June 10, 2009 10:27 AM

Hagel Caters To Narrow Niche

By
David L Miller
Senate Foreign Relations Committee member, Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb. takes part in a hearing on Iraq before the committee, Thursday, Jan. 11, 2007 on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Dennis Cook)

Senate Foreign Relations Committee member, Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb. takes part in a hearing on Iraq before the committee, Thursday, Jan. 11, 2007 on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Dennis Cook) (AP Photo/Dennis Cook)

(The Politico)  By The Politico's Jonathan Martin.


If Sen. Chuck Hagel launches his presidential campaign on Monday, his candidacy will test whether an anti-war — and sometimes defiantly anti-Bush — contender has a viable constituency in the Republican Party.

A bid by the Nebraska Republican would further jolt an unsettled Republican presidential field and a GOP already under siege in the wake of President Bush's unpopular troop surge plan and a steady drumbeat of other bad news for the administration.

Some analysts say Hagel, who will announce his intentions in Omaha, faces an impossible task in courting the party's conservative base considering his own vociferous opposition to the war in Iraq. Given that, they say, his best course may be to run as an independent.

But at least one political consultant believes that Hagel's anti-war stance could attract moderate suburban GOP voters who have become increasingly disillusioned with the war.

That and Hagel's feisty and ubiquitous TV presence — the talk show bookers love him — may make him a threat to his own party, someone who, if nothing else, will force a change in the conversation about the war in Iraq.

Early on, though, Hagel's biggest challenge lies in convincing the party's pro-Bush activists to support him.

"I don't know what constituency he'd be looking for," said Chuck Laudner, executive director of the Iowa Republican Party. "To be the anti-war Republican? Good luck to you, sir."

Laudner, who is not affiliated with any candidate, said few likely Republican caucus-goers in his first-in-the-nation contest would respond to an anti-war candidate. Like many Republicans, he predicts a nightmare scenario should American troops withdraw from Iraq.

"If we pull back to the horizon, guess what becomes the frontline of the war on terror? The horizon," Laudner answered. "I'd rather have the fight in downtown Baghdad than in downtown New York City."

So far, all of the Republican candidates have delicately maneuvered around President Bush. They recognize his low standing in the polls and have grimaced through a succession of recent body blows to the administration that do yet more damage to the GOP brand.

Those include The Washington Post's revelations, and subsequent congressional hearings, on abysmal conditions at Walter Reed Army Medical Center; the firings of eight U.S. attorneys, allegedly for political reasons; the conviction of I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, former chief of staff to Vice President Dick Cheney; and the news that the FBI had overstepped its authority under the Patriot Act to investigate citizens.

But the GOP base that the candidates must court remains loyal to its commander in chief, in part because to oppose the president would put these activists in league with the Democrats and liberals they so loathe.

"Being critical of the president is one thing for a Republican primary voter," notes Dante Scala, a political science professor at Saint Anselm College in New Hampshire, "but poking him with a sharp stick at every opportunity is something else."

That is essentially what Hagel has done by excoriating the administration's prosecution of the war. He called for the start of a troop draw-down last November, writing in a Washington Post op-ed that "There will be no victory or defeat for the United States in Iraq."

With President Bush announcing plans to send in 21,000 additional troops, Hagel has grown more outspoken. He predicted in January that the surge would be "the most dangerous foreign policy blunder in this country since Vietnam."


The Politico
Add a Comment See all 13 Comments
by sprvtr March 12, 2007 3:53 PM EDT
I also know little about Hagel. Interesting comments about character. In this day and age; however, multiple marriages are not uncommon and I don't believe the majority of Americans would necessarily look at that as a showstopping issue. I think the poll showed that within the character issue, honesty came out as the #1 issue. That's where it could get interesting.
Reply to this comment
by newsjeff-2009 March 12, 2007 3:08 PM EDT
I read about a survey on a news network saying that Americans care more a canidate's character than his political issues. If that is the case I say that Chuck Hagel may have better "Character" than Guiliani or Gingrich could ever have. I don't know much about Senator Chuck Hagal, but at least I haven't heard that Hagal has multiple marriages or marital affairs like Guiliani,Gingrich, and yes of course Bill Clinton(Newt Gingrich and Ruby Guiliani should be happy that I didn't leave out Clinton since I am sure Bill Clinton's name will be brought up in Hillary's campaign.)I personally would like to see Guliani or Gingrich debate Hillary over "Character" or "Morals" judging from Gingrich or Guliani's past marriage affairs. So I say let Chuck Hagel have a shot at the nomination, his character can't be any worse than Guliani's or Gingrich's
Reply to this comment
by sprvtr March 12, 2007 2:44 PM EDT
Tucker...do you really think Guuliani is one of the extremists? I was looking at him because of his history of moderate social views. As a Repub I've always been torn because my social views tend to run more liberal.
Reply to this comment
by scott4261 March 12, 2007 2:39 PM EDT
Chuck Hagel has called President Bush's plan to send an additional 21,500 U.S. troops to Iraq "the most dangerous foreign policy blunder carried out since Vietnam."

Hagel is certainly more conservative on most issues than I. But on the Iraq war, he is absolutely correct. This war has been a disastrous mistake. In fact, if he were the Republican nominee running against Hillary Clinton as the Democratic nominee, I might just vote Republican in a presidential race for the first time in 24 years!

I have enormous respect for this man and give him credit for standing up to the neo-con right. He is a dying breed. A TRUE conservative.
Reply to this comment
by huskerarmy March 12, 2007 1:55 PM EDT
"...and some corners of our public need to be beaten senseless with the truth until they give up their fantasies."
We have become so commercialized that we now have fantasy consumers. Their designer fantasies are protected from the ugly, dirty truth by the FOX propaganda news network.
Reply to this comment
by antoniof123 March 12, 2007 12:53 PM EDT
Dear Mr. Hagel change parties and I will consider voting for you in a few years when you prove you can leave this group dead in its track. I for one have been tricked enough by Republicans never again.
Reply to this comment
by dallison7 March 12, 2007 12:49 PM EDT
Hagel has an opportunity to begin the rescue of the republican party from the nazis who now control it. Just the exposure of a 'reasonable' republican dialog will help... can't hurt.
Reply to this comment
by Razzl March 12, 2007 12:27 PM EDT
If any honest man wants to come forward and lead the Republicans out of their blindness I say, good luck to you sir! If Sen. Hagel runs he can also help us sort out the Democrats who aren't serious about taking on Bush. Like Democrat Mike Gravel of Alaska he may not have much hope, but he certainly has right on his side, and some corners of our public need to be beaten senseless with the truth until they give up their fantasies...
Reply to this comment
by karlimhof March 12, 2007 12:27 PM EDT
%u201Cthe most dangerous foreign policy blunder in this country since Vietnam.%u201D


i'd vote for him just for this one true statement.
Reply to this comment
by karlimhof March 12, 2007 12:23 PM EDT
If we are referring to 70% of the voting population against this Bush War madness, I'd say this "narrow niche" is widening by the day.

Reply to this comment
See all 13 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook