It's All Libby All The Time In Media
The Skinny: Guilty Verdict Dominates Nation's Major News Outlets, But Does Anybody Else Really Care?
-
Play CBS Video Video Wilson On Libby Verdict Joseph Wilson told Harry Smith that his wife, Valerie Plame, felt relief after "Scooter" Libby was found guilty. Wilson and his wife are bringing a civil trial against Vice President Dick Cheney.
-
Video Libby Convicted Of Lying After a four-year investigation and 10 days of jury deliberations, former vice presidential aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby was convicted of lying. As Gloria Borger reports, Libby plans to appeal.
-
Video Schieffer On Libby Verdict CBS News Chief Washington Correspondent and host of "Face The Nation" Bob Schieffer discusses the ramifications of the Scooter Libby verdict with Hannah Strom.
-
I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby (Getty Images/Win McNamee)
-
Photo Essay After The Verdict Lewis Libby found guilty of perjury, obstruction of justice and lying to the FBI
-
Interactive The Libby Trial Follow the the perjury and obstruction trial of I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby
Volume II of a lengthy Washington saga that captured the media's attention -- and pretty much no one else's -- is over. All of today's front pages (including the top of the Wall Street Journal's newsbox) document the details of yesterday's verdict in which Lewis "Scooter" Libby was convicted of lying to investigators in the CIA leak investigation.
The New York Times includes the most vivid description of Libby's reaction to the verdict: he "grimaced briefly before resuming his expressionless demeanor."
Everyone takes note of a special historical fun fact: Libby is the highest-ranking White House official to be convicted of a felony since the Iran-contra scandal. Or, as USA Today notes, he is also "the highest-ranking Bush administration official to be convicted of a crime."
And beyond that, each paper also has its own opinions on what this trial and the conviction represented for America.
"The trial highlighted the nation's divisions over the war, the Bush White House's intolerance of critics and the uneasy symbiosis between an elite tier of Washington journalists and their confidential sources inside the government," writes the Washington Post.
Other papers focus on the consequences for the Bush administration. USA Today writes that the conviction "could further burden a White House struggling with a 4-year-old war in Iraq and low poll ratings," and the Los Angeles Times echoes that sentiment, writing that the conviction "was one more setback for the Bush administration, already laboring under low approval ratings, public impatience with the war in Iraq and a new Democratic majority in Congress."
The LAT expends another front-page article discussing the potential of a presidential pardon for Libby, since the verdict "was also seen as an indictment of the White House political operation [Libby] helped design and direct."
The Google Factor
Meanwhile, in the real world, some job applicants are finding that Google searches are having an impact on their job searches.
A few law students interviewed by the Post reported that they were top-tier candidates for law firms, but were having trouble getting hired because of what they thought was "a new form of reputation-maligning: online postings with offensive content and personal attacks that can be stored forever and are easily accessible through a Google search."
The students were the subjects of "derogatory chats on a widely read message board" run by another law student. While it's "difficult to prove a direct link" between the messages' presence and their lack of job offers, the students' stories do raise some questions – especially since, according to the Post, "roughly half" of employers use the Internet to vet job applications and "about one-third of the searches yielded content used to deny a job."
Which means that there is a new service in town: ReputationDefender, "whose mission is to search for damaging content online and destroy it on behalf of clients."
More Fun With Financial Disclosures
After the Washington Post got some good mileage out of Sen. Hillary Clinton's financial disclosures, The New York Times has some questions about Sen. Barack Obama's.
The big question surrounds a $50,000 stock purchase in two companies "whose major investors included some of his biggest political donors."
One was a biotech company that was developing a drug to treat avian flu, and after buying $5,000 in shares, "Mr. Obama took the lead in a legislative push for more federal spending to battle the disease."
But, according to an Obama spokesman, the senator "did not know that he had invested in either company until fall 2005," because his broker purchased them as part of a blind trust. Once Obama learned of the purchase, he sold the shares at a $13,000 loss.
"Even so," writes the Times, "the stock purchases raise questions about how he could unwittingly come to invest in two relatively obscure companies, whose backers happen to include generous contributors to his political committees."
A NOTE TO READERS: The Skinny is now available via e-mail for those of you umbilically attached to your blackberries and whatnot. Click here and follow the directions to register to receive it in your inbox each weekday morning.
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."





- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 56 CommentsAlexander, Lamar- (R - TN)
Allard, Wayne- (R - CO)
Baucus, Max- (D - MT)
Biden, Joseph R., Jr.- (D - DE)
Chambliss, Saxby- (R - GA)
Cochran, Thad- (R - MS)
Coleman, Norm- (R - MN)
Collins, Susan M.- (R - ME)
Cornyn, John- (R - TX)
Craig, Larry E.- (R - ID)
Dole, Elizabeth- (R - NC)
Durbin, Richard- (D - IL)
Enzi, Michael B.- (R - WY)
Graham, Lindsey- (R - SC)
Hagel, Chuck- (R - NE)
Harkin, Tom- (D - IA)
Inhofe, James M.- (R - OK)
Johnson, Tim- (D - SD)
Kerry, John F.- (D - MA)
Landrieu, Mary L.- (D - LA)
Lautenberg, Frank R.- (D - NJ)
Levin, Carl- (D - MI)
McConnell, Mitch- (R - KY)
Pryor, Mark L.- (D - AR)
Reed, Jack- (D - RI)
Roberts, Pat- (R - KS)
Rockefeller, John D., IV- (D - WV)
Sessions, Jeff- (R - AL)
Smith, Gordon H.- (R - OR)
Stevens, Ted- (R - AK)
Sununu, John E.- (R - NH)
Warner, John- (R - VA)
If you think Americas sacrifice is worth it contact your ELECTED OFFICIAL and tell them http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/
The House Speakers email address: AmericanVoices@mail.house.gov
Posted by Jebby_One at 03:55 PM : Mar 07, 2007
LOL Well now the fascist are the ones who say no crime was committed so that excuses the crime Libby committed. I believe if you watch REAL news for a change and LISTEN to what Friz says the TRUTH will come to you. The OUTING come not be properly investigated because this clown LIED and OBSTRUCTED Justice. That according to the Fritz made a finding impossible. In other words the Fascist in the White House set this clown up to take the fall...to cover up for Cheney who was so determined to tear down Wilson that he would out the agent. He KNEW, Cheney did and LIBBY did the deed. In his attempt to get off his OWN Attorney told the Jury that Libby was the fall guy, was set up by the White House to take the fall for Cheney. Now WHY allow this man to LIE, Why set him up to lie and obstruct justice if there was NO WRONG? We need to have Cheney and Bush come clean on this...We need to know what THEY said to the FBI and the Investigators.
Posted by SusanHelit at 03:17 PM : Mar 07, 2007
LOL You are right but if you think these fascist care you are dead wrong. THEY have determined there was no crime and it's fine to out her and then lie to the Grand Jury about it, then obstruct justice to cover up for the boss. It's all just fine as long as the Party is benefited. No wander they can't win the War on Terror. No wonder the majority of the citizens of the planet fear them more than Bin Laden.
It is not illigal to disclose the name of an individual simply because they work within the CIA. There never should have been a two year investigation. There was no crime. But, lets go ahead and crucify someone in the Bush admin. Lets blame Libby and this time lets forget that the Clinton administration made it acceptable to lie to a grand jury, Just like they taught our kids that a &*%$ job is not ***. I NEVER HAD *** WITH THAT WOMAN!
Posted by doc18d at 02:54 PM : Mar 07, 2007
Now maybe in the small and very insignificant mind of a flame throwing fascist OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE and LYING for the Vice President, to admit you are taking the fall for that man is okay with you clowns. I guess you people have the illusion that somehow all these lies are okay because YOU, the same clowns who believe the mission in Iraq was accomplished, think there was no crime committed. ROFLMAO That's about the most insane statement I have EVER heard in my life. IF WE, the PARTY, determine there was no crime then lying and obstructing justice is okay? ROFLMAO Want part of Mein Komp do you intend to inforce next? ROFLMAO Sieg Heil
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/030707A.shtml
GETMO time for the lying sleezzz of a VP.
Posted by Jebby_One at 04:42 PM : Mar 07, 2007
ROFLMAO Now YOU are a real nut case! Here we have a guy who sat in front of a Grand Jury and LIED. He then obstructed Justice and was conviced of it! In his closing he admitted he was covering for and was a fall guy for the White House and you equate that to Burger taking a document that he'd seen and had been in position of several times? Unbelievable... just about as UNBELIEVABLY STUPID AS ANYTHING I've ever heard in my life!!!
Posted by perception5 at 04:53 PM : Mar 07, 2007
HUH?? What are you babbling about? Libby was tried in a FEDERAL Court for OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE for God's sake. What difference does it make IF you do not think there was a crime being investigated. Are you saying that EVERYONE who lies in EVERY case where YOU think there is really no crime involved should be able to just lie and Obstruct Justice then walk away? That's INSANE! ABSOLUTELY INSANE!! The INVESTIGATION is supposed to REVEAL if there was a crime.. that's what it's for. You simple minded fascist seem to be saying that because you clowns have determined there was no outing then he should be allowed to lie and obstruct the investigation. Come on!! That's to stupid even for a fascist. Sieg Heil
Posted by Jebby_One at 07:24 PM : Mar 07, 2007
To even compare what Bill Clinton did, targeted the LAST remaining facilities to produce WMD to what Cheney, Bush and the rest of the Magots in the White House is without a doubt beyond belief! Have you people COMPLETELY lost your minds...COMPLETELY. This little man was CONVICTED OF LYING AND OBSTRUCTING an INVESTIGATION of the Bush Administration. HE took the fall for Cheney and ADMITTED it in the TRIAL. HIS ATTORNEY said it in his CLOSING STATEMENT for God's sake. What is WRONG with you people???
Its obvious to anyone who hasn't lived in a cave, Bushco fabricated lies about non-existent WMDs and ties to Al Quaeda. The Libby trial is just the tip of the iceberg, why would Libby lied? What was his motivation to do so?
Bush supporters are more concerned with Anna Nicole Smith, Natalie Holloway, Flag burning, banning gay marriage then actually trying to figure out why 23,000 U.S. soldiers have been permanently maimed or killed, why under Bushco the national debt has increased by over 3 Trillion dollars and after all the lost lives and treasure, Iraq is more of a hell hole now then before we invaded.
are you serious? Bill clinton lobbed bombs at Iraq long before Scooter Libby arrived on the scene. Bill Clinton apparently believed that Saddam was attempting or planning to build WMD's. Who told Bill Clinton all the lies then?
And CBS News asks: does anyone really care????
No morons, nobody cares. Just feed us more BS stories about Paris Hilton, the battles over Nichole Smith's baby and the amazing success of American Idol, and leave us alone. You bunch of idiots. Of course all thinking Americans care. You in the media are supposed to care too.
No. I think that Sandy Burger stealing classified documents from the national archives is a far greater crime.
Posted by Jebby_One at 04:42 PM
-------
What Berger did was clearly wrong, but as harmful as this? Surely, you really must be joking! Scooter Libby's actions helped perpetuate a lie that there were WMDs in Iraq, when clearly there were none. A career was ruined. We are approaching 3200 dead American soldiers. Many, many more with wounds from which they will never recover, physically and psychologically.
To me and many other Americans, those are impeachable offenses. Not only should Libby go to jail, but D i c k Cheney and George W. Bush should be impeached!
I swear. You Bush water-bearers never cease to amaze me!
"In conversations with journalists or in a July 6, 2003, op-ed, Wilson claimed to have debunked evidence that Iraq was seeking uranium from Niger; suggested that he had been dispatched by Mr. Cheney to look into the matter; and alleged that his report had circulated at the highest levels of the administration.
A bipartisan investigation by the Senate intelligence committee subsequently established that all of these claims were false -- and that Mr. Wilson was recommended for the Niger trip by Ms. Plame, his wife. When this fact, along with Ms. Plame's name, was disclosed in a column by Robert D. Novak, Mr. Wilson advanced yet another sensational charge: that his wife was a covert CIA operative and that senior White House officials had orchestrated the leak of her name to destroy her career and thus punish Mr. Wilson.
The partisan furor over this allegation led to the appointment of special prosecutor Patrick J. Fitzgerald. Yet after two years of investigation, Mr. Fitzgerald charged no one with a crime for leaking Ms. Plame's name. The trial has provided convincing evidence that there was no conspiracy to punish Mr. Wilson by leaking Ms. Plame's identity -- and no evidence that she was, in fact, covert."- Washington Post
No. I think that Sandy Burger stealing classified documents from the national archives is a far greater crime.
Ever since Bill Clinton signed the Telecommunications Act of 1996, media has not focused on real news, but infotainment. I just read a report on Monday morning which stated that one is much more likely to be current on Britney or Anna Nicole than on the war on terror.
"Liberal" media? Ha! What a joke! Not that it ever existed, but it certainly doesn't now. Media is guided by profits here, not ideology. It's the dumbing down of America.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 56 Comments