February 11, 2009 5:18 PM

Why Should Hillary Apologize On Iraq?

By
Vaughn Ververs
(CBS)  By CBSNews.com Senior Political Editor Vaughn Ververs



When celebrities like Mel Gibson or Britney Spears run afoul of public sentiment, they head straight to rehab in the hopes that their various sins will be forgiven by the public in whose hands such careers rest.

America, the thinking goes, has a soft spot for humble redemption.

In this fast-paced 2008 presidential election, a segment of the Democratic Party is insisting on their own litmus test for forgiving candidates who have supported the Iraq war in the past. It's a simple request made by staunch opponents of the war who will likely play a large role in tapping the eventual Democratic nominee. They simply want to hear "sorry."

This plea for penance is most directly affecting a handful of hopefuls who served in the U.S. Senate in 2002 when Congress voted to authorize the use of force in Iraq — Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, Joe Biden and Chris Dodd. All voted to give President Bush the authority to use military force in Iraq and thus far three of them have renounced their votes in some manner, either by direct apology or by calling that vote a "mistake."

Edwards, now out of the Senate and running for president full-time, got ahead of the trend last fall when he penned an op-ed for the Washington Post on the subject.

"It was a mistake to vote for this war in 2002. I take responsibility for that mistake," he wrote in November. Dodd and Biden have since followed suit. Other Democratic hopefuls, most notably Barack Obama, have no vote to apologize for.

But Hillary Clinton, to the consternation of many in her party, just won't say the words "sorry" or "mistake." The question continues to be asked as she campaigns across key early primary states — and to dominate the media coverage of her events.

When Clinton made her first trip to New Hampshire earlier this month, voters took it directly to her.

"I want to know if right here, right now, once and for all and without nuance, you can say that war authorization was a mistake," said one man at a town-hall style meeting in Berlin.

Such exchanges were widely reported, as were her answers, which amounted to this: She would not have voted the same way now, President Bush is responsible for the mistakes made and she would like to end the war — but that's easier said than done.

In a return visit to the state this past weekend, according to reports, Clinton was asked point-blank why she would not apologize for the vote.


Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment See all 195 Comments
by btans1 February 23, 2007 7:37 PM EST
Rep. or Dem.... samey same My problem with them is that most of them are plain stupid...What eles would you call someone who voted to send the cream America's youth to a war that was at best illadvised and at worst illmoral...whether you were "led astray" or are just an IDIOT the result is too many empty spaces at the dinner table...
Reply to this comment
by cristyb01 February 23, 2007 5:10 PM EST
Hillary has accurately described what happenned. She was given false or misleading information. Based on that information she made the only decision possible. She has nothing to appologize for. The one who owes an apology to the american people is the current president and his staff.
Reply to this comment
by randalds February 23, 2007 4:20 PM EST
She's really a female version of Hugo Chavez (in a bad pant suit).....she's socialist to the core.
Posted by bigwhtpony at 10:36 AM : Feb 23, 2007

I like her pantsuit, esp from the back (nice as*s for an older chick!). Besides as a fellow Socialist I should be supporting her, but I'm not. She's pandered far too (just like that as*shole McCain on the right) to get my support in the primaries.
Reply to this comment
by hawksprings February 23, 2007 2:00 PM EST
"Patriotism and honor mean nothing to these people."

And neither does honesty.
Reply to this comment
by bigwhtpony February 23, 2007 1:40 PM EST
So was Nancy Pelosi, with her TEN YEARS on the Intelligence Committee LYING???
Posted by HawkSprings at 10:10 AM : Feb 23, 2007

Nicely done. Air Pelosi is a hippy throwback from the Haight-Ashbury 60's who will sell her sould (and has) for political gain for her party and for herself.

Patriotism and honor mean nothing to these people.
Reply to this comment
by bigwhtpony February 23, 2007 1:36 PM EST
Hitlery should apologize for trying to pass herself off as a moderate "centrist." She's really a female version of Hugo Chavez (in a bad pant suit).....she's socialist to the core.
Reply to this comment
by hawksprings February 23, 2007 1:10 PM EST

So was Nancy Pelosi, with her TEN YEARS on the Intelligence Committee LYING???

"I come to this debate, Mr. Speaker, as one at the end of 10 years in office on the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, where stopping the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction was one of my top priorities. I applaud the President on focusing on this issue and on taking the lead to disarm Saddam Hussein. ... Others have talked about this threat that is posed by Saddam Hussein. Yes, he has chemical weapons, he has biological weapons, he is trying to get nuclear weapons."

Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Addressing the US Senate
October 10, 2002
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/
cgi-bin/getpage.cgi?position=all&page=H7777&dbname=2002_record
Reply to this comment
by hawksprings2 February 23, 2007 1:07 PM EST

So was John Kerry LYING:

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003 | Source
Reply to this comment
by hawksprings February 23, 2007 1:02 PM EST

Jason, YOU are proving my point exactly!

All we hear from the Left and the Media is that Bush LIED about WMDs and Iraq.

Before we went in the Dembots all said Iraq had WMDs and Saddam needed to be stopped.


So is Ted Kenneday a Liar?

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002 | Source

Reply to this comment
by jasonmcj February 23, 2007 12:58 PM EST
To Hawksprings:

You are missing the point (which I think GOP does intentionally), which is: Democrats DIDN'T go to WAR, waste billions of dollars, lose all international creditability, and most importantly, we did not create MORE terrorists.

That all happened on GOP watch.

I'll wait for the ad hominem attacks, since it is all GOP has left.
Reply to this comment
See all 195 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook