December 5, 2007 12:39 PM

Court Nixes Suit Alleging CIA Tortured Man

By
Amy Clark
(CBS)  By CBS News producer Phil Hirschkorn.



Khaled El-Masri, an unemployed German car salesman who sued the United States for allegedly ordering his abduction and secretly detaining him for months in a dingy Afghanistan prison, has been dealt another setback in the U.S. courts.

On Friday, the Fourth Circuit federal appeals court in Richmond, Va., rejected arguments made by the American Civil Liberties Union to reinstate his lawsuit for damages.

A three-judge panel was unanimous in a 24-page ruling that the suit could jeopardize national security by disclosing "state secrets" - sensitive military intelligence information that remains classified.

"We must reject El-Masri's view that the existence of public reports concerning his alleged rendition (and the CIA's rendition program in general) should have saved his complaint from dismissal," the appeals panel wrote, "because the public information does not include the facts that are central to litigating his action."

Presenting those facts, the court said, would expose how the CIA organizes, staffs and supervises its most sensitive intelligence operations; the existence and details of CIA espionage contracts; and the means and methods by which the CIA gathers intelligence and makes its personnel assignments.

The appeals court noted President Bush's speech last September acknowledging secret CIA-run prisons overseas and last June's European Parliament report finding that El-Masri's story was "substantially accurate." But the judges said their hands were tied.

"El-Masri envisions a judiciary that possesses a roving writ to ferret out and strike down executive excess," the judges wrote. "We decline to follow such a course, and thus reject El- Masri's invitation to rule that the state secrets doctrine can be brushed aside on the ground that the President's foreign policy has gotten out of line."

The order upheld last May's ruling by a federal judge in Alexandria, Virginia, who dismissed the case for virtually the same reasons.

"Regrettably, today's decision allows CIA officials to disregard the law with impunity by making it virtually impossible to challenge their actions in court," ACLU Executive Director Anthony Romero said in a written statement. "With today's ruling, the state secrets doctrine has become a shield that covers even the most blatant abuses of power."

The ACLU is considering an appeal to the United States Supreme Court.

Three years ago, El-Masri was snatched while traveling by bus to Skopje, Macedonia. After being locked in a hotel room for 23 days, he was flown secretly to Kabul, Afghanistan — beaten, bound, and drugged, he says — and then detained, incommunicado, in a CIA-run former brick factory known as the Salt Pit. It was four months before he was sent back — dropped off in Albania with a commercial plane ticket home but no explanation.

Besides CIA officials, including former CIA director George Tenet, El-Masri sued three U.S.-based aviation corporations that his attorneys believed to be involved in the prisoner traffic.

As CBS News reported last November, if the case were to be green-lighted, the ACLU was considering adding aviation giant Boeing as a defendant because Spanish flight records reveal a Boeing subsidiary, Jeppesen, handled numerous rendition trips, including El-Masri's Boeing 737 flight from Macedonia to Afghanistan. Many rendition flights and crews made rest stops in Mallorca, Spain, the records show.

German prosecutors relied on those records in levying criminal charges last month against 13 CIA agents and contractors — 11 men and 2 women — for false imprisonment and serious bodily injury.

"Today the appeals court gave the CIA complete immunity for even its most shameful conduct," said ACLU attorney Ben Wizner, who argued El-Masri's case before the 4th Circuit last November, which El-Masri traveled to the U.S. to attend. "Depriving Khaled El-Masri of his day in court on the ground that the government cannot disclose facts that the whole world already knows only compounds the brutal treatment he endured."

El-Masri, 44, who was born in Kuwait to Lebanese parents, has lived in Germany for the past 20 years.

Copyright 2007 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment See all 27 Comments
by lars008-2009 March 4, 2007 9:41 PM EST
Thomas Jefferson knew about fascist nazi islam..... he killed plenty of them....

In 1786 Jefferson and John Adams went to negotiate with Tripoli's envoy to London, Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdrahaman or (Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja). They asked him by what right he extorted money and took slaves. Jefferson reported to Secretary of State John Jay, and to the Congress:

The ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman who should be slain in battle was sure to go to heaven.[1]
Reply to this comment
by lars008-2009 March 4, 2007 6:51 AM EST
nope...... fascism is alive and well in the fascist nazi islamic nations......

ISLAM / PERFECT EXAMPLE OF FASCISM!!!
islam is intent on killing or enslaving all nonmuslims......

The most notable characteristic of a fascist country is the separation and persecution or denial of equality to a specific segment of the population based upon superficial qualities or belief systems.

Simply stated, a fascist government always has one class of citizens that is considered superior (good) to another (bad) based upon race, creed or origin. It is possible to be both a republic and a fascist state. The preferred class lives in a republic while the oppressed class lives in a fascist state.
http://www.couplescompany.com/Features/Politics/Structure3.htm
Reply to this comment
by mh4cbs1 March 4, 2007 5:04 AM EST
If the CIA can 'rendition' one person without any recourse or meaningful oversigtht, then they can do this to WHOEVER they want to.

Watch what you say. Fascism is alive and well in the USA.
Reply to this comment
by p-syrus March 4, 2007 3:26 AM EST
then i guess FDR really broke the constitution by locking up all the japanese in america....

Posted by lars008

Actually he did. The issue was ducked at the time because it was politically popular although clearly unconstitutional. Another instance of "politics trumping law". FDR conveniently died before the issue could be dealt with legally and the whole thing was glossed over after the war with an "official apology" & "reparations".
Reply to this comment
by toolmangler-2009 March 4, 2007 1:54 AM EST
Nevermind -008, I can see that you can't see because it went right by you. I wish you well anyway.
Reply to this comment
by lars008-2009 March 4, 2007 1:25 AM EST
then i guess FDR really broke the constitution by locking up all the japanese in america....

has bush locked up all the fascist nazi islamic muslims in america????....

maybe he should......
Reply to this comment
by toolmangler-2009 March 4, 2007 1:18 AM EST
Open your eyes -008. You allude to being in the military so you of all people should know the the 'Tail still wags the DOG'!
Reply to this comment
by lars008-2009 March 4, 2007 1:12 AM EST
since when did the constitution apply to the whole world skippy?
Reply to this comment
by toolmangler-2009 March 4, 2007 1:06 AM EST
"There is no provision in the US Constitution or military law for government agents to kidnap and torture people. Nor is there a provision that prohibits them from being brought to justice for doing so.

Even in times of war."

Posted by tuckerndfw at 05:42 PM : Mar 03, 2007

"Absoposislutley!!!!" But what does exist is language that allows the current Administration to interpret the law as they see fit. (Where is Habeas Corpus?) You had best look deeper into what has been removed than what has been put in.
Reply to this comment
by bellal-2009 March 4, 2007 1:01 AM EST
You are incorrect.
Posted by tuckerndfw at 05:42 PM : Mar 03, 2007

The court rejected the appeal. Hello.
Reply to this comment
See all 27 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook