BAGHDAD, March 8, 2007

8 Captured In Iraq Security Crackdown

Suspected Insurgents Captured North Of Baghdad; Shiite Rites To Begin In Karbala

  • Play CBS Video Video General Offers Outlook On Iraq

    The top U.S. general in Iraq, David Petraeus, said a military solution alone would not solve security problems in Iraq, and the extra U.S. troops sent there would likely be needed for quite some time.

  • Video Iraq Shiite Pilgrims Murdered

    Iraqi pilgrims on a religious journey are being targeted. Another 10 were killed Wednesday, a day after bomb blasts killed more than 100 Shiites. Aleen Sirgany reports.

  • Video Iraq: Shiite Pilgrims Attacked

    A total of 100 Shiite pilgrims were slaughtered by suicide bombers on their way to a religious festival in Iraq. Allen Pizzey reports.

    • Lt. Eroch Cordts, 24, second right, Sfc. David Horn, 36, left, Sgt. Chase Decker, 23, second left and Staff Sgt. Ryan Stringfellow, 32, right, plan a joint foot patrol with the Iraqi Army and Iraqi National Police in the Shiite enclave of Sadr City in Baghdad on March 7, 2007. Photo

      Lt. Eroch Cordts, 24, second right, Sfc. David Horn, 36, left, Sgt. Chase Decker, 23, second left and Staff Sgt. Ryan Stringfellow, 32, right, plan a joint foot patrol with the Iraqi Army and Iraqi National Police in the Shiite enclave of Sadr City in Baghdad on March 7, 2007.  (AP Photo/Maya Alleruzzo)

    • A U.S. and an Iraqi soldier watch for a sniper in the Buritz village, in Baqouba, Diyala province, Iraq, Feb. 18, 2007. Photo

      A U.S. and an Iraqi soldier watch for a sniper in the Buritz village, in Baqouba, Diyala province, Iraq, Feb. 18, 2007.  (CBS/Cami McCormick)

    • Soldiers from Bravo Troop, 2nd, Battalion, 325th Airborne Infantry Regiment, Iraqi soldiers and Iraqi National Police officers set out on a joint foot patrol in the Shiite enclave of Sadr City in Baghdad on  March 7, 2007. Photo

      Soldiers from Bravo Troop, 2nd, Battalion, 325th Airborne Infantry Regiment, Iraqi soldiers and Iraqi National Police officers set out on a joint foot patrol in the Shiite enclave of Sadr City in Baghdad on March 7, 2007.  (AP Photo/Maya Alleruzzo)

    • A U.S. soldier of the 69th squadron, 3rd brigade, 1st Cavalry Division, stands guard by a bullet-riddled wall of an abandoned Shiite family's home just outside Muqdadiyah, Iraq, March 5, 2007. Photo

      A U.S. soldier of the 69th squadron, 3rd brigade, 1st Cavalry Division, stands guard by a bullet-riddled wall of an abandoned Shiite family's home just outside Muqdadiyah, Iraq, March 5, 2007.  (AP Photo/Dusan Vranic)

    • An Iraqi Army commando guards Muslim Shiite pilgrims marching towards the shrine city of Karbala, about 65 miles south of Baghdad, on March 6, 2007. Photo

      An Iraqi Army commando guards Muslim Shiite pilgrims marching towards the shrine city of Karbala, about 65 miles south of Baghdad, on March 6, 2007.  (Getty Images/Mohammad Sawaf)

    Previous slide Next slide
  • Photo Essay Battle For Buritz

    In the dangerous Diyala Province, U.S. troops train Iraqi soldiers to become more self-reliant

  • Interactive Battle For Iraq

    The government, the insurgency, key players, background and photos.

  • Interactive American Heroes

    Profiles of U.S. soldiers who've died in Iraq, a look at the war's toll and pictures of mourning.

(CBS/AP)  U.S. and Iraqi troops captured eight suspected insurgents Thursday in raids north of Baghdad as part of a campaign to prevent insurgents from regrouping outside the city during the ongoing security crackdown.

The operation took place in Duluiyah and the Jabouri peninsula — a bend in the Tigris River about 55 miles north of Baghdad — part of the Sunni areas around Baghdad where insurgents have fled since the crackdown in the capital began last month.

The top U.S. commander in Iraq, Gen. David Petraeus, said the security operation would be extended beyond the city limits to target these areas, which he referred to as "the Baghdad belt."

Petraeus did not put a time limit on how long the additional troops might remain in Iraq, but he said they're likely to be there beyond the summer, reports CBS News chief foreign correspondent Lara Logan.

"The priority clearly is Baghdad, (but) anyone who knows about security in Baghdad knows you must also secure the 'Baghdad belts'— in other words, the areas that surround Baghdad," Petraeus told reporters at his first news conference since taking command last month.

Petraeus said the security operation would continue as long as necessary "to achieve its desired effect."

"We are still in the early days of this endeavor — an endeavor that will take months, not weeks, to fully implement," Petraeus said.

Petraeus acknowledged that some kinds of attacks are almost impossible to stop, reports Logan.

“There is a point at which if someone is willing to blow up himself, particularly, perhaps, disguise himself, and use a vest rather than a vehicle, the problem becomes very, very difficult indeed,” he said.

Petraeus also said he had not decided whether to ask for additional troops beyond the 21,500 combat forces already earmarked for Baghdad. The last of the reinforcements are due in early June, he said.

In other developments:

  • The embassy of the Republic of Georgia said Thursday the former Soviet republic is raising the number of soldiers it has with the U.S.-led coalition in Iraq to more than 2,000 from its current 850.

  • The Pentagon has approved a request by the new U.S. commander in Iraq for an extra 2,200 military police to help deal with an anticipated increase in detainees during the Baghdad security crackdown, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said. Gates also cited early indications that the Iraqi government is meeting the commitments it made to bolster security, although he cautioned that it was too early to reach any firm conclusions about the outcome.

  • In a direct challenge to President Bush, House Democrats unveiled legislation Thursday requiring the withdrawal of U.S. combat troops from Iraq by the fall of next year. Speaker Nancy Pelosi said the deadline would be added to legislation providing nearly $100 billion the Bush administration has requested for fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan.

  • Violence across Iraq Wednesday left about 90 people dead. The deadliest attack, a cafe bombing northeast of Baghdad, killed more than 30 people. According to a police officer, a suicide bomber detonated the explosive in a cafe in Bala Ruz. In addition to the 30 killed, dozens were injured.

    The New York Times reported that the operational commander, Lt. Gen. Raymond Odierno, recommended that the extra troops remain until February 2008. Odierno said the extra troops are needed to allow time to win over the Iraqi populace.

    Continued



    © MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.

    Video and Galleries from Iraq After Saddam

    Add a Comment See all 87 Comments
    by ftwool1941 March 8, 2007 10:18 AM EST
    Reply to this comment
    by dallison7 March 8, 2007 10:22 AM EST
    Surge! Stay the course! More surge! Bring em' on! Still more surge!

    QUAGMIRE ACCOMPLISHED!!
    Reply to this comment
    by mcvet March 8, 2007 10:24 AM EST
    How many MORE people will it take to convince this Incompetent Little Man. You can NOT win in Iraq with Military. IF those people, who after all LIVE there, do not get along then no amount of Military Might can stop a Civil War. I know it's something a Southern Fascist is NOT very good at but there are so many in this nation who are. How sad that our Military has to suffer through this horrible Administration.
    Reply to this comment
    by tuckerndfw March 8, 2007 10:25 AM EST
    From the story:

    "and political talks must eventually include some militant groups now opposing the U.S.-backed government."

    Imagine that. He is advocating the plan proposed by the Iraq Study Group.

    Amazing how Bozo Bush claimed he was implementing his own plan when his plan appears to be the same as that proposed by the Iraq Study Group.

    That is the only plan that will work and will not work until all US combat forces are withdrawn from Iraq.

    It is unfortunate that George Bush is a pathological liar and refuses to credit the ISG for the plan he is implementing.
    Reply to this comment
    by lieber1881 March 8, 2007 10:56 AM EST
    tucker - rhymes with guess what - which is WHAT YOU ARE, plus being what you described the President of the United States.

    Of course, a moronic fascist like you - and the rest of the surrender monkeys liked Cliton - a draft dodging pervert who rained bombs down on Serbs who were NEVER a threat to the U.S. - None of you cowards, traitors, fascists and mental midgets demanded his head. Why? Because, even in the case of the so-called "vets" here, he was your kind of guy. Even though when bombing Belgrade he totally ignored Al Qaeda.

    Getting a little more quiet in Baghdad? I guess you hyenas will be screaming louder and pointing out to Diyala, Ramati, and Anbar. So sad to disappoint you, but they'll be cleaned out of cockroaches too, pretty soon. Which will leave your girlfriend, Botox, and rest of the traitors looking for more excuses.

    Grow Up. And if you don't like the war, the mission, or this country - more so the latter, kindly leave it. Live in one of the roach holes. I'm sure you will loved there especially when they slit your scrawny necks, bozo fascists.
    Reply to this comment
    by tuckerndfw March 8, 2007 11:01 AM EST
    - None of you cowards, traitors, fascists and mental midgets demanded his head. Why? Because, even in the case of the so-called "vets" here, he was your kind of guy.

    Posted by Lieber1881 at 07:56 AM : Mar 08, 2007

    I have only written a letter to one president requesting that he resign for the good of the nation.

    No, it wan't LBJ, D. Nixon or Jimmy Carter.

    It was Bill Clinton.

    You, like the rest of the Bush bootlickers, are a moron. And, it appears you are a hysterical, shrieking moron, at that.

    George Bush can always rely on the moron vote. After all, birds of a feather do squawk together.
    Reply to this comment
    by gunnerv1 March 8, 2007 11:07 AM EST
    If any of you could get past name calling, you just might, and I empasize the word MIGHT be able to have a good exchange, but alas, I know that it can't be done, so Ill just laugh at all of you from a distance because I don't want your manners to get close to me.
    Reply to this comment
    by iceman_1960 March 8, 2007 11:10 AM EST
    "But Petraeus stressed that military force alone is "not sufficient" to end the violence in Iraq and political talks must eventually include some militant groups now opposing the U.S.-backed government."

    ***.

    Another Leftie aiding and abetting the insurgents.
    Reply to this comment
    by bluestardad March 8, 2007 11:16 AM EST
    How long are we to STAY THE COURSE in Iraq? Many times have Democrats said they will introduce resolutions to end the war but still they fund the war and the Republicans do what they want. America says get our troops out of Iraq! This war was started on a lie, with no planning no health care for our wounded or policy to win the peace with an exit strategy! Democratic Non Binding resolutions are not enough! Democrats keep moving back the date when they will take significant action to stop the war and each time they do nothing but move the date back again to another later date. If this Democratic Leadership cannot get America out of Iraq it is time to change the Democratic Leadership! Bush and Cheney are nothing but liars and war criminals but the Democrats are partakers and just as guilty by their complacency!
    If you think Americas sacrifice is worth it contact your Congress person and tell them http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/

    Here is the House Speakers email address: AmericanVoices@mail.house.gov
    Reply to this comment
    by iceman_1960 March 8, 2007 11:20 AM EST
    Cheer up, General Petraeus.

    Does this man look worried ?

    http://wwwimage.cbsnews.com/images/2006/03/20/image1422382g.jpg

    That picture is from a CBS story about a year ago: 3/20/2006:

    "President Bush on Monday cited progress in stabilizing an insurgent stronghold in northern Iraq, saying he has "confidence in our strategy" and contending that critics should look beyond the images of violence to see clear signs of progress."



    Reply to this comment
    by formrusmcsgt March 8, 2007 11:21 AM EST
    I have been stating here forever that a standing army will never defeat a motivated, competent guerilla force that has the support of the local populace.

    The neocons always respond that I do not know what I'm talking about, that I'm a traitor, an enemy agent, etc., and we just need more troops to get the job done.

    Well, this morning Dubya's hand picked boy finally spoke the truth:

    No military solution to Iraq - U.S. chief

    POSTED: 5:59 a.m. EST, March 8, 2007

    BAGHDAD, Iraq (Reuters) -- U.S. and Iraqi security forces cannot solve the problem of violence in Iraq without political action and reconciliation with some militant groups, the U.S. commander in Iraq said on Thursday.

    General David Petraeus, in his first news conference in Baghdad since he took command last month, also said he saw no immediate need to request more U.S. troops, but reinforcements already requested would likely stay "well beyond the summer."

    "There is no military solution to a problem like that in Iraq, to the insurgency of Iraq," Petraeus said.

    http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/m
    east/03/08/iraq.petraeus.reut/index.html


    Now you neocons, call Petraeus an enemy agent and traitor for speaking the truth - go ahead.

    Reply to this comment
    by iceman_1960 March 8, 2007 11:27 AM EST
    Here is the kind of supporter Bush has been reduced to:

    "I'm sure you will loved there especially when they slit your scrawny necks, bozo fascists."
    Posted by Lieber1881

    Bush is welcomed to that clown and all the other clowns he can crowd into a Hundred Man March in support of policies that have failed as surely as the maiden voyage of the Titanic.
    Reply to this comment
    by omnibus66 March 8, 2007 11:32 AM EST
    So we are beginning to see the admission that the "surge" is not working. Naturally the insurgents are going to take their attacks to areas where the U.S. forces are thinnest, and we end up playing "whack-a-mole" with them. The whole thing is sheer madness, promoted by the madman-in-chief.

    Do not look for the Democrats to be able to do anything to stop it, since they do not have a large enough majority in either house of Congress. Additionally, the madman-in-chief would veto anything they might manage to pass.

    The key rests with the rubber-stamp Republicans. IF and when enough of them realize that their rubber-stamping is ruining this nation, we will return to sanity.
    Reply to this comment
    by iceman_1960 March 8, 2007 11:33 AM EST
    "Of course, a moronic fascist like you - and the rest of the surrender monkeys liked Cliton [sic] - a draft dodging pervert who rained bombs down on Serbs who were NEVER a threat to the U.S." - Lieber1881

    Clinton submitted to the draft (eventually), took a physical at an American military base in England and then took his chances with the draft lottery.

    Bush dodged the draft completely.

    Get your facts straight.
    Reply to this comment
    by iceman_1960 March 8, 2007 11:40 AM EST
    If Bill Clinton had gone to Congress and gotten a formal Declaration of War, I wouldn't have had any problem with his Balkans campaign.

    He didn't.

    Lieber1881 and his crowd will never forgive Clinton for losing no Americans in combat in that campaign. How it would have pleased them to scream on this forum, "Clinton lied and 3,000 Americans died in the war with the Serbs !!"

    That would have made them so happy -- it would have been better than SE*X for them.
    Reply to this comment
    by musty2u March 8, 2007 11:42 AM EST
    The surge hasn't really started yet. Let the games begin. My company manufactures body bags and I need the business. Business even in the streets of NYC have fallen off. Whatever is a capitalist to do?
    Reply to this comment
    by karlimhof March 8, 2007 11:46 AM EST
    And if you don't like the war, the mission, or this country - more so the latter, kindly leave it. Live in one of the roach holes. I'm sure you will loved there especially when they slit your scrawny necks, bozo fascists.
    Posted by Lieber1881

    i bet liebersissy wets his pants every time he writes one of his lie-berisms.

    IDF's still waiting for you dude -

    Reply to this comment
    by iceman_1960 March 8, 2007 11:47 AM EST
    One_American declared the Surge victorious after the first 48 hours of quiet, and predicted that Democrats who opposed it were facing "political suicide."

    That Crystal Ball is defective, sir.

