Fox News Boss Hits Edwards' Boycott

Roger Ailes Criticizes Presidential Hopeful's Decision To Skip Debate Co-Hosted By Fox News

(CBS/AP)  Fox News chief Roger Ailes said any political candidate who blacklists a news organization is making a "terrible mistake."

His remarks followed Democratic presidential hopeful John Edwards' decison to skip a Nevada debate co-hosted by Fox News.

Liberal activitsts say the news channel has a conservative bias and are urging Democratic presidential candidates to boycott the debate, which is also sponsored by the Nevada Democratic Party.

"Any candidate for high office from either party who believes he can blacklist any news organization is making a terrible mistake about journalists," Ailes said.

Ailes, who did not mention Edwards by name, spoke at a Radio and Television News Directors Foundation dinner in Washington on Thursday night.

"Recently, pressure groups are forcing candidates to conclude that the best strategy for journalists is divide and conquer, to only appear on those networks and venues that give them favorable coverage," Ailes said.

Ailes said that candidates "who cannot answer direct, simple, even tough questions from any journalist runs a real risk of losing the voters."

Earlier this week, Edwards' campaign said the involvement of Fox News was part of the reason the candidate was passing on the Aug. 14 debate in Reno.

Online activists and bloggers quickly hailed Edwards' decision as a victory in their campaign to urge Nevada Democrats to drop Fox News as a partner.

MoveOn.org Civic Action says it has collected more than 260,000 signatures on a petition that calls the cable network a "mouthpiece for the Republican Party, not a legitimate news channel."

The two Democratic presidential frontrunners, Sen. Hillary Clinton and Sen. Barack Obama, have not indicated whether they will attend the Nevada debate. Fox boss Rupert Murdoch threw a Senate fundraiser for Clinton, and is said to have a good relationship with the former first lady.

Democratic Party officials and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid initially touted the partnership with Fox News as an opportunity to reach out to a different bloc of voters.

But in a letter posted Wednesday on the party's Web site, Democratic Party Chairman Tom Collins said Reid now shares activists' concerns and "has asked us to take another look."

Collins said the party would invite a "local progressive voice" to participate on the debate panel, which also would include a reporter from a local Fox affiliate, a national Fox News reporter and the moderator.

The party also invited the local Air America affiliate, a liberal radio network, to air the event live. C-SPAN will carry the debate after the Fox News broadcast and PoliticsTV.com to carry the live Fox News webcast feed on its site for one-time viewing, he said.

MoveOn Civic Action spokesman Adam Green dismissed the offer as "a lame proposal that would have multiple Fox personalities joined by one lone Air America panelist. That's a rigged, unfair and unbalanced debate."

"The Fox debate should just be canceled and a more legitimate news source should be found," Green said.

Nevada Democratic Party spokeswoman Kirsten Searer said Edwards is the first candidate to formally respond to the invitation. New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson has said publicly he plans to attend.

Searer said the decision to partner with Fox, which will pay for some production and promotion costs, is part of Nevada Democrats' overall plan to bring new voters into the presidential process and its new early caucus, scheduled for Jan. 19.

[jebby_one]

:)

the obvious strategy of the Neo-commies is to repeat their lies over and over and over and over.

Do they believe that honesty and truth are influenced by the number of times a lie is repeated.

[rgrankin]

broadcasting

[rgrankin]

fuziwuzi
At least now I know who I'm dealing with. I didn't know WBAI was still brodcasting.
And your right about opinions,that's really all they are. Would you be interested in pursuing truth these days ?

[coffeehead-2009]

Great analysis!



Ailes claiming that Fox News has real "journalists" is a huge stretch of the truth, also. Ailes would have been right at home in the propaganda office of the Third Reich, along with all his minions like O'Reilly, Hannity, Coulter, Limbaugh, Boortz...

Also, claims that the rest of the media is "liberal" are a bald-faced lie, as well. They are all corporate shills, nothing more. They advance whatever the corporate goals may be, which are neither liberal or conservative. Fox News is simply farther right than the rest, that doesn't make the rest "liberal", just less sleazy.

Posted by fuziwuzi at 10:14 AM : Mar 10, 2007

[Ed0719]

diogenes3: You're not winning points here, this isn't a contest, so grow up. I wrote my opinion on the article in question. You can either agree or disagree, your choice. Why do you find it necessary to invent stuff to write, making unfounded accusations about others who proffer an opinion? Your opinion is no more or less valid than anyone else's, mine included.

[psycmeistr1]

The only reason they don't want to go on FOX news, is because they know they won't get softball questions like they will on the other networks.

[psycmeistr1]

Pox Noise Channel does NO investigative journalism. They are not a news organization, they are cheap entertainment. They have proven again and again that their audience is THE MOST MISINFORMED demography in the country. Worse even than people who watch the Comedy Channel.

They are a wing of the republican party. The rest is ***. "

Why does no other news organization get opposing viewpoints from each side when they do a news story (or if they do, put up four liberals against one conservative)? Fox does.

Like it or not (which I'm sure you don't) FOX *is* the most fair and balanced of the news channels.

You're just upset because there's one network out of seven or so that doesn't cowtow to the DNC line.

Get over it.

[psycmeistr1]

"Pox Noise Channel does NO investigative journalism. They are not a news organization, they are cheap entertainment. They have proven again and again that their audience is THE MOST MISINFORMED demography in the country. Worse even than people who watch the Comedy Channel.

They are a wing of the republican party. The rest is ***.
Posted by j0hnwi11iams at 05:38 PM : Mar 10, 2007"

Yes, and those who watch the unbiased, professional CBS news have been treated to the likes of the "false but true" TANG memos, etc.,

I know that the likes of CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, MSNBC are all "fair and balanced" because they all represent the moonbat viewpoint, right?

Yeah, about as "balanced" and "fair" as you are.

Get a clue--maybe a life, while you're at it.

Geesh. Some people's kids.

[j0hnwi11iams]

Pox Noise Channel does NO investigative journalism. They are not a news organization, they are cheap entertainment. They have proven again and again that their audience is THE MOST MISINFORMED demography in the country. Worse even than people who watch the Comedy Channel.

They are a wing of the republican party. The rest is ***.

[starleo146]

I'd know a republican if they came up and bit me because I would have to have a RABBEEEEE SHOT!!!!

[rgrankin]

I rest my case .

[rgrankin]

fuzi ?
Where's the answer to any of my questions ?
You sound like you've been listening to WBAI.
Is that where you get your "facts" ?

[jebby_one]

" But would you actually know a "real Republican" if they came up and bit you? "

----------------------------

Silly. Republicans don't bite. Actually, liberal neo-commies don't bite either, they just yap and growl a lot but they usually end up biting themselves :)

Old gramps use to joke about Democrats a lot. he'd always say something like "don't worry about their teeth, they won't bite. It's their hands you have to watch! Always watch their hands, especially if they're trying to pat you on the butt!"

[Ed0719]

Ailes claiming that Fox News has real "journalists" is a huge stretch of the truth, also. Ailes would have been right at home in the propaganda office of the Third Reich, along with all his minions like O'Reilly, Hannity, Coulter, Limbaugh, Boortz...

Also, claims that the rest of the media is "liberal" are a bald-faced lie, as well. They are all corporate shills, nothing more. They advance whatever the corporate goals may be, which are neither liberal or conservative. Fox News is simply farther right than the rest, that doesn't make the rest "liberal", just less sleazy.

[rgrankin]

The Edwards campaign has made an interesting move to gain attention. He'd like very much to be the Democrat nominee and needs a lot more attention in order to accomplish that goal.
The intensity of the debate over bias accusations regarding FOXNews is also interesting. What are the examples of bias ?
I find Bias in all the networks. The difference is that most are biased in favor of the Democrats and FOX is the exception.
What is the Edwards team afraid of ? If FOX is that bad, wouldn't they want to have an opportunity to demonstrate an obvious prejudice?
What am I missing here?

[bm6005]

But would you actually know a "real Republican" if they came up and bit you?
Posted by emokev

Yea, I'm old enough to remember the real ones. But it is an old memory.

[webdepot]

Well, it's all moot now... on the Reuters RSS feed:
"Nevada Democratic Party officials said on Friday they were canceling a presidential debate co-sponsored by Fox News,....."

This, after the Fox chairman Roger Ailes admitted Fox news is biased in its reporting against Democratic, Liberal or Progressive politicians.

'Bout time they woke up and smelled the roses.

[starleo146]

Who told you Fox news is first in the ratings, FOX. Just because it is Cheney's favorite channel does not make it so.

[adian1-2009]

I am not a Republican. Edwards is not my choice out of the three pre-candidates Democratic Party. It might be a mistake, as Fox claims. But if so, only in terms of possible political gains. Edwards is right in declining Fox's invitation. Dignity must reign over possible political gain. Fox has shown its bias for quite a long time. Its slogan of balanced and fair is a joke. Its claim of journalism is false, unless journalism is re-defined to fit Fox conspicuous bias. Edwards should be emulated by Hillary and Obama.

[dallison7]

It never fails. When liberals cannot win an argument (see FoxNews rating vs others)
Posted by ScottRoyer1



If a network existed that was totally biased to the left there can be no doubt that a million or two 'far left nutcases' would sit glued to the tube watching it 24/7. Such is the case with Faux News. They have a very loyal audience with the far right wingnuts and nazis. The rest of Americans (including 99%+ of the republicans) surf the channels.