Aug. 26, 2007

Left Behind

Scott Pelley On The Plight Of Iraqis Who Helped The U.S.

  •  (CBS/AP)

(CBS)  Admitting two to three thousand of the applicants is not even a good start according to Julia Taft. She’s a former assistant secretary of state and lifelong Republican, who has more experience than just about anyone in handling refugee emergencies.

"Well, my understanding is that there are tens of thousands who might be eligible. And I'm disappointed that the figure seems to be so low," she tells Pelley.

"But the State Department would tell you that's all that can be physically accommodated in the system," Pelley remarks.

"Well, then the system's really shrunk since I did it," she replies.

In 1975, after the collapse of Saigon, Taft was in charge of finding homes in the states for South Vietnamese, who worked for the Americans.

"President Ford said, 'Let them come. Let's help them. This is what we must do for them. They deserve it,'" Taft remembers.

What was she able to accomplish?

"On the 20th of December, 1975, over 131,000 people had been resettled throughout the United States. Incredible," Taft recalls.

Those 131,000 people were brought to communities all over the United States between May 1 and December.

There was organized opposition then, but Taft says that when Americans saw these families arriving in the U.S., the opposition melted away. "It was a huge enterprise. But it never would have worked had there not been the sustained commitment on the part of the administration working with Congress to make it happen," Taft says.

"On the part of President Ford?" Pelley asks.

"Absolutely," Taft says.

Asked if she's not seeing the kind of political will and leadership in this case that she dealt with in 1975, Taft says, "I'm afraid that's the case."

"We took 131,000 Vietnamese in eight months. Nothing like that is even contemplated in this case," Pelley remarks to Ellen Sauerbrey.

"You know, that was in a different day. And the different day was it was prior to 9/11. After 9/11, the United States put into place very thorough security checks that didn’t exist at that time. And it takes a lot of time to work people through the security process," she explains.

But Taft says, "Some of these people lives are in jeopardy. You don’t wait around for months and months and months to try to find out if a former translator whose life has been threatened is gonna be a threat to the United States. You’ve already vetted this person. You know this person."

Retried General Paul Eaton worries about the message all of this is sending to America’s other allies in the world. "Anybody who threw their lot in with the Americans deserves an opportunity for a future. And the loyalty has got to be in both directions. If we do not take care of these people, then the signal to anybody else in the future is a bad signal. And if you throw your lot with the United States, they'll use you for a while and then they will - they'll just cut you off," he argues.

Asked if he thinks it's a matter of honor, Eaton says, "I believe this is a matter of morality."



Assistant Secretary Of State Sauerbrey told 60 Minutes last March that two to three thousand Iraqi refugees would be welcomed to the U.S. by the end of September. But the number is still little more than 100. As for the two Iraqi translators who spoke with 60 Minutes, both are still stuck in the Middle East.

Produced by Joel Bach and David Gelber
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Recent Segments
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Add a Comment See all 84 Comments
by janessa9 September 3, 2007 1:59 AM EDT
I totally agree with ICWright12''s comment posted today Sept. 2, 2007 regarding Scott Pelley. It was a terrible interview. He was so accusatory. Who does he think he is? Thank God we have Marines like Sgt. Frank Wooldridge (sp).
Reply to this comment
by Lawson Wright September 3, 2007 12:00 AM EDT
Where in hell did Scott Pele (sp) get the permission to accuse an American for doing his duty? What do you think we did in WW-2, on every point we didn''t HESITATE. He should have to serve 2 yrs. in IRAQ !!!!!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by sms8755 August 28, 2007 1:01 PM EDT
I am willing to help. My home is open to provide a place for these refugees to come. If someone reads this who can direct me to the right place, I would be happy to provide a place.
Reply to this comment
by kwinckler August 27, 2007 11:36 PM EDT
While the Iraqi translators who sided with the US forces need to be protected, the answer is not to send them to America. They are exactly the people who need to stay in Iraq to promote the values that we have been fighting for. If they all come to the US, who will be left in Iraq except those that want to spread the extremist religious views. Set up a "Green Zone" for them and let the Iraqi military protect them.
Reply to this comment
by omajoyce-2009 August 27, 2007 8:18 PM EDT
I understand the sense of abandonment that Rami and others like him must feel; but, when they are members of a religion that''s main tennant is to kill all non-believers, I fear them. This is NOT the same as Vietnam. Their religion is their law and they cannot swear allegiance to our nation, our flag and our laws without violating their religion. Their conflict would be bad for us and them.

Muslims have been fighting a religious war in the Middle East for over 2,000 years, with no resolution and continuous conflict. I prefer it stay in the Middle East. Yes, it is selfish; but, we do not need to import more separatism.

I believe the US does owe these persons and their family some resolution to their problems, but it is not relocation to the US. Dare I say it, compensation to live in another Muslim nation, until and when the situation in Iraq is resolved (if ever it can be resolved?) would not be out of the question - yes I would be willing to pay the taxes to support such a retirement. I have a great concern for my family, country, friends, and neighbors that we are asking for additional trouble to bring these persons with such a strong religious affiliation into this country. How can these people practice their religion here and not practice acts against our nation''s people and national interests?
Reply to this comment
by r0721743 August 27, 2007 5:35 PM EDT
So "Rami" and thousands of other Iraqis are being hunted by the insurgents and want the U.S. to rescue them. Why don''t they join the Iraqi military and fight for this cause they supposedly believe in? "Rami" and his companions made a well paying choice to fight for the cause, unlike the American troops dying in Iraq daily.
Reply to this comment
by kelly_a76 August 27, 2007 5:13 PM EDT
I work as the director of a refugee resettlement office and I am beginning to hear more and more of these stories. I am contacted daily by family members who have loved ones in Jordan, Syria, Turkey, Indonesia as well as many who are still in Iraq and therefore are not considered refugees according to the UNHCR. More shocking still is that immigration has created a "special immigrant visa" for several hundred Iraqis who worked closely with the US government. However, that status will not necesarily confer any benefits that refugees ordinarily get such as cultural orientation, food stamps, cash assistance during the initial months, medicaid, employment assistance and general guidance from an agency like the one I work with. It is simply a disgrace.
Reply to this comment
by truthspeake2 August 27, 2007 4:41 PM EDT
Their first lesson in "Democracy"...Hypocracy!
Reply to this comment
by kathygei August 27, 2007 3:29 PM EDT
This story really tugged at my heart. Isn''t there someone we could write to and show some public outcry? We must help these translators we have abandoned.
Reply to this comment
by mc_trump August 27, 2007 1:46 PM EDT
they brought in 150,000 boat people from vietnam it was the right thing to do then as it is now, and if you are worried about the cheap labor then just deport that many illegal mexicans what have they ever done to help our country.
Reply to this comment
by sharncedar August 27, 2007 10:21 AM EDT
This reminds me of the Vietnam war where they brought in some millions of cheap labor, I mean poor refugees, from Vietnam. Upon arrival, they immediately set about their customary business, which was to create gangs and go on a crime spree. We still have the gangs and chaos from these, the worst and most violent and most ignorant, of the Vietnamese.

I guess Bush and his friends want to create a whole new gang system of former Iraqi traitors and riffraf here in the US. That''s real smart, what an amazing, smart, well run country! What a bunch of genius administrators we have, sure makes me feel secure! Now let''s lower that Fed rate, the rich need to get richer!
Reply to this comment
by mcvet August 27, 2007 10:19 AM EDT
Scott Pelly is doing the dirty work of the insurgents. There will be a special place in Hell for you Scott. Or perhaps you have an eye on 70 virgins?
Posted by taks4 at 05:28 AM : Aug 27, 2007
+ report abuse

A TRUE believer huh? Sparky we are going to leave that country the only question is if we can manage to get it done with our Dictator on the job. You fascist have never liked the fact that the PEOPLE in this nation make the rules and THEY have decided we are leaving... Now I''d like for you to tell us, if you can muster enough brain power, who would you like to determine what we hear and see in this country. You OBVIOUSLY do not like the FREE Press and attack anyone who doesn''t hold to the Party Line when putting out the news so what would you like to do about it. Should we go ALL the way back to what you clowns wanted when Jefferson first put pen to paper and allow the KING to appoint someone to approve the news? Should we have a Propaganda Minister like your Hero, Hitler? Just how would you do it? Sieg Heil Bush!!
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 August 27, 2007 9:50 AM EDT
"Left behind" implies "we" are leaving. We''''re not leaving so we cannot be leaving anyone behind. Posted by taks4"

Wishful thinking, Taks, we will sooner or later (hopefully sooner) be out of there, and you will be on the front lines of the "don''t let the Muslims in" faction, agreeing that they not be allowed in. Like I said before, that is what they get for selling their brethren to a known liar.
Reply to this comment
by taks4 August 27, 2007 8:28 AM EDT
"Left behind" implies "we" are leaving. We''re not leaving so we cannot be leaving anyone behind. This is the kind of slanted Liberal journalism that CBS as a whole perpetrates to undermine the efforts of our soldiers and emboldens our enemies. If Scott Pelly cared about the Iraqis he speaks of in his piece, which he doesn''t, he would recognize that any Iraqi who is considering cooperating with our troops is now going to think twice about helping us should they listen to this 60 Minutes segment. Scott Pelly is doing the dirty work of the insurgents. There will be a special place in Hell for you Scott. Or perhaps you have an eye on 70 virgins?
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 August 27, 2007 6:57 AM EDT
Posted by lugarbow,

Actually, we also didn''t declare war on Vietnam, either.

But back to the point, that is what they get for trusting a known liar, and selling out their own people.

Colin and Condoleeza, (Uncle Tom and Aunt Condi) take note, sooner or later it will be your turn.
Reply to this comment
by joyseann August 27, 2007 5:13 AM EDT
Isn''t this typical of the Bush administration. They do not know the meaning of loyalty. Look at their track record. They don''t even take care us in our need. Case point: New Orleans after Katrina. I am so glad he won''t be back. He is a disgrace as an American President.
Reply to this comment
by lugarbow August 27, 2007 1:56 AM EDT
This is the first time the United States in its history has ever attacked a soverign Nation without a declaration of war!! Think about it. Not one Iraq person was ever found as taking part in 9/11. Most where from Bushes oil buddies in Saudia Arabia. Do your homework!!! WE do not belong there, we only create more mistrust and are looked at as being as bad as Russia during the 50,s until the late 90''s. We need highways, better schools, new bridges, health coverage for all americans. We should mind our own business!! And our home land security was created AFTER bush attacked Iraq.
Reply to this comment
by meep8 August 27, 2007 1:52 AM EDT
It''s all very well and good that we are told what is happening to the former translators and US ''helpers'' in Iraq, but we aren''t given any information about how to help these people. I think it''s disgraceful that they are being dumped after they helped our soldiers. Could this be part of the reason the insurgents are gaining such a stronghold?
Reply to this comment
by lugarbow August 27, 2007 1:49 AM EDT
Iraq had NOTHING to do with 9/11. The United States treated the American Indians the same way, we are great at using people!! They saved many American lives, and should be shown the same respect that our military foot soldier is shown. Bush cares less about them and there welfare. This will come back to us the next time we are asked for help and we turn our backs again!! What shame this country and the Bush administration has heaped upon us!!!!!!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by tlread August 27, 2007 1:19 AM EDT
60 Minutes
If you hanen''t read AMERICA ALONE by Mark Steyn you are doing our country a great disservice and failing to see what is happening.
We need the truth, the facts and stop putting off what the Islamists are doing. We are not perfect but we will be distroyed if we don''t act imediately.
Reply to this comment
See all 84 Comments
60 Minutes RSS Feed