WASHINGTON, Feb. 27, 2007

In Rush To Iraq, Army Units Skip Training

Two Combat Brigades Being Deployed To Baghdad Without Usual Desert Training

  • U.S. Army soldiers from the 2nd Infantry Division on patrol in Baghdad on Dec. 29, 2006. Two Army combat brigades are being sent to Baghdad without their usual session at the Army's premier training range.

    U.S. Army soldiers from the 2nd Infantry Division on patrol in Baghdad on Dec. 29, 2006. Two Army combat brigades are being sent to Baghdad without their usual session at the Army's premier training range.  (AP Photo)

  • Interactive Battle For Iraq

    The government, the insurgency, key players, background and photos.

  • Interactive Military 101

    Basic training to learn all about America's fighting force.

(AP)  Rushed by President Bush's decision to reinforce Baghdad with thousands more U.S. troops, two Army combat brigades are skipping their usual session at the Army's premier training range in California and instead are making final preparations at their home bases.

Some in Congress and others outside the Army are beginning to question the switch, which is not widely known. They wonder whether it means the Army is cutting corners in preparing soldiers for combat, since they are forgoing training in a desert setting that was designed specially to prepare them for the challenges of Iraq.

Army officials say the two brigades will be as ready as any others that deploy to Iraq, even though they will not have the benefit of training in counterinsurgency tactics at the National Training Center at Fort Irwin, Calif., which has been outfitted to simulate conditions in Iraq for units that are heading there on yearlong tours.

Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., said Monday she is concerned about the "less-than-ideal training situation" for the 4th Stryker Brigade of the 2nd Infantry Division, which is based in her state and is one of the two brigades that did its final training at home. That brigade is to go to Iraq in April, one month earlier than planned.

The other is the 2nd Brigade of the 3rd Infantry Division, based at Fort Stewart, Ga., which is due to go in May for its third combat tour since the war began in 2003. Instead of going to the National Training Center first, it imported personnel and equipment — even Toyota pickups like those used by Iraqi insurgents — from the training center at Fort Irwin for two weeks of final rehearsals that begin Wednesday.

A spokesman for the brigade, Lt. Col. Randy Martin, said the soldiers lose nothing by the switch, while shaving about two weeks off their pre-deployment training schedule.

"It's realistic training," he said. "I don't think that anyone would say readiness is affected" negatively. He noted that another brigade from his division underwent similar home-station training before it deployed in January.

"The preferred method is to have them come here," a spokesman at the National Training Center, John Wagstaffe, said in a telephone interview Monday. The main things that cannot be replicated in a home station exercise are the vast spaces of the National Training Center, which is located in the Mojave Desert, and the weather and other environmental conditions that so closely resemble much of Iraq, Wagstaffe said.

"Your weapon won't jam from sand at Fort Stewart," he said.

Murray said she does not doubt the ability of soldiers to adapt.

"They have done everything we have asked of them," she said. "However, I am deeply troubled by the president's escalation plan and am committed to questioning the new demands it places on service members."

On a visit to the brigade's home station at Fort Lewis last week, Murray asked the top commander there, Lt. Gen. James Dubik, whether the soldiers' preparation for Iraq was adequate without going to the National Training Center, according to a Fort Lewis spokesman, Lt. Col. Dan Williams, who said he attended Dubik's meeting with Murray.

Dubik assured her it was, William said. The general told her he was confident "that they were ready to go" to Iraq even if they had not had 1,300 soldiers imported from the Joint Readiness Training Center at Fort Polk to play the role of Iraqi insurgents and civilians and to observe and control the mission rehearsal exercise.

"They went through all the things they know they're going to do in Iraq," Williams said.

Some outside observers say it was inevitable that, in a pinch, the Army would tinker with training.

"It tracks with what we should expect when we hurry the units up in their last three months" before a deployment, said Kevin Ryan, a retired brigadier general and former Army planner who is now at Harvard University's Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. Army commanders are compelled to make "economies," he added, when an accelerated deployment plan forces them to compress some aspects of training.

Ryan said he doubts this approach will significantly detract from the soldiers' degree of preparation for Iraq.

" 'Adequate' is probably a good description of what that training is," he said. "It's not the premier kind of situation that commanders would prefer, but it is adequate."

Daniel Goure, a military analyst at the Lexington Institute, a think tank, said, "This shouldn't have a decisive impact, although it carries a modicum of risk."

The two units that are skipping their National Training Center sessions are among five Army brigades that are being dispatched to Baghdad on an sped-up schedule as the centerpiece of President Bush's new approach to stabilizing Iraq.

The first to go, in January, was an 82nd Airborne brigade specially designated for short-notice deployments; it did no full-scale final exercise before deploying to Kuwait and then into Iraq.

The next two, from Fort Benning, Ga., and Fort Riley, Kan., did their final training sessions at the National Training Center. The unit from Fort Riley is entering Iraq now and the other is due to arrive in March.

© MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 52 Comments
by j-whitman February 28, 2007 7:21 PM EST
Wizest,,, With a White House that insists that a Pledge is only valid if given in a court of law
Reply to this comment
by wizest February 28, 2007 7:04 PM EST
You voted for them. They can send anybody, anywhere,
anyplace, anytime!! This is the Republic everybody been clamoring for, that's in the pledge of a Allegiance.
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman February 28, 2007 7:02 PM EST
Lars,,,, It's shocking anyone wants the GOP on the 08 ballot at all ---- Iraq is a Failure, Afaganistain Faiing,, Republicans support Bush in giving New York & New Jersy to the UAE (Sunni's) & fighting in Iraq for the Sunni's, not to mention funding radical Sunni Muslems in thier ops against Iran.
... Who's the Enemy here ??? -- 9/11 Terrorist where Sunni's & most from the UAE,, OBL is Sunni.

BUSH HAS CUT OUR TROOPS TRAINING,, DOESN'T THAT MEAN ANYTHING TO YOU ??
Reply to this comment
by mrvolleyba11 February 28, 2007 7:01 PM EST
If you were in a war zone would you feel better having 100 fellow soldiers around than say 10? the answer to crime in US Cities is to fund more police but I don't hear any one complaing about too many police on the streets. its called strength in numbers all you idiots!!!
Reply to this comment
by lars008-2009 February 28, 2007 7:00 PM EST
Appeal for Redress
Sign this Appeal.
This site is an Appeal For Redress in support of our mission in Iraq.
An Appeal For Redress is an authorized means for active duty military to submit a grievance to Congress. It can be signed by Active Duty, Reserve, or National Guard military personnel.
It is authorized by DoD Directive 1325.6 and DoD Directive 7050.6.

The wording of the Appeal for Redress is:
As an American currently serving my nation in uniform, I respectfully urge my political leaders in Congress to fully support our mission in Iraq and halt any calls for retreat. I also respectfully urge my political leaders to actively oppose media efforts which embolden my enemy while demoralizing American support at home. The War in Iraq is a necessary and just effort to bring freedom to the Middle East and protect America from further attack.
If you are active duty, reservist or national guard, please Sign this Appeal.
Most service members fully support the war in Iraq and feel calls to retreat by Congress and attacks by our media on our conduct and mission act to motivate our enemy while demoralizing our support at home, directly increasing the threat we face and resulting in greater American casualties. This Appeal for Redress provides a way in which individual service members can appeal to Congress to fully support us and actively oppose media attacks on our mission and our morale.
This Appeal will be delivered to members of Congress.
http://www.appealforcourage.org/
Reply to this comment
by mrvolleyba11 February 28, 2007 6:56 PM EST
Kstrisha your full of ***... no 16 year was in Active duty boot camp unless they had fake documents, probably was high school ROTC camp. They will accept 17 year olds only with PARENT permission into active duty. And what does the age of this person have to do with anything in this article? remember its an ALL volunteer force, if you go in to the military you may do it for college money, to get out of your town, or for patriotic reason; but you have to remember whatever your reason for joining that the military's job is to fight wars, to sign up take the money every month and then say you want out or ain't going because you think it is an unjust war is balony!!!

There are a lot of people in the military that think we need to be in Iraq until it is secure and that more troops will help!
Reply to this comment
by acauble1 February 28, 2007 6:39 PM EST
MAY THE BLOOD OF THESE SOLDIERS BE ON THE HANDS OF GEORGE W. BUSH AND EVERYONE WHO SUPPORTS THE 'SURGE' POLICY!
Reply to this comment
by rharrin1 February 28, 2007 6:34 PM EST
Father and son bush have been sleeping with BinLadens for years. Ask yourself this who gave permission for a plane load of BinLadens to take off day after 9/11 when all U.S. flights were grounded.
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman February 28, 2007 6:23 PM EST
It's shocking anyone wants the GOP on the 08 ballot at all ---- Iraq is a Failure, Afaganistain Faiing,, Republicans support Bush in giving New York & New Jersy to the UAE (Sunni's) & fighting in Iraq for the Sunni's, not to mention funding radical Sunni Muslems in thier ops against Iran.
... Who's the Enemy here ??? -- 9/11 Terrorist where Sunni's & most from the UAE,, OBL is Sunni.
Reply to this comment
by rharrin1 February 28, 2007 6:17 PM EST
About time everybody started understanding that bush doesn't care about the troops or anybody else.
Reply to this comment
See all 52 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Grammy winner Shakira on her music career, philanthropy and being sexy. Watch Now

  • MOST POPULAR
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: