bleed, make them hurt. Fill their sand with bodies. It is too bad that there will be lots of collateral damage in this process, but this could have been avoided if we would extracted enough damage four years ago.
Barack has absolutely nothing to hide from about his childhood--he should not make any emphatic statements about not being a Muslim. If his parents put him in various kinds of religious schools during his early childhood that is commendable, doesn't make him somehow sympathetic to Islamism, and makes everyone who claims otherwise a bigot whose upon should not be courted or catered to.
As for McCain, it's tragic that a man who could see the moral light and take the high ground against torture hasn't been able to follow those insights all the way to opposing the rest of the Bush program. I'm grateful for his one act of resistance, but that's not enough. And I think even rank and file Republicans feel that it's not enough.
I tried to tell you all that no matter who was in the white house, we are never leaving, we will have permanent bases there, that is just the way it will be. Now even Your "goddess" Hillary can see the big picture.
Name one "Strategic" country (except China & Vietnam) the United States ever got a foothold in and then left. We are in the middle East to stay! Get used to it!
Hello??? What do you think they are doing now, silly little girl. Why don't you go home and fight pervert? Show you are really a woman and not some silly lil' a%%.
Oh yeah, she doesn't want us to get involved in an ethnic war, so tell me, dear Shrill Shrew, what the f*ck were we doing in Kosovo. And where were you after pervert lied and was impeached when he sent the B-52s - not to bomb terror targets in Afghanistan on a regular basis - remember Al Qaeda had just struck our Embassies in Africa -but to bomb innocent, pro-American Serbs in downtown Belgrade??
Where were you, stupid little girl?
Oh, probably baking cookies while the draft dodger was getting bj's from his pet Pig NotBright.
Yet, they publish 3 days worth of a DeLay book slamming Gingrich and other republicans.
Nope....no bias at CBS that I can see.
Posted by Lieber1881 at 05:43 AM : Mar 16, 2007
And writing about how it "takes a village" to raise children. For democrats, it's a village of idiots!
Sensorship...LOL. No stories at all about Ron Paul for president. Just the communists and national socialists candidates appointed by banks, corporations, and AIPAC.
Sign this Appeal.
This site is an Appeal For Redress in support of our mission in Iraq.
An Appeal For Redress is an authorized means for active duty military to submit a grievance to Congress. It can be signed by Active Duty, Reserve, or National Guard military personnel.
It is authorized by DoD Directive 1325.6 and DoD Directive 7050.6.
The wording of the Appeal for Redress is:
As an American currently serving my nation in uniform, I respectfully urge my political leaders in Congress to fully support our mission in Iraq and halt any calls for retreat. I also respectfully urge my political leaders to actively oppose media efforts which embolden my enemy while demoralizing American support at home. The War in Iraq is a necessary and just effort to bring freedom to the Middle East and protect America from further attack.
If you are active duty, reservist or national guard, please Sign this Appeal.
Most service members fully support the war in Iraq and feel calls to retreat by Congress and attacks by our media on our conduct and mission act to motivate our enemy while demoralizing our support at home, directly increasing the threat we face and resulting in greater American casualties. This Appeal for Redress provides a way in which individual service members can appeal to Congress to fully support us and actively oppose media attacks on our mission and our morale.
This Appeal will be delivered to members of Congress.
http://www.appealforcourage.org/
-
by pakaal
March 16, 2007 8:15 PM PDT
- Lieber1881 !? Wasn't it Lieber881 half an hour ago? And lieberman18 before that, janem4, Janeymcgreevey, etc.
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 27 CommentsGirl, you really should tone down your shallow, vicious smears so you don't your latest name(s) banned from the CBS site so often. You're gonna run out of user names in a couple weeks at this rate!