February 11, 2009 5:12 PM

Pure Horserace: Road Hazards

By
Vaughn Ververs
(CBS)  Presidential politics is no place for nuance or "responsibility genes." That's something you'd expect a savvy political operative like Hillary Clinton to understand — which makes her interview in today's New York Times so puzzling. Having spent the past several months trying to convince Democratic activists of her anti-war bona fides, she hits the brakes — sort of.

Here's what Sen. Clinton said at a gathering of party members last month: "If we in Congress don't end this war before January 2009, as president, I will." Today, Clinton tells the Times that, as president, she would leave some contingent of U.S. troops in Iraq to help with the "remaining military as well as political mission" there.

Clinton said the number of troops she would keep there would be much reduced from current levels and that their mission would be to fight al Qaeda elements, prevent the spread of fighting across the region, train Iraqi security forces and stay out of the middle of any sectarian violence. If you think that sounds like a semi-reasonable approach someone who might be charged with leading the free world would take, well, then, you're probably going to be surprised at the reaction it's likely to provoke.

Look for a vocal segment of Clinton's own party to skewer her for, as they see it, stepping back from her pledge to "end the war" as president. For anti-war activists, the only acceptable policy is complete and total withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq. Clinton has been pressed on the campaign trail about her refusal to apologize for her vote authorizing the war — she certainly isn't going to be given a pass for this. Of course Republicans will see this as one more Clintonian attempt to have it both ways.

Is there enough room in the middle of her own party to keep straddling the line when it comes to Iraq? That appears to be the betting, here but usually the only thing left standing in the middle of the highway is road kill.


Speaking Of Hillary… The latest juicy detail to be leaked from Democratic strategists Bob Shrum's upcoming book is that the former first lady was on John Kerry's list of possible running mates but was ruled out because she was deemed too polarizing. That's according to an account by The Associated Press, which reported yesterday that Shrum's tome claims John Edwards' vote in favor of the 2002 authorization for the Iraq War was cast on the advice of his political advisers.

That the senator from New York might be on a list of some 25 possible vice presidential picks or that political considerations would play some role in casting a vote is hardly surprising. Neither is an attempt to sell books on the part of a consultant who has been involved in, count them, eight losing presidential campaigns. Grain of salt, anyone? How about a bucket?


McRudy Romney? A new poll by CBS' Boston affiliate WBZ and Franklin Pierce College shows a tightening three-way Republican race in New Hampshire. John McCain, winner of the 2000 New Hampshire primary, clings to a statistically insignificant lead over Rudy Giuliani, 29 percent to 28 percent. Meanwhile, Mitt Romney is sneaking up on the two front-runners, garnering 22 percent in this latest survey. Numbers for the Democratic primary were released yesterday.


That's Sooo Two Elections Ago: McCain has reached deep into his bag of tricks to try to recapture some of that 2000 campaign magic. Yep, he's pulled the "Straight Talk Express" bus out of mothballs and boards it today for an Iowa expedition. Here's hoping it's still equipped with state-of-the-art technology — like fax lines and dial-up Internet connections.


Gold Rush? California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger today signed legislation which moved his state's presidential primary up to Feb. 5 of next year. Conventional wisdom holds that this will again make the once-vital state a player in presidential politics. Solidly in the Democratic column in recent general elections, California has also been sidelined in the nominating process due to the fact its primary came late in the process — after nominations were already wrapped up.

So, more clout for the nation's most populous state, right? Yes – but how much more remains to be seen. Twenty or more states either have already moved to that same date or are looking at the possibility of doing so -- states like Florida, New Jersey, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Texas will compete for attention. A de facto national primary could leave California less pivotal than this move was designed for.


It's Good To Be The Gov: New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson has had a busy week. First, he signed legislation outlawing cock-fighting in his state, then made the bolo New Mexico's official tie with another stroke of his pen. Now, he's declared today "Alan Arkin Day." It seems the recent Academy Award winner makes his home in New Mexico and is being honored for his Best Supporting Actor award. Is this Richardson's way to reach out to the Hollywood crowd? Anyone holding their breath for New Mexico landowner Don Rumsfeld to get a day?

Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment See all 17 Comments
by randalds March 17, 2007 5:53 AM EDT
Mitt Romney will eventually rise to the top. Regardless of how the liberal Democratic media is trying to paint him, he is a true conservative. He balanced the budget every year of his term in Massachusetts. He fought against pro abortion legislation, gay marriage legislation, and other liberal legislation. He has been strong against illegal immigration. Don't worry US_Infidel, he will be a great president. www.mittromneyin2008.com
Posted by eric3170 at 09:19 PM : Mar 15, 2007

Thank you for that comment from Mitt Romney headquarters. You may be right since sh*it usually does float to the top, but I doubt that the hillbilly religious right that picks the republican nominee will go for a Mormon. I'm not saying it's right or that they can't make a mistake (Hell they we're actually stupid enough to think Bush, Cheney and Rove gave a sh*it about them, so you never can tell), but to them a Mormon is a cultist (even if they can't pronounce it) and they won't vote for him.
Reply to this comment
by forthepeaple March 16, 2007 10:53 AM EDT
HAVE BEEN TELLING ALL OF YOU TO GO AND READ THE FACTS TRUE FACTS ABOUT IRAQ AND IRAN..HOW MUCH LONGER TO I HAVE TO KEEP POSTING THE SAME THING UNTIL YOU ALL READ IT..go to www.scoop.co.nz go to search tab and put in PENTAGON WHISTLE-BLOWER IRAQ and read it..it is sad but true and until you americans wake up and smell the s/h/i/t/ that your government has been telling you for CENTURIES.....
americans need a real american to run this country so vote for david a belanger for president he is a real american and will only help america and americans. for-america@hotmail.com
Reply to this comment
by j02281 March 16, 2007 10:03 AM EDT
Mrs Clinton should be renounce to her ambitions.
America deserve more than her,and I will,pray
for America. God help us from her.
Reply to this comment
by j02281 March 16, 2007 9:59 AM EDT
America needs: Pants,courage,dignity, love for
our Nation. Mrs Clinton wants power,for what ?.
AMBITIONS. Thats all.
Power for lesbians,***,liberals,but she will
destroy our values. God help America from people
like her. Please God send back MR REAGAN.
Reply to this comment
by j02281 March 16, 2007 9:47 AM EDT
This is my perssonal oppinion.
America deserve a better option than Mrs Clinton.
We had enough with her husband. Only the enemies
of America,are happy with her.
***,lesbians,liberals,and enemies,will vote for her.God help America,in the next elecction.
Reply to this comment
by eric3170 March 16, 2007 12:19 AM EDT
Mitt Romney will eventually rise to the top. Regardless of how the liberal Democratic media is trying to paint him, he is a true conservative. He balanced the budget every year of his term in Massachusetts. He fought against pro abortion legislation, gay marriage legislation, and other liberal legislation. He has been strong against illegal immigration. Don't worry US_Infidel, he will be a great president. www.mittromneyin2008.com
Reply to this comment
by eric3170 March 16, 2007 12:19 AM EDT
Mitt Romney will eventually rise to the top. Regardless of how the liberal Democratic media is trying to paint him, he is a true conservative. He balanced the budget every year of his term in Massachusetts. He fought against pro abortion legislation, gay marriage legislation, and other liberal legislation. He has been strong against illegal immigration. Don't worry US_Infidel, he will be a great president. www.mittromneyin2008.com
Reply to this comment
by forthepeaple March 15, 2007 10:33 PM EDT
I was once proud to be american and proud to say i i'm a vet,now i just want out.You all in congress and capital hill and white house should be working for america and the americans that elected you to protect us,that isn't the case and i know why. I have been looking and found something that all america has forgotton.Who said this statement: If the personal freedoms of all americans by the Constitution and bill of right are Inhibiting the Government ability to (Govern)that meant control, the people of united states of america..Than we Should look to Limit those GUARANTEES #2.The united states Government CAN'T BE so fixed on our desires to preserve the RIGHTS of ORDINARY AMERICANS #3.I can do any ********* thing i want,I'm president of the united states and you dont forget that.....who am I..... so you all have been following your orders well i want you all to know that i hold all of you accountable for the murders of thousends of americans that have died and wounded in a war we have no buisness being in, you all are makeing large sums of money on americans lives and you all will pay a big price for that someday,heavens gates will never open its golden gates to you.. i hope someday that america and true americans will wake up and see that this washington crime family has sold our country to the highest bidders, china being # 1 and is # 1 in the world now, they are the supper powers of the world now. THANKS..DAVID A BELANGER,FOR AMERICANS FOR AMERICA,AT for-america@hotmail.com
Reply to this comment
by jebby_one March 15, 2007 10:08 PM EDT
the only thing that Hillary seems to stand for is political power, at least before the election. Who do you think she will try to please AFTER she gets elected?
Reply to this comment
by jebby_one March 15, 2007 10:08 PM EDT
the only thing that Hillary seems to stand for is political power, at least before the election. Who do you think she will try to please AFTER she gets elected?
Reply to this comment
See all 17 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook