Despite Food Scares, FDA Cuts Inspections
Former Bush Official Among Critics Who Charge Cuts Threaten Public
-
FDA consumer safety officers Dean Cook, left, and Matthew M. Henciak inspect spices at the port of Baltimore in 2000. The FDA has cut the number of inspections to half the levels of three years ago. (AP Photo/FDA)
-
Quiz Food Safety Quiz Are your kitchen habits endangering you and your loved ones?
-
Fast Facts E. coli Learn more about a dangerous strain of a common bacteria.
-
Quiz Are You Food Savvy? Have you consumed myths about diet and nutrition? Take these quizzes to find out.
The United States last year imported about $10 billion more in food, feed and beverages than it exported, according to Census figures. Even as imports grow in volume and diversity, the number of FDA inspections is shrinking: agency inspectors physically examined just 1.3 percent of food imports last year, about three-quarters as much as in 2003.
The FDA, meanwhile, says it is concentrating its efforts on areas where the potential threat to the public's health is greatest.
"We're applying resources to targeted areas. So in a way, it's not a matter of 'Are you inspecting one out of 100 or 10 out of 100?' The real issue is if you can define risk. Are you applying the 10 inspectors to the 10 areas of concern? Then it's essentially you're covering 100 percent of your problem, which is not covering 100 percent of the universe," FDA commissioner Dr. Andrew von Eschenbach said.
FDA inspectors, for example, visited the ConAgra plant on Feb. 14, a day after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention told the agency it suspected the company's peanut butter was the source of the outbreak.
For one member of Congress, that's not good enough.
"We are reacting to crises rather than preventing or minimizing them," said Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn., chairwoman of the House subcommittee that oversees the FDA and its budget. DeLauro said she worried food inspections were becoming a "stepchild" of the regulatory agency.
Von Eschenbach said the agency's food safety system can be reactive but is aggressive nonetheless.
"What you saw with the spinach and certainly what you saw with the peanut butter, is when we see those signals we're going to act to protect the public health," von Eschenbach said.
In the meantime, the House Committee on Energy and Commerce is investigating the adequacy of the FDA's efforts to protect the nation's food supply, Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., said.
A recent Government Accountability Office report noted that most of the $1.7 billion the federal government allocates to food safety goes to the Agriculture Department, which is responsible for regulating about 20 percent of the food supply. The FDA, responsible for most of the other 80 percent, gets about 24 percent of the total.
When the FDA finds violations with a food product, it asks companies to voluntarily fix any problems. The agency also can request a company to recall a product or it can ask that a product be seized by law enforcement.
The Agriculture Department said this month it also would switch to a "risk-based" inspection plan for plants that process poultry, pork and beef.
Plants that make products with a high risk for contamination, like hamburger, and that have had past violations would face greater scrutiny. Others than make less risky products, like cooked, canned ham, and have clean records would be inspected less.
© MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
The secrets of tennis legend 




"The Jungle". If you care about your food being safe,write your Congressmen to stop this Commissioner from gutting FDA.
The rest of us have to either grow our own food or stop eating.
Posted by skyk at 07:39 AM : Feb 27, 2007
Good morning, skyk.
As I often say, the neocons themselves have done more to ensure the death of their ideology than the Dems ever could have.
It has been exposed as a dangerous and bogus ideology both domestically and abroad and the ramifications from it will have to be dealt with for many years to come by all of us.
Hey, the money for the boondoggle has to come from somwhere, eh?
We eat tainted food so Dubya can chase his windmills in Iraq......
2. The chimps appointees to the FDA are taking good care of us, trust me on this one. Ha! Ha!
3. This does not support the chimps war efforts, or make Halliburton any richer. So why spend money on it?
4. Another prime example of our government wanting to help it's citizens.
- by frankly6 February 27, 2007 5:00 AM EST
- Reply to this comment
See all 12 CommentsThis is what happens when take federal agencies that are charged with protecting the American people and fill them with former lobyists from the very industries they are supposed to be protecting us from. Bush and Co. have done this with the FDA and the EPA. As for FEMA and Homeland Security, he's just filled those agencies up with cronies who have little or no experience.