No Moussaoui Evidence For 9/11 Plantiffs

Federal Appeals Court Reverses Order Giving Case's Evidence To Families Of 9/11 Victims

(AP)  A Virginia judge lacked authority to order the U.S. government to provide evidence from the trial of al Qaeda conspirator Zacarias Moussaoui to the families of Sept. 11 victims for use in their lawsuits against the airline industry and others, a federal appeals court ruled Wednesday.

A three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the federal court in the Southern District of New York has sole authority over evidence in the civil cases stemming from the terrorist attacks.

U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema of Alexandria, Va., last April ordered the government to give the plaintiffs non-sensitive information that prosecutors turned over to Moussaoui's attorneys, but which was never introduced at his trial.

The appeals court unanimously ruled that Brinkema exceeded her authority.

"We, like the district court, have great sympathy for the victims of September 11 and their families," Judge Karen Williams wrote. "They have endured the most abhorrent of acts. But regardless of how much respect and compassion this court has, we must ensure that the federal courts in our jurisdiction — no matter how well intentioned — do not exceed their legal power."

[baldfrog-2009]

To ALL you Republican W4 Iraq War Lovers being paid by Rove probably to publish his cockroach fecal matter on here. Yes being paid to go through the INTERNET for articles, the press to publish editorials in papers call in radio media you rotten pastie faced Rovian Young Turks.I am not buying it and trust me I know Roves tactics from the Committee to Reelect the President in 1972.He will stoop to anything.Ask someone who lived through that(Watergate era) who ole Rover's former boss was a player.Maybe ask John Dean? who knows about that one.I suspect that's all ya'll do is go through press articles,the net,to and call Rush Bimbas E.D.Limba, call in show over and over again masturbating him with Republican accolades,yet another turk probably on the Republican payroll.
Hop on over to the recruiters office and enlist take the rest of you pals with ya.Surge on!. Ya don't even have to do desert warfare training anymore so they can get you in the game quick.Check out Joe Bidon's comments on W's War, from the Senate.Then go bleed blood for the war you so dearly believe in.Report back to us the Mission.Take Mitch McConnell,Lindsey Graham and Rove with ya to Cover Your Back.Yeah go join and after your 3rd tour or so come back and tell us all how Iraqi Freedom is all working.Be sure to get some tips at Walter Reed before ya GO!Another great Republican bungle that hurt our troops.

[emhawks]

The families of the 9/11 victims will always have my unending sympathy & prayers. They have been treated disgracefully.
REOPEN THE 9/11 INVESTIGATION!

[tuckerndfw]

Let me see if I have this straight:

A federal judge ordered the federal governmnet to produce evidence in its possession but the appeals court ruled the federal judge has no such authority because the evidence is within the exclusive jurisdiction of another federal judge.

Uh-huh. I can see how that is reasonable.

And why the "war on terror" as being conducted is pointless. If federal judges/courts are not required to share evidence or information, there is no chance other federal agencies or departments will do so.

If the evidence is in custody of the federal (state/local) government, it should not matter which judge or court has control of the evidence. It should be available to all courts.

[tuckerndfw]

Let me see if I have this straight:

A federal judge ordered the federal governmnet to produce evidence in its possession but the appeals court ruled the federal judge has no such authority because the evidence is within the exclusive jurisdiction of another federal judge.

Uh-huh. I can see how that is reasonable.

And why the "war on terror" as being conducted is pointless. If federal judges/courts are not required to share evidence or information, there is no chance other federal agencies or departments will do so.

If the evidence is in custody of the federal (state/local) government, it should not matter which judge or court has control of the evidence. It should be available to all courts.