General Won't Apologize For Gays Comment
Gen. Peter Pace Said Homosexuality Is "Immoral" And The Military Should Not Condone It
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Pace On Gays In The Military
CBS News RAW: In an interview with the Chicago Tribune, Gen. Peter Pace, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said homosexual acts are immoral.
-
Video
Pace's Comments Renew Debate
Marine Gen. Peter Pace's comments on homosexuality have renewed the debate on the status of gays in the military. David Martin has more details.
-
Photo
Gen. Peter Pace answers reporters' questions on problems at Walter Reed Army Medical Center, March 7, 2007. Pace's aides say he won't apologize for calling homosexuality "immmoral." (AP)
-
Interactive
Military 101
Basic training to learn all about America's fighting force.
-
Interactive
Gay In The U.S.A.
State-by-state laws on gay issues, the marriage debate and photo essays.
In a newspaper interview Monday, Marine Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, likened homosexual acts to adultery and said the military should not condone it by allowing gays to serve openly in the armed forces.
In a statement Tuesday, he said he should have focused more in the interview on the Defense Department policy about gays — and "less on my personal moral views."
That didn't sit well with gay veterans like Eric Alva, who was visited by his Commander in Chief after losing a leg in Iraq, CBS News national security correspondent David Martin reports.
"I think it was an insensitive and disrespectful remark to the thousands of men and women who are currently serving in the armed forces actually following the guidelines of 'don't ask, don't tell,' where they don't express their open orientation because they're not allowed to," Alva said.
No one knows how many gays are quietly serving in uniform, although one unofficial estimate puts it at 65,000, Martin reports. Whatever the number, Brian Fricke was one of them. He's a Marine who served nine months in al Anbar.
"He's saying you can still serve and die for your country, but don't tell if you're gay, because then you're dishonorable; you're immoral," Fricke said.
Pace did not offer an apology, something that had been demanded by gay rights groups.
"It's bad enough that he thinks that. It's even worse that he would be foolish enough to say that publicly," Arlene Isaacsen of the Massachusetts Gay and Lesbian Political Caucus told CBS Radio station WBZ-AM. "It is crass prejudice, crass bigotry and brazen ignorance, and it's disgraceful to think that someone in his position would think in these terms."
"General Pace's comments are outrageous, insensitive and disrespectful to the 65,000 lesbian and gay troops now serving in our armed forces," the advocacy group Servicemembers Legal Defense Network said in a statement on its Web site.
The group, which has represented some of the thousands dismissed from the military for their sexual orientation, demanded an apology.
In an interview Monday with the Chicago Tribune, Pace said he supports the policy, which became law in 1994 and prohibits commanders from asking about a person's sexual orientation.
"I believe homosexual acts between two individuals are immoral and that we should not condone immoral acts," Pace said in the audio recording of the interview posted on the Tribune's Web site. "I do not believe that the armed forces of the United States are well served by saying through our policies that it's OK to be immoral in any way."Listen to the Chicago Tribune interview.
Pace's senior staff members said earlier that the general was expressing his personal opinion and did not intend to apologize. They spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not allowed to speak on the record.
CBS' Susan Roberts reports that the White House agrees that Pace's comments were personal — and that it probably would have been best if he kept them to himself.
Rep. Martin Meehan, who has introduced legislation to repeal the current policy, criticized Pace's comments.
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Listen to the Chicago Tribune interview.



- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 17
- next
See all 813 CommentsThe societally worthless homosexual BEHAVIOR is deviance and perversion of the filthiest kind.
This diseased behavior threatens the society because these low lives specifically target the children in order to sodomize and traumatize them and spread the deviance, much as the christian perverts have sodomized and traumatized the children in their churches of child sodomy for generations.
When the society is threatened, it is the OBLIGATION of the no nonsense military men to restore order, less the nation perishes.
Law of God says:
You shall not lie with a male as with a woman., because it is an abomination.
Law says to the nation of Israel:
There shall be no *** of the daughters of Israel, also there shall be no sodomite of the sons of Israel.
Law of God also says:
You shall not bring the hire of a *** or the price of a dog into the house of the LORD your God for any vow, for both of these are an abomination before the LORD. Here the word dog is meant a sodomite.
This is made even more clear in the book of Revelation of LORD JESUS CHRIST to Apostle John where it lists those who are excluded from the Holy City Jerusalem descending out of heaven from GOD:
For outside are the dogs and magicians and the immoral and murderers and idolaters and whoever loves to tell lies.
Righteousness exalts a nation. Sin is a disgrace to any people. Proverbs 14:34
Truth is; g a y s and lesbians have, are, and will continue to serve honorably in the military. The least we can and should do is to be honest about it. And for God's sake, GROW UP!
I may not agreed with Goldwater on everything while he was alive, but he was right on target with that comment!
------------
Makes no sense we need people who can speak Arabic in the Middle East. Sexual orientation should be a non-issue.
Diane C. Lambert
There's more to being a christian than shreiking "LOOK AT ME I'M A CHRISTIAN" - and Bush and his cronies have lied, thieved and bullied their way through the White House. If that's your idea of Christianity you need to start over.
Posted by fryedbread at 10:25 PM
---------
Yes, as a matter of fact, they do!
But seriously - if they weren't so not-so-bright they'd have realized long ago that Bush destroyed his brain with booze and drugs with years of abuse - long before he repented!!
Well, according to the General, that includes gay people and adulterers. If we decide to expel everyone that falls into those categories from the military, I'm sure we'd find it hard to put together a serious force in the first place. And if we expanded that definition to liars, drunks, fraudsters, etc., we'd have no military at all.
No wonder Jesus admonished us: Let only s/he who's without sin hurl the first stone...
Just as it happened in the days of Noah, such will it be in the days of the Son of Man. For they were eating and drinking, and marrying and giving in marriage, until the day when Naoh entered the ark, and the flood came and destroyed every man.
And again, just as it happened in the days of Lot; they were eating and drinking and buying and selling and planting and building, but in the day when Lot went out of Sodom, the LORD sent down a rain of fire and sulphur from heaven, and destroyed them all. Such will be in the day when the Son of Man appears.
That is why LORD JESUS said: Be alert and watch and pray for you do not know the hour when the Son of Man will appear. Will He find faith when He returns?
Posted by bsrasmus at 11:21 PM
----
And why would anyone, gay or straight be allowed to have s e x in the barracks? Come on! A person's private life is his or her own business. Anyway, we have been, are, and will always be in the military and serving honorably. We should be honest about that.
Great! let the moron and his hetero buddies all "serve" and get shafted by the army, screwed over for benefits, proper medical care in a failing VA hospital system, and let him and his hetero buddies get THEIR behinds shot at and blown up. Why ANYONE in their right mind would even want to join Bush's illegal unjust little tirade NOW is a mystery to me- as far as I'm concerned mr morality general whats his face is enabling the destruction of OUR economy and everything else by enabling the worst near-dictator this country has had for president.
WHile the news is the army is crying and scrambling for mORE soldiers they can't get, they totally skip goy/les people due to bigotry- FINE, I have to laugh at them and their stupidity cutting off their own nose to spite their faces.
Just because one is open about being gay or lesbian does not mean that person is going to be having s e x in front of you or even in your presence! Not any more than you would be in front of them! Do you realize how crazy that sounds? It's as if you believe a gay guy is going to make out on the pool table in front of you or whatever! Give me a break and grow up!
Posted by singinrick at 11:35 PM
------
Rick, Clinton IS a Christian. And anyway you are right. It is between him and God. Just like my salvation is between me and God.
Bill Clinton may be a Christian, but if he is he doesn't act like one. IMO, no true follower of Christ would fight for women to have the right to slaughter their unborn children.
-------
Christians cannot even agree on that issue. Anyway, this discussion is not about abortion(or Clinton, for that matter). Stay on topic, please.
Abortion is NOT the topic on this thread!
Your logic is really lame and you should do a little more homework before you post such a shallow-minded blog.
I don't want *** teaching my children about Johnny's two dads in school.
I don't want to see *** parading around in drag at some parade.
I don't want *** bastardizing the word "marriage".
I don't think *** deserve to get health care benefits just because they claim to be "married" to someone of the same sexx.
I don't think *** should be allowed special privileges because they claim to be a "minority" group. It's a lifestyle.
I am a hetrosexual, and I have brought up my children teaching them the importance of family values.
I don't question my sexuality. I have never been attracted to someone of my same sexx. I certainly am not hiding my "latent sexuality" either. LOL
I am not afraid of ***. Why should I be? The majority of them fit into society and don't make a habit of displaying their sexual preferences.
General Pace said he supports the Pentagon's "don't ask, don't tell policy" in which gay men and women are allowed in the military as long as they keep their sexual orientation private.
I agree fully with him and he should be given a medal for speaking for so many Americans.
We need not attack any individual. We are called to contend earnestly(not savagely) for the precious faith of the Apostles. We are called to speak the truth in love. We should remind ourselves what Apostle Paul said; If I understand all mysteries and all knowledge, and though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not love in my heart, I am nothing.
I am a Christian. I am pro-choice. And I'm also gay (in case you haven't figured that out already).
You know what? You and singinrick make me tired! I have to go to bed, because I have to work in the morning.
You may feel better about your salvation if you can point out my sin or Clinton's sin or whatever.... Personally, I think Jesus would be appalled at your behavior. Who are you to judge my relationship with God anyway?
The subject of this discussion is g a y s in the military and General Pace's statement in that regard. I just simply pointed out that we have always and will continue to serve in the military with honor and dignity. And personally, I would rather that we didn't have to pretend we are something we are not in order to serve our country.
Now you can judge me, say I'm not really a Christian, say I'm going to hell, whatever your going to do. I don't care. I know my heart, I know who I am, I know God loves and accepts me. Just remember that you don't really have the right to judge me. ONLY GOD has that right.
But I know you'll still be beating this horse to death in the morning, so I'll see you then.
The myths of Christians or Jews or Muslims or Hindus or whatever are nothing that any American should have to pay any attention to whatsoever.
First, your most recent statement that "what if the claims of the Bible are true? How true would your statement be?"
First, what if the Bhagavad Gita were true? Or the Tao Te Ching? Or how about the Qur'an? How true would your statements be?
Second, what does it matter? Decisions in government are NOT to be made by purely religious moral codes. Laws should be based on freedom. That's the foundation of the US, not religious morals.
Two *** who love each other and have intercourse with each other, no matter how immoral you think it might be, do not impinge on the freedom of others by so doing. This is very different from what we consider crimes, like bestiality, pedophilia, robbery, and murder, which all impinge significantly on the freedoms and rights of others (be they animal or man).
There are lines which do indeed appear to show that, according to Christian teachings, homosexual intercourse (not being homosexual) is a sin. The most quoted line to prove this is in a book which also claims that eating shellfish is "an abomination." There were many odd things that were considered sins at that time.
Jesus had absolutely NOTHING to say about homosexuality. You would think if it was as evil and repugnant as some would have us believe, Jesus would at least have mentioned it.
My other point is that sins are sins. Homosexual intercourse is a sin. So is stealing. And adultery. The list goes on and on. And, according to Christianity, all humans sin. To look down on a sinner or pity them because they "commit homosexual acts" is ridiculous, because you sin too. In other words, homosexuals CAN be Christians. If they ask for forgiveness, they have just as much a right to get in to heaven according to Christianity as anyone who asks for forgiveness.
(each of whom had affairs without even waiting for a divorce)
I guess these politicians should not serve or be associated with the military?
For Shame...
Should we call it the G-Word now?
First of all - I stand by the statement - no REAL straight man thinks about *** nevermind talks about them ad nauseum teh way you 'religious-right' do.
Second of all - *** are for the most part earn large incomes they tend to be fairly well education and also spend large quantities of monies. They are just as entitled to a return on their taxes as you are. If my taxes can continue to support the ever-failing Red Southern States who've not ever become self-sufficient since end of Civil War with multiple families and 2nd and 3 and even 4th wives then you can surely contemplate living in a world where *** don't have to hide away - they've always eben around - since before the coming of Christ.
AND - AND - the Bible, as great a book as it is, is the writings not of Jesus but of the apostles's TRANSLATION of what they thought Jesus was saying. If we were to take the Bible as literally as you would want there'd be no American football - cause there's something in the Bible about pigs skin and not touching it..... But right - the 'religious-right' make exceptions and adultry is okie-dokie so long as you are a registered republican and repent for it and *** are okie-dokie in Bush's white house so long as they dress up in a marine's get-up and sneak out the basement (Jeff Gannon).... the hypocracy of the 'religious-right'knows no bounds.
It's opinions like the General's that make 'republican christians' so unlikeable.
Who gave you the right to judge?
And, I thought "Thou Shalt Not Kill" was a moral commandment...
Bravo Kate, though I think you may be preaching to (willfully) deaf ears our voices will overwhelm theirs. The religious right wing is a dying voice at last, but one that we must continue to fight against or, like locusts, they'll come back to infect us again.
I think Gen. Pace is a dumb "donkey"
I also think that the "don't tell don't ask" policy sucks, soldiers should not have to hide their sexuality, but given the number of ignorant people in this country, it is a very functional policy.
And in regards to the discharges due to the policy, I know of many straight soldiers who are against the war in Iraq and have claimed to be g.a.y. in order to leave the military. I question of those 10,000 how many of them are really g.a.y. or just using it as a loop-hole.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 17
- next
See all 813 Comments