New Airport Scanner Gets Personal

Equipment Peers Through Clothing, Alarming Privacy Advocates

(CBS)  It's called a backscatter X-ray, but critics call it a digital strip-search, CBS News correspondent Bob Orr reports.

Here's how it works: A passenger stands in front of a large scanner, X-rays penetrate clothing, but bounce off the traveler's body. This generates a silhouette-like image.

"Here, down in the passenger's sock, you can see what's been concealed here is a ceramic knife," says Joe Reiss, explaining a demonstration.

Reiss, whose company makes the backscatter machine, says it's key to finding weapons and objects that metal detectors and traditional X-rays miss.

"It has the capability to find all types of weapons — not only guns and knives, but also explosive devices or even non-metallic weapons," says Reiss, vice president of American Science and Engineering.

But backscatter X-rays have been highly controversial. Earlier versions were explicitly revealing, capturing pictures in which people appeared nearly naked.

The new backscatter, which will be tried out in Phoenix, is not nearly that graphic. Its software adds privacy filters, and security officials stress the images will not be saved.

Passengers CBS News spoke with on Thursday in Phoenix weren't worried.

"I like it. I'd feel safer if I knew that was there," one male passenger says.

"It's pretty impressive that it just shows the outline of the body versus showing any private parts," a female passenger says.

But privacy advocates are still outraged.

"We're not convinced that it's necessary. We're not convinced that it's effective, and we think the privacy risk is serious and hasn't been fully explained to the public," says Marc Rotenberg, executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center.

At least at the outset, backscatter X-rays will be voluntary. Most passengers will pass right by them. And those who are singled out for extra screening can choose between a backscatter or a traditional pat down.

Security officials say backscatter strikes a fair balance between privacy and security, and that the technology eventually will spread to more airports.

But critics ask, how far will the government go to make us "safer?"

[j0hnwi11iams]

Their security requires depriving you of yours.

[susanhelit]

What's the big deal? It's a more effective scan. And let's not be dumb here - any guy can at any time see a perfect body naked by buying the right magazine - looking at a black and white grainy image of you just isn't anything. They can look at my cellulite all they want, if it gets me through security faster.

[susanhelit]

'critics', 'privacy advocates' - more concerned with making a point, and so tightly focused on their little world that they're crosseyed - they're making a mountain out of a molehill.

Keep my privacy so far as what I am doing (so long as I am not committing a crime), my medical history, books I buy. This is just nonsense.

[canaima]

This machine sounds like a winner, particularly as the article states that backscatter X-rays will be voluntary. One can choose between a backscatter or a traditional pat down. So if you object to it, don't use it, go for the pat down & keep your big nose out of other people's privacy concerns.

[glidescube]

What good are all these privacy rights if your dead body is scatterd over a field in Pennsylvania or a smoldering crater in NYC? Once you leave your home and enter a secure area you really have given up your privacy. This is the world we live in today so deal with it. And as long as it keeps us and our loved ones safe and sound it's a small price you should be glad to pay.

I wonder if those innocnet people aboard those planes on 9/11 gave a *** about those terrorist privacy rights? I wonder if the thought even crossed thier minds right before they realized they were going to die!

[linfinster]

Bring it on! We must get it together folks! You think that the terrorists are just sitting back and watching and laughing at us? THINK AGAIN! They are planning something big. While we p*uss*yf**t around crying about our trampled rights! Can't say I like the idea of my image on a computer and records being made, you know for every action, there's and equal and oposite reaction. No good deed goes unpunished. It will be taken advantage of, I'm sure.
Anyway, I'll get on the plane where everyone was scanned and you can get on the planes where people were not! Feel safer now that your "privacy" was protected?
Yeah, I'm sure you wont.

[caitlinndad]

stay home , don't fly.
happy now?

[shanev137]

I think it's great and it looks like it will save time. I always get the pat down because I have so much steel in my body from an auto accident.

[annd2302]

Good deal all around, pardon the pun. The dating or mating just might increase or possibly decrease all while being safe. Best of both worlds, huh?

[gmond]

No need to worry about clean underwear anymore..

[fitedafuture]

i saw this movie once it was called Total Recall.

[fitedafuture]

ok,lets track their credit card transactions,moniter their money with counterfeit tabs,wiretaps,surveillence cameras,unmarked helicopters,satellites,internet,c'mon whats next?

[fitedafuture]

oh,how convenient it doesnt discriminate against
*** or gender,hmmn school metal detectors ring a bell? like havin some fancier machine is suppose to make us feel safer,what a crock...

[anopinion1]

boohoo
some fat woman cried because it showed all of her 387 rolls of fat. she felt it was a bad photograph of herself..
boohoo

any guy can look at a girl and pretty much imagine what she looks like and probably do a better job then this machine..

[fitedafuture]

"The life of a nation is secure only while the nation is honest,truthful,and virtuous."

Frederick Douglass

[jasonmcj]

Why is this forum blocking out the word s.e.x.?

What are we coming to?

[dragonmouse-2009]

The xray above is hardly anything to "whine" about.

Some of these people who are so upset about "privacy" issues OBVIOUSLY have something to hide.

An xray...no big deal. Bring it on. It was rather cool in "Total Recall". It actually kinda sounds like fun.

When the airlines start making everybody strip down to their "birthday suit" to ride on the plane...THEN perhaps I'll scoff a bit. I'm not exactly a Victoria's Secret model and there are a lot of other plane patrons that ain't exactly George Clooney...Some things can be "scarier" than terrorists.

[godseyesore-2009]

The danger is that when you realize your privacy is an illusion, it is too late to do anything about it...whether you have something to hide or not!! This SHOULD be America here...with privacy guarantees, not a nazi police state where dragonmouse says, "...people who are so upset about "privacy" issues OBVIOUSLY have something to hide."

[danshaw5]

Airport "security" is a joke, and America needs to wake up. Until every single bit of commercial cargo is scanned (but oh, my, that will will be too expensive and slow down the pace of the all- important profit machines), until every single bag is scanned before it goes in the cargo hold, x-raying passengers will provide nothing more than an illusion of security. Passengers are now the least likely place for weapons to be found, and focusing more attention there is wasted. There are too many other security holes to be plugged at airports. You have to choose: do you want to live in America, or in a police state?

I think its too much. The old way was fine. The only thing that I think truly needs revising is the luggage check. Some security don't even check the entire bag and just nod it off because they're tired of checking.

[myopinion34]

I think me being seen nude is worth not losing my life over if the person behind me was found to have a weapon on them! Some personal opinions should be put aside for everyones safety! I would love to know I was on a plane and everyone there had been thoroughly checked out. It would give me a great piece of mind.

[rf35]

If you want to fly, deal with this. If not, drive. The new software only shows a silhouette? So what is the problem? What are you hiding? The airports are the primary embarkation/debarkation points for terrorists. Maybe they NEED to be a little like a police state. How quickly 9/11 was forgotten.

[lochlan-2009]

What rights? You're an American. Now strip.

[susanhelit]

Hawk Springs - it'll only get boring. Black and white and fuzzy, and just too many. Just ask any gynecologist.

[observantx]

Boy, i can't believe the number of people so eager to hand over the last shreds of their personal dignity and basic Constitutional rights.

What a bunch of bleating sheep we are. No wonder the boy wonder and his Unca D i c k get to do whatever they want. Nobody has any guts anymore, especially our @sskissing rubberstamp Koolaid Kongress.

Why don't we all just go get barcode tattoos, submit our DNA and shackle ourselves together?

We can build our own little "freedom" camps, complete with barbwire, guard dogs and the little sign on the gate that says "Arbeit Macht Frie"?

It's pathetic to read some of these posts. Oooooh, please xray me, so that the terrorists won't get me. Boo Hoo Hoo.

[bobgee_1999]

A dangerous person is dangerous whether they're armed or not. I agree with ObservantX in spirit, but this specific is a bit trivial, besides, we're talking about a group activity (flying) not a personal one. On the other hand I disagree with Myopinion34 that anyone's personal opinion should ever be put aside for anyone's safety. Opinions of themselves are beyond legislation. Anyway, if the terrorist goal is to terrorize, then they've already won. The war is over. What American's need is some personal courage, not more laws.

[rf35]

The government already has my DNA sample. They took it about 8 years ago so if I was shredded in combat they could ID my remains easier. I do not have a bar code tattoo (yet) but my ID card has a microchip.

[sharncedar]

"What American's need is some personal courage, not more laws. "

Hear hear. When exactly did we become a nation of sniveling cowards.

Odd how its the Republicans who run to big government like it was their mommy, to hide without dignity or courage in the skirts of intrusive government authority. Abject cowardice, oddly coupled with their silly swaggering talk.

It's only death, far worse to honest men is the loss of their freedom, you little Repub phonies. Don't you DARE SAY YOU admire John Wayne, would he be caught dead hiding in fear behind some government strip search? He'd die with his boots on and his body unviolated. You make me sick.

[darkfyreaol]

I don't see a problem with the BackScatter.

For one, in the year or two after 9/11, there were countless visitors from other countries who were themselves treated as if they were terrorists, or less than human. Random strip searches at the airports, and all they got was a 'sorry' from Uncle Sam, if that.

This is by far less invasive then any cavity search.

[michellem99-2009]

I am older and I last flew in the 80s. I don't like the hand held thing they use for personal reasons. I would not like some one I don't know seeing what they should not. WHO has access to what the Xray or what ever they are called sees. What is done with the visuals. I can understand why but how clear are they. I like it before they put in all them crazy laws. Awerica use to be great. Her leaders took her down hill.

[oleander8]

No! No! No! No! Enough! Airport security has become an entrepreneurial opportunity. Will they start putting these contraptions at the entrances to malls? at bus stops? government buildings? This is security gone mad - and some people are going to get very rich.

[bildooreilly]

Freedom isn't about guaranteed safety. Freedom is risky and slightly dangerous, seems a lot of americans aren't cut out for freedom these days. They'd give it all up just to be told their safe which is nothing more than an illusion, you'll never be totally safe.

I used to fly quite often, I haven't flown for a year or so now since they won't even let you take a cigarette lighter on a plane anymore. I say just stop using their services as much as possible and let them all go bankrupt again or before you know it you'll all be flying naked and cavity searches will be the accepted norm... You got a better chance of being struck by lightening than being killed in a terror attack, grow a back bone.

[michellem99-2009]

I read the posts and I for one Can't see to drive but same time hate having my pock book gone thru as s blind person have nothing to hide but I know where things are.I know that I need use things related my handicaps. This ban rule hurts us who need items. Don't tell us to get over it. The kids who say this have not walked in our boots. I have NOT forgotten 9/11 but it seems people are willing to let Big Brother control. Bush didn't/doesn't helps matters I am talking about FEAR. America-US stop being the world's cop. End your FEAR.

[maaaaaad]

The year is 2009,and you don't have the right to refuse now,,This is an outrage!!!! i'm pretty sure the airports don't need any more bad publicity..I live in albq.N.M and they just installed these mandatory....We are a small city that has never had a terrorist prob....I will not be useing the Abq,sunport ever again,and i know alot more people that won't unless they remove them..Read the constitution, then decide for your selves who the real terrorists are...Come on people read a little......