NEW YORK, March 1, 2007

Is No Paris Hilton News Good News?

Results Of The AP's Self-Imposed Ban On News About The Ubiquitous "Celebutante"

  • The AP purposely avoided writing about Paris Hilton for one week, but the ban ended just before her Feb. 27 arrest for driving with a suspended license.

    The AP purposely avoided writing about Paris Hilton for one week, but the ban ended just before her Feb. 27 arrest for driving with a suspended license.  (AP Photo/Lilli Strauss)

  • Photo Essay Vienna Welcomes Paris

    Hilton is the celebrity guest at this year's high society Opera Ball

  • Photo Essay Promoting 'Paris'

    The heiress and reality TV star launches a new career as a singer

(AP)  So you may have heard: Paris Hilton was ticketed the other day for driving with a suspended license.

Not huge news, even by celebrity-gossip standards. Here at The Associated Press, we put out an initial item of some 300 words. But it actually meant more to us than that.

It meant the end of our experimental blackout on news about Paris Hilton.

It was only meant to be a weeklong ban — not the boldest of journalistic initiatives, and one, we realized, that might seem hypocritical once it ended. And it wasn't based on a view of what the public should be focusing on — the war in Iraq, for example, or the upcoming election of the next leader of the free world, as opposed to the doings of a partygoing celebrity heiress/reality TV star most famous for a grainy sex video.

A Quote

"It was only meant to be a weeklong ban — not the boldest of journalistic initiatives, and one, we realized, that might seem hypocritical once it ended."

Jocelyn Noveck, Associated Press
No, AP editors just wanted to see what would happen if we didn't cover this media phenomenon, this creature of the Internet gossip age, for a full week. After that, we'd take it day by day. Would anyone care? Would anyone notice? And would that tell us something interesting?

It turned out that people noticed plenty — but not in the way that might have been expected. None of the tens of thousands of media outlets that depend on AP called in asking for a Paris Hilton story. No one felt a newsworthy event had been ignored. (To be fair, nothing too out-of-the-ordinary happened in the Hilton universe.)

Photos: Paris Hilton In Vienna
The reaction was to the idea of the ban, not the effects of it. There was some internal hand-wringing. Some felt we were tinkering dangerously with the news. Whom, they asked, would we ban next? Others loved the idea. "I vote we do the same for North Korea," one AP writer said facetiously.

The experiment began on Feb. 19. A few days before, the AP had written from Austria about Hilton's appearance at the Vienna Opera ball, just ahead of her 26th birthday. We didn't cover her weekend birthday bash in Las Vegas.

During "blackout week," the AP didn't mention Hilton's second birthday party at a Beverly Hills restaurant, at which a drunken friend reportedly was ejected by security after insulting Paula Abdul and Courtney Love. And editors asked our Puerto Rico bureau not to write about her visit there to hawk her fragrance. However, her name did slip into copy unintentionally three times, as background: in stories about Britney Spears, Nicole Richie, and even in the lead of a story about Democrats in Las Vegas.

Then Hilton was arrested on Feb. 27 for driving with a suspended license — an offense that could conceivably lead to jail time because she may have violated conditions of a previous sentence. By that time, our blackout was over anyway, so reporting the development was an easy call. (On the flip side, we never got to see what repercussions there would have been if we hadn't.)

Continued



By Jocelyn Noveck
© MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx

CBSNews.com On Digg

Add a Comment
by cricketmk3 March 3, 2007 10:56 AM EST
Paris Hilton, Nicole Richie, Lindsey Lohan, and Britney Spears are appalling examples to our children as was Madonna years ago. It's a shame that their arrests, rehabilitations, and indiscretions are rewarded with such fame and fortune. Madonna portrays herself as a strict and protective mother but where were those convictions when she was being such a terrible example to my children.
Reply to this comment
by inspire411 March 2, 2007 11:49 AM EST
"They're intrigued by her unshakable self-esteem. People are fascinated by that."

Ummmm.... wrong.
She's an egotistical, materialistic, ignorant *****.

Hey, AP, now let's try a week without Britney Spears and the other hollywood tr*mps !!!
Reply to this comment
by Razzl March 1, 2007 11:35 PM EST
Paris is a contrary indicator. When she's back on the front page we'll know the stock market is okay again and people are back in tune with their inner oblivion...
Reply to this comment

Exclusive Webshow

Does dad need a nursing home? Dr. LaPook talks with a geriatrician about navigating a difficult decision.
Watch Now

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Lieberman May Torpedo Health Care Reform

    (236 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: