9/11 Mastermind: I Killed Daniel Pearl
Al Qaeda No. 3 Says He Beheaded Wall Street Journal Reporter
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Detainee Admits 9/11 Plot
According to the Pentagon, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed admitted responsibility for the Sept. 11 attacks as well as other plots. David Martin reports.
-
Photo
Slain Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl, left, and Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the alleged mastermind of the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks. Mohammed is quoted as saying, "I decapitated with my blessed right hand the head of the American Jew, Daniel Pearl, in the city of Karachi, Pakistan." (AP Photo)
-
Interactive
Sept. 11 Investigation
Al Qaeda arrests, the FBI's most wanted, military tribunals and a look inside Gitmo.
-
Interactive
Bin Laden & Al Qaeda
Where al Qaeda operates, who's been caught, how they're financed and a timeline of attacks on Americans.
-
Special Report
War On Terror
Complete coverage of the military's battle against terrorism.
"I decapitated with my blessed right hand the head of the American Jew, Daniel Pearl, in the city of Karachi, Pakistan," Mohammed is quoted as saying in a transcript of a military hearing at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, released by the Defense Department.
"For those who would like to confirm, there are pictures of me on the Internet holding his head," he added.
Mohammed's claimed involvement in the 2002 slaying of the Wall Street Journal reporter was among 31 attacks and plots — some of which never came to fruition — he took responsibility for in a hearing Saturday at the U.S. naval prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, the Pentagon said.
It released the bulk of the transcript late Wednesday, but held back the section about Pearl's killing to allow time for his family to be notified, said Defense Department spokesman Bryan Whitman.
The Associated Press reported Wednesday that it had learned that the transcripts released Wednesday evening had blacked out the reference to Mohammed's confession about the Pearl slaying. Pearl was abducted in January 2002 in Pakistan while researching a story on Islamic militancy. Mohammed has long been a suspect in the slaying, which was captured on video.U.S. military transcripts of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's confessions.
Sealing a legacy of historical notoriety, Mohammed portrayed himself as al Qaeda's most ambitious operational planner in a confession to a U.S. military tribunal.
The Guantanamo Bay hearing, known as a Combatant Status Review Tribunal, is a formality allowing the military to certify a detainee as an "enemy combatant" who warrants further detention and can be prosecuted by a military tribunal. In Mohammed's case, the prisoner made matters quite simple. "For sure, I'm American enemies," he said. "I don't have anything to say that I'm not enemy," reports CBS Evening News producer Phil Hirshkorn.
Mohammed’s language offers what CBS news consultant Paul Kurtz says is a fascinating insight into the mastermind behind Sept. 11.
"He is a warrior, and he's taking on his enemy the way he sees fit," Kurtz tells CBS News national security correspondent David Martin. "He's sorry about losing 3,000 people over the World Trade Center attacks. Nonetheless, this is the language of war. He says that several times in the transcript."
Many plots, including a previously undisclosed plan to kill several former U.S. presidents, were never carried out or were foiled by international counterterrorism authorities.
"I was responsible for the 9/11 operation from A to Z," Mohammed said in a statement read Saturday during a Combatant Status Review Tribunal at the U.S. detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Mohammed's confession was read by a member of the U.S. military who is serving as his personal representative.
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
U.S. military transcripts of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's confessions.



- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 143 CommentsHis "confession" isn't worth paper it's printed on. "Confessions" obtained through coercion or torture are indadmissible in legitimate courts.
But, that's no problem for George Bush's kangaroo courts. Bush & supporters have already demonstated their disdain for the US Constitution and rule of law. Same as all dictators everywhere, past, present & future.
And who cares who killed Israel's spy in Pakistan? He played the game and lost. Too bad for him, that's what happens to spies.
Posted by connapa
but first have him tell us how they got around our air-defenses - on the very day they were out over Alaska on manouvers!
Stop defending the indefensible, you low-life terrorist apologist traitors.
If you don't have the guts to defend this country, then I personally invite you to GET THE HELL OUT!
Posted by connapa at 10:50 AM : Mar 15, 2007
Legitimate courts use something called the "rule of law" and it requires prosecutors to prove their case beyond reasonable doubt.
Based on credible evidence.
Since there is no credible evidence, the case cannot be prosecuted anywhere other than a kangaroo court more suited for Zimbabwe than the US.
"Confessions" obtained through coercion or torture cannot be used in legitimate courts. They can only be used in courts in third world dictatorships, Israel and now, "courts" invented by the Bush administration.
The US is rapidly devolving into a third world dictatorship.
What about "I killed Lincoln and JFK?" LOL
Seriously, is there any killing that this guy is not responsible for? LOL
Posted by notblue
A) I love my Country - America.
B) I hate our dipshit president.
After FIVE solid years of CIA/military torture anyone would admit anything.
Sorry, Bu$h, not only is this story unbelieveable, in most nations it would be inadmissable in court.
Nice try.
Posted by notblue
A) I love my Country - America.
B) I hate our dipshit president - Bush II.
Posted by notblue
A) I love my Country - America.
B) I hate our dipshit president - Bush II.
C) Got your tickets to this years VFW bash the un-american, left wing, neo-commie meet yet?
D) Oh that's right you didn't serve, did you? Ask your bro to get the tickets for you!
Definitely he is not the one who is responsible for Mr. Pearl's killing. 3 persons are in Pakistani jail for that crime. One British born Pakistani who admitted this and that person was released from Indian jail to get the release of hi jacked Indian Air lines plane to Afghanistan by terrorists right under the Pakistani president.
And after getting out from Indian jail the first crime he committed was Mr. Pearl's . Not Khalid Sheik Ahmad. CIA was not even given to chance to interrogate that British born Pakistani and Pakistan's president refused to extradite him to US for Mr. Pearl's death. Do not get carried over by this insane fanatic. Pakistan wants only some terrorists to be arrested at it's will not all.
Foreign nations ordinarily are immune from lawsuits in U.S. courts, but Congress amended the law in 1996 to allow victims to seek monetary damages against countries classified as state sponsors of terrorism.
Why don't you explain 911 to us then.
Chuckle head a$$ clown
You don't outnumber anything, you worthless punk traitor.
Keep up your stupidity, and a civil war against you and your stupid terrorist-supporting movement is coming, and you and your ilk are going to be extinct soon.
Proof that torture is a great idea!
Anyone want to bet on the outcome?
The US has fared poorly in 9/11 matters.
Could it be it's all based on a lie?
Notice the timing.
When the administration gets its @ss in a jam, they trot out the big bad boogyman.
This guy has been under sensory deprivation, diet manipulation, & you name it for so long, he'll confess to being from the moon.
He's definitely a bad actor & is up to his eyeballs in Osama's pipe dreams, but really, how reliable is anything he says anymore? If I had to go through what he's been through, I'd be confessing to being Pearl's killer in a heartbeat.
The issue is that good intelligence has been scrambled and muddied with ham handed medieval tactics. Now we really don't know who really did what with any certainty.
You can bet those pictures are inflaming Muslim passions whenever their governments or leaders do something terrible as well...
Convenient timing for diversionary purposes is all this is.
Liberal?? CBS news constantly links to the christian science monitor and has some kind of deal with them, in bed with the christians basically to promote their side of everything. Note how stories always include the mini sermonettes about how "the lord..." "god said.."
puke!
Posted by newster1
I'd be willing to bet you're right on the money.............
http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/911Report_Ch5.htm
What a load of Bush-***! With the most conservative news anchor of any major news organization, except for FOX, no one can honestly believe CBS to be liberal anymore. Dan Rather is gone. And so is honest news reporting. The problem is that whenever a conservative hears anything constructive about the current White House, they immediately label it "liberal". Well wake up Conservatives, the whole world hates USA and therefore the whole world must be liberal! Correct?
This is the problem with the use of torture; even if the confessions are true no honest person can really believe it.
The past and obviously continuing lies and deceit of this administration just adds to the mistrust exhibited here.
Previously, it would have been ridiculous to believe any administration would ever deceive the people on the scale this one has.
It also would be ridiculous think the sun will no rise tomorrow, but if it fails to rise a couple of times one would start to doubt it
Posted by badaxmofo
Neither, it's badbrthmofo!!
Not as to some of your posts you never accepted clinton.
Anyway, what I wanted to say that most contributors are non-plus-ed, sceptical, unbelieving, wary, bored - I wonder why?
Have we all been so punched around by this government's "war on terror" for the last 6 years that - we really don't care anymore?
Posted by connapa at 10:50 AM : Mar 15, 2007
And while we're at it lets charge him with all of the Jack the Ripper murders and the murder of Adam Walsh too. Hell at this point this guy would confess to betting on baseball and making it look like it was Pete Rose. His "confession" is about as credible as that as*shole Bush saying he started the war in Iraq because of WMD's or to "spread freedom".
HOWEVER, does that mean that I think even he doesn't deserve the right of habeas corpus? No. In fact, this whole mess could be handled much more humanely. So before you start neo-cons start yelling "rah, rah, USA!" just remember that our standards used to be much higher before President Bush took office. And, it is likely that a number of these other detainees are not guilty of terrorism against the U.S.
So even though Mohammed may indeed be guilty, that doesn't make torture right. Nor does it make our government honest. Don't believe everything that is spoon-fed to you.
Video Google "terror storm" if you want to know what they are doing to all of us...so you can quit the Dem vs GOP crapola....
RG Panama city, Panama
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 143 Comments