    Get your money back.
    Reply to this comment
    by crater7 March 8, 2007 11:48 AM EST
    At some point, you have to say enough, is enough. First it was 21,500 more troops, already they are asking for more troops. They will be needed to guard the expected increase of insurgent prisoners. How many will they be asking for next month? My queston is, why cant the Iraqi's run these prisons? If they cant be trusted to oversee a prison, then what can they be trusted to do? Would you trust the Iraqi's enough to leave troops behind and living with these same Iraqi police, that cant be trusted to run these prisons? Your Son, Daughter, love one, may be left in the care of these Iraqi's.
    Reply to this comment
    by karlimhof March 8, 2007 11:50 AM EST
    The surge hasn't really started yet. Let the games begin. My company manufactures body bags and I need the business.

    Posted by Musty2U


    you are one sick sick dude
    Reply to this comment
    by iceman_1960 March 8, 2007 11:53 AM EST
    "Benchmarks" for which the Iraqi government faces no consequences if they don't meet them -- that's just another word for "Non-binding Resolutions."

    Anyone with real world experience knows you have to set real deadlines for difficult tasks, or they won't get done.

    Even something as relatively painless as tax preparation needs that April deadline to enforce it.

    We should give the Iraqi government real deadlines and tell them we're pulling out if they don't meet them.
    Reply to this comment
    by karlimhof March 8, 2007 11:54 AM EST
    "We have not set our military up for success. We're not firing on all cylinders, diplomatically, economically and politically.
    Gen. Batiste

    need we say more.....?
    Reply to this comment
    by karlimhof March 8, 2007 11:57 AM EST
    He noted that such political negotiations "will determine in the long run the success of this effort."
    Gen. petraeus

    Oh, really, we didn't realize that....it means we have to talk to someone? Before unilateral action?
    Is that Neocon-cratic ?

    Reply to this comment
    by iceman_1960 March 8, 2007 11:57 AM EST
    "Even something as relatively painless as tax preparation needs that April deadline to enforce it."

    The IRS doesn't tell you they're establishing an April benchmark for your tax filing, and that they will then evaluate your progress in meeting it.

    The IRS gives you a deadline.

    The Iraqi government has already had four years.
    Reply to this comment
    by bluestardad March 8, 2007 11:58 AM EST
    Alexander, Lamar- (R - TN)
    Allard, Wayne- (R - CO)
    Baucus, Max- (D - MT)
    Biden, Joseph R., Jr.- (D - DE)
    Chambliss, Saxby- (R - GA)
    Cochran, Thad- (R - MS)
    Coleman, Norm- (R - MN)
    Collins, Susan M.- (R - ME)
    Cornyn, John- (R - TX)
    Craig, Larry E.- (R - ID)
    Dole, Elizabeth- (R - NC)
    Durbin, Richard- (D - IL)
    Enzi, Michael B.- (R - WY)
    Graham, Lindsey- (R - SC)
    Hagel, Chuck- (R - NE)
    Harkin, Tom- (D - IA)
    Inhofe, James M.- (R - OK)
    Johnson, Tim- (D - SD)
    Kerry, John F.- (D - MA)
    Landrieu, Mary L.- (D - LA)
    Lautenberg, Frank R.- (D - NJ)
    Levin, Carl- (D - MI)
    McConnell, Mitch- (R - KY)
    Pryor, Mark L.- (D - AR)
    Reed, Jack- (D - RI)
    Roberts, Pat- (R - KS)
    Rockefeller, John D., IV- (D - WV)
    Sessions, Jeff- (R - AL)
    Smith, Gordon H.- (R - OR)
    Stevens, Ted- (R - AK)
    Sununu, John E.- (R - NH)
    Warner, John- (R - VA)

    If you think Americas sacrifice is worth it contact your Congress person and tell them http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/

    Here is the House Speakers email address: AmericanVoices@mail.house.gov

    Here are the senators up for reelection in 08 write them or quit complaining!
    Reply to this comment
    by iceman_1960 March 8, 2007 12:01 PM EST
    "Here are the senators up for reelection in 08 write them or quit complaining!"
    Posted by bluestardad

    With D-ick Durbin I would be preaching to the choir.

    But thanks.
    Reply to this comment
    by iceman_1960 March 8, 2007 12:06 PM EST
    Many of the men and women in the service signed up in response to the 9/11 attack.

    I don't think they envisioned risking their lives to protect Iraqi Shiite Pilgrims or Islamic shrines.

    They wanted to protect Americans.
    Reply to this comment
    by us_infidel March 8, 2007 12:09 PM EST
    "Attacks Intensify Outside Baghdad".....and the MSM giggles with glee.

    We should give the Iraqi government real deadlines and tell them we're pulling out if they don't meet them.
    Posted by Iceman_1960 at 08:53 AM : Mar 08, 2007

    I agree with this 100%. They better start getting a handle on the forces entering their country causing strife. If they can't control it, it will for sure be a lost cause.
    Reply to this comment
    by panhandlpete March 8, 2007 12:14 PM EST
    "We need to mobilize this country. They need to understand the what and the why, and what happens if we fail,"
    Maj. Gen. John Batiste (Ret.) says the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan "are going to take a lot longer than we think."

    I say this is a fine example of the people at the helm. He found his tongue after he retired. It is difficult to gain credibility once you have LIED, LIED, and LIED again. We were told by the DECIDER: an immediate threat, WMD's, would be paid for with Iraqi oil, mission accomplished, and then it changes to.....stabilize IRAQ, fight the terrorists there so we don't fight them here.

    It is the people in the Middle East that need to be mobolized together at a conference, and let them find a way to either live together or KILL each other as long as they wish. (How will they know when they have gotten the last terrorist? As long as people exist, they will find ways to kill.)

    Reply to this comment
    by iceman_1960 March 8, 2007 12:16 PM EST
    "Hundreds of thousands of Shiite pilgrims have been streaming by bus, car and foot toward the holy city of Karbala, about 50 miles south of Baghdad, for annual religious rituals that begin Friday... Petraeus said U.S. forces are ready to help provide additional security for the pilgrims if asked by Iraqi authorities."

    This triple aterisk *** is not what America's servicemen and women signed up to do.

    And this isn't even a declared war.

    Bush should be impeached for abusing the military like this.
    Reply to this comment
    by crater7 March 8, 2007 12:17 PM EST
    bluestarted: I'm sure most people know who their elected officials are. Thanks for the info. We will leave the complaining to you, since your opinion is the only one that matters.
    Reply to this comment
    by rsoxfan1123 March 8, 2007 12:18 PM EST
    Stay tuned for more "Stay the Course Part IV", part of the change in strategy promised to us by the ever-incompetent republican administration.
    Reply to this comment
    by observantx March 8, 2007 12:19 PM EST

    Here we go again with the continuing game of "Whack-a Mole"

    We "surge" into Baghdad, the militias and insurgents melt away into the countryside. We go to the provinces, they scurry back into Baghdad. Repeat as desired.

    And with every swing of the mallet, a minimum of 3 US soldiers make acquaintance with an IED or a sniper.

    If we cannot win over the general population, there is no amount of troops or equipment that will insure any success in Iraq. So far, we have had a dismal record.

    Partly, it is because in the eyes of the Iraqis, we morphed very rapidly from liberator to occupier. They want us gone yesterday. They need the room to get on with their own plans for bloodbath and mayhem. The few mutilated bodies that keep turning up in the street every morning aren't enough for them. They want to start the production lines rolling.

    So do we futilely chase moles or do the smart thing: pull out, seal the borders tight and wait for the sectarian slaughter to begin, flourish and then finally ebb.

    Until the Iraqis either resolve their internal religious strife or let it lay waste to their country, there is little we can do to improve the situation.

    Unfortunately far too many innocent lives have been lost. That loss is partly on the heads of our little tyrant and his dark prince and their aides and spinmeisters in our White House.

    We need to deal with them as quickly as we can for our own nation's sake.

    Reply to this comment
    by rsoxfan1123 March 8, 2007 12:22 PM EST
    For only $2 billion a week, we can liberate another random nation! Why spend money on education, transportation, law enforcement, fire departments in America when we can give it to various third world nations that hate us anyway? Leave it to the genius of the republican mind to devise this brilliant plan. Just think, elect another republican president and we'll have more of this "fiscal responsibility".
    Reply to this comment
    by iceman_1960 March 8, 2007 12:24 PM EST
    Well listen up, Pilgrims...

    The American military has better things to do than guarantee security in "the holy city of Karbala."
    Reply to this comment
    by bluestardad March 8, 2007 12:26 PM EST
    HERE ARE THE SENATORS UP FOR REELECTION IN 08 WRITE THEM OR QUIT COMPLAINING! The longer we interject American military and money in the Middle East the longer the problems will exists. If America pulls out of the Middle East then the countries will have to work out their differences between themselves and true peace will be achieved. 50 YEARS OF SACRIFICE IS ENOUGH! We cannot want peace in the middle east more than those who live there!

    Alexander, Lamar- (R - TN)
    Allard, Wayne- (R - CO)
    Baucus, Max- (D - MT)
    Biden, Joseph R., Jr.- (D - DE)
    Chambliss, Saxby- (R - GA)
    Cochran, Thad- (R - MS)
    Coleman, Norm- (R - MN)
    Collins, Susan M.- (R - ME)
    Cornyn, John- (R - TX)
    Craig, Larry E.- (R - ID)
    Dole, Elizabeth- (R - NC)
    Durbin, Richard- (D - IL)
    Enzi, Michael B.- (R - WY)
    Graham, Lindsey- (R - SC)
    Hagel, Chuck- (R - NE)
    Harkin, Tom- (D - IA)
    Inhofe, James M.- (R - OK)
    Johnson, Tim- (D - SD)
    Kerry, John F.- (D - MA)
    Landrieu, Mary L.- (D - LA)
    Lautenberg, Frank R.- (D - NJ)
    Levin, Carl- (D - MI)
    McConnell, Mitch- (R - KY)
    Pryor, Mark L.- (D - AR)
    Reed, Jack- (D - RI)
    Roberts, Pat- (R - KS)
    Rockefeller, John D., IV- (D - WV)
    Sessions, Jeff- (R - AL)
    Smith, Gordon H.- (R - OR)
    Stevens, Ted- (R - AK)
    Sununu, John E.- (R - NH)
    Warner, John- (R - VA)

    If you think Americas sacrifice is worth it contact your ELECTED OFFICIAL and tell them http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/

    The House Speakers email address: AmericanVoices@mail.house.gov
    Reply to this comment
    by rsoxfan1123 March 8, 2007 12:26 PM EST
    The American military has better things to do than guarantee security in "the holy city of Karbala."
    Posted by Iceman_

    Like come home to their families in one piece and let Iraq take care of its own problems maybe?
    Reply to this comment
    by iceman_1960 March 8, 2007 12:38 PM EST
    If the Joint Chiefs would just be honest enough to authorize these words in military recruitment ads, no one would ever enlist.

    "You can be among the brave men and women of America's armed forces as they fight to protect the holy city of Karbala, where Shiite religious rites mark the end of a 40-day mourning period for Imam Hussein, grandson of the Prophet Muhammad. Hussein's death in a 7th-century battle near Karbala cemented the schism between Sunnis and Shiites."

    Can this get any more absurd ?
    Reply to this comment
    by rochest March 8, 2007 12:43 PM EST
    EVENTUALLY this war will be over but how many more young men and women will die and be maimed and how many Iraqis will have the country and their lives destroyed before this happens? We have a general speaking truth that this is no military solution. He and the Iraq study group are saying the same thing .... negotiate even with some militant groups.... get our combat troops home NOW .... equip and train the Iraqi army and police and formalize some type of oil revenue sharing so all Iraqis have a stake in this government.
    Reply to this comment
    by antoniof123 March 8, 2007 12:44 PM EST
    Wow, another day in Iraq. I really wonder how it would be if some of you who say we are fighting for freedom were there. You do not have a clue just like this group that is in office now. They do a good job of supporting the troops yea right. Once they are spent they come home and have to fend for themselves and do not say that it has always been happening. When you say support the troops then you allow things like this you are the worst of the worst. Never again will I vote for a Republican. I did not have a problem but now when you call me a tratior because I do not support the troops when did you support me when I got out. SOB like you do not deserve to live in this country.
    Reply to this comment
    by iceman_1960 March 8, 2007 12:50 PM EST
    "Hussein's death in a 7th-century battle near Karbala cemented the schism between Sunnis and Shiites."

    OK, we're going now. America wasn't even in existence in the 7th century.

    When the Iraqis get done refighting the 7th century and catch up to the 21st, we'll be back.
    Reply to this comment
    by iceman_1960 March 8, 2007 12:53 PM EST
    "Hussein's death in a 7th-century battle near Karbala cemented the schism between Sunnis and Shiites."

    How do they put it in Texas ?

    "We don't have a dog in this fight."

    (Or is that, "We don't have a God in this fight" ?)
    Reply to this comment
    by musty2u March 8, 2007 1:05 PM EST
    Contact your Senators! Contact your Represetatives!

    Tell them Hadj sent you and you want more bombs rained down upon your heads.
    Reply to this comment
    by rsoxfan1123 March 8, 2007 1:10 PM EST
    We have a general speaking truth that this is no military solution.
    Posted by Rochest
    And this guy was hired after the last one "retired" for saying there was no military solution (along with all the other who said the same thing). I thought he was supposed to be Bush's bobblehead? Looks like he is developing his own brain.
    Reply to this comment
    by clestes-2009 March 8, 2007 1:16 PM EST
    How many more times is it going to have to be said. There is no military solution in Iraq, there never has been!!!

    What is wrong with the people in this administration in that they cannot understand this very simple idea??

    Here we are 4 years later after a strictly military campaign still fighting the same people. This is stupid, costly and useless and I am SICK TO DEATH of reading about the number of soldiers and civilians killed in the same fruitless way. Me and a lot of other people all predicted that putting more troops in Baghdad would accomplish NOTHING except kill more soldiers and drive the insurgents to pop up in another place!!

    General Petraeus, I am sure, is a fine soldier, but he himself ackownledges that he cannot win in Bahgdad with just the military. There MUST be a diplomatic push as strong as the military push to accomplish ANYTHING.

    And even then it will take years. This whole stupid mess is beyond belief. It will be a problem for decades to come.
    Reply to this comment
    by bluestardad March 8, 2007 1:29 PM EST
    Iceman_1960; VERY WELL SAID!
    Reply to this comment
    by rsoxfan1123 March 8, 2007 1:30 PM EST
    There is no military solution in Iraq, there never has been!!!
    What is wrong with the people in this administration in that they cannot understand this very simple idea??
    Posted by clestes

    Because that would mean Bush admitting he was wrong and he will throw as many limbs and lives away as necessary if he thinks there is even the samllest chance he can avoid that.
    Reply to this comment
    by rsoxfan1123 March 8, 2007 1:34 PM EST
    smallest I meant
    Reply to this comment
    by notblue March 8, 2007 1:52 PM EST
    Love the way people here at leftwing central cherry pick the news. I watched CBS news this morning and listened to the generals entire statement. He said there is no military solution ALONE. He stated there must diplomacy combined with military he also said that this war would last for many years and that Iraq and Afghanistan are the first two chapters in a world wide conflict. Funny how everyone here leaves the last part out, typical!
    Reply to this comment
    by rochest March 8, 2007 1:55 PM EST
    antoniof 123 I am sorry that this administration did not give you the support you needed hopefully this new Congress will fully fund the VA and all its necessary Services now.

    iceman you are right so right we do not have a dog (God)in this fight... bring our combat troops home safely to their families now.
    Reply to this comment
    See all 87 Comments
    • MOST POPULAR
    • Viewed
    • Commented
    Latest News
    Featured Blogs